Iraq wants to be split into three different countries: Kurds, Shiia, and Sunni. Syria also wants to be divided. Israel wants to takeover Palestine. Palestine wants to become it's own country. The Eastern part of the Ukraine wants to be returned to Russia. Egypt democratically elected the Muslim Brotherhood, but they were deposed. Western Belgium wants to part of France. Libya's militia wants to take over.. It seems like the new world order is really the old world order. These people want to return to their roots and not follow the modern day borders of their countries. What are your thoughts?
sort by best latest
lone77star; Thank you for your insightful view of the NWO. Do you have a hub or links to articles to verify your comments? I have often thought there was a power influence that operated behind the scenes.
An excellent answer. Thank you for your thoughtful remarks.
The difference is a democratic process within the context of a democracy. Most of the countries I mentioned are theocracies. When democracy is thrust upon them, the outcome is never good. I Should have made this a forum instead of question format.
sean--Do you find this acceptable or unacceptable?
next--This is perhaps one of the most inane statements I have ever read. Is it possible for you to back this up with any clarity?
cjhunsinger : After WWI, the mid-east was carved up by the British and the French without any regard for ethnicity, culture and religion to create chaos as an instrument of control. Today, the borders are not being honored by the people living there.
next-- Of the The Sykes–Picot Agreement you neglected Russia and no insanity here, only imperialism (greed). The Zionist were also involved. None of this was insanity. Borders exist for the same reason youlive w/walls and locks on your doors-insanity
cjhunsinger: I agree with you, but there are only so many characters in these comment fields. I could only include the essence of what the real problem is. I should have made this a forum, instead of a question format.
Which god might that be? Kingdoms require subjects. How does this work in a free society or are you promoting a theocracy. Of what I see in the world past or present this god is not a good planner, unless chaos is his best suit.