Absolutely . . . Infact few minutes before I was thinking abt the same . . .
Yes famous person should help others it will give someone new hope towards life and it will give some one a good reason to leave in their life.
Philanthropy is a wonderful thing. When a famous figure gives their wealth for a cause it is even more positive, since society is more likely to hear about the donation, and might even learn more about the cause.
Yes, 100% believe that. What is the point of having so much money that one could never spend all of it in their lifetime.
Have a great day.
by janesix 4 years ago
Why take more resources than you need to be comfortable? How many cars or jets or mansions is REALLY enough?Is it wrong to take more than your fair share?
by Audrey Appiah - Aboagye 4 years ago
Do you have to be rich to be a philanthropist?
by Ka'imi'loa 5 years ago
If its true that we are here to help others, what are the "others" doing here?
by Rev Bruce S Noll HMN 6 years ago
What makes us more inclined to help some people and not others?What would cause you to help a homeless person or a stray animal but not a family member who has an issue that somehow just rubs you the wrong way?
by Clive Donegal 6 years ago
What constitutes our obligation to others?Is doing no harm sufficient or does each of us have an obligation to actively reach out to help others?Do you think that those who believe in a hereafter are more inclined to be philanthopic than those who do not?Is altruism natural or is it learned...
by Linda Bryen 3 years ago
In general life, which one do you put first others or yourself?
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|