And may God help us!
This could be the biggest upset since Dewey claimed victory over Truman in 1948.
All the pundits were wrong. Michael Moore was prophetic, and so was Ohio.
So ends civility as America's most contentious alt right groups will be emboldened to intimidate and terrorize.
So with a Trump Presidency and a GOP dominated senate to drive it we will be up to our necks in right wing s*** for the next 4 years.
It is definitely time to put on the sackcloth, and await the time he and his minions will round up all progressive folks and banish them to the gulag in Alaska along with a free press.
Enjoy your victory, as you got what you wanted....
We had the choice between a criminal and a clown.
This is going to be really embarrassing for the USA.
We are the laughingstock of the world right now.
That is for sure, sadly.
However, I believe Trump to be more a libertarian, than a conservative.
You must have been watching Australian TV this afternoon! Yes you are.
Every election they find these caricature to lead a faster treadmill to nowhere fast.
Ronald McDonald should hand over his clown outfit to Trump and the Government should hand over the red button for him to push.
Treadmills are too insane, Bolivia was right to not trust the leaders of America who aim to steal your soul.
Sadly, the point is that we don't pay that much attention to any of your countries' internal workings. When I am presented with a news report; I sometimes laugh, sometimes cry and sometimes cringe. Australian politics has confused me, from time to time, in how backward the thinking is. But, I don't usually comment to Australians about that. It would seem rude. But, since you are laughing at us I chose to point it out.
and the far left whacked out Liberals still don't get it...which is the more embolden that are AGAINST TRUMP the Stronger the USA citizenry is becoming. wake up be a grown up and shut up HE WON he certainly is not corrupt taken money from foreign countries to line his pocket for himself and his family and has not made up lies to cover up the murders in Benghazi...u ppl are just loons. its not a far stretch that Trump voters would take up a collection to buy ONE WAY TICKETS to the Communist Country of your choice...BYE BYE
wow talk about stupid ...why in the world do u think the UK voted out of the EU? HELLO
Why do you think you UK voted to leave the EU? I'm intrigued.
Blimey guvner thats easy. The racist xenophobic unlettered commoners exerted their will.
I think you're joking from the standpoint you take on other issues, but I seriously wonder why Connor, or you, think the UK voted to leave?
Ignorance and hatred triumphs. Who would have guessed in a country like the US?
This is how the Brits are reacting:
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/inte … 1109116771
...and my New Zealand friend has just cancelled her trip to the US next year.
Can a liberal, for once, think outside of their own hatred? Do you honestly think it is the worst of the worst that the news media could find to showcase as a Trump supporter who caused this man to be elected? Joe Bob from Bumpass didn't get Trump elected any more than Tyrone from Detroit would have gotten Hillary elected had she won.
Ordinary people chose these representatives. Ordinary people who are tired of business as usual or ordinary people who couldn't stomach the idea of a vote for Hillary. You want to blame someone or something for a Trump victory? Blame the corruption within the DNC that worked so diligently against Sanders' bid for the nomination.
This is a lesson in how almost any demagogue can exploit the less educated section of a population, press the racist and xenophobic buttons, deign to show a little interest in the insecurities of the 'little' people and triumph over reason plus the real life interests of those who are targeted.
More schooling needed, lol.
And THERE is the epitome of all you have spoken in forums , all along . And so , the voice of true racism. That which you have so clearly shown here and now !
Lol, racism? I'm white, in case you didn't know. That is what is called a "quip."
Hillary lost among both uneducated white men and uneducated white women.
Oh.......... I mistook a bigot for a racist ?
Your typical incoherence still prevails, I see.
Seems to me that it is you that misunderstands Americas immigration , freedoms and liberties AND its election system. So what is it when things don't go your way , its crying time ?
Canada immigration website is shut down. They can't handle draining of the swamp load of Americans who want to escape fascism.
Running the boarder the other way now.
I am not questioning the legitimacy of the outcome. I'm sure you would be doing so right now if Hillary had won. No whining here, just me making sure you Trump voters fully own your "victory."
No whining???
" You all who chose this hideous, nasty excuse for a human being get what you deserve, but the rest of us have to endure your horrendous choice. "
"World, I apologize to you... They voted for it."
" Y'all wanted to blow up the system. Don't blame us when your dreams come true."
"No, let's place responsibility right where it lies, with those who voted for Trump. Own it, because this idiot belongs to you now."
"Yep, uneducated white folks have spoken."
"Hillary lost among both uneducated white men and uneducated white women"
Not whining?
GA
LOL, I don't categorize that as whining, but you are certainly free to judge it as such. To me, whining would be if I questioned the results. I hardly think that ensuring those who voted for Trump are taking responsibility for their vote is whining, but again, feel free to think so.
I really don't give a rat's arse. ;-)
I have to say that my happiest moment post election is when I realized I definitely am a more gracious loser than some.
So, what is a "gracious loser"? One who decides to shut up about what Donnie has said he is going to do and what he has done?
I would think you would be proud and excited to talk about all of Donnie's tremendous plans to make America great again. I mean, you voted for him so I thought you would be eager to discuss his exemplary behavior and inspirational campaign moments. He is our President-elect! Our future Commander in Chief. And your candidate. You must be on Cloud 9!
Cloud nine? Knowing I'm a more gracious loser has me giddy but not quite there. You obviously haven't paid attention to anything I've said during the course of the election. Not surprised. That's one of our problems. All anyone is concerned about is their petty projects getting funded. Everyone wants to be the entitled ones and to hell with the rest.
Oh why bother. You didn't listen then when you were so certain business as usual would continue unabated. You can't listen now because you are pouting
I'll hope for the best while you pray for the worst. And, I'll continue to hope that we can all band together to hold those now in power accountable to all of the American people and strive to do what's best for this nation.
LtL, you just don't want to see what you have done.I get it. That would be ugly. You think you voted for some grand new thing that will somehow blow up that ugly old thing we've managed to make do with since the founding of this great country of ours. Instead you voted for an uglier, nastier thing that will not only not blow up the ugly old thing, it will twist that old thing into a knot to squeeze out every last drop it can before tossing it aside.
Of course, I could be wrong and Little Donnie will be the God Thor, a savior who saves us all. What do you truly see in Donnie? He has not hidden it.
As I said from the beginning, we will see.
By the way,, I don't pray. I do.
I guess my definition of pouting is different from yours because that's a pouty post, imo.
So you won't pray for the worst but you appear to be fervently hoping for an I told you so outcome. I wish more for America than that.
No, I hope for the best. I just haven't seen a single indication that Donnie will do anything that goes against his own personal interest. But we can hope, can't we? That's all I have.
You and other Trump voters, on the other hand, have belief. You voted for him--his character, his policies, his personal views on women and people of all colors, nationalities and religions, and his promises and policies. He's your choice for president because you liked what you saw enough to cast that vote.
Donnie told you exactly what he wants to do and he demonstrated exactly what kind of person he is. You all kept saying he is real and not a phony politician. I find it fascinating that simply reiterating what Donnie has promised and done is interpreted as hoping for an I told you so outcome. You should be happy to discuss all these wonderful things, since you voted for them.
I have no complaints about the behaviour of most Trump supporters in the aftermath, though I take issue obviously with some of the analysis.
However, leaving aside the Trump supporters, what about the candidates themselves? Hillary Clinton's speech today was gracious and congratulatory, and in accordance with civilised standards of democratic behaviour. Even though she looked at times to be on the verge of tears, and has been repeatedly brutally attacked with lynch mob-like chants of 'crooked Hillary' and 'lock her up' at Trump's instigation. Obama's response has also been decent.
Can you imagine Donald ('the vote is rigged') Trump's reaction if the vote had gone the other way? Or the reaction of his more extreme supporters? Therein lies one difference between the two candidates, and one diplomatic reason why Trump is not fit to be president.
I thought Hilary's speech was gracious and surprisingly egoless . A one of a kind for her . I'm just glad this ends a criminals entire career , .........I hope.
I wish everyone would stop stating things as fact, which are unproven (ie: 'criminal'). It's beginning to sound like a worn out record. In connection with that, I wonder if Trump will now appoint that special prosecutor? I suspect that may be the second Trump pronouncement that will quickly be put to one side now the election is over (the first being that the election was rigged)
"Therein lies one difference between the two candidates, and one diplomatic reason why Trump is not fit to be president."
You mean the grumblings and extreme imagination in declaring how terrible he would have been? As opposed to no one picking on the speeches of Clinton or Obama? That difference is what makes him unfit?
No. If you look at the speeches, fact checking - including evidence from video or audio recordings anyone can access - demonstrates the inaccuracy and hyperbole in so much of what Trump said. Nothing like the same level of deceit was present in Clinton or Obama's speeches. Independent fact checkers consistently identified that to be the case. One analysis suggested 63% of Trump's statements have been untrue, compared to 14% for Clinton.
Save your breath, he has as much confidence in the fact checkers as he had for the polls. Even though describing Trump as a consummate liar is not too far from the mark.
Wow you guys !, You are totally delusional about reality
Fact is fact. You can't argue with the recorded evidence, just to suit a personal agenda. Every independent authority acknowledges that Trump consistently lied, exaggerated or misled, to a far greater extent than Clinton. To deny that is like denying that the Earth is round.
Ok, I will think so. And you do give one too, or you wouldn't be here.
GA
I dont rightly know all the reasons for it, 'ceptin some was for him an some was agin him. But it aint surprisin its still a'stingin since they took such a whoopin.
Those you consider uneducated have as much stake in this country as you do. They have a right to live, a right to dream and a right to vote. This is exactly why I could never be a democrat. If up to you guys, lesser educated Americans would lose the right to vote since for some bizarre reason an ignorant democrat thinks they know better for another person's life than they do. That pathetic mentality is what has us in the mess we are now in.
And since the inner cities usually vote democrat I think your 'uneducated' statement is pathetic. Does an uneducated person of color have more right to vote than an uneducated white person?
My, my so defensive. Just stating the facts. Of course, everyone has a right to vote. The people have spoken. Now, all of you Trump voters must sit back and watch the Idiot in Chief in action. Own it. Savor it. It's all yours.
These aren't facts. They are your opinion. Everyone I know who voted for Trump run the gamut from Masters degrees to those who simply graduated high school.
Balancing a checkbook shouldn't solely be a republican skill and wanting your government to balance theirs isn't a sign of ignorance but self preservation.
Keep in mind that they were very upset and almost in tears, because their team lost, ABC and or NBC seemed to imply that minorities werent motivated enough to get out and vote for ctooked hillary. They seemed to lay the blame at their feet last night.
Them uneducated white folks work for, get hired by, employ and drink beer right along side them folks and their families. I think DC, MSM and hollyweird got sent a message by all people of all colors
I'm not putting anyone down. Just stating the facts.
All I expect is for Trump voters to take full responsibility for electing Donnie. Some are already trying to blame everyone but the people who actually cast their votes for him.
Oh but wait , we're not done with the accountability of the Obama breakdown of America yet !
So much or the preservation of his legacy
Hilary won't be doing that for you .
I have no interest in protecting anyone's legacy. It will work itself out over time.
But you had plenty of intent in protecting the Clintons legacy ?
Still putting down Obama is what makes me sick. Democrats put up with Republicans putting down Obama for 8 years. Now we say anything against Trump and you'd think we slapped them in the face. Why are they so defensive? They can dish it out, but not take it?
Don't you think it would be more productive if we stopped whining and arguing and stand together to demand this newly elected body represent us, the American people as a whole, for a change? Set aside personal desires and find what is best for all that our collective tax dollars can reasonably sustain? And, for God's sake, stop letting politics divide us?
I guess u don't get it either the person to thank for Trumps Victory is HILLARY she is solely the only person responsible for her major loss...the only one and the poor foolish people who believed her lies and on and on and now we hear she still hasn't learned her lesson she is putting her iligit daughter out to run for Congress i wonder what her bio father thinks of this? what say u Web Hubbel
I must say Trump strategy of stacking the deck with the country's desperation and angry Americans went over the moon. Their irate and overwhelmed of the most exteme Corruption franchise Corp Government in history. Picked a strongman fascist to fight an impossible fight for them against a greedy giant that puppets all presidents anyways. If Trump dose not get himself shot like JF Kenny he is not the real deal.
This is only the people's fight, they are the only ones who can change anything. Just like every other time in human history dealing with a dark empires.
Still it will take many people's hit on the head lessons to begin to understand, . Then it will take over 100 million people to die to convince them, for all to take action.
Mark my words, all prediction have come true, just never anything near to this scale.
Did you vote for Trump? Then you and everyone else who did are responsible for his victory.
Chelsea is illegitimate? That's a new one. Where did you learn that one?
No birth certificate, no marriage license. Probably doesn't have a driver's license, either. Surely you can follow that!
I guess I'm not privy to all the best news sources.
Huh! Well, just spend more time online - you not only get all the news, you get to pick which of 5 different versions just HAS to be true.
Infowars rocks. Its also where I score my centrum.
Y'all are crackin' me up tonight. Centrum is your drug of choice, huh? Maybe if you lived in my state it would be something a bit more medicinal, like ganja.
Have you tried centrum? Knock it back with an Ensure or Chocolate Boost? I could front you some till payday. Unless its like a maybe friday later kinda deal.
I'll stick with my legal ganja. It does wonders for my election-induced anxiety.
Lol, we can use it recreationally here. No glaucoma required. But, I actually don't use it at all. I was just teasing. My husband does, though. It helps him deal with my election-induced anxiety.
its damn near common knowledge in Little Rock. I use to be a floor trader in Chicago BONDS and one of the biggest BOND traders off the floor is this guy in Little Rock who is just connected like i have never seen. He invited me down to Little Rock and while we were out for Lunch HRC was there with Web Hubbel and they were all over each other and mind u this was in the late 1980's
I saw a guy who knew a guy who did a thing so it's true.
I once occupied the same room with an airplane mechanic who worked on Elvis' private jet and he says Elvis could be alive. This was also in the eighties. True story.
Oh it was in the eighties? Well then, of course it's true! That you gives you way more credibly because it means you're old enough to know true stuff and also that you've known true stuff for, like, a really long time.
I've known true stuff for decades. I'm that old.
Lucky. I'm just a terrible millenial. I have never known anything, continue to not know anything, and am doomed to never know anything.
I've noticed you know quite a few things.
Seriously, I wish more millennials would participate within the system. They would make it work better.
Agreed, I'm not sure why so many under-30s are so comfortable letting the older generations decide the direction of the country they will inherit. Not to suggest the older generations always get it wrong. But it's like if my grandparents were building a house that they planned to give to me in the near future and they offered to let me help them build it to suit my needs and I just said "nah, can't be bothered."
Being a wise, wealthy, distinguished looking GenX thats had all the time to travel the world, Tahiti, the bank in the caymans etc is not all its cracked up to be. I mean, how does one top all that? Theres no place to go after that.
You have a FANTASTIC life, how LUCKY you are. Use your power, YOU OWN IT!
Millennials are cool.
An Old Baby Boomer Who IS Still With It (Somewhat)
Listening to Kool and the Gang Music is the Message Album on YouTube & jamming.
According to Howe and Strauss in their book, Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069, the cutoff date was 1961; however, some pundits maintain that the cutoff date is 1965. I was born in 1954.
According to Howe and Strauss, Generation X is known as the 13th Generation which was akin to the Lost Generation in the 1920s. Generation X is a sturdy, strong generation. This was the generation of the latch-key kids, the tough kids, & kids who were wise beyond their years. This generation takes no guff from anyone. Read Generations, it is a fascinating book. Generation X a/k/a the 13th Generation know how to make things work.
Once worked with a man that told me how to get rid of warts.
You cut a potato in half and rub both halves on the wart. So far I'm with him - potatoes contain acid and other chemicals. But then he continued: next, tie the potato back together with string or rubber bands and bury it under the full moon. MUST be under the full moon.
True story, and he believed it!
Oops! That category description should have been under-educated, (as in no college degree), not "uneducated." Or do both terms mean the same to you?
Fifty-nine million "uneducated" white voters, (and their ethnic counter-part I suppose)? Would that mean that all of Hillary's fifty-nine million voters were elitist?
Much is made of that "under-educated" category, but not much about what it means relative to perspective. Surely you have seen where our higher education degrees rank world wide. Surely you have seen some of those on-the-street interviews asking college students basic history and political questions. Surely you have seen the news of MBA graduates flipping burgers for a living. Tell me, Shirley, what makes that 4-year college BA-degree-in-ornithology graduate a more informed voter than the shop owner that has been in business twenty years, or the electrician that wires your house?
PrettyPanther, if I describe your response as unflatteringly haughty and condescending would you more likely peg me as college educated than if I described it as snotty BS that shows you need to be taken down a notch or two, "cause you ain't so much better than me!"?
Is that degree holding voter that voted for Hillary because she is a woman, (or a Clinton, or a Democrat), a more informed voter than the non-degree voter that didn't? Is the Socialist Left of the Democrats more informed voters because they have college degrees?
Geesh! Look at all the categories in Trump's fifty-nine million voters . That's a lot of "uneducated white men."
I think the author of a recently-linked New Yorker article accurately summed-up the real reason, (and target for your finger-pointing), for Trump's support. To paraphrase; The Democrats have over-played their hand regarding the divisive social changes they rammed down America's throat in the last eight years. Half of Americans are still digesting these changes, and Hillary promised that much and more. Half of America is choking and the Democrats answer is to promise more to come.
That is where you should be venting, even if it does take an under-educated white man to point it out to you.
GA
Hello, GA. I am aware from reading previous discussions on these forums that you find the term "uneducated" to be offensive. I agree that "undereducated" might be more descriptive. It is a fact that "undereducated" white men and white women voted for Trump in numbers higher than in any previous elections. No, they were not the sole reason for his victory. However, they were a significant reason for it.
If you think I'm haughty for stating the fact that a particular demographic preferred Trump over Hillary, then so be it. If you think I am snotty, I really don't care. I am just stating a fact. I did not add any of the other stuff you are attributing to me, apparently through some sort of mind-reading ability that enables you to see my haughty thoughts. ;-) I did not state that any one demographic is better informed than another. I merely stated that Donald can thank uneducated white men and women for propelling him to the top. I believe I replied to a quip "more schooling needed. lol" or something to that effect, so perhaps that is where you got the idea that I am being snotty. I guess I can see that, but unless you can show me that uneducated white voters are better informed than educated white voters, then I believe it is reasonable to assume that education helps one to be a better informed voter. Can you show me otherwise? If so, then I will concede that my assumption was unreasonable.
I am married to an non-college-educated white male, who chose not to vote at all for president for the first time in his life. He is quite well informed. That is anecdotal. I have not done any research to determine whether uneducated white men and women are more or less well informed than the college educated. Have you? I would be interested to know, because you seem to find it offensive to simply point out a fact about a particular demographic. Perhaps we need to dig deeper to find out why.
Sorry, I'm not cuttin' much slack today. I don't intentionally state untruths, nor do I intentionally slam entire groups of people.
Edited to add: For the last 30 years or so, I have seen a steady de-valuing of education in general and knowledge of the physical sciences, philosophy, history, and social silences in particular. I think it's time we acknowledge ignorance for what it is and stop saying it's perfectly okay for people to vote based on lack of knowledge or the inability to identify truth from BS. Again, if you can show me that under-educated white voters are just as knowledgeable as college-educated ones, I'll shut up about this. I am, at this point, making an educated assumption that having a college education makes you better at understanding issues and differentiating facts from B.S. I could be wrong, though.
Glad to see you back PrettyPanther, I know what you mean by the reasons for your absence. My participation has been down also.
I am not sure I can go with your explanation that you were just stating facts. Context is everything, (especially in text-based communications). The topic of the thread, and the content and tone of your comments, (*see "whining" post response), provided a context that read your "uneducated white men" as a denigration of that voter.
Combine that with an assertion that the term "uneducated" is a distortion of poll and study summaries that used "under-educated" and "less educated" as descriptors for their education category conclusions. Those descriptors morphed into "uneducated" in the hands of anti-Trump pundits and writers. Because I think to most folks it carries a more negative connotation. Why adopt a less accurate descriptor if not for a purpose?
Now, in one of those, "What is the first thing that pops into your mind" quiz modes;
Uneducated - What is the first thing you think of? Dumb? Good or bad?
Under-educated, or less-educated -- Not as smart? Good or bad?
Of course you know my answers to those questions - they were the examples. Were yours different?
Calling someone uneducated is not offensive to me if it is an accurate statement of fact. But when it is an inaccurate description, it is not a fact, and its use can only mean an implication was intended. Why would you knowingly use an inaccurate descriptor, with implied negative connotations, if it were not for a purpose. I don't think that reasoning is convoluted, or related to the definition of "Is." So, no, I don't think you were innocently just stating a fact.
But... the "why" question concerning education levels and voter qualifications is an interesting one. Maybe we can take a look at that, in combination with Wilderness' musings about the significance of red and blue geographical implications.
GA
I admitted that I am making an educated guess that under educated white voters are less knowledgeable about the issues than college-educated white voters. I can see where you could view that as derogatory. I admitted my terminology is not accurate. I submit to you that, unless I am wrong, it is okay to be dismissive in this case. In fact, I submit to you that it is high time we quit pussy footing around the knowledge that a very large segment of voters are unwilling or unable to discern fact from fiction and that these voters are a serious threat to our country's future. It is time we stop giving them a pass. Do you think this is an improbable guess or assumption? Based on my admittedly limited knowledge of how a college education correlates with critical thinking skills, I will bet that I am right.
In any case, whether or not you think I am a snotty elitist matters only to the extent that your inaccurate view will damage the effectiveness of our future exchanges. Yes, I am snotty toward individuals who repeatedly dip from the trough of false media even after they are shown the error of their sources. I am intentionally snotty because I have no patience for those who do not learn the simplest lessons from their mistakes when they have the intelligence and ability to do so.
Under educated white folks have a right to vote. In this election, polling has shown they are much more likely to believe certain lies that have been spread by certain false media outlets. If believing that demographic is less knowledgeable than the college educated is snotty then so be it.
I feel I have perhaps veered from the core subject but maybe it helps you understand my position.
Alright, alright, enough with this "snotty" stuff. It was used to illustrate a point, and it looks like you got the point. I don't think your use was innocent. You say yes, I say no, so let's see whether we might be in disagreement, or are just not connecting.
Your, "I can see where you could view that as derogatory. I admitted my terminology is not accurate. I submit to you that, unless I am wrong, it is okay to be dismissive in this case." looks like a good starting point.
No, it is not "...okay to be dismissive." Trump's victory should be ample evidence of that. Some of the under-educated may be more susceptible to persuasion, but couldn't the same be said for blind-loyal educated folks too? Even when they do know better? Do you think either of those groups are the majority?
Critical thinking skills? I am not convinced even a majority of college students that specifically take "Critical Thinking" course come out with those skills, much less the majority of all college students. We must have very different perceptions of the maturity and social understanding of 22 year old graduating students. But... I can see where the social structure and interactions of a college education could produce a better informed voter for some, but I don't give it as a presumption for all. A 4-year military enlistment could provide the same experiences of social structure and interactions.
In the broad sense I do agree that college educated voters are likely to be more informed voters, in general, but not to the point of invalidating or dismissing a less educated voter. To do so seems to smack of an aristocratic slant. If Joe Blow doesn't know beans about foreign affairs, but does know about life, and the required steps to get from here to there, is his vote less informed than the grad that doesn't have a clue about life, (yet), but does know how a treaty is reached?
I just don't think the education advantage is as significant as portrayed by those that latch onto the "uneducated" perspective. Especially to a degree that warrants denigration or dismissiveness[sp].
Pay no attention that it could look like I have painted myself into a corner. It is just an illusion that I am defending those uneducated voters that really do deserve the denigration of the title - because they really are knuckleheads. But I think they are the minority of the category, and not the true picture of the category. Just as I think there are knucklehead educated folks that taint their category in the same way.
GA
I'm excerpting this, because it seems to be the core of your argument: "In the broad sense I do agree that college educated voters are likely to be more informed voters, in general, but not to the point of invalidating or dismissing a less educated voter. To do so seems to smack of an aristocratic slant. If Joe Blow doesn't know beans about foreign affairs, but does know about life, and the required steps to get from here to there, is his vote less informed than the grad that doesn't have a clue about life, (yet), but does know how a treaty is reached?"
I feel that you are making my statements out to be much broader than they actually were. I do not dismiss non-college-educated voters as an entire group. If I did that, I would be dismissing my husband, who is one of the most well-informed people I know. What I am saying is this: Statistically speaking, non-college-educated voters are more likely to believe lies and less likely to be well informed. I could provide you with a bunch of links if you insist, but I think you know this based upon your comments. Examples are "Barack Obama is a Muslim" "Barack Obama supports open borders" "Hillary laughed about a 12 year old being raped" "Obama will take away our guns" "Obama has already pardoned more people than all previous presidents combined" (this was just posted here on the forums a day or two ago.)
Now, people who refuse to accept facts are people I will dismiss. However, I have never dismissed an entire group of people. Plenty of non-college-educated people do not believe any of the above lies. My husband is one. He has an inquiring mind. He reads, listens, and learns. There are people on these forums who are perfect examples of non-college educated white people who refuse to consider any fact that contradicts their firmly entrenched world view. YES, there are plenty of college-educated people who do the same thing, but statistically speaking, they are far less likely to do so. I see nothing wrong in pointing that out. Nothing at all. I also see nothing wrong in pointing out that surveys have shown approximately 40% of Trump supporters believe blacks are lazier than whites. It is simply a statistic. Based on multiple surveys, it is perfectly rational to state that a significant number of Trump supporters are racist. But, guess what? A significant number of Hillary supporters also believe blacks are lazier than whites, I think it's about 20% or so? I'd have to look it up to be sure. That's a lot. However, it is also statistically far less than Trump supporters.
Do you see what I'm saying? Merely stating the results of surveys or statistical facts is not in and of itself derogatory. If it bothers you when reporters state that uneducated (yes, I used that word again) white people favor Trump in greater numbers than in any previous election, then I think your reaction is emotional, not rational. It's okay. We all have those types of irrational reactions at one time or another.
As far as critical thinking skills, I have no proof on that one way or another. As I previously stated, it is simply an educated guess that college-educated people probably have good critical thinking skills in greater number than the non-college-educated. This does not mean I am dismissing the non-college-educated. This does not mean that there are not plenty of college-educated people who lack critical thinking skills; of course there are. But, statistically speaking, I'm willing to bet that the non-college-educated are more lacking in those skills.
Yeah, knuckleheads are everywhere in every demographic. It's just that some demographic groups contain a far greater number.
You are probably an intellectual elitist , Don't take that negatively however because we do need intellectualism in America as bad as anywhere perhaps more so ! What we do not need OR accept however is the elitist part , That which intellectual elitists always seem to assume , that which leads intellectuals to decide that they know far better what exactly is required and needed by and for the masses . The institutional elitism that leads to government service and then the dictatorship of---- " It is I , that knows better what it is that YOU need "
Why does this happen in the American government ? Because these same elitist intellectuals can't perform on their own in a competitive private economic market because of their lack of common sense , maturity and productivity .They have to go where the easy paychecks originate and they can still perform such elitism ! "Government service " Your Obamas , your Clintons , your Bloomberg's, your . And , most of them are so intellectual that they could simply never see themselves as conservative or independent , much like you , they are Too Intelligent for that !
If being a stickler for factual information makes me an elitist intellectual, then brand me with a scarlet "E."
"Why does this happen in the American government ? Because these same elitist intellectuals can't perform on their own in a competitive private economic market because of their lack of common sense , maturity and productivity .They have to go where the easy paychecks originate and they can still perform such elitism ! "Government service " Your Obamas , your Clintons , your Bloomberg's, your . And , most of them are so intellectual that they could simply never see themselves as conservative or independent , much like you , they are Too Intelligent for that !"
You say a lot of stupid things, but this one has to be in at least the top five, although it would be hard to rank them. Seriously, dude, your non-college-educatedness is showing. Look, I used a word that isn't a word. Some intellectual elitist I am! [snort]
Yes, GA, I'm being snotty and dismissive. Sometimes it is deserved.
I remember in one of our conversations it was noted that extremes or fringes, on either side, were to be considered outside the parameters of the point being discussed. Sounds applicable here, so the "snotty" concern probably isn't a point of contention.
GA
I don't know where you think education gives you a better bull$&!# sniffer than the "common man" but life and experience plays a large part of education as well. Hillary suffers from a long history of statements made in the past which she reversed in order to persuade people to vote against their own best interests. Couple that with the collusion that was exposed with regards to favoritism excluding Bernie Sanders, which he had to fight Debbie Wasserman Schultz to regain a list of the constituency he wanted to reach out to, and then hiring Wasserman on her election staff does not take a lot of education to figure out what is going on. What are we or anybody to think? Critical thinking skills will absolve all of this as we are to look to the bigger better picture in her globalist vision for the countries place in the world? Far too long have we seen the Wall Street elite buy their way through our laws and best interest for the almighty greed for the buck at the cost of the "common man" and they were her biggest fans.
There are so many who have seen their jobs overlapped by illegal immigrant labor and being told it was not fair to their families to hold them accountable. Yet find a legal citizen take any money under the table to help feed their family or pay the rent and the wrath of Hades government comes down on them like a sledge hammer.
I live in the trenches. I am an uneducated working slob with an eleventh grade education and some trade school in my background who "missed out" on those "Critical Thinking" courses you and so many others who know more than me got. I have been in the carpentry trade for 43 years and have to compete against others who will work for $10.00 an hour. What do you think that does to my bottom line?
I did not vote for Trump and I did not vote for Hillary as both were so objectionable with their lies and egotistical rants. I voted for a woman who has "critical thought" in mind and she wasn't even considered in the debates among the elites or the current political machine. But I can emphasize with those who made the choice of a horrible candidate that at least addressed some of their fears. Maybe America is the problem that the divide has to accept and work towards a solution rather than letting the elite decide for us uneducated slobs.
Well said.
Incidentally, was that woman Jill Stein?
Jill Stein has far more characters than Bozo and swinger and their fairytales.
Ron Paul was another one with good sense.
The parties don't want that, and the Corperation system will rig it for them to fail.
I only listen to these elected politician enough to know what to avoid.
I'd have voted for her too, if she had a chance of winning.
Winning wasn't an option. We all lost as a step towards change has been overlooked and more angst and rancor will abound as the Congress who would not support Trump wrestles with their new dilemma of fleecing us while appearing constructive. Very few vote their desires while settling for apathy instead.
Anecdotes do not equal statistics. Statistically speaking, the non-college-educated are more likely to believe BS. That is just a fact. Yes, there are plenty of college-educated fools and plenty of high school dropout geniuses. So what, it does not change the statistical fact.
Facts were not what was discussed with the Hillary crew as much as our being told what is good for all of us uneducated brood. Hillary turned on her charm for the cameras but could not erase the Golden Standard TPP topic which resonated so much with the Bernie crowd and then transferred to the Trump bunch. You don't need to rely on anecdotal rhetoric when you have video recorded evidence and reversals for the edification of the uneducated. Dismissing this as a mix up by the less than brainy masses as believing BS is quite disingenuous as as you state the college educated fools were all too willing to line up with the Trump BS which was more than available. Both sides were encamped in their beliefs and not open to the BS that was flying back and forth. It was already set.
You can argue all the statistical BS you want but the facts are the country in general was tired of this long campaign and the candidates and instead of choosing what was historically shady decided on something new. I was with Bernie until he bowed out and then the clowns were left.
You are so far off anything I actually said that I'm not even going to respond except to say that.
That is why your candidate lost as well. You just don't get it do you? Don't feel bad as there were many others duped by her with you.
Might want to reconsider that college kids and grads have any concept of history or facts.
https://youtu.be/yRZZpk_9k8E
Well this is a generalization. While typically less educated people are very susceptible to hyperbole generated by conspiracies & media conjectures, there are less educated people who are quite logical because they read & do research. Conversely, while more educated people do the research & use logic to ascertain the validity of their political candidates, there are other educated people who are propagandized to believe the hype, even rhetoric stated by their chosen media. Yes, it goes BOTH ways.
You're the guy who said Obama has pardoned more people than all other presidents combined, which is factually incorrect. I asked you twice where you got your misinformation and you never responded. That was my way of determining if you care about the truth and simply made a one-off mistake (none of us are perfect), or if you're one of those who carelessly promotes false information.
Do you care to fill me in on where your interest in the truth lies?
It's asinine rhetoric such as this that makes coming together as a country impossible. The 'Agree with me or you're an uneducated idiot' shtick shows the ignorance of the speaker not the group they seek to insult.
"You want to blame someone or something for a Trump victory? Blame the corruption within the DNC that worked so diligently against Sanders' bid for the nomination."
No, let's place responsibility right where it lies, with those who voted for Trump. Own it, because this idiot belongs to you now. Trump voters cannot weasel out of what they have unleashed upon the rest of us.
Had the democrats fielded a respectable candidate Trump wouldn't have had a chance. Your party is corrupt and the majority of Americans pointed this out with their vote. Until you own that you can't blame anyone.
Can a conservative ever stop labeling people who disagree with them?
I'm sorry. Was it not a liberal I was responding to? Is using the name someone has chosen to identify with 'labeling' someone or simply accepting their own assessment?
What this election has taught me is that Trump is AMERICA and AMERICA is Trump, if I can bear the winters perhaps it is time to take up the Snagglepuss line, 'exit, stage left' on to Montreal. I will watching with glaring eye and baited breath for the holocaust to come.
Better check with the Canadian authorities , After all it's only that easy to get into America , the other countries have expectations of good morals , integrity and high expectations !
You actually have to be welcomed into some countries !
Wait, wait! I can't let you leave with that bad eye and wormy breath. An eagle eye and minty bated breath will probably get you closer to your point.
GA
Take heart in the fact that those who elected him are now responsible for what happens. They'll trade it for a bunch of emails in a heartbeat.
ur thoughts are exactly what mine were when u racsists elected Barry my former HS classmate at Punahou prep school in Honolulu. now u get to live thru the crap we had to endure only difference is monetarily u will prosper just from our coat tails...lucky u
Popping in from my weeks-long hiatus to say this is a sad, ugly day in America. You all who chose this hideous, nasty excuse for a human being get what you deserve, but the rest of us have to endure your horrendous choice.
World, I apologize to you. Perhaps this presidency will blow up the U.S. as you know it and save you from the stupid Americans. We'll probably be replaced with something worse, but hey, about half of us wanted that. They voted for it.
I will apologize to the world also for the childish, melodramatic and shortsighted nature of our citizens. Your post epitomizes why I would apologize.
We shall see,won't we? I was right about GWB and Little Donnie makes Dubya look like an intellectual.and spiritual powerhouse. Y'all wanted to blow up the system. Don't blame us when your dreams come true.
Another disappointed voice of sensation heard from , Please ...........! I hope you remember these words when in a year or so when your thoughts go , "Maybe Trumps not so bad after all " happens.
what i don't get with ur processing or lack there of...is how did u get this way? there is a way to fix ur processing...enlist in the Military learn why we do what we do in the USA even when it means putting up with ppl like u and the processing that is way off...only tells me u have had a life without service to others and u haven't had to work for much its all been given to u too freely and when that happens there is always a lack of appreciation
Enlist in the military? Being in the military doesn't give everyone the keys to the kingdom. Someone high on drugs might believe such nonsense, but in the military there is the concept of "need to know". Only if an individual has a need to know can they possibly qualify for certain security clearances. And that is subject to change whenever that need to know no longer exists. I had top secret clearances for two years while working at CINCPACFLT Headquarters. That clearance was revoked once I was transferred and no longer had a "need to know".
I was privy to sensitive information that my Navy friends at Pearl Harbor had no clue about. And of course, I never talked about what I knew, as part of my job was processing sensitive documents. Consequently, in some cases I knew more about the "why of it all" than many of my friends who did not have a need to know. In other cases I was processing code that I did not understand myself. Having been inside the belly of the beast, I can tell you that after 6 years I have no appreciation for the evil that I participated in.
The fact is, I was involved in maintaining a war machine for 6 years. Not only that, but everyday we were at sea we were ordered by the Captain to throw all of our garbage into the Pacific Ocean. That included food from the mess hall, industrial waste, plastic, you name it; everything went over the fantail into the beautiful blue Pacific! And so I was also an accessory to the destruction of the environment as well. My lack of appreciation for an evil government is based on the racist Colonialist oppression of over 500 years, and my own experience of participating in a business that ultimately leads to the killing of innocent men, women, and children. The elections of Obama and Trump reveal that the Oligarchy is getting desperate, and that they are running out of distractions. It is an interesting take on the classic "good cop / bad cop" routine.
I'd agree with the obama pick, but Trump, who had everybody against him?
Unless it was the biggest con in history, and I will give it time to play out to see if that's the case. I trust nothing in the U.S. Government.
With the picks he's had so far, Trump may or may not be the puppet of the "hidden government".
If he is, then America is doomed.
If he actually tries to "drain thee swamp', then there's hope.
Because if he doesn't drain the swamp, a violent uprising will occur. And it won't be the wimpy stuff we're seeing in the streets right now. The uprising, if Trump does turn his back on his promises, will be deadly.
We live in interesting times!
Our deep divisions are as profitable as any WAR; and are no-doubt perpetuated intentionally. The chasm that exists through both America & The World is a lot more simple than most people realize. Christians & ex-Christians Prove God Exists by Debunking Salvation: Science & Spirituality Reveal the Real Jesus Christ hub.me/akagx
I'm not entirely happy that the republicans swept through both houses and took the White House. But I am happy to see Hillary booted to the curb. Can't have everything.
Say it ain't so, Panther!
The unimaginable has happened. As for the polls and pollsters, I am reminded of the scene from 'Back to the Future' where Doc Brown was wearing his tin hat in the attempt to read Marty McFly's mind, before angrily coming to the conclusion 'that this damn thing does not work at all'.
This is all one big looney toon, to the AMERICAN people I say, "always remember, you asked for it".
What, compared to Hilary the greatest liar of mankind, the woman who bleach bit her 33,000 subpoena'd emails, the woman who berated and threatened her husband's rape victims, the woman who lied to the FBI, the woman who ran a charity that stole millions of dollars from Haitians while giving the money to her daughter for a $10,000,000 dollar wedding..you mean that is your pillar of virtue..PUHLEEZEEE!
The woman who believed all those things!!! (That would be you.) I am amazed at the continual liberal-bashing in here. Are you people DEAF?!!
LIBERALS HELPED PUT YOUR GUY INTO OFFICE! Trump would NOT HAVE WON IF so many unhappy DEMOCRATS hadn't voted along with you. People were expecting Democrats for Bernie who were MAD at Hillary to 'do the right thing' after Trump started becoming more & more ridiculous - which is one of the reasons WHY everyone was so SURPRISED that he won, EVEN TRUMP!!!
The media has SPUN your mind as much as anyone else's; so STOP acting like you're all that.
I might believe that some liberals might have come to the conclusion that their concepts and perceptions were wrong, and that because of that event, they voted for Trump.
And yet, I can see socialists voting for Trump as a way to stop the criminal hillary killary clinton from getting into the White House.
If that's the case, thanks demoncraps for picking such a lousy candidate for president! Couldn't have been a poorer choice unless you picked the sex offender Weiner.
Demoncraps can, at times, be exceptionally stupid.
Have a happy day!
In four years they will turn again to Democrats to clean up their mess - again.
Yes, Trump has won despite the odds. Americans got wind of Hillary's unethical behavior & decided that she didn't have the character to be president. Well, it is QUITE a SURPRISE. I guess now some celebrities will be leaving the country. Well, BYE BYE!!!
It scary that this coarse, brutal man is the people's choice. Hillary Clinton was gracious enough to congratulate Trump on his victory. Do you think he would have done the same if Hillary won? I doubt it, he would have scurried into some corner somewhere, hurling accusations and sulking like a 2 year old.
But, the people have spoken and I will abide with their decision. But until he sends me to one of his proposed gulags, I will watch and comment on his every step.....
I admire that. I don't have it in me any more. Remember the movie Field of Dreams? The writer says "I don't have any pain left for any of you." That's me. I wrote. I shared information. I answered questions. Nothing helped.
I live in a country that could do this?
The same could be said had Hillary been elected. I wouldn't have said it, but I wouldn't have thought it odd had someone else done so.
I've posted this elsewhere, but this seems to be a pretty good spot, too:
The reason why you didn't see these protests was because the majority of people weren't nearly as concerned about Obama having a 'hateful disposition' meant to intentionally stir up hard feelings among our DIVERSE population AND the entire world. Also, he had the 'book knowledge' and some political experience to do the job. We may have elected 'someone unusual'; but we didn't elect an irresponsible, hate-mongering, spiteful jerk. Obama & Hillary have both been quite gracious losers. The other side was threatening us with GUNS if they lost!! I suppose we should all be grateful.
Hillary lost for three reasons:
1) The electorial college vs popular vote. FYI, because the GOP won BUT didn't win the popular vote means that MOST people in this country did NOT vote for their policies. Thus, the protests.
2) The majority of white Christian women for some reason obviously don't think the same way about things as other Christian women of other races. The same thing goes for men, but they have an easier time throwing the excuse of 'we're ANGRY' at the world.
3) Comey's conveniently-timed, illegal stunt that was designed to remind people of Hillary's 'badness' over The Donald's at a critical juncture AT THE END of the race.
This is why INDEPENDENTS (not 'liberals' or 'democrats') are ANGRY with the election results:
1) You vote only the way Republicans and/or your Preachers TELL you to (Franklin Graham!) - like, KEEP voting FOR rich people because THEY have the money to let us work menial jobs beneath them so they can pay us peanuts; and their money can 'trickle down' to us humble folks. (Jesus doesn't want anyone to have any money anyway, right?)
2) Vote FOR wars because we all know that whomever we are fighting are NOT Christians; and therefore we are 'on the side of God' when we go to war. Those heathens NEED to either accept JC as their savior and DO WHAT WE WANT THEM TO DO - or DIE. Its unfortunate, but NOT OUR FAULT that they will go to hell.
3) Vote FOR anyone who is Pro-Life in order to eliminate abortions in this country (no matter WHAT); because GOD is judging us for murdering babies. That's why our country is like it is; and in FACT, there is a verse in the WORD of GOD that SAYS a country will be judged for this crime! It AMAZES me how much they completely ignore trying to fix the REASONS WHY women choose abortion & attempting to fix them. It should also be noted that CHRISTIAN WOMEN are the ones who acquire the MOST abortions in this country (seach for my hub question titled, Why do Christian women utilize the 'sin' of abortion the most). There are statistics.
4) They are so damn scared of HELPING each other out through what they consider to be 'socialism' - its ridiculous! What a bunch of SELFISH, UNLOVING, HATEFUL brats. Sorry, LOVE is not a word that comes to mind.
Jesus Christ was at least a semi-Socialist:
Matt 25: "For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."
Matthew 5 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others?"
If you are a Christian and HATE me for saying any of this - do a heart check. I know, it doesn't usually help you because you're all always so damn RIGHT. But every once in a while it does WONDERS. I know, because I am someone who managed to realize how mind-controlling that religion IS and squirmed my way OUT. Christians have absolutely NO IDEA what it means to actually be FREE - although they sure believe they are. Its HARD to admit that the big eye controls YOU.
Our deep divisions are as profitable as any war; and are very possibly perpetuated intentionally. It is always the SAME government in that office - just varying shades of who cares about the people who live here. The chasm that exists through both America & The World is a lot more simple than most people realize. SEARCH for - Christians & ex-Christians Prove God Exists by Debunking Salvation: Science & Spirituality Reveal the Real Jesus Christ
Really... Am I the only one who has any respect for McCain as a Veteran? I might have voted for him instead of Obama if he has not picked scary-as-trump Palin as his VP.
Right, this last one isn't a donald quote; but still profoundly true all the same.
And I responded to this when you first posted it on the Dangerous Liberals thread. I'm not in the habit of posting the same thing in multiple spots. It seems like spam, to me.
Yeah, I just respond to you over there. I could protest in other ways besides spamming - but I'd rather have an intelligent response returned.
The reason why you didn't see these protests was because the majority of people weren't nearly as concerned about Obama having a 'hateful disposition' meant to intentionally stir up hard feelings among our DIVERSE population AND the entire world. Also, he had the 'book knowledge' and some political experience to do the job. We may have elected 'someone unusual'; but we didn't elect an irresponsible, hate-mongering, spiteful jerk. Obama & Hillary have both been quite gracious losers. The other side was threatening us with GUNS if they lost!! I suppose we should all be grateful.
Hillary lost for three reasons:
1) The electorial college vs popular vote. FYI, because the GOP won BUT didn't win the popular vote means that MOST people in this country did NOT vote for their policies. Thus, the protests.
2) The majority of white Christian women for some reason obviously don't think the same way about things as other Christian women of other races. The same thing goes for men, but they have an easier time throwing the excuse of 'we're ANGRY' at the world.
3) Comey's conveniently-timed, illegal stunt that was designed to remind people of Hillary's 'badness' over The Donald's at a critical juncture AT THE END of the race.
Our deep divisions are as profitable as any war; and are very possibly perpetuated intentionally. It is always the SAME government in that office - just varying shades of who cares about the people who live here. The chasm that exists through both America & The World is a lot more simple than most people realize. SEARCH for - Christians & ex-Christians Prove God Exists by Debunking Salvation: Science & Spirituality Reveal the Real Jesus Christ
Now you are spamming. If you can't respond to me in the other thread do you honestly think posting the same misinterpretation of events over and over will somehow make your point more credible?
I didn't realize that you had REALLY responded over there; so here is my response here, too:
Right, sorry - my apologies, this was stuffed among all the others and I missed it. Stupid me!
Yes, tensions were high throughout the election - and believe it or NOT, people like me were waiting with anticipation (not hate) for the results; FULLY INTENDING on accepting the outcome - until we discovered WHY so many people voted the way they did (ie. white - especially Christian - women & men vs other races). Christian men have an easier time blending in with all the rest of the angry white men who voted; while the split between women is much more evident. Again, why do white Christian women vote so differently than Christian women from other races who have every reason to be at least as angry? The same question goes to white Christian men.
Comey & The Hatch Act: "The rules are violated if it is obvious that the official's actions could influence the election, there is no other good reason for taking those actions, and the official is acting under pressure from persons who obviously do want to influence the election."
Things would have been different surrounding that issue if 1) his original 'announcement' hadn't been so intentionally-criptic & vague; when LATER 2) it took them mere DAYS to go through those 'potentially-incriminating' emails to clear her; when they COULD have done that BEFORE they made any announcements. You don't think that is suspicious, at all?
Voting for Rich: FYI, one of the basic beliefs of the Republican Party is to buff up the rich to let money trickle down to the middle class & poor. It has ALWAYS been part of their platform; and it is also why Christians in those classes vote for them.
"I'm pro choice. I'll be honest. I don't think Drumpf gave a rat's behind about the subject until it came up in the election process. You noticed how he kept changing his stance? He didn't care and had never really thought about it. And, I don't think he will care as president. It's none of his business anyway."
That is one of my points: Republicans use the issue of abortion to manipulate the hearts & minds of good Christian women who simply CANNOT vote for the opposing party who they see as being FOR murdering babies. And as you just indicated, that is exactly what they did. HOWEVER, the concerning thing is that the topics of both immigration & abortion are two things that he can take action on quickly enough when he gets in there. They are two of the things he can carry through on almost immediately to make it appear that he is carrying out the wishes of 'his people'. Christians are actually VERY OPTIMISTIC that abortion will be overturned.
I disagree on the helping out programs, obviously. As many decent people use them as a temporary thing between life situations, as you view lazy people. Certainly there are room for improvements; and we can only improve things by continuing to work on them - not kicking them to the curb.
"The Republican party knows now that they do not speak to the people on issues we care about." I don't know what world you live in; but in case you haven't noticed - their entire platform is based on p*ssing on as many things Obama accomplished over the past eight years as they can; AND they obviously could care LESS about the fact that they did not receive the popular vote.
Thanks for finally replying with a response other than 'you're stupid'. Honestly, the only reason I say it to begin with; is because I keep hearing similar crap from Trumpsters while NOT getting a decent response. Thank you!
I'm going to be honest here. I've never seen anyone post the same thing in multiple threads. It's a little odd. I'm only responding here. And since you did call yourself smart I assume that implies that you think others are less bright, which could also mean stupid. Comments like that do tend to help escalate tensions. I don't recall ever calling you stupid but if I did it would probably be due to your caustic comments.
Now. That out of the way. I do think those on the left lean too heavily on polls whose results bolster their beliefs. No one can know what ultimately motivated any one individual to vote a certain way and poll questions can easily be designed to create a false impression. Not to mention there are a lot of people like me who,.when in the position to answer polls, throw out crazy responses for the fun of it.
I would think the outcome of this election might help you see that polls are not necessarily right. Not to mention the fact that to have such a negative opinion of other Americans pretty much plays into the hands of those whose best interests are served by keeping us firmly divided.
You have gone a step beyond the line by saying what Comey did was illegal. I've heard officials call it ill advised and irresponsible. I haven't seen where anyone deemed it illegal. If they have, if you can point me to the source I'd appreciate it.
I will reiterate. It was all rather squirrelly but I do believe if given the benefit of the doubt one can see how Comey could have felt caught between a rock and a hard place. Either way he went could easily result in the perception that he favored one candidate over the other. I think, when all was said and done it benefited Hillary. She was cleared, prior to election day, and I was left with the impression that it looked as if she had been wronged. Were I a Hillary supporter it would have galvanized me to vote, if I had been lukewarm about the process prior to that.
I think you are too hung up on the Christian label. I agree with you that trickle down economics is appealing to some. They just hope to one day be the ones trickling stuff down to the rest of us. It isn't a tenet of the Christian faith (that I'm aware of) so blaming it on their Christianity comes off odd.
Trump can't act quickly on abortion. He can certainly nominate someone to fill the empty seat but when that seat was filled by a conservative Roe v Wade wasn't overturned. I'm not saying there isn't reason for pro choice advocates to be concerned but it's a women's issue and I cannot put my desires for women to have the right to make their own choices above the needs of the nation on all other matters. If overturned (which I find unlikely) that will be challenged again and again and again until our right to make our own choices for our bodies and lives are restored.
I haven't said anyone was lazy concerning use of social programs. I have advised people in need of help to stop being embarrassed about getting it. That is what it is there for. But there is a segment of our population who have been marginalized by these programs. I read an article once which made a strong argument to the effect that it is a form of slavery in that we provide a small living without expecting any attempt to rise above it. These people become part of the system, vote for the continuation of the system, and do nothing to question the system.
I'm not implying that there aren't many people who would always be in need of help but we do our fellow citizens a disservice by not expecting them to be productive when they are capable of being so.
As to Republicans wanting to tear down what a democrat has done. So what? That is the give and take of a two party system. It is nothing new. Both sides have done it over the years.
And I will say again. I don't remember calling you stupid although I'm pretty sure you have said it to me.
i think we need to get an amazing rally to escort these Babs like celebs going to Canada wave good by to them from their private jets. I wonder if they know the weather in Canada is not like Malibu or Santa Barbara Beverly Hills or Santa Monica? and forget Palm Springs there isn't any place in Canada like PS Ca. and if they were to try to sneek back in to the USA it would be big news given they'd have to admit their far left whacked Lib mindset was and is all WRONG hopefully we can buy their properties up for sale at bargain prices
I wonder if you've noticed that Republican disdain for Hollyweird celebrities disappears when they stick an "R" beside their name and run for office? Trump, Reagan, Schwarzenegger, Thompson, Bono, the list goes on. We've got lonely Al Franken. I think we should run Will Smith next time. Y'all will probably vote for him because he saved the planet from aliens on Independence Day.
By the way, we're still waiting for O'reilly and Limpbaugh to leave. They said they would years ago.
Isn't this so true of politicians?
But, it's more fun pointing this towards hillary killary and her sex addict husband.
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
Cheers
That is the funniest poster I've seen on these forums thus far.
Happy to bring a laugh to ya!
Really, in 10 years, what we say here, is it really going to matter?
Cheers
It may. The contentious nature of the exchanges may cause greater division in our country. Simply because only a few may read a particular post doesn't negate the fact that the attitude created by it will send ripples out with everyone who reacted to it.
LOL. And I was thinking last night (as I stood in shock) that all of the conspiracy theories I feared about no way in hell would they let himtake the election were untrue.
Forget the sack cloth. There are no trains set up to take anyone to Alaska. There is good and bad in everything. We'll find the good in this.
I don't know, you and so many of the other conservative posters here kept saying that relative to Clinton, Trump was politically harmless.
While he may come off as a ham handed ogre, he has the rocket fuel of a GOP Senate and House, so the barbarians are not just at the gate, but have stormed and broken through.
He will need to add 'rug doctor' to his list of appointees.
Then we need to stand together as a nation and demand they hear us. Demand they accept the real reason for this upset. That they are not paying attention to the needs of the whole nation. That we are demanding they now do.
We are not so far apart as so many want to believe.
so u'd rather have 4 yrs of criminal investigations going on starting 1-20-17 if HRC was elected? and it would not just be her its a long list of criminal actions by those around her.be grateful she was not elected. be grateful that ur 401K has already blossomed be grateful of the new era of BOOM employment the massive infrastructure that is going to take place my gawd wake up
Credence -What a sad response , What about of the positive reactions to change . In 2008 you voted for hope and change , in 2012 you did the same . The difference is simple -change did not happen . Hope - you must admit never materialized .
But the right in America sucked it up took a deep breath and took their savings out of the bank and paid their bills with their 401's depleted their reserves of hope while being laid off again , they remortgaged their houses to pay for the Obama-care , now drop it for too high premiums and deductibles and pay the penalty ! We've watched as" the pay for play " of not just Hilary but the ENTIRE CONGRESS AND SENATE play . We've watched as Obama pi$$ed all over America's heritage , it's military , it's constitution .
Credence - This is not a victory for the others but for all of us . For once the workingman and woman spoke clearly , not wall street, not foreign powers , not another culture , let us have our run ! If then it doesn't play out , we can then go back to the "Hope and Change " of the left . All that the left has to do right now is look beyond the bogus claims and phony election dialog and watch for a new reality .
I think you will see a healing attitude from Trump. That is change enough isn't it ?
Now it is not hope and change, but fear and dread.
This is a victory for you and your sort. I have to abide with it as part of the Democratic system, that is lot more than the 'righties' would do. I have no choice but to go along, but you can count on the fact that if he gives in to his authoritarian leanings, or otherwise gets out of line while in Washington, I will be all over him like a cheap suit and honeymoon for him will be brief before he sends me and outspoken others to his proposed gulag.
One good thing about it though , There will finally be a separation between the Clinton Foundation and the government offices and influence that you supported !
Trump will create his own new and illicit associations....
Well two wrongs won't make it right. From an extreme conservative, get rid of all Feds.
Trump has a longer list of personal revenges than maggots eating at civil war times. How can Trump give sound support to Zionist Israel projects in the middle East and Zionist at a 100%. When pretent to have the energy to go after Zionist bankers like Rothschild own 500 trillion dollars and the Zionist Rockefeller own oil.
How is any of this possible me to take down these Globalists when Trump himself is the most emtreme Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Plus the whole US Government (in disguise) has not the time, ethics and money to do a stronger investigation into bankers.
Good God. You guys on the far sides are so very ridiculously melodramatic. It isn't righties that put this guy in and it isn't righties he has to account to for this victory. I can assure you that authoritarian leanings and your imagined gulag will be met with more resistance than you on the left can muster.
I certainly hope for the sake of many that you are right. But, I will be sleeping with one eye open waiting for his trucks to collect all the 'undesirables'.
Well, this unfounded concern is better than if Hillary had been elected and the actual tax payers awaited being told we'd foot the bill for 10-15 more programs.
Don't feel so bad, look at the participants. America had a total chance to get it wrong. The working class finally found someone who spoke to them. Who responded to their loss of good paying jobs plight and was not establishment politics as usual. It really surprised me as I thought the fight had been stomped out of the working class. The millennials were the up and coming votes for ignore others and vote for what you can get for little effort. The real fight will be between Trump and Congress. He needs the tried and true GOP to go along with his more libertarian ideas and by the way kiss and make up to Paul Ryan in the process.
What fight? It is a just a disagreement among friends, Congress is totally GOP. So all we have to look forward to is 4 years of right wing bulls*** .
Just as Hillary made up a lot of promises in her bid for the White House,Trump made his. What will he choose to expand and pursue? He came from a single payer opinion in the past and Congress wants to kill everything that is a health care alternative to the ACA. They have since the nineties. What Trump will run into is tantamount to herding cats. This will make great "must see TV" by the time the media spins it up. This was almost like watching Survivor with the whole country getting blindsided by the press at Tribal Council. Stay tuned.
Not quite sure what they wanted - other than the removal of Hillary Clinton - but I think nobody knows what they're going to get, Credence. Or whether they'll want it when they get it..
That's politics in America. We voted in Obama and found ourselves severely disappointed so Trump, if a disappointment, will simply carry on that legacy.
Here's the thing. Trump made very clear what kind of person he is, what his views are, and what he wants to do if elected. Trump voters knew exactly who and what they voted for. They cannot claim ignorance and they cannot claim that they were duped.
Let me explain , Washington has stopped working ! We want a move away from politics as usual and a return to a people powered republic-democracy , Washington is mired down in ideological rhetoric , in legislative constipation if you will. It's ideological divide has mired progress down to a halt ! Nothing positive comes from our "leadership " ,nothing of action in progressing ANY ability to help economics , to improve education , to empower minorities , to advance the job market , to stop the exploitation of the American economics abroad, to stop the erosion of our constitutional rights , The cost of government has grown increasingly high compared to what it delivers in the promise of the founding fathers. Freedom, education , liberty , the protection of our borders ,
Nothing WITHIN party politics has moved or improved in Washington for years , So , the American people have chosen someone from OUTSIDE of Washington .
Win or lose - success or failure ,it's that simple !
Get used to it .
And Trump is going to fix all of this? Someone had it right, Ronald McDonald should pass his clown outfit to Trump. The so called liberal media, if they have the courage of their convictions, should continually hold Trumps feet to the fire before he has them charged for either libel or treason, and otherwise silenced.
Kind of like this intimidation at a peaceful protest, under Obama?
I listen to what I have found out to be a liberal station. They silenced any voices which might have had something positive to say about Trump.
I am getting tired of the double standards here. The guy won against the wishes of the Washington elite, against the wishes of both political machines and in the face of a very liberal media. I find it increasingly hilarious that the left has used every dirty trick in the book and now are accusing Trump, even before he takes office, of doing likewise.
Let's give the guy a break, and a chance.
Don't fret Credence , the liberal media will continue the critique of the Trump presidency like never before . 99 % pure bias is always going to be 99% pure bias, perhaps with one percent B.S. . I know one thing for sure , leftist ideology is permanent , Of course YOUR media is in your pocket ! ....While conservative America had to run on pure truth and conviction among the voters without the benefit of fair media .
That won't be forgotten soon.
I don't know about that truth and conviction rubbish. And yes, there will be plenty of liberal media watching and critiquing Trump every move. I would not have it any other way. If he is the supposed Mesiah, he should not be afraid of the scrutiny? He might consider it blasphemy.
Who the f**k ever called the guy the Mesiah?
Are you all so irrational that you can't stay within the parameters of reason? Does grief strike you such? It doesn't have the same effect on me. Had Hillary won I doubt I'd have made one bitchy complaint about her. It would be 'Oh. OK. Let's see what happens.'
As to the liberal media watching Trump like a hawk...how is that any different from yesterday?
Um, on these forums, he has been called a "Savior." He has been pictured as the God, "Thor." Did you not notice these things?
Savior doesn't have to have religious connotations although I think savior is quite the stretch. The Thor thing. Whew that was pretty weird.
He might (fix it). Probably not, but he might.
But there is exactly zero chance that Clinton would have - on the contrary she would have made it as much worse as she could. It is the "progressive" platform, after all - to "progress" towards ever greater government that operates FOR the government and not the people.
While he attempts to ban opposition media for not fawning over him, the old adage applies, be careful what you wish for, you might get it!
He has shown himself as petty and vindictive, a trait that is inconsistent with access to the nuclear launch codes, and those two snotty nosed sons with the Dracula hairstyles will be insufferable.
We live in a global village, and change in direction of this magnitude here is going to affect the globe. For us, it is be afraid, be very afraid. Michael Moore, media personality, has said that the BREXIT thing may well have international ramifications. It is just that nobody wanted believe it.
There is absolutely no reason to eat any crow. We can't control angry minds, we can only respond to them. And thankfully, most of us non-conservatives aren't nearly as fond of Guns. That could very well be why 'God' allowed Trump to win; cuz his conservative fanatics wouldn't have been able to handle a different outcome, LoL!).
I have personally found a new way to constructively-vent my concerns over this election, and have every intention of continuing: by plastering a short link to my spotlight article at the end of every 'hot' political news story for about an hour every morning & evening, with this message:
The deep divide that exists down the center of both America & The World is a lot more simple than most people realize. Its time to wake up and get things into perspective. SEARCH - Christians & ex-Christians Prove God Exists by Debunking Salvation: Science & Spirituality Reveal the Real Jesus Christ
I've had a HUGE spike in curiosity!
We ALL have complaints about this election; but the truth is... America is obviously VERY divided, and Trump was finally able to pop the angry whitehead, ha! Democrats were divided from the beginning, which helped Trump a LOT. (Sorry, conservatives really should stop trying to take so much credit).
Watch what happens next election and over the next four years. Those will be more revealing about us 'as a whole' than this election. Trump will either be 'the vessel' that we needed to help navigate us into a better world; OR we will discover he brings 'negative contrast' that we don't want - and we can then 'steer' our way toward another, potentially-better option.
Congratulations, Trumpsters! You've demonstrated Democracy in action; and this will probably be THE GOP'S LAST CHANCE to FORCE erroneous conservative beliefs down the country's throat. Conservative worries & concerns are not why Trump is headed toward that office, now. He did use their sensitive, angry hearts, however. And that is MY biggest complaint against him.
Trump would not have won if he had not hijacked the GOP, giving good Christian folks who are embedded into that party - NO other option. Good girls simply CAN'T vote for someone who is 'for abortion' as most of them view Dems to be.
MC, I refer to eating crow for the reason of why I and so many of the tea leaf people could have been SO wrong in predicting the actual outcome. I was more against Trump than I was for Clinton, but I expected her to win. We all did, talk about Blind sighting..
This is the rise of the dark forces, as in the Empire Strikes Back. Thor and his golden hammer goes down on our heads.
This was time for the anti-establishment candidate and our side did not pay attention, as HC was the very contradiction of that ideal. The DNC machine is responsible for this tsunami known as Donald J. Trump, the anointed one. A man elected to the highest office in the land as coarse and vulgar as any since Lyndon Johnson. But he makes LBJ look like an alter boy in comparison.
Trump is camera shy and will do his dirty deeds through his henchmen, with the press disinvited. We are in trouble now that Trump will pack the court with sclorotic rightwingers, and is of the same party as both that dominating both branches of congress.
We must organize, peacefully protest, and expose to the world his daily activities, making sure that he is never allowed to not be on the front page, front and center.While so many right wing types say that foreign opinion is irrelevant, they do care because the AMERICAN ideal is a product that is sold, like everything else. Hypocrisy can be exploited by our foes and chastised by our friends and allies. That can't play well indefinitely.
Trump may well be the wake up call the progressive community needs, the kick in the pants to avoid complacency, not listening and taking the electorate for granted. It was easy to do that with someone as vile as Trump, but as we saw last Tuesday....
First, Trump will purge those in the GOP that was disloyal and there will be a bloodletting, with the repentant ones begging the Messiah for mercy.
The GOP will take advantage of this situation to shut down the progressive agenda permanently. All the proposed court appointments will pack the court with conservatives, doubling down on the formaldehyde to extend the viability of the rotting corpse known as the old guard that cling to the GOP, for an additional season or two. So, strap on your whalebone corset for that blast to the past, the ride of your life. They will allow states to ratchet up on voter suppression making sure that the phenomena known as Obama will never happen again. Eveyone from the eternal bird brain, Sarah Palin, to the arrogant and pompous frog mouth, Newt Gingrich, will be his closest advisors and considered Cabinet material. Yes, Virginia, we are in trouble.
Relax, there are plenty of other possiblities now that we know more about how & why the majority of people voted (or didn't vote) the way they did. It helps, because it lets us know where we need support as a country. Trump IS a wake-up call - he'll either become the vessel 'we the people' believe he is to navigate us into a better world; or he will crash & burn, miserably - seriously damaging the GOP, politics and our country further, in the process.
Trump is the deciding factor on whether or not the GOP will ever be taken seriously ever again. I think we can afford to give them one last chance.
I'm an old liberal and I've lived in the South all my life. I'm dismayed but not totally surprised by Trump's win. I've always seen the racism and bigotry that he made palatable to a large segment of our population. I take heart in a couple of things: he didn't win the popular vote and demographics in this country are changing.
As progressive we need to organize and be active in the political process on a local, state, and national level. And all of us need to learn to be more civil in our discussions. I feel angry toward Trump supporters and would like to lash out at them, if not with blows, at least with words. But they're my neighbors, my friends, my family. So instead I think I'll get to work.
I'm an old conservative that lives in the south. Although I do not understand those that would ever support hillary, I would never want to "lash out at them, if not with blows". As far as racism and bigotry painted on the back of a large segment of the population, I wouldnt know. I'm white, I guess and all my actual friends are actually different races or mixed.
Agreed, we need to keep the public spotlight on Trump so that his every move is subject to analysis by the journalists and those that did not vote for him.
As I say, don't get mad, get even. The man is a ham handed clod, he will get out of line soon enough. We will be prepared to help focus the world's cameras on the United States and its leadership when he does.
Not my monkey. Not my responsibility.
Where were the 80 million registered voters who didn't vote? Hiding under a rock probably.
Well, that's not a very enlightened statement, is it? "Not my monkey. Not my responsibility." When all humans realize that they HELP CREATE this crazy reality, we'll start accomplishing something.
Even monkeys unionized and stop working picking fruit in Indonesia. They demanded more food for themselves before they starting to work again.
Personally I would not hire them.
It is just funny how they are biologically 99℅ like us. It natural you can't work right a
or enjoy it when your over worked and under feed.
I'm afraid I can't blame them much. Given the options it was impossible to completely want either of them. I think most voted against one or the other but I can certainly understand a feeling of not wanting either and throwing up your hands in disgust.
Here's where I struggle with this:
Pick a third party. Don't people hate the two party system? How is that going to change if people decide not to vote at all if they don't like either of the two parties? Seems counterintuitive. Everyone individually probably thinks "my vote for anyone else doesn't matter" but when you have 80 million people saying that it makes no sense. Those people could have mattered.
I know people also like to moan that a third party vote is "wasted" but that's ridiculousness. If you can't stomach a vote for someone then don't vote for them. But surely people can find a platform that at least somewhat speaks to them, a place to put their vote for someone/something that stands for what's important to them in even the tiniest way. I've voted third party here before. Did my party get elected? Not even close. Did I feel bad about placing a vote with a party whose platform I related to most? Not even close. A tiny voice is still a voice, and all of our collective decisions are just a bunch of tiny voices speaking together.
It's everyone's right to not vote but I have trouble understanding it. Like damn, I think I might even get those people who wrote in votes for Harambe more than the people who didn't vote at all.
Well I saw huge problems in both candidates but I voted anyway. Not for a third party because that is as effective as not voting at all. I would love for this election to be the impetus for a strong third party to arise. Middle ground.A platform which represents those who have become the independents. We are, truly, the majority which always must compromise our beliefs when choosing a party to support.
Spurs Coach Greg Popovich said, " just sick to my stomach because of the disgusting tenor and tone and all of the comments that have been xenophobic, homophobic, racist, misogynistic,” and that the scariest part was living in a “country where half of the people ignored all of that to elect someone.”
Just like I have maintained all along, a great many Americans possess a low IQ, and are either racist or indifferent to the plight of minorities. Same as it ever was! If not for the biological weapon of Small Pox used against my people, the evil Colonizers, rapists, murderers, and thieves would have never gained a foothold on this continent. And just as I have also maintained, many Christians in the U.S. are flaming hypocrites. It was Donald Trumps racism that appealed most to white voters and those pretending Jesus. And the greedy women and people of color who voted for Trump apparently ignored the racism and misogyny with the hope that his wealth would rub off on them. That equals low IQ ... which equals stupid.
Instead of voting for the lesser of two evils the American people could have boycotted the entire election process. That is what a whelming intelligent populace would have done. But we don't have that here, as the intelligent people are greatly outnumbered by the ignorant and the greedy. The election of Donald Trump is empirical evidence that my assessment of the American mainstream has consistently been spot on. And his election makes it impossible for anyone to raise an argument to the contrary.
Many of those intelligent Americans famous national treasures are leaving to live in other countries. Many Republican on threads here like to rub that in and help tbem pack their bags. Have not seen this much great divide since GW Bush. How long can each president keep getting much worst, before everything collapses?
Wow. Way to ignore everything you chose to in order to unfairly criticize. First we'll have to see who is leaving and who is simply expressing sour grapes.
I f**king knew it. For those of you who might remember, I said this in another forum thread a while back that I predicted Trump was going to win the election. Granted, I did start to have doubts about that considering how blatantly obvious the media and the establishment was trying to rig the election in Hilary's favor. But the fact that Trump won doesn't really surprise me. Hilary has too many scandals around her to be the least bit likable.
And considering she's been part of the establishment for years, she was too big of a target for Trump. If you guys watched the debates, it's kind of obvious that Trump's debate style was persuasive, and he's great at dishing out insults to people. Hilary and Bill were tailored made opponents for him. The only real presidential candidate that could've beaten Trump was Bernie Sanders.
If Bernie would've gotten the nomination from the democrats like he should've, then Trump never would've had a chance in hell of beating him. Seriously, Bernie has a squeaky clean record, so Trump wouldn't have anything to really attack him on other than he's a socialist, which doesn't matter because Bernie admits to that openly anyway.
Plus, anytime Trump would've lost a debate to Sanders, he wouldn't be able to cry to the media or social media claiming how he actually won, and how the establishment favors bernie because bernie is a political outsider too, so Trump wouldn't have been able to get away with that s***. With Hilary Clinton? Oh you bet your a** he got away with it. Now, I weep for future generations.
Thank god David Dukes lost his bid for the senate office in Louisiana at least...otherwise I probably would've ended up killing myself tonight, but thank god that didn't happen at least.....
One thing , learn your history - David Duke has lost many times , including running for president ! And Bernie -----If you knew him like we do in Vermont where he is a senator - You would know a true rhetorical ,socialist wanna-be who has absolutely O legislative accomplishment !
A politicians would not be worth dying over. If you don't like the nuclear weather, move.
You can't believe what Trump says, he said is 100% behind Israel then says he is against bankers and Globalists. What a line of ultimate pure PHD BS that he Sold to so many US CITIZENS (not true Americans). Trump sold you into US Corporatism servants and slaves. He is a snake, back door politician, if anyone believe all the things he is saying he is going to do, you live among the funny pages. Like a Walmart happy face, yet sad in the insides.
" Not True Americans"............I suggest you might be right but what you perceive as true Americans , is extremely twisted , And , your particular living and political situation reflects that perfectly . I believe those who hold opinions like yours are selfish , bigoted , biased and bent into your own sense of political ideology by arrogance .
1 I do have a little ego about of world class road record in sports and arts. In What
is Trump's world class status, desides aroggrant of calling himself a winner all the time and putting down most all others.
2 . The only thing I'm bigotry of is the take over of Globalists Corporatism, Religion can not sucker me into anything, where they can.
Trump is worldclass at something, the greatest two face liar, Hippocratically about Corporatism.
3. Not selfish, self serve first yes, in order to serve humanity best. I sacrifice much of my art work to build natural self substainable tiny house communities that 90% of people can afford vs most people who can not afford a house. Trump dose not give 2 sh_ts about natural environment. The greatest threat to humanity.
4. I'm political bent and bias about Politics. I love fairytales, just not the US Corporatism federal kind that dose more harm than good.
We are not off the hook yet, in deference to the KKK and Aryan Nations, Trump might reward DAVID Duke with a Cabinet Post, head of INS, perhaps.
He will fill a termite infested cabinet with likes of Juliani, Gingrich, Ann Coulter, and of course, that sage of the age, Sarah Palin.
Who do I blame for the upcoming 4 years of darkness that is to befall us.
you are right and I have warned Progressives about the danger of a Trump victory when first of all not testing the winds selecting Clinton over Sanders
Second, Clinton spent too much of her candidacy keeping the skeletons in her own closets from tumbling to the floor each time the door was opened.
Third, her Veep choice was unwise and uninspired, she ignored the element of excitement and popular support generated from the Sanders run. Liz Warren as VP, for example, would at least allow Sandinistas a sense that Hillary wasn't turning a tin ear to their concerns.
This was her election to lose and somehow she managed it.
I agree with everything you just said. Although we have to give credit where credit is due. Trump ran a great campaign. Not supporting the guy, but we have to be honest about that. I don't know who is campaign manager was, but whoever it is deserves a raise. Hell, if I'm Trump, I'm buying that person christmas presents this year, as whoever managed his campaign did a helluva a job.
That person was Kelly Anne Conway - By the way if liberals really care about progress and " Glass Ceilings " - The first woman to ever run a successful presidential campaign !
Talk about Brilliance - I hope she remains in the cabinet .
Kellyanne Conway is good at her job. I just hope she is able to sleep at night.
Wow , Have you all read this ? A liberal woman congratulating a conservative woman for her accomplishments , without the usual partisan demonizing of them ? You had better be careful , the left might send you back to socialist repatriation camp.
I am not a socialist, for about the thousandth time. I know you like to categorize me to fit in your pretty little box so you don't have to actually think about what I say here, but that doesn't mean I don't see right through it. Sadly, so do others, but you seem to be blissfully unaware of your ridiculous stereotyping based on an appallingly large amount of false and imagined information.
Who knows, the GOPmay have been playing all of us with the Good cop-bad cop routine, as if there were really a difference in mainstream Republicans and the Trump faction. Trump, not only earns an EMMY for his performance, but has won the Presidency.
yes isn't odd that the Libs who loved the corruption of HRC wanted it to continue in general corruption always has a price in the USA this corruption cost the poor and the uneducated to keep them that way. a good percentage of Blacks finally saw thru this corruption and how they have paid for Dem corruption. and the bigger problem is how Black celebs for the most part signed up for more of the same corruption. shame on Whoopi Goldberg and high end sports celebs Jon BonJovi and the idiot in chief Bruce Spingsteen. whatever the tax increase HRC would have made it would not bother these high end celebs all it does for them is to ease their guilt ridden conscience. Ppl need jobs not hand outs and Thank God this last second abortion is out the window killing a baby cuz it may be inconvenient that is corrupt and EVIL my best advice to all these far left whacked out Liberals find the following YOUR CONSCIENCE Your Character and find Courage to fight to be Morally in tune with your Creator
Perhaps what caught my attention the most in this election was the massive difference between metropolitan and rural areas.
Whether the state went blue or red, when the state itself was looked at and separated into counties, there is a mass of red with a few blue counties in metropolitan areas. Whether New York or Virginia, Pennsylvania or Texas, the state is a sea of red surrounding metropolitan areas. Even California, with it's massive cities and liberal bias, followed the trend with rural areas going red.
Was that Clinton's real problem? That Democrats (and Republicans as well, for that matter) have ignored the blue collar workers and producers that built this country for the ivory towers in the big cities while Trump spoke to them? That the farmers, the workers building your home, those that dirty their hands and break their backs have been ignored for years?
It cannot be more clear that that is what carried Donald Trump to the presidency - will our masters in the swamp learn anything from this election?
I think the swamp masters had better learn something from the American voices , sadly , I see that that map with the over-lay of the map of America from space at night , shows me there are huge gaps between population centers , inner city dwellers and rural America .
I don't see it sad at all, that there is a big space between population centers. If you pack rats in their cage too tightly they go mad and destroy each other. Likely would vote Democratic if they could!
Just put tag team pro wrestlers politician in a ring and watch them tear US apart. Look at most top US entertainment movies where people are tearing each other up physically.
You look at geography, but progressives win based on population, several rural counties cannot have the pull of one LA county. The will of the people is based upon numbers, not geography.
And the will of the people was Trump this time. More numbers.
But I DO find it interesting - that the liberal vote is so highly concentrated in the rat races of cities rather in the working people that grew this country into the greatest on earth. Just seems like there is some deeper meaning here, maybe because the money to buy liberal politicians with is so concentrated in cities rather than in farms. Or maybe because the tighter we pack them in, the greater the desire to control their neighbors. Or because the higher the population density the more reliance on someone else to provide services (more police, water, sewer, transportation, etc.).
Not sure just WHY it is, but the trend seems quite obvious.
Have to agree on this one. The American people spoke & in droves; however, some Liberals refuse to acknowledge this. They are very angry. Oh well.........
They certainly did. Against the desires and instructions of the liberal elite, against the desires and instructions of the conservative elite and against the desires and instructions of the corporate world (embodied in media).
Will it be heard past year-end? Will it be remembered, or must they shout even louder (don't know that could happen, though! )
Or maybe it's because there are more varied demographics in cities. Maybe it's because everyone interacts with different people from different backgrounds and different status every day. Maybe they talk more and understand each other more. Maybe they value progressive social policies and protecting and defending and helping each other more.
Or are we incapable of attributing possible positive attributes to Democrats/liberals?
Couldn't we just call them satan spawn and leave it at that? What good ever comes of being reasonable?
Just kidding. Good points.
So, the people in large cities do not work, how arrogant and flintstonian is this? Who are you to say that city dwellers are less deserving than some sod buster. It is one man, one vote, or does fascism find a place within your core? Perhaps, Idaho is not just another planet....
I thought that your perspective would be sophisticated than talking about some natural nobility of country folk over city folk, that rings hollow for me.
I hope that your man enjoys his victory today. But, if your man gets out of line, it will be short lived.
Cmon, Your assessment is just some ridiculous theory that does not hold water under any serious evaluation, shooting from the hip?
Lightening strikes...pretty weird.
Image from Deplorable Dave: https://twitter.com/DaveNYviii/status/7 … wsrc%5Etfw
In Norse mythology, Thor, was called the “god of the common people!”
I didn't see anyone calling Trump a Savior or a God. I did post a viral photo from Twitter, because I thought it was fun! I guess I'll post that photo more...
My thread "Trump Is THOR: The god of the common people"
* http://hubpages.com/politics/forum/1381 … on-people-
I like it ... mythology too. President Trump 2016!
Can I just make one more point here? It's just a 'loose use of terminology' issue which seems to have been overlooked, but it does irritate as it distorts what actually happened. On this forum, and on my own, these are some of the quotes I've seen:
wilderness - The will of the people was Trump this time. More numbers
gmwilliams - The American people spoke & in droves (to elect Trump)
Live to Learn - Your party (Democrat) is corrupt and the majority of Americans pointed this out with their vote
ahorseback - the American people have chosen someone from OUTSIDE of Washington
And from the Democrat side:
credence2 - It is scary that this coarse, brutal man is the people's choice
I'm not criticising (least of all Credence, whose views I obviously respect greatly), but can I point out it seems highly likely that Hillary Clinton has WON the vote of the majority of the people against Trump? It is only the electoral college system which has given the presidency to Donald Trump. Now I am objective and I recognise that if every vote had 'counted', people may have voted differently, and some may have turned up to vote instead of staying at home, so we can't say what would have happened under a different system. All we can really say is that America is evenly and deeply split.
Donald Trump has been elected fairly and legitimately under the rules. But to imply that the MAJORITY of the American people chose him against Clinton is not really true.
I'm not a fan of the electoral college system but I do smile when I think that a woman who was using the election like a chess game, as most politicians do, counting on the electoral college not the popular vote lost.
I believe in one person one vote. The horrid vote swapping democrats attempted to use in order to manipulate the electoral college is a prime example of people not caring what is fair, just wanting to manipulate a system to their gain.
But, it is too soon to state, definitively, that Hillary won more individual votes. That is the initial assessment but they are still counting. Although there are large pockets in various areas throughout our country which do manipulate the numbers through voter fraud. Historically, democrats are more adept at this than Republicans so I will assume that all turned out as it should have.
Edit. I should also point at that as divisive as our elections have become and how narrowly won; the Congress would do well to do away with the electoral college. We might have a better chance of healing wounds and moving forward if this was not an issue we were destined to argue about after every election.
I go back and forth about the need for the electoral college. I'm really starting to believe we don't need it in the modern information age. Rural/urban people have access to the same information. I don't see a need to give rural people a slight advantage. It doesn't make sense to me anymore.
Here I go again...
What if it wasn't perceived as an advantage for rural folks, but as a bit of an equalizer that lessens their, (rural folks), disadvantage to the most populous folks?
It seems that folks that see our nation as the Republic of states that it is, defend the need and validity of the electoral college, and folks that see our nation as one body of citizens think it is outdated and unfair.
I could see some validity to the latter's argument... if I didn't have the perspective of the former. Consider that by popular vote, 11 states could control an election. It would take 12 to win by electoral votes.
GA
I generally have supported the electoral college for the stability it brings and the compromise with the hayseed, flyover states, so that they don't get the distinct impression that their votes are of no consequence. When the popular vote was overruled by the Electoral College totals which occurred once in a blue moon, fine, as long as it is not found to supersede the popular vote too often. Maybe, twice in 20 years or 5 election cycles is just too often. We may have to look at reform.
Is 4 times in 200 years too often? Because that's all that it has been.
I think that before we seriously consider discarding small states from elections that way more information is needed. Are these two an aberration, not to be repeated for another 100 years? Or are they becoming the norm as our nation moves to metropolitan living? If the latter, do we really find it reasonable to exclude small states, or is the tiny advantage something we owe them as a part of the nation?
Never forget that a great deal of the constitution was formed around protection of the minority, that the tyranny of the majority not overrun them completely. Probably our most sacred (pun intended) premise of separation of church and state comes directly from that principle.
Still since it is a democracy where people vote by the Greatest number of votes registered American. Or it democracy is a lie.
America is a selection not a election by the people who hire and foot the bill. On top of this an already a stacked deck of Corporatism lobbyist running the country anyways.
That that why US is Corporation, not a country.
Good point. Like I say, I go back and forth. On the other hand, we have the Senate and house to represent the states. Since federal policy affects the country in its entirety it seems unfair to let the rural vote override the majority vote.
But Linda, Listen to me, listen to me... A Republic of States, a Constitution for a Republic of states, a government structured for a Republic of states... Linda, honey, listen to me listen, listen... Federal policy affects the country in its entirety... [as a Republic of States]
Maybe I should check it out first, but I am not sure the rural vote overrode the majority vote. They may have swung the scales with their collective effort, but they needed a lot of help from non-rural America to do it.
And speaking of overriding... if our nation is considered as a Republic of states, and based on democracy as a way to make decisions, then how "fair" does it seem that it would take the will of about 15 states to match the power of the single state of California. Or about 22 states to fight a California/Texas partnership. I don't think the rural folks did any overriding. Out-voted maybe?
GA
Not positive if it's true, and it very likely depends a great deal on definitions, but I did see where 62% of Americans now live in metropolitan areas. Rural America cannot override that majority no matter how hard it tries.
Hello Greensleeves Hubs,
I hope you don't mind if I use this as a starting point.
"Donald Trump has been elected fairly and legitimately under the rules. But to imply that the MAJORITY of the American people chose him against Clinton is not really true."
Although technically correct, I am not sure I would want to hang an argument on the "MAJORITY" vote perspective. A less than 25 thousands of a percent, (.0025), majority. A less than 300,000 out of 119,000,000 million votes majority.
I think our Electoral college serves a legitimate and needed function. We are a Republic, not a crowd. If a majority is considered, shouldn't it be the majority of states? 30/20, a 20% majority vs a .0025% one? I think the Electoral College serves as a needed speed bump separating democratic rule from mob rule.
ps. I think the images of who is protesting in the streets over Trump's win buttress my point.
GA
That is spoken to the deaf ears of an outsider , much like telling that to the rioters right now . This system DOES work , we don't always have to like that , but it does.
"... the deaf ears of an outsider."
As in not a club member?
GA
So now that Bozo wins, the system works the way that it was intended? I thought that you said that it was rigged.
By suggesting that I have 'deaf ears' you mean that you are right and that anyone who disagrees with you, cannot possibly be listening.
That is the typical argument-avoidance technique of anyone who is exactly that way inclined - unwilling to listen to alternative points of view.
Glad you think the system works. Would that have still been the case if Clinton had won?
Hi. I did make the point that the popular vote is not really conclusive, certainly given that more people would have come out to vote, or switched votes from Independents, if the voting system had been different. Your point about a 300,000 majority confirms that. I'm not really making the case that a majority wanted a Clinton presidency - more that a majority didn't necessarily want a Trump presidency, as some would claim.
We'd have to agree to differ, but I can't see the case for the Electoral College when electing the president. It denies so many the right to influence the result. I think I read that theoretically a president could be elected with just 30% of the popular vote. Now don't get me wrong - that level of perversity would require a ludricous voting pattern, whereby he won by one vote in many states and got zero support in the rest. Nonetheless, it does demonstrate how the Electoral College can misrepresent the will of all the people.
I condemn the demonstrations if they break the law (though I suspect you'd have had worse if Clinton had won). But perhaps you wouldn't have such a feeling of injustice to bring the mobs on to the street, if every vote had counted equally?
The electoral college works , As any democrat who voted in the primaries will tell you I'm sure .
I was talking to a small businessman the other day who said , "If Clinton wins My business will continue this decline and I Will have to close my doors soon ,"
These are the greatest truths about this election :
- the past eight years have been a political disaster
-The economy has to get better or there will be MORE violence in the streets.
-The distrust in our government is extreme and critically low
- The institutions FBI, DOJ , are compromised at the top by leftist ideology
-The belief that Trump can change the path of the economy is real
-The Media IS BIASED and complicit in the mass of misinformation this in mass media
-Socialism nocked at the door of America ,And America voted no .
-
'these are the greatest truths'.
I can only shake my head and smile. Someone once said jokingly that England and America are two nations divided by a common language. Clearly definitions of 'truth' are one of the language differences we have.
And you know so much about American truth, living and being a citizen in England because.................?
There is no such thing as American truth I'm afraid. Truth is truth, founded on fact.
How about this , In America and if your American it is an American truth ! If you are in England it is an English truth . The reality that is America and it's electoral system however is none of you or your country's business beyond national security ..
I thought we already made that clear , in the 17- 1800s'.
Have we got to musket up again ?..........:-}
Sorry, I simply found that to be rather funny.
I'm a patriot and support patriots who get a little defensive when those outside of America stick their noses in to our business , To me ; either apply for U.S. Citizenship or stay out of our affairs , we already have enough problems and dissention within our borders .
Tell you what though , trade , , I'll give you all our dissenting celebrities for one Greensleeves though. , I kinda like him he's a fighter !
.
Leaving aside the 'sticking their noses into our business' jibe (as I don't want to escalate the dispute), I'll say thanks for the last part and take it as a nice compliment!
In another post, you talked about 'having to musket up again'. That's OK. If it comes to that, and you're using muskets, we might be able to get our colony back!
We will before you will. ....... Maybe .............maybe that's the driving force behind your input here , do you feel utterly helpless at home ?
Come to America , You would be welcome !.......:-]
Trade one Hilary for greensleeves anyone.........?
Stating an opinion is not sticking your nose in. Invading a country because you want their oil, now that's sticking your nose in.
We need your imput and those of others from the outside as a healthy barometer as people here are blinded in madness, so often. It is easier to see clearly from outside the fray, and you certainly understand the fundamentals of the American system.
Your observations are spot on. I live here and will take a wait and see attitude. I am glad that you are not subject to same upheaval across the pond.
Believe me , England has their own problems - and even less voter power to control the problems. He agrees with you liberal nearsightedness and that's why you agree with him .
Credence2, Thanks very much for the vote of confidence. I do feel I can speak with a degree of objectivity and detachment which may not be so easy for Americans. It's conceivable that Britain may even benefit from this economically - Trump seems to like that we went for Brexit, so maybe we'll get favourable trade deals with him. But one has to look at the bigger picture, and of course I feel the negatives are huge, both for you and for the rest of the world.
But enough of the politics for a moment - I hope you all manage to negotiate the next four years without too many tears. Appreciate your comment.
I tried to look into your "30%" scenario, and decided I did not want to make it a deep research project. My problem was finding summary sources for voting population vs. population. Which is further complicated by the voter turnout variable.The later was easy to find and look at, the former was less so. But based just on population, it would take 10 or 11 states to control the election by popular vote, and by electoral vote, it would take 12 states. The converse of that would seem to make the same point. I just don't have the desire to try to find that 30% theoretical. It would almost certainly involve 39 or 40 states - at least.
So I am skeptical that your theoretical is a valid concern.
I do understand your point about a vote not counting. I am a non-blue voter in a traditionally blue state. But, that is changing, so I can at least think of my past votes as place-holders.
I think of those lost votes as the price of the mechanism. My perspective is our nation is a Republic of states, not just a nation of citizens, and that popular rule is no different than mob rule. From street corner to nation, it is just a matter of scale. The Electoral College acts both as a bit of an equalizer for small states, and a needed representative layer between the will of the mob and the election.
GA
Gotta give Credence credit. He manned up and ate crow. * Tips hat.
Where that alternateprime feller? Aint seen him since the election. Kinda worried.
Alternateprime* sp? (Google voice)
My friend, Alternate Prime, is devastated and is in mourning as we all are. I have to take a Que cera,
cera attitude and watch for the all signs of tyranny peeking. I will sleep with one eye open for a while.
Thanks for the kudos, though.
Yup. Np.
Maybe look at it this way Credence. Obama was elected twice. Conservatives or whoever assorted people did not want hillary.
This is true, so the shoe is on the other foot. And as scarecrow McConnell once said about Obama, 'we will make him a one term president'. Should I be any more gracious regarding Trump? At least I will give him a few days after he takes the oath to see if the reign of terror we have all been expecting will take place, before I commit to 1 term pledge.
Im not sure you understand my point, because I didnt articulate it well. It doesnt have anything to do with the amount of terms in my mind. If republicans or conservatives or anyone really had only the choice of obama or hillary - 4 years ago. No republican choice at all. Obama would have won. Or maybe this. You gotta choice. Sarah Palin or Ben Carson. See?
ie. Democrats arent gonna go outa there way to vote for Carson, but you know they would show up in droves to vote against palin.
I am taking a wait and see attitude. Trump is unpredictable, as we saw in the primaries when he would change is position practically daily to satisfy whatever crowd or person he was talking to. The one thing I won't do, is let Trump voters off the hook. They now own this guy, but hey, maybe he will do them proud.
AP was vehemently anti-Trump. To him, Trump was the nearest thing to Satan.
To add:
Conservatives were in mourning & devastated when Obama won, now Liberals are in mourning & devastated when Trump won. Politics is a never-ending circle. Well, that's life. I refuse to let this upset me. I am the owner of my life & will make it the best. People have to realize that they, not the politicians, are in charge of their lives. If people want to succeed, they WILL regardless of WHO is in office!
Regarding the 'uneducated' vs college-educated discussion, this might be relevant: https://www.washingtonpost.com/postever … _tw-bottom
Having a college degree helps people develop a respect for evidence and rational thought but can still leave them in a deep state of ignorance. I remember a guy in these forums who got himself a geology degree despite being a 'young earther'. He merely discounted 80 per cent of what he was taught, lol.
There are so many anti-rational elements in US culture, It would be hard to know where to start.
And more worrying than the above is all that hatred that is so easy to exploit.
Anyway, the US got fooled this time. Hope it learns from the experience. Maybe, next time, try someone who actually cares about the marginalized. Obviously, that would not include Hilary Clinton, lol.
"Maybe, next time, try someone who actually cares about the marginalized."
The voices that Trump appealed to have been ignored and dismissed by intellectuals, elitists and the media. All year long I've heard them labeled as racist, misogynistic, homophobic "deplorables." And thus whatever concerns and objections they raised were easy to dismiss. These voices were marginalized in a very real way.
What needs to be done is found within the last two paragraphs of the article I sent. The left needs to start making actual arguments instead of reactionary accusations of 'isms,' and they need to genuinely attempt to understand where the other side is coming from.
Okay, let's get specific. Can you name one concern of these marginalized voices that was not addressed by a policy position of the Democratic party in general or Hillary Clinton in particular? Also, can you contrast how Trump addressed this same concern with a specific policy? Furthermore, can you explain how Trump's policy will address the concern more completely, or more to the satisfaction of these marginalized voices?
Some concerns would be immigration, jobs, trade deals, national security, addressing Islamic terrorism, minimizing intervention in other countries, better relations with Russia. (I don't think I need to state the specific policies; you should know by now the candidates have different strategies for dealing with the aforementioned.)
You might also want to take into consideration how they were ignored and disrespected in this and other election cycles. And there might be something to be said about the pushback against authoritarian political correctness.
Either way, I'm not one of these marginalized voices. I'm just trying to listen to them and understand where they're coming from. If you genuinely want to understand them you'll need to actually listen and have honest discussions with them, instead of dismissing them as a basket of deplorables.
Joe Scarborough gets at this issue and sees an opportunity for self-introspection instead of pointing fingers at everyone else: https://youtu.be/zY3nRgEZTm8?t=237
Thanks for the link. I feel a bit affirmed. All warm and cozy.
GA
Again, for those of you who keep missing this point: the entire world UNDERSTANDS that if you voted for Trump, that doesn't necessarily mean you're uneducated or stupid if you are. You can stop being so defensive, our faith in your intelligence is intact.
Here's the kicker: 'uneducated white men' (& women) were 'the majority' who came out in EXTRA-significant numbers (tipping the scales for The Donald to win) in an 'unusually lopsided way' (7 of 10 men; 6 of 10 women, though men's numbers were significantly higher than women) compared to every other 'group' who voted: including educated white women and other races (both of whom Trump insulted on more than one occassion); and all of whom STILL voted fairly regularly across the board between Trump & Hillary (similar to the splits with Obama's first contentious election).
One of the reasons why everyone was SO DAMN SURE that Hillary was going to win, was because everyone naturally-assumed that the majority of women would vote for her for that one reason. But, that didn't happen - not even among educated FEMINISTS, even they were divided among themselves.
The uneducated white men/women group had absolutely NO REASON to be any angrier than any other group. And since the majority of Trump's rumblings had to do with subjects of racism & misogyny - that is why those specific voters are being labeled as racists & misogynists.
However, realizations are very GOOD - just consider that us 'liberals' or 'elites' or whatever your favorite label is to call us - aren't necessarily judging things the way you think we are. Basically, liberals & conservatives are getting all cozy in bed together. Things could get even more interesting, LoL! Adding a link to voting stats: http://www.startribune.com/exit-poll-am … 400458221/
Unfortunately as long as liberals focus on things that had little to do with the majority who supported Trump and attempt to find things they (and we) find offensive as reasons to denigrate the majority of the individuals who voted for Trump they will be living in a fantasy world of their own making. To the detriment of America, I might add.
Allow me to re-post the link to the video that I was responding to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLG9g7BcjKs
Conservatives didn't put Trump in that office, as much as you would like to all take credit for it. There are not enough 'conservative' people in this country to vote that way, anymore. However, 'the left' that you're all so sure is a bunch of irresponsible hippies; obviously does not have ONE PROBLEM thinking outside of the box and jumping on board with a conservative-nominated candidate if it proves their angry point.
NON-fear is what got Trump elected, not FEAR - with the exception of conservatives who voted for Trump soley for religious reasons (which are, admittedly, many). Again, look at the voting stats. Angry white men are being accused of racism & misogyny for very good reasons; and MANY (if not most) religious folks voted for Trump for the same reasons they always vote Republican: hoping he will enforce the dogmas that cause so much fear among them.
I'm not a conservative. Honestly, I'm not a republican either. Used to be until the religious right poisoned the party.
I wasn't so much bashing your statement as pointing out the crazy sour grapes attitude of liberals at the moment. I'm hoping they will soon put their disappointment on the back burner and look at the outcome for what it is and try to understand why it is.
Whatever Trump proves himself to be this is a victory. The republican party has seen that their shirt sleeve christianity is not appealing to the majority and religion has little place in politics. I hear the DNC considers itself to be in shambles and knows it is not addressing the concerns of the people.
If this bizarre election cycle does nothing other than to let politicians know we have lost complete faith in their ability to represent us it is a success, of sorts.
Then why are you bashing 'liberals' along with every other person who is ignorant about this subject? We have good reason to be mad about election results; and we're divided among ourselves - obviously. I, for one, am getting really really SICK of being labeled a liberal.
Im sorry you are feeling bashed, or victimized. Im just a racist bigoted deplorable irredeemable too stupid to even be allowed to vote. Which I didnt. Perhaps I was too discouraged at that point to even try. But my under-educated Native American best friend voted Trump.
No, you're just another person who is so sure that is what I've said in here - completely missing entire posts that explain. Even so, allow me to elaborate a bit more... I'm really sick of being labeled a liberal by conservatives who are happily celebrating the erroneous concept of, "ha, we showed you how much conservatives rule the land!"
That's not the case.
As you may already know this is all too intellectual for me to comment on. As the other lady said, she seems to be hopeful the demographics are changing. I have to assume the goal is for that demographic ruling the land. Lets not forget the 200 million or so that didnt vote and how much pull they have. The demographics are changing. Notably in the house and senate and maybe more.
Phoenix, first let me say I tried to find an earlier post where I accused you of exaggerating and you explained you were referring to the Republicans winning the presidency and both the house and senate. You are right. Your statement was not an exaggeration.
Second, what exactly did you vote for when you voted for Trump?
This is how it works here. If you point out the facts, you're an intellectual elitist. If you point out that Trump voters just installed a man who promised to build a wall, ban Muslims from entering the country, and send Hillary Clinton to prison, that's sour grapes. If you ask when the mass deportations begin, that's whinng. These are all things Trump said he would do, yet we are somehow being big babies for asking when these things are going to happen.
Now, we are told Trump isn't really going to do those things, so we ask then why did he lie? We are told that's not really lying, it's a "persuasion technique."We are told that by asking these questions we are dismissing the concerns of "marginalized voices."
Maybe I'm really an intellectual elitist, but since when did white people, and white men in particular, become marginalized?? They still dominate every institution, still make more money than every other demographic.
Sorry, but Donnie was elected because he masterfully appealed to people's emotions. There is nothing intellectual about it. Certain white people are angry because the world is changing and they believe their power is dwindling. The facts are that they still have control of this country, and their vote for Trump was fear-based. Y'all can try to rationalize it all you want but in this election the amygdala won.
II'm proudly wearing my Scarlet "E."
Agreed. Trump won this election by masterfully manipulating people's emotions - but, the 'fear-factor' is split between (mostly religious) people who DID vote for Trump out of fear; and Dems/Libs/Independents who voted for the opposing candidate FEARLESSLY. Its mixed.
White men have not been marginalized... It is uneducated white men (and women) who are getting the hit for racism & misogyny for the very good reasons that I have already stated in a previous long post.
I can certainly see where it might be fun to think those who disagree consider the other party an intellectual elitist but I an fairly confident neither side of the argument, in this forum, falls into that category. I will point out that considering oneself to be such might inhibit one's ability to carry on a mutually considerate conversation.
We voted for Trump. Mutually considerate conversations were thrown out a long time ago. This is the harmony & unity that he inspires. Its not going to get smoother unless he somehow manages to gain some finesse - unlikely, considering the way he was crying on twitter this morning about people still protesting because of the media.
Um, I have been called an intellectual elitist several times by more than one person in just the last 72 hours. For doing the things I just alliterated in the above post. I really don't care if talking about reality and calling out lies means some people think I am elitist. That is why I will proudly wear the Scarlet "E."
We have to stop letting people base their votes upon the massive piles of BS shoveled out of certain ugly pieholes.
I've been called a lot of things. Which doesn't make them true. And, there were piles enough of bs from both sides during the election. But, I'm not sure that swayed all voters. I think people prefer to think the other side is ignorant. It is much easier than taking their true point of view into account. I noticed that, repeatedly, you ignored my words and choose to demonize me for your imagined beliefs during the course of our conversations.
No, not true. When you say you voted for Trump to send a message to the corrupt leaders that you're ready to blow up the system rather than let it continue in its current corrupt form, I believe you. However, I will not give you a pass on what you ALSO voted for: every racist, mean, misogynistic statement out of your candidate's mouth, every outrageous policy he espoused, and every single shred of evidence of what kind of character and temperament he possesses. Just like I voted for Hillary and own every aspect of her policies and character, including the distasteful and potentially harmful ones.
LoL! See what I mean... I voted for Hillary for the same reasons as you did; and am really really angry with liberals who voted for Trump for those reasons. I was angry with them before they voted and have been fighting with them (as much as conservatives) for MONTHS. Racist and/or misogynistic - and definitely irresponsible - JERKS.
Are you saying even the liberals who voted for Trump are racist, misogynistic and irresponsible jerks?
I'm not sure she's commenting on their character or embodiment of those things so much as the fact that they voted to essentially promote those things, whether that was the reason they voted for him or not. In reality I think probably very few people voted for him because they relate to his poor character. But it's sort of like an unfortunate side effect to a drug that you feel might help you get better. A side effect that affects mostly those who chose not to take the drug because they couldn't live with the side effects.
I don't know about her but if you vote for one who is so openly racist and misogynistic, then you are firmly esconced in the racist and misogynistic basket right along with him.
I see. How has tooting the racist and/or misogynistic horn worked out for you?
I don't care how it has "worked out for me." Truth is truth. If you voted for Trump then you are okay with a racist, misogynistc, authoritarian bully as president. He didn't hide who he is.
Just as my vote for Hillary means I am okay with a woman who played fast and loose with an email server as president. I own my vote. I'm not sure why you Trump voters are having such a hard time owning yours, but I'm not letting you get away with it.
No, according to you they're not just "okay" with a racist, misogynistic, authoritarian bully; they are, as you say, firmly ensconced in that basket with him.
If you don't care about understanding why it hasn't worked for you (in spectacular fashion, might I add), you'll be doomed to making the same mistake. But keep tooting that horn if it makes you feel better. It won't win you any arguments, not here nor on the cultural level.
I'm not trying to win an argument. I am simply stating that if you voted for Trump you voted for every nasty, racist, misogynistic, bullying thing he said and did. Are you saying that is not true?
I voted for Hillary. That means I voted for a woman who has been investigated out the wazoo, who played fast and loose with an email server, and who had some failures as Secretary of State. I admit it. Why can't Trump voters admit what they voted for?
"I'm not trying to win an argument"
What I mean is you aren't even trying to engage in discussion. You're content flaunting your moral superiority, which is why you continue to throw those 'isms like candy. It's why you've lost the election and it's why you're losing the cultural war.
"I am simply stating that if you voted for Trump you voted for every nasty, racist, misogynistic, bullying thing he said and did."
You'll be surprised to find that people differ on what constitutes racism and misogyny.
Yes! You finally said it. That you don't think Donnie is racist. Whew, that took awhile.
You're right, I don't think identifying a subset of illegal Mexican immigrants as "bad people" or calling Rosie O' Donnell fat is racist or sexist. I personally don't like watering down these terms to the point of meaninglessness.
Don't think you're going to get that one across. The liberal concept does not encompass portions of Mexicans citizens illegally entering the US: any discussion of illegal aliens is about Hispanics and that's racist.
Similarly, responding to an insult with another one is always sexist...or at least it is if it is a male responding to a female. What is actually said is irrelevant - it is raw sexism.
Which, ironically, is actually more racist or sexist than anything Trump said, because it treats these groups as if they are monoliths. Commentary about one or a subset is commentary about all of them.
I can't decide if it suggests that they think these groups are too stupid to distinguish between the two, or that they're so sensitive and helpless that they need to be protected against any commentary about any individual that belongs to that group.
Either way, it's incredibly patronizing.
Well, I can see where reasonable people could think the "rapists" comment is not necessarily racist, but the insult campaign against the judge of Mexican heritage is a different story. In any case, I really don't want to get into a debate about whether or not particular Trump comments are racist. As long as you admit that your vote for Trump was a willingness to accept each and everything he has said and done as acceptable enough to earn your vote for the highest office in the land, then you are being honest about what your vote truly means.
I don't think questioning a judge's potential conflict of interest is necessarily racist just because the potential conflict of interest is related to race or heritage. It's possible that the judge may have ties to Mexico, and thus a bias because of Trump's position on immigration, the wall etc.
I have family members from Brazil that want to immigrate to Canada. If I were a judge presiding a case involving a Canadian Trump who wanted to ban or limit Brazilian immigration, I'd recuse myself from the case. I'd have a direct conflict of interest. If this Canadian Trump invoked my heritage as a possible source of bias, it wouldn't necessarily be a racist accusation (though it might be entirely unfounded).
I do find it stupid and unfounded for Trump to accuse the judge of such a thing, but not necessarily racist.
As for your demand that I accept each and everything he said and done, no, I won't. I don't accept any of the unscientific things Trump has said over the past few years, for instance. Nor do I have to. A vote for a candidate is not an acceptance of everything a candidate has said and done in the past, present or future.
"As for your demand that I accept each and everything he said and done, no, I won't. I don't accept any of the unscientific things Trump has said over the past few years, for instance. Nor do I have to. A vote for a candidate is not an acceptance of everything a candidate has said and done in the past, present or future."
Your vote signifies that you find everything about your candidate, in its totality, acceptable enough to be president. I am not saying you agree with everything your candidate says or does. I am saying that, with your vote, you have expressly indicated that you are okay with that person being president, and that you accept all that he has said and done (to your knowledge), all of his stated intentions, beliefs, and plans, as acceptable enough for your vote. Obviously, if any part of what he has said, done, or plans to do was unacceptable enough for you to judge him unfit to be president, then you would not vote for him.
Then I would use the word "tolerate," not "accept." People who tolerate him as the lesser of two evils can't be put in any basket, whether that be the racist, sexist basket of deplorables, or the unscientific basket of ingoramuses, as if they're also guilty of the crime.
I guess we will just have to disagree. With my vote, I said I am willing to accept Clinton's transgressions as part of the total presidential package. That means I was willing to risk another secretive and possibly unlawful Clinton move that could occur during her presidency. I admit it and I own it. I am asking Trump voters to acknowledge the same with Donald. You've heard every obnoxious and ugly thing he has said, every horrible crime he is being investigated for, every lawsuit that is pending, and his own statements about women, Muslims, the wall, nuclear weapons, war heroes, and so much more. So, when he goes off the rails in any of these areas, while occupying the historically dignified and sober position of the Presidency of the United States, I hope you will reflect upon your choice but, more importantly, take responsibility for it.
Obviously there's a risk and the responsibility is our own, as is the case with every choice we make. But that was not what you were getting at. You were not so subtly trying to put the people who voted for Trump (for a variety of reasons) in the same basket as him. Taking a risk with a questionable figure does not mean you are guilty of the same transgressions.
I did not say you are guilty of the same transgressions. I said you are in the basket with the racists and misogynists who cheer all of his transgressions. There is a subtle difference. Maybe I'm not being very clear. To give a simpler, more clear cut example, if you vote for, say, a member of the Aryan Nation, are you not saying you find it acceptable for a president to be a white supremacist, even if you yourself are not? You are in the basket because you enabled his installation to a position of power knowing exactly what he represents.
Fair enough. I find it a little bit like accepting the consequences of free speech. I accept that people can be racist, sexist, anti-scientific bigots because the alternative of suppressing their free speech is worse. I assume you accept that as well.
As I said, however, I'd use the word tolerate. Acceptance implies a sense of approval. I also disagree with your use of the basket imagery, as it implies that people who tolerate lesser evils for a greater good are just as bad as the people who indulge and encourage in these evils.
You're oversimplifying. You know very well those are not the only comments that lead people to come to those conclusions. Maybe a mildly misinformed comment here and there could be glossed over but the fact that it's a pattern is the problem.
All you have to do is search "Trump sexist comments" and you'll find plenty of lists with actual quotes.
There's also been more than one lawsuit against him for discrimination (because of both race and sex).
The examples I've given you are 'actual quotes' and they are included in every list I've seen. >95% of those lists are populated with such comments. If he is so obviously racist and sexist there would be no need to include them.
The obvious pattern is that he has no filter and says misinformed comments about anyone, of any race, creed or gender. But the comments about groups that are deemed marginalized are magnified. Nobody cares when he insults Jon Stewart, Russel Brand or Jeb Bush. But as soon as he insults a woman? Sexism.
I'm not aware of a lawsuit against him for discrimination based on sex. The race based lawsuit was settled out of court on a condition of no admission of wrongdoing. If true, it would be racist, I agree.
Again, it's the pattern that's the problem. Him insulting Rosie for being fat doesn't seem anything more than rude on its own perhaps, but as one of several comments made trying devalue women based on their physical appearance, it's pretty clear sexism to me (and many others).
Interesting that you're not aware of the class action lawsuit filed against Trump for discrimination against women that worked for him given that I brought it up in the last conversation you and I had about Trump. How quickly you've forgotten (or maybe never paid any attention to in the first place?).
I agree that many of Donald Trump's comments are offensive to women. However I am not so thin skinned that an offensive comment will sway me from determining if someone is qualified to do other tasks. I have to say that mrpopo made a valid point that (heavily paraphrased) insulting one is not insulting all.
Insults are based on the target's weaknesses. Calling women "virgins" does not have the same effect as calling men "virgins." Likewise, a man calling another man "ugly" does not have the same effect as a man calling another woman "ugly." Trump typically insults women based on appearance, and he typically insults men based on success or stature. Those are the points where the respective targets would be most sensitive. The pattern is a pattern of targeting the person's weaknesses. It is not sexist simply because the particular sensitivities differ between the sexes.
Interesting that instead of opting to remind me or give me the benefit of the doubt, you opted to shame and insinuate that I wasn't paying attention. I'm sorry that I haven't memorized all of Trump's scandals weeks after having discussed them. I don't clutter my head with unverified claims about Donald Trump (a man who I don't care about in the slightest) when I can simply look it up and verify for it myself.
And that's what I did. I've looked at our most recent discussion and cannot find where you pointed to that class action lawsuit to me. Can you point me in the right direction?
I can, however, see where you talked about the lawsuits in a discussion you had with someone else: http://hubpages.com/politics/forum/1383 … ost2845980
Unfortunately, I'm not capable of following every sub-discussion in a thread, nor should I be expected to.
As it happens, I actually was aware of those lawsuits. But this is where I bring up another of my limitations: I did not consider harassment to be necessarily an act of discrimination. It's now clearer to me that there are some types of harassment that are forms of discrimination, and that these lawsuits would be considered both. Had you simply given me the benefit of the doubt and reminded me I would have seen my error immediately.
I freely admit to being ignorant of particular legal classifications of lawsuits. I do not admit to quickly forgetting or not paying attention to the things you say.
I apologize for the snarky comment. Truly. That was unfair, especially considering you have actually (from what I've seen) made more attempts than most to understand where other people are coming from. I was frustrated for a multitude of reasons at that point in my evening and unfortunately I partially took it out on you. I'm sorry.
That's big of you, I appreciate it. There's no hard feelings.
Be careful she like the Angelina Jolene of Canada, she'll try to adopt ya. Classy post though she did.
I'm the Angelina Jolie of Canada because I want to adopt everyone and not because I'm so beautiful? Sigh.
(Your adoption is still pending if you want in... I'll take really good care of you! *pinches cheeks*)
Speaking of Jeb Bush, someone just reminded me of a couple accomplishments of Trump so far. Maybe he just got rid of both the Bush family and the Clinton family.
+++ That pretty much sums up the difference between the two candidates and the two camps.
Well, I put an 'and/or' in there - I certainly don't believe that every person who voted for Trump is necessarily ALL of those things at the same time (any one of them is plenty); NOR do I believe that everyone who voted for Trump are these things. Read the rant that went with this and the 'reasons' we've been fighting with that were listed - THAT is what I'm referring to.
If you voted for Trump with a long list of valid reasons - cheers to you! You are among a long list of others who did, also. However, you are mixed in with a bunch of nincompoops. These 'nincompoops' are the new liberals, LoL!
Finally! Someone who gets what I am saying. Well, my husband also gets it but he couldn't bring himself to vote for anyone for president this time. He is a registered Republican.
There are a lot of people who stayed home for the same reason; and I can hardly blame them, either. It is still a form of voting, when you think about it - IF you didn't vote just because you were lazy. It says a lot about how unhappy peeps were with both candidates. Its not a 'spiteful' un-vote. I have nothing but respect for those people. Its not like I'm afraid of what's going to happen with Trump in office, as so many people are. Good stuff can come from the craziest things. I choose to believe the impossible.
For the record, we live in a firmly blue state so he felt his non vote would not affect the outcome. He did say he would choose Hillary if he were in a battleground state. He is retired military and worked in the NSA and believes Trump does not have the temperament to be Commander in Chief.
That was my main ding against him, as well - and it scares me that he seems to be continuing with 'the way he is' with the continuing protestors on Twitter. He needs to get himself a damn good PR person and then LISTEN to them. Maybe even hand over his Twitter account for the next four years, ha!
I don't like how he taps in to people's anger from just about every direction it comes from. I don't trust him. I do, however - believe we can learn and move on. This election is not the end. It is a scientifically documented FACT that humans are highly-adaptable beings.
Well, whether you like it or not we have a new president and it is up to both of us, as reasonable citizens, to hold him to the fire.
My son got a divorce a while back. A child was involved. The mother was bi polar and wavered between reasonable and quite irrational. He's a good man. I told him to fight dirty, if need be, to gain the upperhand in the proceedings and once he had one be fair, compassionate and reasonable. We couldn't expect that from the other side. But I knew we could from him and that would ensure the rancor had a short lived life.
I am hoping that with the election over we will see why Trump fought so hard and dirty to get elected. If he is truly what you believe him to be trust me. The majority will stand against it.
We will see. You are essentially hoping he is not what he outwardly displayed. Isn't that one of the biggest complaints you all had about politicians? That they say whatever they need to say to get elected? And that you like Trump because he is not a politician, is not PC, and says exactly what is on his mind?
Honestly, I see so many contradictions in what Trump voters say from one day to the next that I can't help but wonder if they truly even know why they voted for him.
You have me confused with someone else. I have never said I like him because he isn't PC. I have said that the advantage to Trump is that his faults are there for all to see. Not like those who play the game, smile pretty for the camera and then stab the American public in the back behind closed doors.
I have already told you, ad nauseum, why I voted for Trump. You obviously want to believe something else so, have at it.
Yet, you are hoping that his faults are a lie he pwrpetrated to get elected. "I am hoping that with the election over we will see why Trump fought so hard and dirty to get elected."
Seems quite contradictory to me.
It appears you have a problem with your keyboard there.
But, let's put this into perspective. There was ample evidence that what Hillary was saying many times was not what she had previously said to others.
We all know things are said to garner votes. Now, those things might seem over the top but if they are pointing toward a valid concern then one can assume that someone is going to do something about it. I would also assume that those who are cheering the over the top comments will be satisfied with a reasonable solution which addresses their concerns. Honestly, we do need to get a handle on illegal immigration. I have no problem with a guy claiming he is going to build a wall and make someone else pay for it (possible? I doubt it) if he instead gets congress to agree to a reasonable and affordable solution to the problem. I have no problem with a guy claiming he is going to see 12 million people deported (possible? no) if he gets congress to agree with a reasonable, fair and affordable solution. And, I think people will be happy.
Trump is one man who made a lot of statements during his campaign. He was not appointed king, dictator or supreme leader. He is just the president. One branch of a government with enough checks and balances to assure us that crazy sh*t won't be happening.
Glad to hear you're okay with everything he said because you don't believe he will actually do any of it. So, he did appeal to your amygdala.
Interesting way of selecting a president.
You did not vote for him based on what he said he will do. You voted for the emotion behind what he said he will do. Your rational mind knows what he said he would do is not possible.
You are making up what suits your belief system. My rational mind knows what we need to do. My rational mind knows what he said is not possible. My rational mind believes that when he understands what he can and he can't do that he will work with his cabinet and congress to find a solution which addresses the problem we all know exists and is in line with our laws.
Very true! Most of the arguments that Trump supporters have given as reasons for voting AGAINST Clinton, could also be given as reasons for voting AGAINST Trump. True, he's not part of the hated Washington 'establishment', and I guess that the combination of being a white, male, multibillionaire does ultimately make him part of a minority group in society, but do people really believe that electing Trump will mean an end to all that they despise in Washington?
Personally I hope he did lie through his teeth throughout the election, and that he does turn out to be a pragmatist - a typical politician. That may not be ideal, but it's better than the alternative - that he actually believes all the stuff he said.
I hope so, too. There is some merit to the argument that he is not beholden to the Republican establishment and doesn't care about their approval. If he truly wants to do what is best for the country, that means he would be willing to work with all of Congress, not just his own party.
I'm skeptical, though. All indicators point to Donald only caring about Donald. I think he craves adoration. During the campaign, he got his adoration "high" from the crowds. Where will he seek it now? My gut tells me it will be from the approval polls. He will do whatever he thinks he needs to do to get a high approval rating. He wants to feel loved, but I think he is going to find it difficult to do. With his penchant for lashing out at any perceived criticism, he will find it hard to win over those of us who find him to be a boorish buffoon. He was able to maintain a facade of rationality during the final weeks of the campaign. I doubt he can do it for very much longer. The beast is longing to break free! Lol
Trump seem to represent the living ultimate American Dream myth. Although you have to be asleep to experience it.
They want this strongman image to solve all these American problems that they think is impossible for them to solve. The reality is the collective power of the People throughout human history is the only true real thing that dose change things for positive results.
I think you are confusing us with Russia. We aren't looking for a strong man to solve our problems. We are hoping for a government who will listen to us and not exacerbate our problems.
Then that is impossible. Corporatism Hierarchy Governments work for themselves and are mercenary for the rich, putting it in the hands of the few. Since the 1970s our basic cost of living has gone up more than 10 times, wage have gone very little. They keep getting more and you keep getting less.
You think Trump will come along like the wizard of Oz and change all this. When there is a few untouchable wizard above him.
This won't have a happy ending like the movie.
Only power of people will change things and a few America national treasures that America has lost will make the suffering continiously worst.
Then why do you believe in Trump's magic wand to make promises that are impossible to keep. Trump says he is religious that is also a form of supernatural magic.
Yes, they do believe in the Wizard of Oz. The average American does not possess the intelligence or the courage to look beyond the facade of democracy and see the hand of a shadow government pulling all of the strings. And as you know, we really don't have to look too far.
The evil Americans have focused on so-called illegal Mexicans and Black Lives Matter as the bogeyman, while the real criminals and terrorists sit in Washington and continue to perpetrate their crimes against humanity throughout the Middle East and here at home. The politicians, special interests," banks to big to fail", and corporations are robbing the people blind, yet these morons actually think that a forced exodus of poor Mexicans and Muslims back to Mexico and the Middle East, and a resurrection of Jim Crow will solve all of their problems. America doesn't need a Donald Trump, but another John Brown. John Brown was a real Christian who had real courage.
John Brown (hung) had a movement to abolish slavery that inspired Lincoln's civil war. Then Lincoln was assassinated which leads to Marshal law and the emergency war act that US Corp adapted to have wars on drugs, countries, race, religion or anything they wanted to fight over, every two years up to today. USA CORP has accelerated in the last 20 years to 22 major wars.
We are into the third wave of an world war and another civil war. A very dangerous time to start a loop of wars. It seem people must go to war to escape out of their abuse and economic slavery of Corporatism US. Along with many ISIS false flag set ups around the world.
If it was civil war I would be hiding in the woods. A world war go to south America.
How would you be prepare for a war if Trump can not control it.?
psst! did you remember to delete me from that "... more than one person in just the last 72 hours." group?
*(I mean those intellectual elitist slanderers)
GA
Ha! "alliterated" I knew it! What happened to "Stated" or "as I said"?
Oops, my bad. I couldn't find any alliteration in "the above post," you mentioned. Guess I was wrong on the Ha! too.
GA
If my comment unfairly labeled you a liberal I apologize. Those who have identified themselves previously as liberals who are currently insisting we are teetering on the edge of Armageddon are the problem at the moment. Hopefully they are no different from the previous deplorable and ridiculous ramblings of those here on the far right. A very vocal but also tiny minority.
I have no idea how you're interpreting the video as you are doing. You seem to think it was a video outlining the virtues of leftists when it was largely the exact opposite. It was a video that cut through the left's cognitive dissonance and opened up the opportunity for introspection, not an excuse for tapping yourself on the back.
As TotalBiscuit commented:
6 minutes of verbally having some sense slapped into me. Jesus... what did I turn into in the last few days.
When Jonathan Pie says "the left did this" he doesn't mean the left voted for Trump (though obviously there are some leftists who voted for Trump). He means the left laid their bed and now must lie in it.
The left set up Trump to win, whether they wanted to or not.
Actually, this was my second response to it that rolled off someone else. The continuity of these posts are not in sync. You've completely missed my point and I'm not going to restate the entire thing, again. I'll just say, that video link was not the first time it was posted.
And again, there are not enough 'conservatives' to have voted Trump in. The majority of people didn't vote 'for' a candidate this time because they supported them - they voted AGAINST the one they didn't want. Oh yeah, liberals did this ALL THE WAY AROUND.
I know that was the second time the link was posted. That's because I posted it the first time. The continuity of these posts has been clear to me.
I've read your posts in response to that video, and your first and presumably primary point was that conservatives were not the only ones voting for Trump. Obviously this is true (to what extent you haven't established) but it's besides the point of the video.
Your next points indicate that you either did not watch the video, ignored it, or are oblivious to what you're doing:
But, I would like to point out the 'the left' is really tired of being labeled the way 'the right' insists on labeling us AND our candidates.
I'm not letting 'uneducated white men' (& women) off the hook, though; and here's why... You were the majority; and your lopsided votes ARE serious indicators of racism & misogyny.
The uneducated white men/women group had absolutely NO REASON to be any angrier than any other group. And since the majority of Trump's rumblings had to do with subjects of racism & misogyny - that is why those specific voters are being labeled as racists & misogynists.
You're tired of Hillary being labeled as a literal demon (as if people take that seriously), yet you are eagerly labeling 'uneducated' white men/women as racists and misogynists (as if people don't take that seriously). You're dismissing their reasons for anger, but do you even know what those reasons are?
Now contrast your statements with the video's:
Not everyone that voted for Donald Trump is a sexist or a racist! How many times does the vote not have to go our way before we realize that our argument isn't won by hurling labels and insults?"
The left is responsible for this result, because the left has decided that any other opinion, any other way of looking at the world is unacceptable... if you're on the right you're a freak, you're evil, you're racist, you're stupid, you are a basket of deplorables - how do you think people are going to vote if you talk to them like that? When has anyone been persuaded by being insulted or labeled?
Being offended doesn't work anymore, throwing insults doesn't work anymore... all you have to do is engage in the debate, talk to people who think different from you and persuade them with your argument. It's so easy, and the left has lost the art. Stop thinking that everyone who disagrees with you is evil, or racist, or sexist, or stupid and talk to them! Persuade them otherwise because if you don't I'll tell you what you get, you get President Trump!
In other words, you're doing the opposite of what the video suggested.
Wow, thanks for going back and catching us up - but you also molded what I said to fit your opinion. See how easy it is to bend things?
"You're tired of Hillary being labeled as a literal demon (as if people take that seriously - OH, YES THEY DO which is WHY so MANY conservatives will ONLY vote GOP), yet you are eagerly (eagerly? yeah, right!) labeling 'uneducated' white men/women as racists and misogynists (as if people don't take that seriously). You're dismissing their reasons for anger, but do you even know what those reasons are?
I'm pretty sure I explained in detail why we are able to peg uneducated white men, especially, as racist and misogynistic - conservative or liberal, across the board. That's how they voted compared to every other group including educated men & women who had as much reason to be angry with Trump as anyone else.
You see me as contradicting that video, where I see myself as expounding on it - no, I don't just blindly take everything I hear, believe it, then absently incorporate it into my consiousness. I agree with him, wholeheartedly - that we liberals did this for the reasons that he said, as much as I hate to admit that 'my own liberal ilk' can be THAT spiteful.
You only see what I have to say about conservatives; but I have lectured many liberals as passionately. I was mad at BOTH sides before this election, basically for the reasons I've previously said and then some. I just didn't realize how RIGHT I was. If you think its pleasant for me to be able to both see & understand the grand picture of what just happened and be either pleasant or happy about it, sorry. Being right isn't always a good thing, especially in this case. But, this is what 'bad things' are for in this life - to 'push off' toward good.
How exactly did I mold what you said to fit my opinion? I've quoted you and contrasted your interpretation to the video. Your point about leftists voting for Trump is not directly supported by the video. Your point about leftists thinking outside the box to prove their angry point is not supported by the video. Your 'expounding' is obviously contradictory to the video.
No, you haven't explained it in detail:
"look at the voting stats." I'm looking; where does it say that uneducated white men voted because of racism and sexism? And what are their numbers?
"Angry white men are being accused of racism & misogyny for very good reasons" Such as?
"You were the majority; and your lopsided votes ARE serious indicators of racism & misogyny." How so?
" YOUR group had absolutely no reason to be any ANGRIER than any woman, generic liberal or generic conservative out here." How do you figure? What were the uneducated white men/women angry about? What were other demographics angry about?
"both of whom Trump insulted on more than one occassion" How did he insult these groups?
"And since the majority of Trump's rumblings had to do with subjects of racism & misogyny - that is why those specific voters are being labeled as racists & misogynists." Which of Trump's rumblings demonstrate his sexism or racism? And how can you demonstrate that they voted for Trump specifically because of his sexist or racist rumblings?
"we liberals did this for the reasons that he said, as much as I hate to admit that 'my own liberal ilk' can be THAT spiteful." To clarify, do you think the video said that liberals voted for Trump out of spite?
The angriest mind in the world is the modern day delusional pseudo- intellectual liberal , can't have your cookies ? Cry , scream ,beg and throw tantrums . Then blame ALL the others when all else fails, It will never be democrats fault even when they feed their own mission statement to the dog ,and then say the dog ate it , AND when you decide to "sleep with the media ", remember your birth control , because the media will promise you it all and change their cloak when the other party says you missed your timing this month .
I don't know what will be worse the crying on the left for eight MORE years or the fact that they won't accept political progress even when you lay it at their feet.
I think it is normal to be dispirited, considering the absolute rejection of their ideology across the board. Even some lashing out is to be expected, to some extent. However, when it comes to being all busted up inside, to the point that no words can accurately describe it....and one is seriously considering producing a favorite stuffed bear so that they could just point to where it hurts the most...well, thats another story altogether.
I hardly think that Hillary winning the popular vote and Trump winning the electoral college equates to "the absolute rejection of their ideology across the board." Exaggerate much?
PHOENIXV WROTE:
I think it is normal to be dispirited, considering the absolute rejection of their ideology across the board. Even some lashing out is to be expected, to some extent. However, when it comes to being all busted up inside, to the point that no words can accurately describe it....and one is seriously considering producing a favorite stuffed bear so that they could just point to where it hurts the most...well, thats another story altogether.
What I meant there was the loss of not only the Presidency, but the majority in house, senate and potentially a conservative supreme court. Absolute rejection? Seemed softer than absolute shellacking.
Shall I fetch the bear while that sinks in, because even from my under-educated perspective it don't sound too good. I find it convenient for liberals to paint themselves as the epitome of tolerance while in reality dismissing people as uneducated and irredeemable.
I find it convenient for conservatives to paint themselves as the epitome of intolerance while in reality dismissing people as educated and irredeemable. I mean, if we're not Christians then our opinion doesn't really matter, does it?
There are republicans or conservatives and certainly plenty of people that cannot stomach the clintons who are not christian here. As a lousy christian myself I had to choose between an ex stripper as FLOTUS or a lady with no morals. It was an easy choice.
I would love for you to point to a statement, anywhere, where someone is 'educated and irredeemable'. It seems like such a very odd thing to say. I certainly hope you aren't making this up as you go.
It sounds like within the reasonable ballpark.
When will a well educated and intelligent person like Ron Paul, or an atheist or non christian, or a woman, a race other than mulatto, a gay, a monk, a Christ like person, a Muslim and everything under the Constitutional sun ever be President.
They will be president when they run on a platform which appeals to the majority of the people. Or, the majority of the electoral college, apparently.
Majority did not vote the way. The color of the US is Corporatism, not democracy. Even though inside most Americans don't want a war economy, they would perfer happier jobs and healthier conditions. They will not get better because of these illegitimate Government set ups.
True, but still overly-simplified with a hint of conspiracy theory. FYI, peeps - conspiracies, whether they are real or not - are NOT something to cower from. We 'regular humans' have more control than we realize; and these kinds of naysayers are as clueless as anyone else.
The Republican platform has always run on making the rich richer by convincing tender-hearted religious people into thinking that they have their best interests at heart. Its SAD beyond the telling of it. Now that you've seen how 'us stupid liberals' are able to step outside of our cocoons to vote our conscious INSTEAD of the beliefs of our religious leaders (many liberals ARE 'religious', SURPRISE!) - try it next election. God is not going to strike you down with a lightening bolt, as demonstrated.
Most Americans don't understand they have more power than the Government. When I did live in America they did. Now they fear the Government and feel helpless to do anything about their fear mongering for control.
My good sense and dreams tell me to get the hell out there before the dark empire hierarchy takes me and other down to nothing before a Nation is rebuilt.
Meanwhile I can start to rebuild for the future in another country, safer and pass it on to Americans to help rebuilt a stronger than ever earth together.
I'm guessing that you are seeing this post without the post before it - that sentence was a 'reconstruction' of a previous sentence that I was responding to. I know, so many things are mystifying.
So you are making it up as you go. Enough said.
Again, you righteous conservatives need to get it through your head that YOU did not win this election - far too many of those FREAKIN liberal dems that you've been complaining about did it by intentionally joining forces with your 'craziness'. Talk about being duped by the media! Do you still think this election has been rigged? I've already heard Trump's supporters start to twist even that original accusation around. This election wasn't about what you're so sure it was about; and realizing who the real stooges were isn't going to be a very easy crow to swallow when realization hits.
God intervened in a rigged election and won it for us!
For those of you still not understanding why Trump won, this passionate venting from Jonathan Pie might help (crude language, NSFW): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLG9g7BcjKs
You're right, absolutely everyone should watch that! I've been trying to tell conservatives that they were not the only ones voting for Trump for MONTHS; and I even suspected Trump to 'really be on Hillary's side' in the beginning, LoL! It just seemed to me as if he was intentionally trying to implode the Republican Party.
This is a rant and a really good one - mostly against 'the left', ha! But, I would like to point out the 'the left' is really tired of being labeled the way 'the right' insists on labeling us AND our candidates. For instance, Hillary is NOT a literal demon. I would really like just ONE of the people who have tried to convince ANY person in this country of that to admit it.
If you move away from apocalyptic themes conservatives would be taken more seriously. This is a heads up, though - next election the Dems will 'probably' have a much more acceptible candidate. We'll see.
I'm not letting 'uneducated white men' (& women) off the hook, though; and here's why... You were the majority; and your lopsided votes ARE serious indicators of racism & misogyny. This is a good time to realize that. YOUR group had absolutely no reason to be any ANGRIER than any woman, generic liberal or generic conservative out here. If you really consider yourself to be 'good Americans', raise your standards.
Honestly I was too scared to vote. On election night I crawled into bed and held on tight to my bible. I was worried that if by the grace of God that Trump got elected, all the talk of when they go low we go high, might turn into lets get high and smash car windows.
Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell. You seem to favor Trump over Clinton, but if you didn't vote then I am mistaken.
I'm serious. Besides I live in one of the reddest states in the USA. I was also worried that hillary was not mentally or physically fit to be anywhere near any nuke button. She start to pass out again or coughing up green foo fighters and she get the football confused with a life alert button...
Just a thought - 'intellectual' 'elite' and 'establishment' are terms which have featured prominently here, and seem to be used in a derogratory way these days. What should these terms really mean?
'elite' - superior in terms of ability or qualities to the rest of a group or society. 'First class', and 'the best' are alternative definitions.
'intellectual' - a person possessing a highly developed intellect. 'Thinker', 'genius' and 'expert' are alternative definitions.
'establishment' - an organisation or institution. The act of being established. And 'established' is defined as 'settled', 'stable' or 'accepted'.
Now I know I'm cherry-picking definitions to an extent, and these are not the descriptions which are being applied here by those who use them dismissively. None the less it is true that the qualities above are increasingly disrespected (we've seen how experience and knowledge have been regarded as less important than originality and a fresh approach from outside Washington. And even worse, one only has to think of the ever lower regard in which scientific research is held in America). It is a shame (whoever is to blame) that qualities such as these have become more and more disrespected.
What's particularly disturbing is that these are exactly the kind of qualities which have most often been attacked in history .... by both communists and fascists.
Personally I would love to be regarded as 'elite' in terms of ability, and 'intellectual' in terms of brain power, and to be governed by a stable and settled 'establishment'.
Thank you. I don't care who anyone voted for, all the labels are getting old and underappreciated by opposing sides. The frustration that comes with trying to defend one 'educated' response against another across this country is SO grade-school-recess. Do we not remind ourselves of Congress and the House? We're just as petty, "you're STUPID for believing in science"; or "you're STUPID for believing that humans are more than the sum of their parts".
If you're someone who really believes either of these things, PLEASE read my spotlight article and get some perspective. At the very least, you should be able to see the opposing side when you're done. And I don't want to hear about 'how long' it is... this has been a damn long couple of years and you managed to get through this. Do yourself a favor, get a cup of tea (or a stiff drink) and read for an hour or two. It might very well do your soul a world of good. No fear, ha!
So many people are obviously wrong from a few different directions; and none of them will admit it. Of course, I don't for a second believe that *I* am wrong about anything. The only thing I am willing to admit to, is that there are times when my passion has met or exceeded whomever's I have been debating. Its always hard to be 'trumped' (hehe, get it? aren't I clever?).
I hadn't planned on getting this upset over the election. There is currently a question asked by me on HP's entry page that was written during the 'swing states too close to call' phase. I was trying to make light of the situation and help people be able to easier-accept whatever the outcome was going to be - because I know how heated emotions are surrounding this subject. But, the outcome revealed things that I haven't decided to walk away from, yet.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for this post.
Thank you, thank you, for showing that you would prefer to believe a comfortable lie than to face a not entirely ugly truth.
What not entirely ugly truth am I not facing? Please tell me, as I have no clue what you are talking about.
Read my response to greensleeves on that original post. Or not.
I will say, concerning your comment to mrpopo that I would not have tied you to every statement Hillary made if you voted for her. It's slightly ignorant to even think someone would.
I doubt anyone would have a problem with being considered elite in terms of ability or intellectual in terms of brain power. As to being governed by a stable and settled establishment that would depend on the honesty and integrity of that establishment.
I think what you fail to take into account is that the term 'intellectual' is really a term the the democrats have attempted to place on themselves in order to cast the other side in a detrimental light. They have consistently attempted to portray any voter who does not support their cause as either ignorant or uneducated. Unfortunately, I have noticed that the American public rarely supports this type of behavior by casting a vote in favor of it.
Elitist also, is a derogatory term in this type of conversation. An elitist is someone who believes society should be led by an elite. Now, I'm not certain I would argue any person's desire to be elite but I will argue their right to be so. I would argue that they are not somehow in a better position to determine my, or anyone's, fate. Washington is, unfortunately, populated by politicians who believe they know better than the average American citizen and we are now suffering because of this.
Establishment refers to those who consider themselves elitists in the light of this conversation. Since the average American citizen does feel that their standard of living has gone down and they are worse off than they were previously they do not consider the 'elitist' or the 'establishment' to be qualified to be in charge of our government.
Whiners take notice , If Trump did all of the above , lied , cheated in the bidding business , [part of doing business ] wrote of taxes for years , [ part of doing business ] took every tax break , tax incentive , played every -outside of the US borders tax game as a foreign businessman [ part of doing business ] , He STILL accomplished far more in the category of positive economic growth , American diplomatic expansionism And paid for his own campaign and promised to take no salary for being President of the United States .
All the while .
Hilary sat on her duff in senate, taking her paycheck from you and I as a career federal employee , while all the while stealing MORE from you and I with her "pay for play " , and deteriorating our foreign policy and national , political reputation increasingly from day to day , and never had one media interview for a year and a half .
And you are shocked that she lost !.......Really ?
Hillary was a bright star, up and comming in politics before she got involved with this guy, who she had met at Yale University, New York:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ayHf7qbZGA
"The strange Nixon-Clinton bond was formed in the spring and summer of 1974, the last act of Nixon’s downfall following the break-in and arrest at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in June 1972. In the next months, the broad outlines of White House crimes were sketched out and painstakingly filled in. The numbskull burglars had been caught. The henchmen G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt had been convicted. John Dean had dazzled a Senate committee with his punishingly total recall. All that remained was to tighten the cinch on Nixon. The job was undertaken with delicacy and tact by the House Judiciary Committee, which was drawing up articles of impeachment, with a staff of bright law school graduates, including Hillary Rodham. She was 26, a year out of Yale Law School, and she got the job after her boyfriend, Bill Clinton, turned it down."
FROM http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/featu … ry-clinton
Hilary sought , bought and paid for this defeat all by her lonesome self. It was her own record of deceit , constitutional abuse , economic bribery , theft , deception and the absolute failure of her perpetrating of the " Arab spring ", the "Pay for play" of the Clinton Foundation , her failure to engage the voting trust , and her poor record of foreign diplomacy , The only thing I will give you as to Bill Clintons involvement - Is this , Hilary supported and promoted his sexual escapades more than even he did. How ? m Be her persecution of the reputation of ALL female victims everywhere in America !
LOL, but someone had to vote for Trump for her to lose. So simple.
I suggest you read the reasoning for the electoral college , and beef up a bit on your emotional based servitude to the left . It's all okay P.P. you will survive this election result .
I understand perfectly well how the electoral college works. Do you understand that voting FOR someone means you voted FOR their policies. character, and temperament?
Yes, I am surviving just fine. Just doing my civic duty and making sure you Trump voters understand and admit to what you voted for. After all, we all must live with your choice.
You aren't performing a civic duty. It looks more like a tantrum.
No LTLis right , it's tantrum , actually a tantrum would be far more mature .
Aw, I almost feel sorry for you guys. I know you want to just forget all the nasty things Trump has said and done, and you especially want us to forget all the absurd things he said he will do. Sorry, we're not letting you off the hook.
Is it because you and Hilary are women that you view this loss so sorely ? You really do seem brighter than that , All that Hilary has done negatively doesn't find it's way into your political perception . Either you are incredibly blind or emotionally attached to her.?
Lol, now that's funny. I freely admit I voted for Hillary and all of her issues. Did you not see that? Why is it so hard to admit that you voted Trump' and all of his nastiness?
I guess the female gender really must be in the majority. It seems not only PrettyPanther, but most Democrats, the majority of hispanics and Mexicans, African Americans, gays, Muslims, scientists concerned about the environment, the rest of the world outside of Russia etc etc must all be women, because they all view this loss sorely.
But then I do know that some conservatives (I'm not categorising you this way) think that only right wing rednecks are real men!
I would think speaking for the world, without any proof that the majority of the world agrees with you, must be a very, very heavy load to carry.
Fair enough point. I certainly can't speak for Africa, S.America or most of Asia (though I'd be willing to bet that I'm right). In Europe and also in democracies which have very good access to all the viewpoints expressed during the election, I think I am on safer ground.
I would tend to disagree with that. You don't speak for all people in those areas. All people in those areas are not informed enough on the issues to have an informed opinion and I doubt they all hold your opinion.
But, I think we can safely say you speak for all with opinions similar to your own. Unfortunately, only superficially since neither you or I am privy to the specifics as to why they might hold that opinion.
This is the type of thing which creates dangerous divides.
There are many surveys that bolster your viewpoint, and the results are not close, like the election was.
No one wants 'off the hook' we just aren't capable of being as childish as some.
I already have my 'Don't blame me, I voted for Bernie" bumper stickers in production
Survive? Yea, but emotional scars are souvenirs you never lose.
As the Rolling Stone's song indicated that you can't always go what you want but you get what you NEED. Trump is what America needs. Politics changes- it can be Liberal at one time & then Conservative. Life changes, get used to it.
I am a Liberal & AM pleased with the election outcome. Trump is what America needs. With his business experience, the country will be revamped socioeconomically. The immigration situation will be moderated. I have nothing to fear from Trump. Why are some Liberals AFRAID of Trump? He isn't the boogeyman. I would to add: Relax Liberals, everything will be fine.
Deleted
The natural environment and nukes, those are my two favorite.
People wonder why I am going to Bolivia.
It is sad that these areas of truly major concern for the whole planet are seemingly less important to most people, and yet some of the things Trump has said on the nuclear deterrent are frightening. I hope he'll be shot down on that one by responsible advisors. Tragically, I expect the environment to suffer as a result of this election. That is something which should alarm the whole world.
Bolivia is probably one of the safest parts of the world to live, in the event of a nuclear war! But there may be so many potential immigrants from the U.S, they'll probably decide to build a wall
I got a plan to sell small houses to the Zionist servants, than build a small wall around them. That is where the Nazi escape to the last world war. Zionist are not so dumb to live in luxury bomb shelters forever in the north.
Being a small fish swimming with the sharks. I've always stayed swimming close to the sharks so they do not sneak up from behind me, their favorite move. Then pretend to see NOTHING!!!
I can't speak for most domestic policies, because I don't know enough about most of them, though I'd have thought that many of Trump's proposals, such as on Obamacare, would be anathema to liberals? But in response to 'why are some liberals afraid of Trump?', these are some possible reasons I can feel able to come up with:
1) Increased division in society leading to increased tensions.
2) The possibility of some minorities (in their eyes) feeling persecuted and under threat.
3) The seemingly casual disregard for the nuclear deterrent. 'If we have them, why can't we use them?'
4) The possibility of a more lenient attitude towards Russia, an increased threat to Russia's neighbours, and an erosion of democracy in that part of the world.
5) Reduced possibilities for sensible gun control measures.
6) Scepticism about climate change and hence an increased threat of environmental disaster.
7) Scepticism about science generally, and a possible escalation of religious indoctrination in schools.
8) A general point - the uncertainty over what policies he actually pursues, plus his apparent ability to change his mind in less time than it takes to read this post, means instability and anxiety both in money markets and in world governments.
Wouldn't it be heaven if every disgruntled American left, just left America ! Starting with the rioters , celebrities , sore losers and media pundits who despise our process of government and society .
We should all make every effort to make that happen ASAP.
Celebrities? You voted one in for president. You guys LOVE celebrities with an "R" beside their name. You vote 'em in every time. At least we mostly keep ours in Hollywood.
As far as leaving, nope, we love this country too much to leave it to those who would vote in an overgrown toddler for president.
What a pickle. Possibly an overgrown toddler for president. Definitely under grown toddlers on the far left. And the far right, for that matter.
Thank God we have mature voters in the middle.
Lol, another version of the "childish" insult. You really don't like it when I remind you of who Donnie really is, do you?
That isn't it, but we both know that. Your comments are not an indication of who 'Donnie' is. I think we all know who he is. They are an indication of who you are.
Yes, my comments are an indication of who I am, as are yours. I am content with my vote and what it says I will accept in my president, but you are still uncomfortable with your vote and what it indicates you will accept.
I am not uncomfortable with my vote. I will say what I have been saying all along. It would have been nice to have two better choices.
The liberals being bigoted and racist, ya gotta love it.
Espousing "tolerance" and "love", but when it doesn't go their way, the demoncraps and socialists are as hateful and bigoted as any KKK member.
They say Trump in unacceptable, blame "undedicated" whites for his triumph over a socialist marxist that we've had in office for 8 years. obama has been hell bent on making America a second rate banana republic.
You think elevating deviant portions of society is "tolerant" when they rant and rave about total upheaval of the basic precepts of a civil society. (If you think I'm wrong read Black Lives Matter manifesto "We are committed to disrupting Western (white) family structure.")
BLM doesn't even want to be associated with America but a "Black Global village". I think, "knock yourselves out, and let the door hit your butt on the way out".
Sorry, us white, "uneducated" (though I do have a college degree") think your particular goals should be done with your fellow blacks, OUTSDE the U.S.
Your concept that "your" way of living is the only way, is as fascist as Hitlers. Particularly when your leaders lie and corrupt the entire free market.
It's was obama that allowed bankers to commit fraud, money laundering, rigging of markets, perjury and other illegal activity, and get way with it. Not one high ranking official at a bank went to jail.
Your candidate, Clinton, was supported by Saudi Arabia, who beheads people as "justice" and stones women for adultery. Yet, you "educated" folk don't see any conflict of interest in that. LOL
You think men should be able to walk into a woman's bathroom without any repercussions, which any father would object to. But you want us "uneducated" folks to accept this as a "normal" thing. Have you gone mad?
Soros, a backer of Clinton and black lives matter, is a Nazi Collaborator, in his own words:
"Steve Kroft of 60 Minutes asked him that. Was it difficult? “Not at all,” Soros answered.
“No feeling of guilt?” asked Kroft. “No,” said Soros. “There was no sense that I shouldn’t be there. If I wasn’t doing it, somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not. So I had no sense of guilt.” (his response to Nazi collaboration)
And you want us "uneducated folk" to align ourselves with people like this because your criminal in charge does?( aka Clinton)
Nah, I think with my "uneducated" mind, i can see where that will go - another fascist in the White House like obama - I'll pass, thank you very much.
War's and more wars. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, Somalia - thanks obama and the nobel peace prize.
Confrontation with Russia, who's doing no more or less that the U.S., when it comes to sticking their noses in other countries affairs. But, that's Clinton's style - "do it my way or I'lll crush you" Sorry, when your opponents got nukes, you might want to reconsider talking vs. confrontation.
And you've had 8 years to sell your con of socialism over democracy. All the news media outlets paid tribute to your fascist leader obama, but you couldn't sell the lie. We "uneducated" folks really can read. We really can follow the dots. We can see your ilk leading us to slaughter in a socialistic "utopia" that you so dearly want.
This, if you "educated" folk would bother to read it, is completely contrary to the Constitution. Individual liberty is paramount in America not the "community". If I want to be bigoted, it's my right. You have NO right to force me to do anything else. If I don't want to support some tramps abortion, you have no right to steal my money (that's what taxation is - legal theft) and use it for that purpose.
Your view that your thoughts, way life, your socialistic dreams can be forced down my throat is where you were wrong. It's got very little to do with Trump, and much more to do with your screwed up "values" and what you consider "norms".
The American people just said, "NO" to your bias and hate.
The epitome of your bias and hate is what's currently going on in the streets around the U.S.. You think by throwing a hissy fit, you'll actually change something. You'll not change the basic structure of the election process. Again, trying to shove down the throats of us "uneducated", "deplorable" your socialistic and marxist concepts.
We haven't bought it after 8 years of your golden boy, obama, we ain't going to buy it when your snowflakes hit the streets. They'll melt away soon enough.
Watch and learn how a man runs America.
You've had your chance with a bigoted, marxist for the last 8 years.
Let's see how somebody who "loves" America does for a bit, shall we?
Keep your bias and hatred on the back burner for a bit.
Give Trump a chance.
After all, this was the election you said we "uneducated" had to accept when it looked like hillary killary was going to win.
Now that your "wise" pundits were proved wrong, take your own advice, accept it and work with Trump to change America back to a freedom loving land.
Because personally, I'm tired of the socialistic, fascist con that's been going on for the last 8 years.
And if you really want to see bias and hate - just watch the protestors in the streets of Seattle, Oakland, etc.
Don't blame us "uneducated" for the bias and hatred coming from demoncraps (should that be democrats?) throughout America. That's on you socialists and marxist. You "loving" and "tolerant" people.
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
I want to abolish Fed Government.
I guess I'm a lone duck out here. Yet the strongest man in the world is the man that can stand alone with his integrity of being honest by means of no harm.
My only fairytales in the works is ultimately being in a loving couple relationship. Because Politics and Religion are far too much impossible to ever be a fairytales that comes true. They have turn the world into throw away products and now throw away follow Americans realationships. While not sharing all interest of other countries. Many sad long term relationship ahead.
Where is Ron Paul? the last of the American honest Politicians.
Yeah, Ron Paul would be a great pick to have on Trumps team.
And the FED should be abolished. Most American have no idea what that is.
The blind supporting the corruption within their government. Just look at all the people in the streets saying, "I want government to tell me what to do and how to live. Without government telling me what to do, I'm lost"
A sad state when we raise our young to want chains around their legs.
Sigh - Can't fight stupid.
But you don't have to hang around with 'em either !
Adios
Case in point : some asked why the libs were concerned about a Trump victory? Obviously, because it lets folks with attitudes like yours dangerously off their leash... And from your diatribe here, that is cause to be concerned.
Dangerous. How many people have gotten shot so far since the liberal hissy fit.
Credencce -
I'm a free enough a man to allow you your opinion.
Sorry if you're like the snowflakes in the streets and can't accept another view.
It kind of gave it away when you said "dangerously off their leash"
At least I'm man enough not to want to be on a leash.
You want to be a serf, be told what to do, you want a leash around your neck, then I can understand why you wanted hillary killary.
You are not someone who loves America.
You're as blind as the mass media was and as marxist as obama.
You're types are the reason America is the cesspool it is today. Congrats on making a once free country into a banana republic.
No wonder the pundits, the pollsters got it so wrong - they saw "Amereeka" through your eyes! Expecting American's to accept a "leash". HAHAHAHAHA
I guess the "deplorable" felt a "leash" was not to their liking. HAHAHAHAHA
Your concept of America is wrong. It's the exact opposite of what you believe.
Hopefully, your socialistic, marxist beliefs die when obama leaves office
Cheers
This is so much of the Trump constituency in the raw. I don't have to agree with it. It is just revealing what one of Trumps loyal droogies is capable of doing and saying. Focus: the barbarians at the gate, this is just the beginning. Because, I don't bow in deference to Aryan Nations makes me a racist, HUH.
Be careful with your name calling and careless use of adjectives, I had another troublesome fellow removed for being uncivil within these forums.
Credence2,
Just because I don't accept the biased hatred and bigotry found in all socialistic and marxists governments, isn't name calling, it's stating a fact.
Socialism and marxism cannot exist without bias and hatred. Governments ruled by socialists and marxists first precept is the citizens do not have the right to choose for themselves. The leaders in socialist and marxist government readily admit that they are superior to the citizens they rule over.
Not rocket science nor name calling. Facts is facts
Not my fault if your biases don't allow you to understand that.
“Government is essentially the negation of liberty.”
And if you need to threaten in order to win an argument - well, kind of says it all,doesn't it?
Sorry, hate to stomp out your feeling of superiority. But, you ain't superior...
Carry on
What I find hard to believe is your beliefs in your rants!
Why do you live in a country that's lifts up individual liberties?
Socialsist don't belong here.
Read the Constitution - individual liberty is the cornerstone of America.
There are no articles concerning socialism nor marxism.
Both were warned about by the founders.
You're view of the United Socialist States of America is skewed, dude
Seriously I dont get that much news. That molotov cocktail thrown into a bonfire or near a group of people, is anyone in a burn center? Leash? I take them to a vet and have them put down if they were I dog I loved.
I couldn't help smiling when I read 'The Old Guard's' original post. Tho' I needed a lie down afterwards.
I think the nature of your response is just right Credence - long enough to make your point clearly, but not long enough to imply any respect for his diatribe.
For sure. A right wing rant is Sooo much more dangerous than things like, I don't knower....blocking interstates, kicking in bank windows, vandalizing cars and throwing Molotov cocktails. How silly for anyone to think otherwise.
I do not support violent and destructive protests. But, I do see how easily you dismiss the comments of this Old Guard fellow as inconsequential.
This was the liberals problem with the elction. And kind of ties into Credance2 little leash he loves so much.
We deplorable people wanted freedom, not leashes.
Deal with it!
Cheers
Hillary won popular vote.
They are both caricature entertainers and Americans love to be entertained more than they do taking down the bankers, where some yet less will get hurt.
Yup, my inconsequential nonsense is what you'll deal with for the next 4 years.
American's have spoken - death to socialism and marxism.
Now go to your safe places and deal with it.
Cheers
It is his opinion and he has every right to share it. Of course I dismiss it, for exactly what it is. Unfortunately I am finding more and more voices from the left I am slowly dismissing. For exactly the same reasons.
People are not going to be rioting for the rest of their lives, but it's not often that people wake up one day and are done thinking/saying hurtful and dangerous things about other people. Perhaps one is more imminently dangerous while the other is more insidious.
But surely we don't even need to make it a comparison in the first place. Do we have to be perfect ourselves in order to offer criticism? If so, this forum would be silent.
There are enough actions for criticism all around. I am simply looking for balance which many on these forums are not offering. We had an impossible choice, this election. It shouldn't divide us as a people.
That ain't going to happen, snowflake.
I won't harm you nor grab anything, but if what I say "hurts" your feelings, well tough. Nothing changes without feelings getting hurt.
You might want to go to your safe space, because what you believed is not the truth. And your feelings are going to get stomped on!
Maybe you might even grow up enough to understand your "feelings" aren't worth a plug nickel to me. If you're feelings get stomped on and I get more freedom, a great trade indeed!
Carry on, snowflake
What liberals seem incapable of understanding is whether its the KKK , PLO, BLT and even Archie Bunker... Everyone has the rights to the 1st Appendage.
Of course, Trump is our legitimately elected president. Even though you didn't vote for him, you seem clearly pleased, so congratulations.
Unlike a politician i dont waffle much.Months ago I posted in this forum that I had serious reservations supporting anyone that would have Piers Morgan as a co judge but call themselves a republican. But when it comes to hillary the choice is easy. Besides once again I live in the reddest state. They havent voted democract here since the Benjamin Franklin Pierce -Trapper John Ticket
I lived in a red state for five years. Interesting experience.
And I have lived in a blue city. Great experience if you have the cash. Not so fun if you dont. Packed in like that it becomes really easy to compromise and think ones progressive when in reality it becomes a seinfeld good samaritan cliche episode. Ive forgotten the meme or expression. Throw some change in a cup and keep on walking. The good deed is done. I like the country and the people better.
I now live ina rural area in a blue state. Best of both worlds. We have the amenities insisted upon by liberals that are lacking in in the rural areas of red states. We also have higher wages and a much better standard of living. And my total tax burden is less than what I paid in Missouri. No sales tax.
Give them time. Their self righteous fervor will find a way to take that right away from any who disagree.
Lol, and you accuse us of hyperbole. I challenge you to find any instance from any of these forums of a liberal saying you don't have the right to speak your mind. Challenging your points of view is not equivalent shutting you down, no matter how much you dislike the challenge.
Some Trumpeters, on the other hand, have an entire thread dedicated to encouraging us to leave the country.
Well I will say that when a liberal starts the response with some implication that the speaker is uneducated then it is a not even thinly veiled attempt to dismiss an opinion as ignorance. I don't mind being challenged but I do find rude comments lacking any semblanceof truth as something entirely different from a challenge.
I saw the thread you mention. I'm sure that is in response to comments made by liberals, first, suggesting they were moving due to the outcome of the election. Since I doubt any liberal is truly going to relocate because of it I didn't see any harm in jabbing at an obvious lie.
Good News
Nearly half of American did not vote at all.
When non voters climbs up to 80℅ I will have faith in America's sanity again.
Don't know how Trump election relates to UK exist of EU. One is an honest disapproval of a too corrupted establishment. Where Trump is a fake take down of the Corrupted establishment only to replace it a worst establishment based on his entire Corporatism corrupted businesses.
For the 12 famous celebrities who are leaving America. I would trade Trump leaving in a heart beat. Except what country would except Trump, I know UK would not.
Pretty much exactly the point I was hoping to make Castlepaloma
As someone who voted for Brexit, but would never vote for Trump in a month of Sundays, it does irritate me how the two have become lumped together, as though the reasoning was identical. In fact, although we voted against the advice of most people in authority, I don't even regard the Brexit vote as anti-establishment at all, in the sense of being anti the British establishment. Quite the opposite - primarily, we voted to give sovereignty and power BACK to our government and AWAY from the European Union.
I could understand the economic reasons why many voted Remain, but I felt it more important to ensure that our government retained control of our own affairs.
They are being lumped together because the view is that 'populists' in both countries did this - based on the unexpected results. And you're right, Castlepaloma... The reason Trump was 'really' put into that office is pretty damn concerning. But again, it is not an impossible thing to overcome. Thus, the protests and who knows what all else. Its kind of nice to know that there are people like you in other countries who realize what's really going on. If this turns into a civil war, it could also turn into a world war - depending on what Trump is messing with.
Well they will have to be more effective than throwing molotov cocktails on themselves, beating each other up and shooting each other. Looking at the bright side.
No worries, this is just the beginning rumble of generally-disatisfied people. Based on Trump's previous record, it won't take him long to fan the flames. He already has on Twitter a couple of times; and his beloved Kellyanne hasn't been helping. I swear, she's the new Ann Coulter. NONE of them are people who seem to be remotely-interested is soothing the division in this country. Clinton & Obama both said 'all the right, nice things' that Dems always say when they lose - calling for unification and support for Trump. It didn't help. Why?
Trump would have to apologize to more than one group he has offended BIG TIME, while eating PILES of crow - AND he would have to do it in a believable way. Not likely.
Uh huh, did you read Old Guard's comment just before your's? This is just the beginning with generally-unhappy people who are protesting. With Trump's track record, it won't take him long to incense people again; and he already has on Twitter a couple times (someone really needs to take that account away from him) - plus Kellyanne isn't helping today.
Clinton & Obama have both done their part - calling for all Americans to unite and support the new President Elect. And with all the crap he has said to us - Trump and his cronies actually believe that OBAMA should be saying something more. Honestly, I think that man has been pretty damn gracious in losing; as has Hillary. (What a shocker.)
Trump needs to sincerely apologize to every group he has offended BIG TIME; and he needs to do it in a believable way - not likely; since 'making nice' would set his rabid, MEAN supporters into a frenzy.
Easy solution for anyone who has problems with the protestors.
Just call easy plow! HAHAAHAHAHAHA
Would'nt want to get in the way of those punches and gun fire.Lol
That's why Trump was elected.
If hillary killary would have gotten into the White House, you'd have had war with Russia and American troops in Syria.
We were just tired of being told what to do by the marxist, obama, is all.
We want our freedom back. If Trump can pull that off, more power to him.
In any case, hillary killary would have been the death of America, You can tell by Wikileaks and the money laundering scheme at the Clinton Foundation.
Thank our lucky stars that hillary killary does not have a foot in D.C. anymore.
Missed that kill shot be a hair! HAHAHAHA
Cheers
Except that we don't fear or loathe Westminster, in the way that many who voted for Trump seem to fear and loathe Washington. We're not trying to give power to the people - just to the people we elect to govern in Britain.
Oh, by the way, Obama is not a Marxist. I could introduce you to a few of them in the UK, and compared with them, Obama is a right wing conservative
LoL! Ain't that the truth - and his haters have been calling him a 'liberal/elitist' for years. NEWSFLASH, peeps: It is always the SAME government in that office; and it SERVES THEM to keep us fighting like they do. The only difference really, is varying shades of actually caring about the people who live here. Yeah, you can be corrupted and still semi-care about people. We watch that scenario in movies all the damn time; and really, we can see that within ourselves. None of us is pure black or white inside. We're all varying shades of grey.
I've said this before: Trump is either 'that same govenment's' END or it is their LAST STAND.
Pay ATTENTION whether you voted for him, or not. Even (and expecially) people like you, Old Guard. You think you're so smart and know everything. I'm holding people like you responsible for making sure he doesn't turn out to be the bad guy - and if he does, YOU should be the ones to catch it before if/when something goes horribly wrong.
I mean, if you're a 'prepper' - you already KNOW that big, bad Obama has got the country setup to enforce military rule any minute, now. All Trump needs to do is make a phone call - OR, maybe just say something worse - before he takes office - that deepens the hate between supporters & protestors. That way, Obama would have to make that decision and you could all BLAME it on HIM.
Misfit, you're funny.
I don't hold you responsible for the marxist beliefs of obama, why on earth would you want to put that on me with Trump? Kind of childish.
I have no more control over Trumps actions that I do with you and your unsubstantiated rants!
Get a life.
Trump got elected because he was a better orator and better person that hillary killary clinton.
I didn't get hillary killary clinton involved with numerous FBI investigations. I didn't get hillary killary clinton involved in her money laundering Clinton foundation. That's all on your hero - no one else is to blame.
But, if it makes you feel better to say you're going to hold me responsible for Trumps actions - well, just knock yourself out! Heaven forbid that any of Misfit's feelings get hurt.
Have a happy night
Blah, blah, blah... ya damn right I'm holding you and everyone else who voted for Trump for LAME reasons like you did, RESPONSIBLE.
Pay ATTENTION whether you voted for him, or not. Even (and expecially) people like you, Old Guard. You think you're so smart and know everything. I'm holding people like you responsible for making sure he doesn't turn out to be the bad guy - and if he does, YOU should be the ones to catch it before if/when something goes horribly wrong.
I mean, if you're a 'prepper' - you already KNOW that big, bad Obama has got the country setup to enforce martial law any minute, now. All Trump needs to do is make a phone call - OR, maybe just say something worse - before he takes office - that deepens the hate between supporters & protestors. That way, Obama would have to make that decision and you could all BLAME it on HIM.
Our deep divisions are as profitable as any WAR; and are no-doubt perpetuated intentionally. The chasm that exists through both America & The World is a lot more simple than most people realize. SEARCH for - Christians & ex-Christians Prove God Exists by Debunking Salvation: Science & Spirituality Reveal the Real Jesus Christ (Btw, that is my message being plastered everywhere I can possibly find to plaster it. I already had this article written; and it happens to fit into this scenario, perfectly. Cool, huh?
My thoughts are pretty simple, they've not let me down once.
MC, right-on. Now that the election is over, maybe your timely captions will give some cause for buyers remorse?
The buyers remorse in all on the left , The right and even the new" politically correct" have chosen and won . We can all post stupid pictures of Hilary too , what's the point of maintaining a face-book maturity to a political and supposedly mature discussion ? The right won - the left lost -this time !
Actually, 'the right' didn't win - the LEFT won the electorial vote; and we WOULD have won BOTH without Comey's ILLEGAL stunt that came to NOTHING - WHICH MEANS that the majority of people who came out to vote - STILL VOTED AGAINST your new ALT-right bullsh*t AND Trump's hateful rhetoric that you're all obviously so fond of.
We are seeing protests because MOST of the people in this country who voted for Trump REALLY seemed to have done it for spiteful / racial / misogynistic reasons; and it is why your idiotic rants against us only cause deeper divisions (and makes you seem even more unwanted than you already are - defending Trump's mouth).
According to the voting analysis, most of you DIDN'T 'vote your consious' as claimed. You simply INTENTIONALLY voted specifically to be *ssholes and put the country in danger. You voted to rub what you have labeled 'liberal' policies in our faces. And now you expect us to act DIFFERENTLY than you have. Its going to be a long four years.
Our deep divisions are as profitable as any WAR; and are very possibly perpetuated intentionally. The chasm that exists through both America & The World is a lot more simple than most people realize. Christians & ex-Christians Prove God Exists by Debunking Salvation: Science & Spirituality Reveal the Real Jesus Christ hub.me/akagx
As hillary killary took $$$$ millions from sheiks in the Middle East ?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Highly unlikely. Considering Trump's not had a chance to do a thing, and your snowflakes are destroying property and attacking police, I don't think "buyers remorse" is even close to occurring.
In fact, your snowflakes response to the elections probably gives more people assurance that they picked the right man for the job.
And they were right in kicking to the curb hillary killary's followers. like the snowflakes in the streets.
HAHAHHAAHA
Being on the wrong side of this move's gotta make you wonder about your own choice. Or not, depending on how big of a person you are.
Just like the alkie who screams he can't stop drinking, so it is with socialists who are afraid missing out on the taxpayers teat.
Have a happy day!
US is not only having an oil war with Russia, Syria and Iraq. It is now into a physical military war. Russia and BRICS are dumping US dollar. US dollar is what hold up the dollar in the game of oil, not gold like BRICS uses.
So Saudi Arabia floods the market to harm mostly Russia's oil market, US cuts them off with Military from Europe exports. Too bad US cuts their own nose to spite their of face with fracking oil.yet good for the natural environment.
They all rather fight than share, all soiled synthetic greedy bastards who disallowed green power like I produce or hemp to replace oil.
Misfit,
What's your point?
According to your little rant before all the pics, the government is abusive, and you want more government?
HAHAHAHA
Can't put it by Misfit, her logic, facts and reasoning are impeccable!
I love the lat pic of the snowflakes. U cannot unify with hate, but it seems to be working well for the losers in the demoncrap party!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Have a happy day!
As I've said before, you're funny.
Yes, she is funny, but also most timely in her remarks.
Well, I look at the coloring books, legos and play doe on college campuses for the little snowflakes after the election, and I completely understand here remarks.
I've been approaching her as an adult.
Now that I know she needs coloring books, legos, crying time, screaming time, I have a better understanding of how to talk to hear.
It's just that I can't seem to remember what it was like talking when I was 6 years old..........
Cheers
Hey Misfit!
Guess you numbers are going down in the demoncrat party! http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/s … k_11122016
Your cohorts are so "strong" they can't even face reality, much less have a backbone to stand up and fight.
No wonder the snowflakes have to gather in groups - they can't stand on their own two feet. They need a "group' to stand up!
HAHAHAHAAHAHA
Got no one to blame but your leaders on the democrat party who wanted us to elect a criminal.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I can not imagine why anyone, would want to be the President of USA. Since 95℅ of Crimes are occupational as President you get to be the best liar, killer and criminal on the planet. To me that would be the greatest disgraceful dishonor I could imagine. That is why Ron Paul or I would never get elected or be popular on this forum of Politics.
Every post you ever make is done in the color of your dire hatred of America , Are you aware that that is how people view your posts ? Does it matter to you that - you an avowed anti American - that your despising America and all it stands for is threaded through every one of your opinions ?
You know, as Bill Maher said, FRIDAY night "We are still here" and will always put your man's feet to the fire. The next four years will not be a cakewalk for any Rightwinged oriented government in Washington.
I''m leaving this Continents because I don't want anything to do with haters, exteme BSer and murderer. Along with many other true American celebrities that have had enough .
When too many American people can allow the Presidency to go around the world and kill millions of people that did absolutely nothing to them, that is insanity. Many Americans do this without remorse then have the Gaul to blame it on many other groups like Muslims, Latinos, Blacks, Gays, pro choice and Satan and so on and so ... without taking any responsibility. The kind of people that tell me I'm the source of the problem when I have not broken my rule of being honest and do not harm or even to hate anyone. I can forgive and have no regrets about the pass.It is the regrets in the future and my clear vision of Trump far worst destruction of America to come. It is because I love America as I do all earthlings on this planet. You got it all backward Horse.
Castlepaloma,
I can understand the points you've made.
An interesting read is Scott Adams, who writes the Dilbert comic strip.
His explanation of perception and perception filters gave me a better understanding of the problem we face communicating with others and ourselves.
People like Credance and so many others have a "perception filter" that doesn't allow them to see anything but their choices of information. And like so many "good" intentioned demagogues, it's either you believe the way they do, or your a moron, uneducated and completely bigoted.
But, life is so much nicer not having to live amongst so many who think they know how you should live your life.
Freedom is a messy business. Slavery is safe - and so many Americans have chosen to be safe.
I left specifically because slavery is quickly coming back to America. Being a slave to an elite class or to a government is still being a slave.
Glad to see you have a perception filter that can see through some of the B.S.
Best of luck!
It is a perception filter that doubles as rightwing BS detector, and it is working perfectly.
Lol. I was leaving even if Hillary won. They are all on the same pro wrestling tag team for megolomanic.
Credence2,
You figure that out while playing with your legos and coloring books?
Of course, if you're a socialist, all your diatribes make total sense.
Only question is, if you're a socialist, why stay in the "Land of the Free" - you certainly don't want that for us uneducated deplorable's.
I await with bated breath for your reply.
Cheers
You folks always use 'socialist' excuse to justify allowing Capitalism to become abusive and exploitive As practiced by the plutocrat. Capitalism is fine, when its abusive aspects and excesses are properly checked.
No point in holding your breath for too long, I wouldn't want you to expire, you know.
Hey, it was your hero, obamama, that let the bankers off the hook. He hired their long time buddy Holder, and the banks bought their way out of jail.
You want cronyism capitalism you got in big time in obamamama.
Who do you think help draw up obamacare - the insurance companies - who've made a fortune off of obamamama's crony capitalism.
Your perception filter just doesn't allow you to see it.
Might want to check your understanding if capitalism and the role obama had in crushing it.
Cheers
People arguing over I like ice cream and you like chocolate so I don't like you ,really don't get anywhere.
The most successful countries for happiness are the ones that blend Capitalism with Socialism as Canada and Scandivian countries have done. The thing that Americans knows, yet too afraid to address is greedy Corporatism or what to do about them. Corporatism don't care if you live or die, many perfer that most of you die by their toxic products, along with the rest of the world.
You're right. The majority of American citizens are Christians; and the majority of those (certainly not all of them, but obviously FAR too many) are FAR too fearful of what 'God' is going to do to them if they don't do what Republicans and their Preachers TELL them to do:
1) Vote FOR rich people because THEY have the money to let us work menial jobs beneath them so they can pay us peanuts and their money can trickle down to us humble folks. (Jesus doesn't want anyone to have any money anyway, right?)
2) Vote FOR wars because we all know that whomever we are fighting are NOT Christians; and therefore we are 'on the side of God' when we go to war. Those heathens NEED to either accept JC as their savior and DO WHAT WE WANT THEM TO DO - or DIE. Its unfortunate, but NOT OUR FAULT that they will go to hell.
3) Vote FOR anyone who is Pro-Life in order to eliminate abortions in this country; because GOD is judging us for murdering babies. That's why our country is like it is; and in FACT, there is a verse in the WORD of GOD that SAYS a country will be judged for this crime! It AMAZES me how much they completely ignore trying to fix the REASONS WHY women choose abortion & attempting to fix them. It should also be noted that CHRISTIAN WOMEN are the ones who acquire the MOST abortions in this country (seach for my hub question titled, Why do Christian women utilize the 'sin' of abortion the most). There are statistics.
4) They are so damn scared of HELPING each other out through what they consider to be 'socialism' - its ridiculous! What a bunch of SELFISH, UNLOVING, HATEFUL brats. Sorry, LOVE is not a word that comes to mind.
Jesus Christ was a Socialist:
Matt 25: "For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."
Matthew 5 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others?"
If you are a Christian and HATE me for saying any of this - do a heart check. I know, it doesn't usually help you because you're all always so damn RIGHT. But every once in a while it does WONDERS. I know, because I am someone who managed to realize how mind-controlling that religion IS and squirmed my way OUT. Christians have absolutely NO IDEA what it means to actually be FREE - although they sure believe they are. Its HARD to admit that the big eye controls YOU.
I can't imagine Buddha, Allah, and Jesus sitting around a table talking about weapons of mass destruction or nukes. That take Politicians tooling with Religion for absolute power and running people lives on ultimate fear.
As far as abortion it is on clear what Jesus or the Bible says about it. Since America people are so divided about abortion with one of the worst sexaul education records. It would be better to learn from other countries who have a much better abortion record.
Like lesson in love in school where people are well sex educated to prevent a high degree of sexaul dieses, porn addiction, less divorces and abortion.
The Christian Right has always been a hypocritical red herring. Look at all the excuses they came up with to justify their support of Trump.
Yes, they are both hierarchy authoritarian system to whitewash your brain. It's the US Politicians mercenary for franchise Corporatism that take it way beyond with physical licences to kill and steal. They take it around the world without democracy, without conciseness or without remorse. This is all coming back with knives like on Julius Caesar.
Funny. I visualized Trump on the Senate floor with everbody in Roman Toga outfits. As he takes dagger after dagger for deviating from the GOP rank in files, he cries, Et TU Newte, in reference to the treacherous henchmen that he allowed within his inner circle, who drives the final point home.
I wish that I were a political cartoonist.
LOL LOL LOL. I used to be an animator in California. Yet was G rated, no religion or Politics.
"Jesus was a socialist"
Odd - I don't recall any instances where Jesus took possessions from anyone against their will (at swordpoint, yet!) and used it for His own purposes. He never once played the Robin Hood game - the root of American socialism - that I remember. Can you provide examples of that instead of advising that we all willingly give to the poor?
Hello Mr. Atheist. I was speaking mostly to Christians. Don't worry, I am well-aware that MANY non-Christian folks are worried about their pennies, too. I, for one, don't have a problem pitching in a little extra beyond my pathetic salary to make sure people have somewhere to go to get healthcare. View it as something to resent if you want to. But, don't blame the people who need it (I was one of them, once - thanks for the temporary help, by the way); and stop judging them. You can be angry with people like me who vote for silly things like that, if you want to. I don't mind.
Jesus could have been a cross between socialist and Capitalist who knew many magic tricks.
It's all relative.
And relatively speaking, he's a devout marxist.
Maybe the laws of the U.S.A. have kept him in check?
Sometimes the laws do work.
Yeah, and the Muslims are a great group pf people.
The left-wing histrionics continue in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory on Tuesday. The latest example of over-the-top rhetoric comes from Hussam Ayloush, the head of the Council on American Islamic Relations’ Los Angeles office.In a tweet on Wednesday, Ayloush suggests an Arab Spring-like overthrow of the United States Government.
Tell me again how "peaceful" the protestors are and idiots like this who support obama.
obama's the worst president in American history, and you snowflakes support him.
What are you doing in America? Go to Europe, go to Saudi Arabia - after all, obama kisses the sultans rings, why not you snowflakes?
What educational system ever taught you this garbage? And you wonder why the deplorable's kicked the democrats out.
Look in the mirror!
Cheers
That has absolutely nothing to do with your erroneous assertion that Obama is a marxist, but okay.
Easy peasy, for those who are afraid to google anything that might prove their assumptions are wrong:
From Forbes:
Besides adopting the Leninist strategy of seeking greater control over the commanding heights of the economy, if one reviews Marx’s 10-point platform for how to socialize a country’s economy in stages (“The Communist Manifesto,” chapter two), one finds that Team Obama and his congressional progressive allies have taken actions to further the goals laid out in all 10 of the planks in the Marx platform. Here are some examples, with Marx’s wording being revised for simplicity’s sake:
If you need more info, type into google - Is obama a marxist - about 500,000 articles are listed.
Have a great week!
Old Guard
More like you I want more power for the people just not more for greedy bastards. Shooting at anyone one group is not my aim. Being more conservative wanting just to get rid of the Federal government. The rest of Government Serving all the small stuff would serve us well enough.
I noticed that you completely ignored what I said to you earlier, Old Guard. All you know how to do is insult & judge people. Listening & learning is not in your comprehension? Perhaps you're one of those old dogs who can't learn a new trick.
Misfit, if you want to ignore facts, go right ahead.
I've called no one names.
Socialists are quaint marxists.
Read the definition.
I hope Trump blows your little minds with truth - exposes the corruption behind your idols in government.
I comprehend and accept facts and truths. I'm not afraid to change my mind, nor look at others point of view.
I judge, just like you do. I hear sniveling, whining kids who don't know jack about history, economics and business.
I hear condescending adults leading a country to it's death while lining their pockets with taxpayer dollars - ala, hillary killary fame.
What's your "cause" Misfit? What's your big goal in life?
Freedom, liberty - or a socialist myopic state like Europe?
You tell me what the snowflakes in the streets are protesting over.
A loss over a fair election?
A loss of a socialistic cause?
A hillary killary defeat that, if she had been elected, would have been the final death shot for the U.S.A.
Enlighten me with your "cause" tell me something different that hillary killary hasn't blathered or obama hasn't spun as a "This is not who we are" enlighten, me snowflake. You've got my attention.
Give me logic and reason to believe in your "cause" I await your stream of intellectual insight into the depths of the "Misfit Chick"'s ways of the world.
You've go the floor, make it good!
Cheers
At this point The Old Guard is pretty much the equivalent to that cynical, out of touch grandpa who everyone avoids at family dinners, who spews inappropriate and crazy talk while the rest of the family just nods along and says "okay, grandpa. Whatever you say, grandpa," because they know arguing with him serves no purpose.
Except he has the Internet so it's unfortunately not limited to family dinners.
Do any of you who voted for Trump for fear-based reasons even understand WHAT this post is saying to you? Most of these people (certainly doesn't include all Trump supporters) are conservative Christians who are AFRAID that Democrats are EVIL - which of course would include ANY Dem in that office - doesn't have to be a dark guy with a funny name like Obama or a criminal emailer like Hillary. This is how conservatives were manipulated throughout Trump's campaign - they played off these ingrained, religious fears that have been embedded into our country's consciousness for generations.
This, of course, means that ANY Republican candidate is on the side of GOD. Anyone who DOESN'T vote Republican is STUPID for NOT believing in their superstious, apocalyptic Christian theories. Gee, I WONDER WHY you keep getting accused of being stupid & ignorant. I mean, do you REALLY think that people who don't believe like you are EVIL?!!
Until we get to the place in our minds where we can see each other for what we REALLY ARE: HUMANS - collectively, in a MUCH more balanced way - we will continue to see each other as 'good' or 'evil' (or ignorant); and we'll have plenty to fight over.
Hey, Misfit,
Yupper, super intelligent rant!
"superstious, apocalyptic Christian theories."
I can see the entire scope of you facts and logic.
Complete understanding of history, economics and political discourse - oh, shucks, you never mentioned any of those.
Just the rant about theories of Christians and God. You don't even understand that!
HAHAHAHAHA
I can see why you don't "debate" on the forums, you just toss around names and bigoted remarks.
Back up your beliefs with facts.
Yeah, we're humans all right. Each endowed with liberty. We don't need intellectual socialistic morons to tell us what we need to do in our lives.
If you need someone to give you directions in every minuscule area of your life - get a boyfriend or a girlfriend for your master.
The rest of us are just fine being masters of our own fate.
Have a happy night!
How prophetic, that is what I am thinking. I hope that I am wrong.
by Stevennix2001 7 years ago
I don't know about the rest of you, but I think he never would've stood a chance against Bernie. No offense to Trump, but if he's not insulting someone on stage during a debate, then he's practically useless because he rarely ever goes over his policies during debates. That alone...
by Stevennix2001 4 years ago
During the democratic primaries, Bernie Sanders was accused of allegedly saying, to Elizabeth Warren personally in 2018, that he thought a woman could never be president. I personally think he was being set up with that loaded question to be honest, as I feel like that question alone tells me...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 8 years ago
According to yesterday's Election 2016 poll results, Hillary Clinton won the California Democratic primary. However, Bernie Sanders refuse to concede to Hillary Clinton. It is obvious that Hillary Clinton is the Democratic winner. Why WON'T Bernie Sanders bow out of...
by Credence2 2 days ago
A contemporary "Reign of Terror" when Trump wins, buckle up.Bill Maher, and many forum participants on the left and Right has said that Harris would win. Some have directed me to look at the outrage against women and their reproductive rights promoted by Trump and the Republicans.I don't...
by Susie Lehto 7 years ago
I'll go first: "The Nightmare Before Christmas"
by Jack Lee 8 years ago
Why are Clinton and Trump the front runners this election year?I'm baffled. According to polls, 70% of Americans say we are headed in the wrong direction. Yet, we have Clinton ahead in the Democratic primary. More over, on the GOP side, this was supposed to be the year of the people against the...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.