Makes sense now doesn't it why they let a pregnant woman go so long before they abort that little baby, doesn't it?
sort by best latest
What is it to the living moving babies inside these warm bodies that created them? Maybe they were a mistake, but then maybe so were their parents. Are we allowed to snip their spines & sell them? The more it is financed the more body parts they
Medical research uses fetus and stem cells to help live humans. A womans fetus is none of your business!
and none of yours...
I'm not making it mine. You are.making it yours. Leave them alone! They don't need your pronouncements on their lives.
It's pure hyperbole if you ask me.
Stay tuned, you will find out & I might ask you stop supporting liars & murderers. These people put tax payers money out there & encourage poor uneducated women to use abortion for birth control & the later stages the better for them.
You do realize that abortions are a very small part of what PP does, right? 80% of the people who go there get contraception to AVOID pregnancy and they provide sexual education to 1.5 million people every year.
They get half a billion dollars a year I hear from American taxpayers; half of who are totally against the murder of human babies. Half of the other half don't even have a clue what is going on.
Because anyone who doesn't agree with you must be clueless?
These babies we are suppose to believe are not babies are having parts sold...their brains crushed, their spines snipped and that is OK with all Democrats? They are going to support this? They are going to pay for these murders and selling of innocen
Okay, again, they're not selling the parts. Not differentiating just shows that you're only interested in demonizing a program that does a whole lot of good because you don't agree with everything.
Of course there are those who are selling fetal remains for profit.They aren't going to advertise their back door deals. Apathy and denial are accessories to evil.
You are right Aime, and they are going to propagandize it so PP is over, and then their real goal: abortion will be over, too. Then all those innocents will belong to the State, and Satan. A fate worse than death.
You don't think that if a woman was denied an abortion and really did not want the child that she would magically love the child and be mother of the year, do you? That child is at risk of neglect and murder. At least they don't feel pain in the womb
Woman can get help without planned parenthood and they should from an organization for preventing babies not murdering and selling them which is exactly what they do and no reason os good enough to do that. Are we savages?
They are not selling fetus parts. Women are donating them. Money is used to facilitate the donation. Period.Late-term abortions are done to save a woman's life-or remove a dead fetus. Honestly--some people would rather a woman die than have free will
Sandie, your statement is so far from the truth. Seriously, late term abortions do not save a woman's life. If anything, they cause more complications and risk to a woman's health. You simply have not researched anything. How very unfortunate.
I research plenty. And I think it was so courageous of Bill Clinton to understand what late term is about, rather than heed the witch-burning of the masses. I believe in women, I have faith in their ability to run their own lives. Too bad you don't.
Kayla, I know u r new 2 Hubpages, but u cannot call someone an idiot here. U can b banned 4 that.
Indeed, Bill Clinton knows all about women and their rights,,,at his feet or elsewhere...we should listen to what he thinks.
A recent study shows that the overwhelming majority of late-term abortions are for financial reasons or because of disagreements with the baby's father, and almost never for the health of the mother.
Some of these babies have to be killed after birth! They have no right to life, they are murdered.
I call bull on both of you!
You do realize that the story about hotel bathtubs and organ theft is one of the longest running urban legends (ie, FAKE stories) on the internet, right?
No. 1986 was before the Internet and OSU med school reported on it & in 1986-1987, same thing occurred in my city - in one bathtub & one dumpster. Our professors in medicine shared research and photos of such cases in the late 1980s and early
Thank you for all these! Margaret Sanger's bigotry was one of the first things we learned in public health classes. A few churches offer free women's health services here, but not nearly enough to replace all of PP. Maybe more will come forward.
I am certainly glad you brought in the truth instead of a woman's right to murder her mistake & force me to pay for it.
They are using these women who love having this available to them to cover all their mishaps & the organization profits,
Fetus or baby, the name doesn't matter, though it is interesting how carefully abortionists avoid the use of the word baby. What matters is that little humans' arms and legs (conveniently called tissue) are divided from their vital organs for $s.
Stop it. The organs are not sold FOR MONEY. They do not profit, they are simply reimbursed for costs. The tissue is then used for medical research, not just sold to a random on the street. Stop perpetuating lies.
Though they are being sold for profit, I did make a mistake by focusing on the monies at all. The real issue is that the mothers are lied to and the babies are used this way.
How do you suppose the mothers are lied to? They're required to give consent. You cannot possibly say they don't know this is happening because it wouldn't be happening if they didn't agree to it.
Examine the responses of the mothers who find out the truth about what abortions do to them and and to their babies, not to mention the fathers, grandparents, siblings… http://hopeafterabortion.com/?p=109
What does that have to do with donating fetal tissue specifically? Of course many people have emotional responses to abortion, I'm not sure anyone has implied that it's an easy decision.
Aime, how naive it is for anyone to believe that PP does not profit from abortions. They are a billion dollar profit making machine. Our society must do everything we can to stop defending that which is defenseless.
Oh I'm sure they do. We're talking about tissue donations here, which they do not profit from.
Do keep in mind that PP also promotes sex ed and contraception to avoid unwanted pregnancy, so they're kind of on your side, too.
Abortion is dehumanizing emotional and physical abuse:
Well, then--you definitely should not have one. For others who disagree, this is still a free country, right?
Sadly, everything that is legal is not safe. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. I am thankful to be able to have a voice in helping promote truth and help for women who are lied to about the safety of abortions.
RTalloni - one of my closest friends had an abortion several years ago and she is emotionally very stable and still feels 100% certain she made the right decision. Many people feel regret, definitely. Many don't.
I am truly sorry for your friend. She may face a day when she can no longer ignore the facts about what happened to her and her baby and I sincerely hope she gets help.
Yes, poor girl. How sad that she managed to form her own opinion, own her choice, and move on with her life. Nice of you to feign sympathy for a non-existing struggle, though.
I had an abortion because the pregnancy was causing a dangerous increase in my seizures. I have a non-epileptic seizure disorder and I almost died so I made the decision so that my other 2 kids didn't lose their mom. No regrets or emotional breakdown
I think if the pro-abortion crowd really knew about Margaret Sanger, they wouldn't throw her name around so much. It is amazing how ignorant they are about her evil intentions. She compared Aborigines as being just a step above monkeys.
And? This is your business how?
If you dont like abortion, the choice is there not to have one. Why are you fighting to take away choice, and force your views on all?
Sandie, Are you watching the same video that the rest of us have seen? It is clear from the video that they are selling and not donating and in some cases, they are aware of the fact that it is against the law.
It's a heavily edited video put out by an extreme anti-abortion group. Consider the sources, people.
The editing is only to reduce the time. No editing can put words in people's mouth. Use your head and your heart. What is wrong is wrong. Does it matter who produced the video? Not in this case.
Uh... it absolutely matters who puts out the information.
Why does it matter?
I'm curious about your thinking. If some left wing group has a video on the Speaker committing some crime, does it make it invalid because it came from a partisan group? When does common sense stop and bias take over?
You don't see why a group with an agenda who has clearly edited videos might want to edit them in a way that helps their agenda and might not be a reliable source of information?
Aime - But that's not what they did. They edited a half hour conversation down to a few minutes to capture the essence of the discussion. It is a hidden video because no one at PP will give an interview and admit to what they are doing...
You have more faith in biased sources than I do, I suppose. I think they probably edited it down to capture whatever essence they wanted it to.
They don't want women seeing these pictures to know exactly what is happening & it is against to law to sell human flesh, cadavers included. They want women to think of fetuses as just blobs but they are not. They have hearts & body parts &am
Not giving women much credit, are you? I think a vast majority are probably well aware what a fetus consists of.
Sandie, any illegal activity which promotes murder for profit is everyone's business. Would you kill a baby who is one day old---for the sake of science. You better believe that murder for scientific purposes is my business.
They aren't being aborted FOR science. They're being aborted because the mother has made that decision. If the parts aren't going towards research they're being incinerated. You've got an aborted fetus either way.
Sandie, Aime....thank you! I feel like all these anti-abortion voices on this page are trying to force everyone to think like them. If a woman didn't want a child and was denied an abortion, the child would suffer throughout life.
Top doctors are telling anyone who will listen that they don't need these fetuses for this cause anymore! Who is listening or who is just getting rich murdering babies & half of America's help & poor uneducated women used? Using this for bir
Me too and all funds should be cut off to them. All! I truly believe they encourage abortions because they are a money making business. Killing live fetus to sell and how could anyone say different.
Thanks for standing against a horrible wrong.
"many will not check the box "will you accept a child if the birth parents are known to have mental disease or drug addictions".People who profess their opposition to abortion should automatically be on a list to adopt the kids that no one else wants
Big one for playing God aren't you to not even believe in Him. He knows who these baby parts belong to, He knows their name.
Who said I don't believe in God? Not YOURS, that's for sure! My god actually permits abortion all the time. And yours does too. It's called miscarriage. A natural act. But suddenly it's demonic if a woman does it herself. That is warped thinking, IMO
Ask God; He might just answer.
Those women bidding for the highest price are benefitting somehow we can be sure and I hope someone is investigating them.
And when the constitution gives certain rights to all human beings; are these beings human?
It's not appropriate to use tissue for medical research that could result in health improvements for others? Is it more appropriate to send them to an incinerator?
It is more appropriate to not kill babies just like you and I once were. We have our rights and they should have theirs and if you don't want them cross your legs!
Yeah, I'm aware of your opinion on the matter. I'm curious as to why Kevin has specifically said that using tissue for medical research is not appropriate.
Top doctors have told us fetuses are not needed any longer for the causes you all speak of so now what do you say?
Really? There are "top doctors" who have said that fetal tissue isn't useful for medical research?
THESE SAY IT ALL
No, that says *in the future* they might not need it and that it hasn't been effective to find a cure for *one* specific disease. You really just see what you want to see, don't you?
Opponents of life say M.Sanger quotes are taken out of context by pro life advocates, but reading her works is eye opening, besides sickening. Deception was key to her proposals, and Mengle's methods are the bigoted fruition we are seeing today.
1 answer hidden due to negative feedback. Show
1 answer hidden due to negative feedback. Hide