"The only news here is that the more than 20-year-old alleged tax document was illegally obtained, a further demonstration that the New York Times, like establishment media in general, is an extension of the Clinton Campaign, the Democratic Party and their global special interests,” the Trump campaign said in a statement about the publishing of the documents.
sort by best latest
There's a difference between illegally obtaining info&publishing info illegally obtained by another organization.Legal precedent suggests if the publisher has“undisputed participation”in obtaining it the media outlet will be found liable.
Is their a Federal stature regarding reprinting e-mail? There is legal precedent on publishing someone else's tax returns without permission
Good point, and since Wikileaks affected national security and this is less severe, only the person who leaked it if caught will end up going to jail.
ReallY? What false document did Chaffetz present in what congressional hearing? And what law did he break? Specifics that can be verified pleased, not your usual innuendo which I'll bet is exactly what your statement is.
Planned parenthood hearing. He showed chart said was from pp. It was from an anti abortion group. False information(lie) designed to hurt pp in public hearing which we pay. Gvt rep lying using tax payer money. Illegal? I dont know. Nothing done
So he showed some facts and the PP people didn't want them seen.......
It wasnt facts. It was lies. And he tried to pawn it off as the truth. In a public hearing. Where is his punishment? How about a congresssional investigation on that? Oh i forgot. Its a gvt of by and for republicans.
OK again Leslie making things up, throwing around false accusations,purposely ignoring the facts.Chafaetz presented a chart to a judiciary committee tha tmay have been misleading,not a crime,hardly=to lying to congress in an investigation.
Hmmmm, "may have been misleading" republispeak for LIE
If you were even interested in the truth Leslie you'd be pointing out that here are the liars, your NY Times : http://www.naturalnews.com/055502_New_York_Times_D...
I pointed out the liar. Chaffets. And nothing at all happenef to him. And he is running hearings which people are forced to endure. No one is forcing u to read nyt. Chavetts is the gubmint everyone is sick of.
so how does this connect to a newspaper illegally publishing stolen federal information?
Both trying to bring ruination by unethical means. If its not illegal to present false documents in front of congress, and pass them off as truth, it should be.