The presumption is innocent until proven guilty.
Too date, there has only been hearsay, innuendo, and opinion on hacking the election. Do we really want to go to war, because president Obama and the democrats say so?
Look what happened when GW Bush played the war card without real proof.
And the US Intelligence hasn't changed since Shock and Awe.
We have the proof on how the DNC and Hillary fixed the democrat primary, and yet we did nothing. Isn't it the same transgression on our election process/
Hold elections again? That didn't happen when we found out how Bernie got hijacked by the DNC, so why can you skip that and suggest holding elections again for the presidency.
It is only a democrat, liberal and HRC contention that there was hacking, and that it was the hacking that lost her the election. Yet, that hacking didn't change the result of the two biggest electoral states CA, and NY. Hacking these two states would have a more direct change in the results.
How can there be no effect in these two states, and yet a claim that hacking was the reason HRC lost.
Does this red herring HACKING, explain why the democrats lost in both houses, and in the state governors?
IF IF IF, is the same as spreading untrue rumors, it is not proof. It is the main ingredient in defamation. And the only defense against a charge of defamation is Truth. And there is NO TRUTH in the claim of Russian Hacking.
As the old horror movie said, "The phone call is coming from inside the house".
As Putin told president Obama, Put up or Shut up.