The Butcher of Benghazi, Hillary Rodham Clinton, has blood on her hands: the blood of Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods, and Glen Doherty. This according to a scathing report (highly critical of her actions during the Libya event) entitled “Breach of Duty: Hillary Clinton and Catastrophic Failure in Benghazi,” put together by OPSEC, a group of former special forces and intelligence operatives, the same group that produced the viral documentary Dishonorable Disclosures. Is Hillary going to be able to continue hiding from the fact that she did nothing in Benghazi or do you love her anyway?
sort by best latest
Hit the nail on the head
At least Vick fessed up when he was caught and served his time. Hil liar y Clinton's not the first commie responsible for the murder of innocent patriots.
Has George W and The Republican Party fessed up to why thousands of innocent patriots died in Iraq over WMDs that didn't exist? Where's that full disclosure? Republicans are masters at the art of deflection. Hillary and Republicans are all pathetic.
Oh you mean the war that most of the Democrats voted for and agreed there were WMDs? Talk about deflection, the dems were for the war in Iraq before they were against it and all agreed you can keep your health care plan, oh until you actually can't.
WhyamInot surprised, IDONO made up an excuse to vote for the woman with the blood of innocent patriots on her hands.Allowing the dead's families to ask for the truth is worse than the person responsible for their deaths.Only a liberal wud go there
Yep, that darn Fox News just would not go along with the cover up and that really messed things up. Had Fox behaved themselves like the rest of the media, Benghazi would have been forgotten by now. The truth will never be made public.
tsadjatko: As usual, you just don't get it. You said it yourself. Let the families decide. Not some TV station or political party. After this next election, we'll see if Republicans are so concerned or if they will move on to the next scandal.
The question isn't about republicans, it's about whether you'd vote for a lying Clnton who's incompetence is responsible for the unecccessary murder of patriots & her coverup (a video did it) for election purposes. Only you'd change the subject.
Like I said Hillary wouldn't get my vote
no way, no how! Just name one thing that Hillary has done as secretary of State other than log mileage. She is not responsible for bringing any two countries together for peace sake. Her name is on Benghazi.
If I get you right, in any election, it bothers me to see one side tear down the other without declaring that they have a better alternative. Tell me why I should vote for you; not why I shouldn't vote for the other person. That's lip service.
I think we agree. I am tiring off the slamming as you suggested. It is like watching the WWF on a Thur evening. I would rather hear the solutions and their short term gains and long term returns. Presenting problems does not resolve / solve? I dun'no
Your answer to the question"If Hillary runs for President in 2016 will her Benghazi scandal affect your vote?" is - no - is it not?And your reason why is that Benghazi is equivalent to slamming?I doubt you'd feel that way if it was your son dead!
tsadjatko: What you tried to do to tsmog's analogy was well...just sad. I won't waste letters on explaining why. I like a good, heated discussion, but I'm not so desperate to win that I would embarrass myself like that. This isn't personal. Settle.
That's your pat reply whenever you have lost the argument, you run and hide and seem to think innuendo wins the day - you are the pathetic one. Be honest, if it was your son would you be supporting Hillary or begging for some answers?
In all honesty, My immediate priority would be to find out WHAT failed to cause this so it didn't happen to others in the future. Not spend precious time worried about who to blame and cursing a cover up. That won't save lives. Blame comes second.
It's obvious from your statement you never had any children (if you do they have my condolences) You have simply repeated the administrations talking point on this(which is part of their covering up the truth) You should try thinking for yourself.
tsadjatko: You are a disgusting excuse for a man. What's next? Yo MaMa? My sons and our relationship is none of your pathetic business. I have absolutely nothing else to say to you. I will delete anything of yours that shows up on my posts.
Name calling and a meaningless threat - no surprise here, and I never have and never would post anything you could delete because I know you'd censor anyone you lose an argument to. Now run and hide instead of ever answering the original question.
okay tsadjatko: You win: I lose. I bow to your wisdom, compassion and superior intellect......... NOW GO AWAY!!!!!!!
hmmmm sounds like something my grandchild might say when she has reluctantly learned a lesson. I hope you learned a lesson here - that being admitting you're wrong is the key to dignified humility, although you have tried your best to undignify it.
tsadjatko: Read again, oh miserable one. I said that you won. I didn't say I was wrong. Again, let it rest or go pick a fight with someone else. I'm done with you. No more replies. I'm sorry I bothered with you this long.
You now have said you are done three times,yet you keep coming back only to get in the last word.People who do that are worried they be overruled or made to look foolish & feel if they get the last word then they win,even though you say I win.
"the physics of 911"? are you one of those 911 conspiracy kooks or do you mean "We See Conspiracies That Don't Exist The Physics of 9/11" by MANUEL GARCIA, Jr. ? http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/11/28/the-physics...
"To be fair" I can see where that is fair, after all it is only fair not to want to vote for lying, paranoid enabler, https://tsadjatko.hubpages.com/question/228317/wou...
Hillary is the poster girl of the twisted power hungry individuals who represent us today. Our government is suffering from a terminal illness.
Liberals or Conservatives, to the extreme, are both brain damage. Somewhere in the middle is freedom. Too liberal becomes immoral. Too conservative becomes cognitive dissonance. Problem is, division is beyond checks and balances. Unification is gone.
There is no middle with Democrats, as even the President's policy is it's his way or the highway. The right is principled, to give up your principles to live in the middle is equivalent to Solomon saying ok cut the baby in half, it doesn't work.
Democrats can't see the middle as they are so far to the left, they are beyond the earth curvature.They may turn around and say the right is the same but at least the right has morals,and are willing to meet in the middle, the left cant even do that
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
"the dirtiest players in the game" That's the best thing you have to say about Hiliary?She campaigned for these high-profile defeats: Ms. Grimes,KY and Senate candidates Kay Hagan, NC and Bruce Braley, IA. Slick Willie was clobbered in AR.
This is a Pyrrhic victory for the GOP .It only ensures that Hillary will win the White House in 2016,,the democrats will take the senate back for sure and maybe even the House .
News flash, Hiliary's not going to run, mark my words. More coming on Benghazi and electorate, especially the democrats, is fed up with their own incompetence.
I guess time will tell who's right. we'll see .I'm pretty sure I'll be voting for Hillary in 2016.