Some say "war on crime is really war on poor people". What do you think of this statement?
There is argument about crime as a result of areas neglected or segregated by the government. Is it true that lack of education has to do or is it a matter of manning up?
The general consensus is that crimes are often committed by those who are less priviledged.
But many of the times those who belong the upper class or certain strata in society are actually responsible or behind these under priviledged perpetrating these heinous acts.
Often times they are the ones who have the money fight their way out and leave the poor behind.
But we can't be daunted there are group of people who are daring enough to go after the big fish and white collar crimes.
The idea that "war on crime" is "war on poor" is bogus because not all criminals are poor people. Bernard Madoff being a case in point.
Some people are just born with a propensity to commit "crime" because they don't believe the society rules apply to them. They can be born into ANY strata of society. They will study the "rules", then exploit it for all they can, and get away with it for as long as they can.
You don't need to have education to have ethics. If you have ethics you wouldn't commit crime (except petty crimes like stealing food) and wouldn't need "war on crime".
That sounds like one of those liberal "blame the society, individuals can't be responsible" type thinkings.
How is a war on crime, a war against poor people? I'm having trouble understanding the question! That's like saying a war on welfare, is a war against working stiffs? Huh? Now, if you say that a war on poor people is a crime, or a war against working stiffs is welfare, it starts to make a little sense.
Either way, the only war I see on a regular basis that seems to be a war against its own people, is the so-called "war on drugs." Now that is one corrupt war, especially since one of the biggest drug problems is in the "prescription drug" industry, to say the least.
I don't think I answered your question exactly, but that was one jumbled up query, so I only responded accordingly, if that makes any sense to ya... What's next, the war on terrorism is really a war against civil rights? Or, a war against illegal immigrants is a war against legal citizens?
I would say it's a little bogus since criminals come from all lifestyles, from the very rich to the very poor.
That either the person saying the comment is not intelligent or the people commiting the crimes are not intelligent. I believe it is a matter of manning up. Some people believe they can take the easy way, like dealing drugs or breaking into people's houses. But the best way is to work hard and man up.
I do not know if the comment is true and I do not believe it is, but if it is, that's sad.
It really depends on what constitutes a 'war on crime'.
In my opinion:
- The poor often commit traditional crimes that are very visible and easily punished.
- The very rich commit much more sophisticated crimes that are difficult to see and to punish. The current western legal system is unable to control these crimes as the laws were developed for a much simpler age. In many cases they may not even be seen as a crime(e.g is it a crime for a company to sell you products that are proven to kill you?).
Both groups do it because the payoff is far greater than the alternatives.
So based on the above,I would say that a 'warm on crime'would broadly target those in lower socio economic groups.
a great crime - it is not a crime. This is a trend in society. A great crime - a measure of freedom in society. A minor fraud, of course, lack of education and lack of investment in police
The so-called War on Crime is definitely a war against poor people, especially poor blacks and Hispanics.
For example, way back in the day when I was a young dude, whenever there was a riot in a ghetto or barrio, "they" cleaned up the "mess" by drafting large numbers of the young men in those communities into the military.
And today, "they" are fighting crime by busting and imprisoning large numbers impoverished young black and Hispanic men for committing such infractions as drinking a bottle of beer on a street corner, smoking a blunt in the park, and "loitering" in front of a bodega/convenience store.
I disagree. Some of the worst crimes in history were perpetrated by people who were very wealthy, such as Bernie Madoff. A criminal mind is no respecter of social status or wealth level. Some people just never have enough!
I believe that cause of crime is the big gap between rich and poor. In southeast of China, there are some poverty rural ereas. All of people are poor, but nice to each other. Their heart are all peace. Crime rate is very low there. In contrast, in some megapolis of China, such as Guangzhou, crime rate is very high. In these big citis, both rich people and poor people lived in together. The difference beteen their lifestyle is very big. The is the real reason why some poor is desperate and feels "unfair". It is diffecult to make heart peace in the big city.
by Christian L Perry 4 years ago
What is the root cause of poverty in the world?
by Goodpal 16 months ago
Is giving money the only way to help poor people?You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money. - P. J. O'Rourke. What do you think?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 21 months ago
How can we REDUCE, if not ELIMINATE poverty in America? Let's get TRUTHFUL, even RAW here, no SOFTSOAPING here! Let's TELL IT LIKE IT IS!
by Grace Marguerite Williams 5 years ago
Do you contend that poor people in America are ENTITLED, want others to support them, & give themservices which they believe are rights such as housing, food, medical care, college education,& related services? Why? Why not?
by mio cid 10 years ago
Mike Huckabee ended his show with these words the other day.He said rich people should live with poor people for a few days so they would experience how hard their life is and poor people should live with rich people for a few days so they would see how hard they work. ...
by Goodpal 4 years ago
Why everything in society gets decided by the rich?Will the rich any importance left if suddenly all the poor people vanish from the societies? In fact, poor people work at cheaper wages to create wealth for the rich. Yet, the poor have hardly any voice in society. The rich shun them as lazy or...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|