savvydating profile image 81

What do you think of the Senate's vote to eliminate all filibusters for most presidential nominees?


Is this decision good or balanced, or are we treading in murky waters? What's your opinion either way?

 

sort by best latest

profile image61

retief2000 says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 3 years ago

    relief2000, you hit the nail on the head. It is tyranny that we must fear. I believe it has already begun with this administration... and will only get worse.


  • See all 4 comments
William15 profile image86

William (William15) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • profile image

    Larry Wall 3 years ago

    You are absolutely correct and that is a good thing. The filibuster is a stalling tatic and never should have been allowed to stop the wheels of government. Now if we can stop "holds" on appointments by unidentified Senators we can move forward.


  • See all 17 comments
profile image61

tbHistorian says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • profile image

    Larry Wall 3 years ago

    I support Obamacare because without it I cannot buy insurance due to pre-existing health conditions. I was a newspaper reporter for 16 years, fought for open meetings, exposed a corrupt police chief and help change a system of gov't. Is that tyranny?


  • See all 2 comments
suzettenaples profile image88

Suzette Walker (suzettenaples) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • profile image

    retief2000 3 years ago

    Democrats blocked some highly qualified Bush nominees and when the Senate Republican majority contemplated this same tactic it was attacked by Barrack Obama and others as an unreasonable power grab. But they were Republicans so they were bad.


  • See all 2 comments
junkseller profile image88

junkseller says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 3 years ago

    Hello junkseller. Bacharach is an unfortunate example. That being said, I am very, very sorry to see this system of checks and balances go by the wayside. Thank you for commenting.


  • See all 2 comments
profile image0

Larry Wall says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 3 years ago

    Hi Larry Wall. Thanks for dropping by. It seems the filibuster often delays the inevitable. I see it as a last resort tool of checks and balances, though it overused as of late. But removing it only widens the gap--now Senators will talk even less.


  • See all 9 comments