Two arguments exist regarding this question. For castration is as a punishment, but also to remove the ability to repeat the act. Against castration is based along the idea that rape is a crime of anger and frustration, meaning this would inevitably lead to more violent attacks on women. What do you guys think?
sort by best latest
seeker7... u r right my friend,,there are a lot of innocent men in jail who have commited rape.there are many cases of making consensual sex without knowing her real age.if chemical castration to rape accused then same for false rape accusertoo.
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
1. That's true, but DNA evidence is never wrong.
2. Who cares if it is sexually motivated or by power? Rape is rape, there is only one way they can prevent it in the future and that's by castration.
3. If rapist is free, he will likely rape again
ms. hopewithin there are a lot of false rape claim ..what these bastards who cry false rape should get..they should also be castratrd.. and u must know dna evidence is wrong at many places..go and search about "innocent project" and shut ur mouth
chemical castration also for false rape accuser