Considering Candy Crowley's role, I don't think a moderator should: 1. Pick questions that apply to only one candidate: How would you differ yourself from Bush? Clearly that question was only for Romney, Obama's answer to that question is clearly pointless. 2. Not give the candidate she dislikes time for a rebuttal especially when it's his turn. 3. Not give the candidate she likes more time to explain himself. 4. Let the candidate she likes get away with not answering the question. 5. Not interrupt the candidate she dislikes. 6. Correct a candidate she dislikes with the wrong facts.
sort by best latest
I knew that leftist moderator coudn't helpt it. They subconsciously can't help aiding Obama. She interrupted Romney more times and didn't let him follow up as much. The whopper was that she sided with Obama and clearly she was wrong on Libya.
Reminded me when the DNC decided to show the world how "democratic" they were by taking a poll to let the crowd decide whether to put God back on their platform. Crowd was against it, Villaraigosa brought it back because it the teleprompter told him
I knew she would be a biased liberal, but I was surprised that she was so blatant about it.
Yeah, that too.
Not only did she do a crappy job during the debate she also did a crappy job before by picking questions that stacked against Romney.
And she allowed false statements by questioners (of course statements that are liberal staples, but demonstrably false) like the question about women making only 72% off what male counterparts make. The census bureau has said that is false.
And she is supposed to see they actually answer the question which in both candidates did not do and she said nothing. The kid asked about getting a job when he graduates and Obama talked about manufacturing jobs...who goes to college to get that?