sort by best latest
You're blaming the victim, as well as excusing the violent protesters at Trump's events. You're acting as if conservative speech is hate speech / fighting words, so threats to harm conservatives and Trump himself are warranted.
Frankly, what comes out of Trump's mouth is hate speech, and I'm appalled that you're calling him a victim. He didn't get a scratch. However, his followers are punching people in the head, while Donald offers to pay their legal bills. He's to blame.
Lisa you had me till your last sentence then the thread broke.
Hate is subjective, and it has no objective meaning to other people. Details, and application of the scenario are needed to understand it. Rhetoric has no meaning here because it is vague
If a candidate spews hate and violence, he's going to incite hatred and violence in his followers. He's going to elicit an equally strong reaction from those who don't agree with him. Hate begets hate. He did this to himself.
Once fists start flying and insults are strewn around, you should be fined and even arrested.
Infighting violence, trying to deliberately anger people, insults...you've accurately summed up the Black Lives Matter activists.
haha. Yeah, You read one sentence of my answer.