The argument against castrating a convicted rapist, is that the act itself is a product of anger and frustration, castrating them would probably lead to more murders. The argument for castration is that if a man who rapes women and children has his bits removed, or chemically reduced, he no longer poses a threat. What do you guys think?
sort by best latest
think of the pain of false rape victims,,even dna evidence is false many time..go search for "innocence project",, castration is also for false rape accuser too