Now that the Conventions are over, we can get back to the actual campaigns. A key part of both campaigns is to nail the Presidential Debates. Will the President do better, or will Romney? Why do you think so?
sort by best latest
Wondering why you are referring to Mitt Romney as Willard when he is running by "Mitt" ? Can I just call Obama "Hussein" because I want to? Seems childish to me.
Willard is Romney's real name. If you choose to call Obama Hussein, feel free. Many conservatives have called him that and worse over the years.
That said, it seems interesting that you chose to comment on that, yet not on the points I raised.
I found very little "fact" in your so called points - can't argue against someone who makes it up as they go. Reagan inherited a much worse economic situation than Obama did but Reagan managed to make us fiscally solvent in his first term.
I do find it interesting that your comment refers to the moderators as Obama maniacs, yet in your response to my statement, my reference to Romney as Willard is considered childish.
Just something I noticed.
As an ardent Obama supporter, I'm inclined to agree with you.
But can he explain his policies or offer any bright new ideas in the debates?
obama is a brilliant orator because he is a brilliant man. romney's IQ is a full 20 points lower. it's a complicated world. give me a smart president.
He is a brilliant orator when he has a teleprompter in front of him. It's become quite evident that when he speaks "off the cuff" he wanders all over the place. Hopefully he'll make an ass of himself.
He won't be able to explain anything.
Yes. I like this answer. Very true, very concise.
I wonder what you made of the enthusiasm shown at the DNC? I thought the Democratic delegates were far more enthusiastic than the enthusiasm shown at the RNC.