Madison Grant, in his book The Passing of the Great Race, described a "Nordic" or "Baltic" type:
"long skulled, very tall, fair skinned, with blond or brown hair and light colored eyes. The Nordics inhabit the countries around the North and Baltic Seas and include not only the great Scandinavian and Teutonic groups, but also other early peoples who first appear in southern Europe and in Asia as representatives of Aryan language and culture."
You know what is funny about that, Hitler was not very tall (short, actually) nor was he long skulled or a blond-haired being. Ahh, who cares about eye color and all the rest.
You know, it is odd that I ran across this question today, as I stumbled upon an interesting speech via a YouTube video earlier, that would be a good contrast to this subject, and you can find it here:
As for what I think of Nordicism, which is, by definition:
1: the belief in or the doctrine of the superiority of the hypothetical Nordic racial type and its cultural capacities — compare aryanism
2: qualities or traits regarded as distinctive of the hypothetical Nordic race
I think it is a load of baloney and utter denial of the diversity of mankind! I mean, for example: What, we only praise one breed of dog and say kill the rest? We only approve of one type of fish, so the rest should die? The same goes with humans. Yeah, separate in groups if ya like, but each deserves a chance at life just like the next one... WTF?