sort by best latest
The CIA trades weapons for cocaine, then smuggles the cocaine back into the United States
Excess aspirin can kill some people. Excess Tylenol can cause liver damage. They are legal. Imagine what the prescription drugs can do to you--especially the hundreds you never heard of.
I used to work for a man who's entire company was a front for importing cocaine from Peru...you're not telling me anything I don't know!
Mr. Shaw, I am certain you turned that man into the authorities and SportsBetter I am certain you can prove that statement.
Larry Wall, turn in a CIA operative? What sort of nonsense are you talking? Oh, just nonsense, that is what.
Should pregnant women be allowed to use drugs. My adopted son had a birth mother who used drugs and he is suffering the consequences of it.
If you shoot, mutilate, shoot or poison your self that may be your business. But when you get in the car after shooting up and think you can drive that becomes my business.
That is true, but then causing car accidents and killing people with your car is already illegal.
My sentiments exactly.
The gecko:Killing people in an accident in one crime. However, if you are high, you should not be in a car. The accident goes from involuntary manslaughter to manslaughter or worse. By being high you have increased the chance of having an accident.
But you do not need to be driving in the first place. The problem is irresponsible drug users. Should irresponsibility be illegal? There are also plenty of people on the road causing fatal accidents that are not under the influence.
The problem with your premise is that when people "destroy their own lives", they cost the rest of us a lot of money, and sometimes our own lives as well.
Some of my comments are beginning to be hidden because of negative feedback. I guess some people are just not willing to consider other view points. I have already written a hub on this.
Oh, the US Government is heavily involved in drug trafficking
Did I say that? No, I didn't. I said illegal profits go to corrupt government.
And @tmbridgeland, @SportsBetter did not say that you said that. He was only making a statement of fact in addition to your statements. Sadly, @SportsBetter's statement is true. The CIA has been especially guilty of trafficking in drugs.
The CIA does little but murder, manipulate, and sell drugs...
Tmbridgeland, you didn't say that, but it is true the CIA smuggles cocaine which a government agency. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6VYd1gpiNk watch the video
Where is the proof about this CIA drug trafficking. Sounds like the beginning of a great hub, assuming you have the evidence to back up the claims.
If drugs are regulated and the strength or amount that would be available at one time was not your liking, would you look for an underground seller to meet your demand?
Since when do "underground" drugs (often cut with other substances so that the criminal dealers can make more profit offering less) beat the pure and uncut legal ones? Never. You got it completely backwards.
Very interesting, suggestive question directed toward you don't you think lol?
Larry has no idea what he is talking about...he is a scared old man who supports dead horses.
Wesman Todd Shaw:
I am 61. I am tired--tired of some of the stuff I read hear. If you have read all my comments you will see I do have some knowledge about drug interactions and addictions. You just want to do your thing and not be bothered by logic.
LOL. Well Alicia, I assumed that HE assumed ppl who advocate legalizing drugs must actually go around doing them, which of course isn't the case. I don't support drug use but I knew what he meant and answered the question hypothetically speaking.
I support legalizing drugs, but I'm not a big fan of the 'comes from nature' argument. There are tons of natural substances that are toxic and fatal to humans.
True, but there are no laws protecting people from toxic or poisonous plants, are there? It is not the caring about the safety of others, but rather the dictating of behavior by authority that is at fault. Laws do nothing to give one logic
I cannot stop you from eating poisonous mushrooms because they grow in the wild. If you eat them you will pay a consequence. If you knowingly sell that poisonous mushroom to a person without warning them, you could be held for a variety of crimes.
So with your logic, I can drive on the left side of the street instead of the right and I can enter lock buildings, just to look around and I can have horses and cows in the patch of ground behind the apartment complex. We cannot survive without laws
Freewill can only go so far. I have a right to bear arms. I do not have the right to shoot you. I have a right to medical care and an obligation to pay taxes to build hospitals for the sick. Should I be forced to pay for medical care of drug addicts.
I would like to see your statistics about most people in jail being non-violent drug offenders. Are you just counting local jails or are you including state and federal prisons where all the murders, rapists, drug dealers, and kidnappers are kept.
Your argument about letting the consequences of drug addition being adequate punishment is flawed. That person may have stolen from me, snatch a purse from my wife, hit my car while under the influence and used taxpayer dollars for ER visits.
hello??? If a drug addict commits theft, arrest them for theft!!!! I am NOT saying we should legalize theft and drunk or drugged driving! Theft is still theft, even if it is committed by a drug addict. Lets try and think clearly here.
D Shannahan: All drunk drivers do not cause accidents. I assumed all drugged drivers do not caused accidents, but they may not be driving properly and will be stopped and charged with driving under the influence of something. Three times and its jail
I totally agree. Driving with poor reactions and making stupid decisions behind the wheel because of being under the influence puts innocent people in danger. That, by all means, should be illegal. There is no reason however, to incarcerate people
You are not going to eliminate the illegal dealers. There will always be a new drug they will have first. They will always be a stronger variety or a willingness to sell more and a willingness to sell to minors. The illegal market will adapt.
The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners.
How many of those prisoners have been on death row waiting for their final determination. What is the execution rate in those other countries compared to the U.S. and how many prisoners are just not reported.
Hey Larry, you just proved why criminalizing substances doesn't work....
Well when drugs are illegal it is easier for kids to get them because they aren't regulated by age. Also, people are already doing drugs. If heroin was legal I still wldn't use it. Government made drugs illegal to push prices up so they can profit
The government made drugs illegal cause they destroy lives alcohol and cigarettes are legal and kids still do them and when they see their parents doing it openly they're even more likely to do them. The child of a smoker usually tries smoking
It is the parents job to protect kids from cigs and alcohol, not leave them readily available. It is much harder for kid to get alcohol, than marijuana. Also, heroin sales are up since US troops have been guarding poppy plants in Afghanistan.
Drug users aren't known for their great parenting skills now are they. Your defense of drug abuse is actually rather disturbing. I've done construction for 20 years and have watched drugs destroy so many lives its sickening
Well straight off the bat Cocaine kills 3500 people a year in Mexico and the US combined the drug violence over cocaine kills about 13 000 people yearly in the US and Mexico so it's obvious which will save more lives. Not to mention the prison pop.
If kids are getting the drugs now and you legalize them, how is that going to stop the kids from getting them. The underground market will just make it easier for them to get it or they will steal their parents' stash.
larry, you legalize and regulate. Just like alcohol and cigarettes
SportsBetter: Can you really tell me that underage children do not have access to alcohol and tobacco. Older friends buy it for them. They find their parent's hidden stash. Do you really think legalizing drugs will reduce use by underage children?
While we're at it maybe we should legalize murder and robbery also we wouldn't want anyone's liberties exploited
Murder and robbery inflict upon the rights of others (namely the right to property and safety) so they should be crimes. Taking a drug does not inflict on anyone's rights.
Drug addicts are the number 1 cause of robbery and very high on the list of causes for murder in the US addicts will do anything to pay for their fix except work cause the ruins their high.
Committing crimes should be crime not doing things that sometimes lead to crime, people who ear hoodies are more likely to commit crime as are people who own motorbikes, should we ban them too?
We're not going to agree on this and that's fine we're all entitled to our opinions but I'm not gonna waste anymore time arguing my point since legalization on that level will never happen anyway.
I am sure it will eventually. Did you care to look mathematically at the fact that the drug wars killed several times more people than drugs?
No I didn't sorry, have you ever had a life long friend stab their girlfriend 2 days before Christmas over crack and then hang their self in their basement cause I did. My opinions not gonna change as I'm sure yours won't either.
DS, violence occurs with alcohol all the time and that is legal. Studies show drug use goes down when they are legal. Also, if they were legal the prices would go down and there would be less robberies.
How are these users going to be able to afford these legalized drugs if they have to rob and steal now and reuse needles. If legalized, the drugs are going to be sold by licensed merchants who pay taxes, will demand ID and will be video taping sales.
2 answers hidden due to negative feedback. Show
2 answers hidden due to negative feedback. Hide