Marc's father, Ed Mezvinsky, Chelsea Clinton's father-in law, a former (D) congressman embezzled over $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi and Nigerian e-mail scams. Friends & politically intertwined with the Clintons for many years he pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud & still owes $9.4 million in restitution.If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or Sarah Palin's daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline & every detail would be reported over & over. Yet liberals claim no double standards in political reporting?
sort by best latest
As usual you miss, or more probably purposely avoid the real point which isn't that no one is talking about this but If this guy was a Republican daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline, but that is what we expect from you.
And as usual you ask rhetorical questions with the point of essentially spitting on people. Why you accept being such a low creature is beyond me.
YOU never fail to prove my point - liberals, like you just can't accept the truth and when you are shown your blatant double standards you revert to raising a straw man, changing the subject, name calling, anything except admit the facts, the truth.
Tagg Romney is mixed up in a ponzi scheme. Don't see him on the news every single day (or any day).
Excuse me, is Romney runnng for an office? DUH! When he was the press couldn't connect him to corruption (like the Clintons are at every turn)so they reported on a hair cutting incident in his chilldhood, his dog, &accused him of killing someone
Clinton isn't running for office either. Even when Romney was, Tagg wasn't a daily headline. The press had no reason to connect Romney to corruption. He was a terrible candidate on his face.
As usual you ignore the facts with your babble. Like Clinton isn't running in 2016?The press is nowscreaming criticism of her is offlimits. http://www.mrctv.org/videos/fncs-kelly-mrcs-bozell...
Sure, let's prove media bias by citing conservative biased sources such as FOX News and the MRC. Makes perfect sense. I think I'll stick to objective and credible news sources. The ones that teach facts such as that Clinton has not announced running.
Again can't face facts so attack the messenger. Really? An objective person knows that clip was factual, the opposite of your spin but like I've said before, you always demonstrate the liberal mind at work quite well, you never fail to dissapoint.
First time I ever heard of it too, & they got married in 2010 but you can bet if Sarah Palin's daughter had such a father in law you would know all about it, wouldn't you? http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/mezvinsky.... Clinton's & he t