This guy Petraeus got a 100K fine and two years probation for sharing some classified data with a mistress who did nothing with the information.
How is it that, to date, Clinton gets nothing for a whole lot of leaking of classified material to people who acted on the information. Both were email excursions. Both dealt with classified material.
Now I mention that for a reason. I am not saying Clinton is completely guilty. I am saying she is not charged with a crime on a ton more proof. And that leads us to influence peddling. When the facts are laid out in the General election it will be very damaging. Not that Democrats will vote for a Republican but they will not in good conscience vote. Voters should factor that in.
On Benghazi the issue goes directly to the competency in managing high risk foreign affairs at a base level. She cannot protect one embassy that she knows is under assault and for sure knew of the threat yet she is to keep our military out of harms way? The voters should most assuredly take that under deep consideration. At the very least she cannot lead underlings to handle matters.
But does that mean it is all about Hillary? Probably not and that is why the Republicans will win the next election. In Obama not allowing a federal prosecution and hampering the Benghazi investigation this shows a party more in tune with covering for each other than getting to a righteous determination of possible wrong doing. What else are they doing this with?
Again it does not mean people will switch party lines but so many democrats "should" factor in these problems they will stay home from the vote. Sure there will still be many who are just frightened of a Republican president but they will be sad in numbers. The Dems better hope for a good turnout because of Senate and Congressional races.