jonnycomelately profile image 87

Why should a person of Muslim persuasion be less qualified to be President?


Surely it is the ability of a person to distance him/her self from any political/religious/commercial bias and to act in the best interests of the Nation as a whole that most befits a Leader. Similarly, a persons sexual orientation should have no bearing provided those non-biased conditions apply....without any backhanders for anyone.

 

sort by best latest

tamarawilhite profile image88

Tamara Wilhite (tamarawilhite) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

20 months ago
 |  Comment
bradmasterOCcal profile image77

bradmasterOCcal says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

21 months ago
 |  Comment
aguasilver profile image86

John Harper (aguasilver) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

21 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Austinstar profile image

    Lela (Austinstar) 21 months ago

    Obama is a constitutional scholar and NOT a muslim. Why do you persist in believing these two lies?


  • See all 5 comments
LoliHey profile image77

Lolita Monroe (LoliHey) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

21 months ago
 |  Comment
  • lovemychris profile image

    Yes Dear (lovemychris) 21 months ago

    You're not under Sharia, you're under Noahide. George Walker Bush, 1991. Public Law 102-14, 102 Congress.

Ericdierker profile image77

Eric Dierker (Ericdierker) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

21 months ago
 |  Comment
  • jonnycomelately profile image

    Alan (jonnycomelately) 21 months ago

    I would hope that it is, Eric. But would a very biased Christian President limit my freedoms by virtue of my sexuality? Any better than under Sharia?


  • See all 2 comments