Absolutely . . . Infact few minutes before I was thinking abt the same . . .
Yes famous person should help others it will give someone new hope towards life and it will give some one a good reason to leave in their life.
Philanthropy is a wonderful thing. When a famous figure gives their wealth for a cause it is even more positive, since society is more likely to hear about the donation, and might even learn more about the cause.
Yes, 100% believe that. What is the point of having so much money that one could never spend all of it in their lifetime.
Have a great day.
by janesix3 years ago
Why take more resources than you need to be comfortable? How many cars or jets or mansions is REALLY enough?Is it wrong to take more than your fair share?
by Audrey Appiah - Aboagye3 years ago
Do you have to be rich to be a philanthropist?
by Rev Bruce S Noll HMN5 years ago
What makes us more inclined to help some people and not others?What would cause you to help a homeless person or a stray animal but not a family member who has an issue that somehow just rubs you the wrong way?
by Ka'imi'loa5 years ago
If its true that we are here to help others, what are the "others" doing here?
by Billy Hicks5 years ago
There has been a lot of discussion about class warfare, and the wealthy not paying "their fair share",so my question for you, my esteemed fellow Hubbers is this:Assuming that they are complying with all...
by Linda Bryen3 years ago
In general life, which one do you put first others or yourself?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.