Is this reasonable, or can the left make their own rules. GW Bush didn't do a great job, especially about 911, but there is a new sheriff in town for over the last 7 years. Shouldn't the focus be on what Obama did? He begged for the presidency, and he campaigned that he would fix the US. So when he didn't make good on his promises, he and the left push it back on to GW Bush.
sort by best latest
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
The US has been declining since the faked oil shortages of the 70s, and it couldn't have been done without the divergent goals of both parties.
Neither party has the solutions but both parties contribute to the problem
Correction: Keep in mind that the Democrats and the UN agreed that the invasion of Iraq needed to take place because of a former treaty that had been broken by Hussein repeatedly. The decision to go to war was a unilateral decision made by many.
Well said Scorpio.
As for the crisis we are now in. That started with the Reagan Thatcher era . And the free market system developed by Martin Friedman.
We haven't won a war since 1898 because politicians of both parties, more on the left have sacrificed military victories for politics. Before WWII, Europe was free, during the war, Eastern Europe under Nazis, after war USSR. Not a victory