People who take things literally and word-for-word can be scary and threatening. With that in mind and considering the Bundy crew and their followers, should we look at literal Constitutionalists as a form of domestic terrorism?
sort by best latest
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
I asked a question without opening the door for a personal insult. Apparently I struck a nerve. The Bundy crew broke numerous laws, strutted their weaponry around as wannabe militia and destroyed government property. They are domestic terrorists.
Police strut their weaponry around daily. Police kill unarmed persons constantly all over the nation.
Who did 'the Bundy crew' murder?
To be a 'terrorist' one has to commit an act of violence, so again - who did 'the Bundy crew' harm?
U.S. Code defines domestic terrorism as acts dangerous to human life that violates federal or state law; Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation.
So while one of these 'dangerous crew' was murdered by law enforcement - and you can't name anyone this 'dangerous crew' harmed - I take it you have no instance of anyone harmed by a supposedly 'dangerous crew.'