an even odious statement as time goes by? Yes being non-PC is his thing and everybody is entertained by it but at one point do supporters say, "OK - that was over the line" I do know that when most people make a decision, it's hard to change their mind but it seem ever more incredulous to believe that Trumpeteers support a man who admires tyrants. Trump Praises Saddam Hussein Again - condoning the former dictator’s complete disregard for civil liberties & North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un should be given “credit” for taking over and killing his rivals.
sort by best latest
Now list the same things about Trump's opponents. If people had good arguments they wouldn't have to use name calling. I know Trump does it,so do other, trumpeteers? 4 your last 2 paragraphs, I would say the same of loyal party voters.
One PRIMARY Difference between "Drumpf" Trump & his Opponents is the FACT that Donald is a "DELUSIONAL", Psychologically Un-SOUND Bigoted Facist Racist & his Opponents are NOT ~ No surprise to me if the KKK's David Duke Spoke at the GOP Conv.
Not a single fact, just noise.
Most of the time I disagree with our Brad and sometimes like this : I agree with you. Too bad we all could be on the front porch in the evening, having a beer and checking out the fireflies while jawing away. )
lol @ brad ~ GOOGLE is just a CLICK away, and as usual, I URGE ALL my readers to INVESTIGATE the FACTs ~ Racist KKKer David Duke ENDORSED Drumpf, Robo-Calls were made by RACISTs on Trumps Behalf, Mexicans are Rapists According to Trump ~ Just FACTs
I don't trust Google. Use Duck Duck GO instead
lol @ brad ~ Of course U don't like GOOGLE, if I were Delusional Donald or a FAN I'd be "FRIGHTENED" to GOOGLE his FRAUD Filled HISTORY as well ~ The ONLY Chance "Drumpf" has to win is if he Invents a "TIME Machine" & goes back & ERASES his P
I miss the fireflies when I lived on Long Island, we dn have them in CA.
AP ur comments are filled with name calling and conclusions. Where are the facts? Talk about issues, not your conclusions of Trump personally. 4 ex, Wall or No Wall MX
@Brad Wall is stupid: see https://youtu.be/vU8dCYocuyI, What I would like to see is an electronic sensor 'fence' and more aerostats, (giant radar balloons), Each solution has it's own problems tho' because some BP agents have cartel ties.
The problem with the US and especially democrats is that they can't, won't and haven't created anything. They are always delaying projects, or denying proj and in the meantime the cost skyrocket and then they say it is too costly.
Not so sure, about the access to National Security Information which the Speaker of the House is suggesting to withhold from Clinton - but not Trump (as per custom as a prez runner in the last few months before election for stable transition).
That is absurd. Hillary was Secretary of State! Why wouldn't she be allowed access to National Security Information? Paul Ryan is a tool.
I think the DNI—the Director of National Intelligence—should block her access to classified information given how recklessly she handled this during the presidential campaign.”
lol @ brad, yeah, and ALLOW a Mentally DISTURBED FRAUDSTER like Trump Scan through OUR Classified Documents?? ~ Hillary has been EXPOSED to "TOP Secret" INFO for YEARS & NOT a Single BREACH or Compromise ~ But U Actually TRUST a Swindler like DON
AP When we captured the enigma machine in WWII, did we tell the Germans we had it? Like pres B Clinton using the WH as a Motel 6 to cheat on Hillary, the capture of HIllary's server info could be used to extort the presidency if Hillary is pres
I do not have a 'party' nor a candidate, I'm independent. What gives me the chills is Trump is the CONTROLLED OPPOSITION for Clinton & no matter what the obvious facts are, Trumpeteers are living in a suspension of disbelief of that fact.
I have no idea what you mean. What is more delusional than Trump's opponents? What obvious facts? What about my comment above? And who are you going to vote for.
Look up Controlled OPPOSITION. It's all political kabuki to give the illusion of government for the people and therefore legit. It is not legit. None of it. It's a facade, window dressing. You are a human being -being corralled like the rest of us.
What is the basis of your conclusion of controlled opposition? Who is controlling it, and how? In any case, why would I think Clinton would be the better choice. If anything, Sanders would be the controlled opp against Clinton.
Trump could of easily ran as a Democrat if he chose different issues to campaign. Trump invited to Chelsea Clinton's wedding. Clintons & Trump are friends.
NY like CA is Democrat owned. If you want to do any kind of proj in NYC u have to get the favor of democrats. Trump is a business person, he knew that and he played to it. He s actually run independent but loyal party voters won't have it.