If so, why would the elite want us to think the world is warming?
sort by best latest
There is evidence that supports the opposite. Scientists who can prove that Global Warming is wrong are fired and discarded from the Elite, so that the hoax can be kept alive. That way they can make money.
And you would rather believe the nonsense hoax that is put up as religion, Lolita? There are "scientists" employed by some big companies, and they tell lies. But many more people study science who are honest, and seek facts, not superstition.
Put religion aside for a moment, because this question is about Climate Change. How do you know that Climate Change supporter-scientists are not lying? Who is right? Who is wrong?
Answer: I don't "know," for sure, neither do you. I included religion in this conversation because it obviously drives your point of view, going by the only hub, so far, in your profile.
Do you ever question the people who deny science? Why/Why not?
I agree with that last sentence. I think that if the elite can convince us that Climate Change is happening, they can tax us to "stop it," and get rich while we pay.
By that time they will know we were mad/crazy/blind because we took from the world what they would love to have had: clean air, diversity of creatures and plants, clean water, abundant fuel, undamaged soil. And they will still be cleaning up.
Well, I apologise for the term arrogant.... more to suggest faith and scientific study can both be valid, we don't all have to see things only one way...and I do respect people's desire to "believe" without proof, even though that does not suit me.
It's got nothing to do with religion. People have claimed that CO2 levels were actually higher in the dinosaur age, but those facts are swept under the rug. In fact, the ice caps have totally melted before and this is normal. It is not our fault.
You have been hooked by the publicity from those companies who want you to be confused. And you only read those, because you don't want to think for yourself.
Not true. I have seen both sides of the evidence.
Ok, let's hear your understanding of the "other" side...the side that has investigated, painstakingly and over many years, the data of numerous climate indicators. Realisticly, honestly and open to negative findings as well as positive.
Perhaps I will write a hub on it when I can sit down and devote a lot of time to it.
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
Good answer. So many people are duped into believing it. The Socialists make a very convincing case for it.
Renaming is not proof that nothing is happening. The fact is science has known something drastic is going wrong and trying to understand it. To deny humans have seriously affected the natural order of the planet is simply ignorant
Being "duped into believing it" is obviously not confined to socialists.
"There are none so blind as those who refuse to see."