Republican Senator Ted Cruz wants to stop Chinese censorship in movies

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (11 posts)
  1. profile image0
    Stevennix2001posted 4 years ago

    Texas Republican Senator. Ted Cruz is trying to pass a new bill called SCRIPT act, which is short for "Stopping Censorship, Restoring Integrity, Protecting Talkies Act".  And according to various sources, the bill will essentially stop the Pentagon from working with movie studios in the foreseeable future if they try to censor movies to accommodate Chinese censorship.   

    It's not uncommon for the Pentagon to work with various movie studios, in order for films to use Pentagon assets like tanks, jets, and naval bases just to name a few things, as many filmmakers love using real life Pentagon assets in movies as it helps give a lot of movies authenticity in their stories.   

    Ted Cruz was quoted saying the following:

    "For too long, Hollywood has been complicit in China’s censorship and propaganda in the name of bigger profits. The SCRIPT Act will serve as a wakeup call by forcing Hollywood studios to choose between the assistance they need from the American government and the dollars they want from China."   - Ted Cruz 

    Part of the controversy that led to this bill even happening was in part to the highly anticipated "Top Gun:  Maverick" trailer that was released months ago.  Yes, they're making a sequel to "Top Gun" that starred both Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer for those of you who didn't know already.  In the trailer for "Top Gun:  Maverick", the two patches showcasing the Japanese and Taiwan flags on Tom Cruise's jacket were digitally removed because Hollywood doesn't want to offend the Chinese government.   

    Needless to say, this move pissed off a lot of fans of the original "Top Gun" movie, even Ted Cruz, who deems the original an American classic.  In fact, here's a direct quote to what he said about it at the time:

    "Top Gun is an American classic, and it’s incredibly disappointing to see Hollywood elites appease the Chinese Communist Party. The Party uses China’s economy to silence dissent against its brutal repression and to erode the sovereignty of American allies like Taiwan. Hollywood is afraid to stand up for free speech and is enabling the Party’s campaign against Taiwan" - Ted Cruz

    Here's a link if you guys want to read more: 

    https://nypost.com/2020/04/30/ted-cruz- … for-china/

    Given this information, what are your thoughts on this?  Personally I can see both sides to this issue honestly.  While I don't necessarily condone censorship myself, but is it really censorship if the studio that made the freaking movie volunteers to alter a film to appease China itself?   Wouldn't stopping them from altering their own films just to assure maximum profit be an indirect act of censorship itself?  I don't know.   It just seems like a slippery slope to me but what do you guys think?

    1. wilderness profile image96
      wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, it is censorship.  That the studio wishes to change it's own property does not alter that.  Owners do not censor; they change.  Others, forcing owners (whether by brute force, economic force or political force) to change from what the owner wishes, censor.

      1. profile image0
        Stevennix2001posted 4 years agoin reply to this

        Hm I guess you do have a point there, so I'm guessing your in favor of this act?

        1. wilderness profile image96
          wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

          As much as I dislike seeing it, yes.  "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

          1. profile image0
            Stevennix2001posted 4 years agoin reply to this

            The irony is we shouldn't even need to pass a bill like this to begin with, as joker  and the Disney star wars films proved you can make billions of dollars at the box office without Chinese support.     I understand why movie studios want to tailor to China, as even I said before the pandemic to a lot of people in private conversations, that China is on the verge of becoming the number one economic super power in the world if they haven't proven that already.  Yeah the USA is still number one for the movies to make most of their money but for how long?   I saw China as the future number one country for movies in the next ten years before the pandemic happened so I can understand Hollywood's position from a business standpoint.   

            However with everything going on in the world right now, and after reading your comments, I think this bill might need to be passed if we're going to ensure our future.   While movies and TV shows aren't essential to society, they have inspired future generations over the years and brought people together in the past.   And with as divided our country is right now, maybe we need to have more movies tailored to inspire American audiences again that can bring people together.   I guess we'll see what happens but I think you might be right as this bill might be a necessary evil if we want to galvanize USA moral.

            1. wilderness profile image96
              wildernessposted 4 years agoin reply to this

              Well, I would fully support movies tailored to inspire American audiences.  But to require that, under penalty of law, not so much.

              1. profile image0
                Stevennix2001posted 4 years agoin reply to this

                I wasn't saying that the movies should be required by law to inspire American audiences.   I do apologize if I didn't word that well, but I was just trying to say that we shouldn't censor movies anyways to appease China, or any foreign super power really is all i was trying to say.

  2. profile image0
    PrettyPantherposted 4 years ago

    Seems like capitalism at its finest to me. The studio is tailoring its product to specific markets.

    1. profile image0
      Stevennix2001posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      True so do you endorse Ted Cruz bill?

  3. GA Anderson profile image82
    GA Andersonposted 4 years ago

    I don't support this bill. Even understanding the financial pressure, the owners still have a choice.

    I do not think the government has any place in this particular issue.

    GA

    1. profile image0
      Stevennix2001posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      This is true as well. I remember when Quentin Tarantino made his last film, "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood", China threatened not to release the film unless they took out the scene where Brad Pitt's character kicked Bruce Lee's ass, and Tarantino said no, so it never got a China release there.   Therefore, you're right that studios do have a choice, but I can see Ted Cruz's point as well.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)