For one thing evolution does not really work this way -- in a nutshell evolution is a tag/keyword/name for the observation that out of a population in a specific environment, members of the population with specific characteristics that are conducive towards survival and reproduction in that specific environment will have a greater probability to dominate that population potentially to the point that the alternative traits vanish entirely from the population over a succession of generations.
This applies to any scale over which you can define a population that has successive generations.
Anything else is change but not necessarily evolution.
With the challenges that recent technological changes have added to the already complicated mix of issues derived from the various inequalities that are naturally present in the whole of human society it is difficult to imagine a good end to it all.
What do you imagine to mean by a 'truer' society? Do you mean one that is more 'unified' towards a racial goal or a richer world for all?
For this to even happen we'd need a planet wide epidemic of understanding and/or empathy to make it possible for the self interest machine to encompass descendant interest (and I do not mean immediate descendants here, I am talking long term).
We probably need a new higher bandwidth language and grammar -- one that conveys more information and more types of information (strength and types of emotions and feelings, more data regarding context of communication, etc...).
IMHO if there is a 'next step' better communication is it. There are a number of ways this could be achieved -- social, technological, biological. But for any lofty species wide collaboration to work a species wide language worthy and capable of supporting such a collaboration needs to come into existence.