The liberals can put their spin on it, but there was no other message than civil unrest. She talked about the founding fathers, the same ones that gave blacks 3/5 for black men, and nothing for black women. The founding fathers also put in Treason, so that their method of creating this country couldn't be repeated by anyone else.
As a former AG, she should be preaching that instead of marching, protesting and rioting, the people should be electing their representative to take their case to a vote.
Also she states the unrest, and implying that it is Trump's fault. When it is the liberals, HRC and Obama that are causing the unrest. The problems that these protesters are blaming Trump for existed for a long time. They should have protested the Presidents and congresses for the last 50 years because they and not Trump caused these conditions to be what they are today. She talks about rights, And what are these rights?? The right to be manipulated, to ignore their power to VOTE.
The Civil Rights marches, riots and resistance against the government didn't work, otherwise we would have this issue today.
Trump wasn't in politics until he ran for the presidency, and he has only been the president since Jan 20, 2017. The left keeps resisting, but their resistance is not to air grievances, but to make Trump pay for showing the country and the world, the corruption of the democratic party.
What Lynch is doing is tantamount to sedition, and on the verge of Treason. She is no different than the guy in the old west that would liquor up the crowd, and then when they all got drunk, incite them to get a rope and bypass the law storm the jail and have a necktie party. Here instead of liquor she is using artificial righteousness.
Seriously, isn't what she is doing pretty much the same thing. Except the necktie party is going to include millions. She is not doing it for congress, she is really talking to the people in the street. It has been pretty quiet for a while, so this is the stimulus to get people drunk and angry. And say, where did we put the rope?
She is the anti MLK.
If a former US AG cannot understand and operate within the laws and constitution of the US, then it makes you wonder what she did as AG.