Marcy Goodfleisch profile image 95

Do you believe there should be tighter gun control laws?


Should there be laws against selling or owning some types of guns? What do you think?

 

sort by best latest

Marisa Wright profile image92

Marisa Wright says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Jack Burton profile image

    Jack Burton 9 months ago

    When people claim "no one wants to take your guns away" we'll point towards Marisa's post to prove otherwise.

lions44 profile image96

CJ Kelly (lions44) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Jack Burton profile image

    Jack Burton 9 months ago

    There is no federal "waiting period" and only a very few handful of states require one.

David Branagan profile image83

David Branagan says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Jack Burton profile image

    Jack Burton 9 months ago

    When people claim "no one wants to take your guns away" we'll point towards David's post to prove otherwise. BTW, David has no clue as to what a "semi automatic" firearm is. He's like a 5 year old on his first tricycle giving racing advice to a pro.

Tusitala Tom profile image83

Tom Ware (Tusitala Tom) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Jack Burton profile image

    Jack Burton 9 months ago

    When people claim "no one wants to take your guns away" we'll point towards Tom's post to prove otherwise. BTW, Tom has no clue as to what an "automatic" firearm is and the laws concerning them.

Shyron E Shenko profile image85

Shyron E Shenko says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
Brians Review profile image82

Brian Cappoen (Brians Review) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Tusitala Tom profile image

    Tom Ware (Tusitala Tom) 9 months ago

    Those 'Constitutional rights' to bear arms came into being when the British were still a very real threat to the brand new United States and when the Red Indians constituted a real threat. Neither still applies. Amend the Constitution!


  • See all 2 comments
Jack Burton profile image78

Jack Burton says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
wba108@yahoo.com profile image83

wba108@yahoo.com says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
profile image60

yourhomiebrian says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
Wesman Todd Shaw profile image90

Wesman Todd Shaw says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Tusitala Tom profile image

    Tom Ware (Tusitala Tom) 9 months ago

    Deliberately taken action to shoot someone is only one part of the argument against the proliferation of firearms. The other is due to the numerous accidents where people - especially children - are either ignorant or careless with them.


  • See all 2 comments
tamarawilhite profile image89

Tamara Wilhite (tamarawilhite) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

9 months ago
 |  Comment