Loretta Lynch wants to prosecute anyone who talks smack about Muslims. I am NOT saying that it is okay to do that, or that I would, because I don't do that, but the point I am trying to make is that--1. Is this not a violation of the 1st amendment? 2. What about other groups, like Christians, Jews, and even gays, other races, etc--where does it stop, and should it stop? and 3. As long as nobody is planning to physically hurt anyone, should it be punished with such severity? Are people becoming too thin-skinned?
sort by best latest
Not a very good idea. In such a "free" society , anyone could yell "fire" in a crowded theatre with impunity. You could tell a retarded person to jump out of a window and let the Easter Bunny (waiting 10 stories below) catch them, etc.
It is a very good idea. Many, many people would be in jail if they were prosecute for free speech. People shouldn't be control, thought controlled, or afraid to say anything and have to keep emotions bottled up.
EXCELLENT ANSWER, TOLD YA THAT THE OBAMA REGIME IS AN OUTRIGHT DICTATORSHIP!
Or what about Black Live Matter chanting "What do we want? Dead police! When do we want them? Now!" or "Pigs in a blanket, fry like bacon." Thank you for your answer. You made some good points.
T~who's the dude in the blue jacket & earrings?Is that Loretta B-4 laser hair removal? I don't see a rise in anti-muslim rhetoric , but if I did it wouldn't be incredibly disturbing. What IS disturbing is that THIS is our AG's greatest fear.
That's just a pic of Lorreta Lynch taken with a new technology camera which shows the real personage behind her motivations, in this case Eric Holder. Don't you just love technology! It's called the DCRC (digital channeling revealed) camera.
You just made that up. But, it's pretty clever anyway. LOL
Well the liberals here just make things up&expect people to believe their fantasies,why can't I?Oh i know the answer,that's like when they point to other's bad behavior to justify their own bad behavior, maybe someone can point that out to them.
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
I agree! - Regardless of who it is directed at, or spoken by, if one is inciting violence and discrimination against any particular race/religion/orientation - should be prosecuted.
SO then you think Loretta Lynch is discriminating by only calling for prosecution of those spewing anti-Muslim rhetoric (her "GREATEST fear"), & not saying same about inciting violence against other religions or beliefs. Bravo, good point!
So, let me get this correct. You claim Muslims who not only INCITE violence (Death to America!) against Christians & all Non-Muslims, but attack, torture & murder, should be prosecuted. I agree. They must be locked up for LIFE.