- Politics and Social Issues»
- United States Politics
Who still believes in the Russians had anything to do with Hillary Clinton losing the presidential election?
2016 Presidential Election
Which of the following had the biggest influence on Hillary Clinton losing the presidential election in 2016
It is now April 20, 2017
Isn't it time for all the democrats, like All the Kings Men give up trying to put Humpty Dumpty Clinton back as president.
On November 8, the presidential election took place, and the winner of that election is Donald Trump.
Presidential Candidate Donald Trump received 304 Electoral Votes to win the election.
- To win the US presidential election as candidate had to get at least 270 Electoral College Votes.
- This was a number that the MSM, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the DNC, and all the Clinton supporters said for the entire election campaign that Donald J Trump wouldn't be able to get.
- No one on the left had any doubt that Hillary Rodham Clinton wouldn't beat Donald J Trump in the Electoral College, and the Swing States.
- Many democrats in congress and most of the Hollywood Elite were very focal that Trump wouldn't "NEVER" become the US president. This included California Democrat Senator Nancy Pelosi, who said for us to believe her, and it is in the bank.
- Actor George Clooney, Alec Baldwin, the people on the TV show the View, and Hollywood in general were so sure that Trump wouldn't win said, that they would leave the country if Trump did win. That is how sure they were that he wouldn't win. Yet, it has been five months since Trump won the presidency, and it has been three months into the Trump presidency, and how many of these Hollywood celebrities have actually left the country?
The Popular Vote is not the deciding factor in winning the United States presidency.
On January 20, 2017, President Elect Donald J Trump became the 45th US President.
The Democrats, including the DNC and Hillary Rodham Clinton have alleged many reasons why Donald Trump shouldn't be president
The allegations are a litany of sour grapes rather than any kind of substantive base to provide any proof why Donald Trump didn't win the 2016 presidential election. There has been NO Proof whatsoever that bear any veracity or substance to Any and All the allegations produced by two time failed United States presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democrat National Committee, the Untied States Congress, or anyone at all.
These allegations all have one thing in common, Hillary Rodham Clinton doesn't factor in any Failure on her part that contributed to her losing the presidency to Donald Trump.
- How can that be true?
- How can Hillary Rodham Clinton ignore all of her choices and decisions on how to handle her presidential campaign?
- Did she effectively use the $1.2 billion campaign fund/war chest against Donald Trump who only had half of that fund for his campaign.
- In 2008, democrat presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama effectively used his overwhelming campaign fund to take Hillary Rodham Clinton out of the democrat primary. In fact, Hillary Clinton had to put in millions of her own money to even stay in the primary as long as she did stay.
- Without regard to the Wiki Leaks that Hillary Clinton, the DNC and democrat supporters say cost her the election, were there any claims that the Veracity and Facts about these leaks were not true.
- The veracity and factual substance of these leaks weren't contest, only the mechanism of the way they were leaked was contested.
- JAMES COMEY FBI
- These were two of the biggest allegations made by the Losers, and neither of these had any substance to make them credible or real.
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey
James Comey came into play twice before Election Day.
James Comey the second coming of Christ for the Democrats.
James Comey the Devil
Do the democrats really want us to believe that James Comey is both of these. Maybe if they asserted some sort of political physics using the
The Heisenberg Principle of Observation
1. Every event is changed by the observation of that event.Or maybe using another axiom from physics
2. The momentum of an event is changed by observation.
- what quantum mechanics really states is that until you measure it, you can never really know where something is going to be, only the probability that it is there.
- The more pragmatic view of what FBI director James Comey did during 2016
- James Comey in regard to the FBI "Investigation" was to allow Hillary Clinton to not be indicted for Federal Criminal Crimes.
- After making a lengthy list of all the things that Hillary Clinton did that were criminal, he took an illogical conclusion that said she had no Intent and therefore no crime.
- It is illogical because the Element of Intent is not mentioned in the statute. Had intent been an element, it would have been Treason as the crime.
- In any case, the democrats applauded James Comey for his illogical and non factual reasons for letting Hillary Clinton continue in the election.
James Comey the Devil
A short time before Election Day, FBI director James Comey became the Devil because he gave congress notice that the Clinton investigation that he previously told them was closed, was now being opened due to new evidence that was being investigated.
- Yet, in ONE Week, the FBI went through hundreds of thousand of pages of the Weiner Computer emails, and once again closed the investigation in favor of keeping Hillary Clinton an UNindicted presidential candidate.
How could this be a factor in Hillary Clinton losing the election to Donald Trump, as in both cases Comey let her off from being indicted for criminal crimes?
Note: That they don't factor the 2005 private recording of Donald Trump and Billy Bush by NBC as having any negative effect on Trump's campaign. Strange that NBC kept this private recording from 2005, and it was leaked just before the election day.
The Russians The Russians
The Hillary Clinton campaign, its supporters, the DNC and democrats allege that the RUSSIANS influenced the 2016 US presidential election.
- Yet, in the more than nine months of investigations, NO evidence has been produced.
- NO Evidence of hacking was produced, as the votes were not affected by any outside means.
- While the Wiki Leaks did give mountains of evidence that the DNC and Hillary Clinton did Influence the Democrat Primary and it successfully removed senator Bernie Sanders from the democrat primary.
- Sanders had won the momentum and the latter months of the primary, and at the least there would have been a contested primary.
- Having Sanders drop out of the primary certainly Influenced the Election.
- And instead of the Russians influencing our elections, we don't have to look any further than Hillary Clinton and the DNC.
- Once again, the veracity and facts or the Wiki Leaks was never contested.
If Wiki Leaks didn't leak the DNC influencing the Democrat Primary would that have been a good thing for the voters to know? Of course it would, and if not leaked voters would have not factored that into their voting.
- Because they were leaked, the Bernie Sanders supporters didn't vote for Clinton or Trump. They instead voted for Jill Stein, and Gary Johnson, and this can be verified by looking at the election results.
The Russians Didn't do anything to Influence the Election
If anyone still believes that the Russians hacked into the DNC servers, then why have they refused numerous request by the FBI to get these servers?
- So too date, NO government agency has ever looked at the purported Russian hacked DNC servers.
- Yet, the congressional investigation on Russian Influencing our election continues.
- Why hasn't this investigation involved actually getting on the DNC servers?
As for the Popular Vote
How can Hillary Clinton, Democrats, Clinton Supports, and the DNC support two Contradictory Views.
Hillary Clinton won the presidency because she had 3 million more popular votes than Donald Trump
The Russians Influenced the 2016 presidential election and that is why Hillary Clinton lost the presidency
Please Comment if you can explain how they both can be True?