dadibobs profile image 61

Should a convicted rapist be chemically or physically castrated, or does the current system work?


The argument against castrating a convicted rapist, is that the act itself is a product of anger and frustration, castrating them would probably lead to more murders. The argument for castration is that if a man who rapes women and children has his bits removed, or chemically reduced, he no longer poses a threat. What do you guys think?

 

sort by best latest

prettynutjob30 profile image88

Mary (prettynutjob30) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

5 years ago
 |  Comment
  • profile image

    anujaa 4 years ago

    think of the pain of false rape victims,,even dna evidence is false many time..go search for "innocence project",, castration is also for false rape accuser too

dadibobs profile image61

dadibobs says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

5 years ago
 |  Comment
poetvix profile image66

poetvix says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

5 years ago
 |  Comment
rajan jolly profile image92

Rajan Singh Jolly (rajan jolly) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

5 years ago
 |  Comment
brages07 profile image60

brages07 says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

5 years ago
 |  Comment