Did Trump Really Try To Implement a Coup?
Now, LOL, Trump is Promising low gas prices.
Trump promises dirt-cheap gas prices. That may require a global recession
Question - why does Trump want a Global Recession??
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/ … e21e649e02Huh! Much like Harris promising to reduce grocery prices, rents, etc. while providing a "living wage" for anyone working. Presumably a hour a week: I doubt even she would give that much for 15 minutes work.
Question: - why does Harris promise what everyone, including her, knows she cannot provide? Even though it produce a Global Recession, she cannot provide it. Is she just another liar, or just stupid, as in a literal idiot?Can you prove any of what you claim? I doubt it.
Yes. MyEso, what's your response? When you seems to be one-sided for biden.
Aren't you "one-sided" for a pathological liar, a Sexual Predator, and a serial felon?
No. You can't get any thing against me here or there that gyped biden and Kamala.
I'm not in favour of Rep or Dem, or any other political party winning the Presidency.
The thing is that I'm just accessing the law as far as crime is concern.
MyEso, this thread is up to 3 years. Thanks for updating it so far. But you as a human being has not give Donald Trump' the benefit of the doubt, in certain of the doubtful cases. Nor have you give him enough breathing space when he got entangled. You're always on his neck, shoklddr, back, when for instance, the Supreme Court of the USA heard and upheld his appeal.
Its like Jesus on the cross! Kamala Harris is the worst candidate for president the world has ever seen. Trump's term in office proved his capabilities in running our country.
End of story.
No one is perfect.MyEso, why don't you ask apolonous, the Jew? Then query a high bench Judge, whose skull is crammed only with law. You know as well as I do, and anyone else that the law and the courts place a high prority in the defence of criminals. A criminal is deemed innocent, until proof of the accusation is present beyond doubt. Don't you agree?
~ apolonous, the Jew?
I found this
http://wigowsky.com/Chapters/apollonius/apollonius1.htmYes. Thank you. I've read the article before and I read through non-stop again. Would Apollonius (the name and spelling varied) agree with MyEso for not defending a criminal? The Constitution, the Law, and the Courts, initially, will defend a criminal, by declaring him innocent, until the prosecutors prove the case beyond seasonale doubt. This is a basic and fundamental law in a democracy. Yes, Trump, was tried, and found guilty by juries, and judges. He appeal to a higher Court. And the appeal subsists. Now, why is this so? Thank you.
You do realize, don't you, that:
1. Trump have found guilty by two juries and one judge - yet you defend him.
2. Do you you know who Hitler is? Are you aware of what he had caused to be done? Do you know no judge ever found him guilty of anything connected with WW II? Do you consider him a criminal.
How about Al Capone, Putin, Maduro, Xi, Un, the leaders in Iran, and the list goes on?
Now, if you say YES, you HONESTLY do not consider any of them criminals, then I can accept that as your POV
Your "deemed innocent" argument only applies to criminal court, not to anything else.
Even in your denial you admit a person can be a criminal without having been convicted of anything.
Nevertheless, here is the difference between you and I. If we both observe the same boy walk through a school shooting and killing everybody in sight then I deem him a criminal while YOU say you would not, even though you saw it with your own eyes.
I can't ask Apollonius anything, he is dead, if he ever existed.Yes, Trump, was found guilty, and he appeal. It still subsists in court. Why? Don't ask Apollo.
Mie57: I don't know how you vote in Nigeria, but in our country you choose one side or the other based on your values and belief system for the candidate you are going to vote for.
There is no benefit of the doubt as you said. If there was, a decision would be very difficult to make. Whether you like it or not, the facts are that Trump is a criminal and sexual predator by his owning doing. We are not in court as lawyers as you are trying to be. They is no benefit of doubt with Trump.
Trump is very rich and has the best lawyers money can buy. The only reason is he is not in jail is because our judicial system allows appeals and he uses them to delay his trials. I
n other words, he games the system. If one steals a loaf of bread and does not have enough money to game the system, they will be tried and go to jail. That is is an exaggeration, but it makes my point.
Trump, the indefatigable liar, FINALLY tells the TRUTH - HE LOST THE 2020 ELECTION.
"Former President Donald Trump's recent acknowledgment that he lost the 2020 election has rattled prominent far-right figures, with some saying they will lead a campaign to keep him from being elected in 2024.
At least three times in recent weeks Trump, the 2024 Republican party nominee, has acknowledged that he lost in 2020 "by a whisker."
"He beat us by a whisker. It was a terrible thing," Trump said of President Joe Biden during a 45 minute interview Aug. 4 with podcaster Lex Fridman. He used similar language at an Aug. 30 Moms for Liberty summit and an Aug. 23 press event at the Southern border."
That has ramifications:
1. It proves his years long campaign to successfully convince his followers that his election denial was nothing more than a CON to get them to do what he wants. Don't you feel USED now?
2. Jan 6 shouldn't have happened since it was the result of Trump's Big Lie. Four Trump supporters and several cops died for nothing more than a lie.
3. This provides a smoking gun in the insurrection prosecution by Jack Smith of Donald Trump.
SO, what say you die-hard Trump fanatics now, eh? Do you feel like fools?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol … 086053007/In a HUGE win for America and a BIG blow to Donald Trump, Judge Chutkan is going to let the prosecution lay out all of the evidence they have against Trump on Sep 22.
https://whyy.org/articles/trump-electio … -evidence/Big deal for some.
"WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Jack Smith filed a new indictment Tuesday against Donald Trump over his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election that keeps the same criminal charges but narrows the allegations against him following a Supreme Court opinion that conferred broad immunity on former presidents.
The new indictment removes a section of the indictment that had accused Trump of trying to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to overturn his election loss, an area of conduct for which the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 opinion last month, said that Trump was absolutely immune from prosecution.
The stripped-down criminal case represents a first effort by prosecutors to comply with a Supreme Court opinion that made all but certain the Republican presidential nominee won’t face trial before the November election in the case alleging he tried to thwart the peaceful transfer of power.
It comes days before prosecutors and defense lawyers are expected to tell the judge overseeing the case how they want to proceed in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, which said presidents are presumptively immune from prosecution for official White House acts. The high court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who now must analyze which allegations in the indictment were unofficial actions — or those taken in Trump’s private capacity — that can proceed to trial."
He is not guilty, so its actually no big deal.Yep, he wasn't guilty of bank fraud, election interference, or sexual assault, was he.
They you're again, MyEso. Why don't you stated this initially? Instead of being one or loop side? While, your country woman and my friend, Kathryn H Hill, has catch you, and fish you out of you rabbit hole. Dig more, and deeper against Trump. And congratulations!
Do me and you have any problem with that? That's MyEso & co trouble.
Even die-hard real conservative Dick Cheney says he’s voting for Harris in November and Trump ‘can never be trusted with power again’ That is how bad he thinks pathological liar, Sexual Predator, serial felon, criminal Trump is.
What does he know that Trump voters do not?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/06/politics … index.htmlHe is generally against sanctions stating, "they almost never work."
He was involved in the Council of Foreign Relations: Council on Foreign Relations director from 1993 to 1995.
He believed that Trump was in the wrong for J6.
Interesting:
https://www.cfr.org/event/2024-us-presi … ominationsI must assume the "HE" you reference is Cheney.
With a few notable exceptions, Cheney is right about sanctions. BUT, you can't do nothing, can you.
And your problem with the CFR is?
If Cheney thought Trump's insurrection on J6 is wrong, then he is spot on.Yes, "He" is Cheney.
The Council of Foreign Relations wants to eradicate the southern and northern borders of the US and have one currency for all three countries:
Mexico, US and Canada. Anyway, I heard that years ago. Maybe they gave up on that plan by now.
Of course, many do not agree that Trump is guilty of J6 insurrection.
I guess Pence agrees with Cheney.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-e … -rcna95810Mike Pence, is indeed a 'real' gentleman. Yet, as human, give the benefit of doubt to his former boss, whom he call 'friend', and refuse or desist from any political wrangling with Trump, as both shuts for the Presidency. Curiously, both are in the same GOP. Compared this scenario with other Rep candidates, who spit fire, more deadly than the fire emitted by the Airforce 'Spit Fire' craft. Or biden, Kamala, or late MCain. Seriously, he puts every question into the hands of the American people to answer. That's a gentlemanly move in the polity.
Do you have some quotes to prove the CFR wants to eliminate our borders as a practical matter? I seriously doubt that is the case.
I would agree that many, in fact a lot, of people don't agree that Trump caused the insurrection. But, they all belong to one group, MAGA cult. (with a very few outliers like Pence who may be saying that for political reasons.)
The majority of Americans blame Trump because they saw it with their own eyes and heard it with their own ears.
WHY DO Trump's former "Best People" that he hired think Trump is not fit for office???
Former VP Pence, National Security Advisor Bolton, Joint Chief of Staff GEN Milley, Sec Def Esper ALL say they will not endorse Trump to be president and most say he is a DANGER!.
Other Trump described Best People agree: former Chief of Staff GEN Kelly, National Security Advisor GEN McMaster, Sec Def GENI(ret) Mattis, (notice how many generals there are, that ought to tell you something), Chief of Staff to Chief of Staff Cassidy Hutchinson, Communication Directors Grisham, Scaramucci, and Mathews, ...
WHAT DO ALL THESE PEOPLE CLOSEST TO TRUMP KNOW THAT TRUMP VOTERS DO NOT???
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/0 … p-00177916Protect the country.
JDT can.
Harris cannot.
"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States."
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-cons … article-ii
“In our nation’s 248-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump,” the elder Cheney said in a statement. “He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again.”
Trump responded by posting to Truth Social, “Dick Cheney is an irrelevant RINO, along with his daughter, who lost by the largest margin in the History of Congressional Races!”
from the link above.Trump already failed once in the job of protecting the country. In 2019, he was pulling our CDC scientists out of China in what he called a cost-cutting move. Their job, to prevent endemics and pandemics. He pared the staff down from 47 to 14.
By the end of the year, a deadly pandemic took hold in that country and then spread worldwide, costing nations trillions.
So, the claim that Trump has the ability to protect the country is not rooted in recent history. In fact, his irresponsible actions likely led directly to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.~what were CDC scientists even doing in China?
Is that really something you can't look up online?
Duh - Their job, to prevent endemics and pandemics. That is what they were doing there. Would you rather they not being doing that?
~ not much of an answer.
"Globally, the CDC works with other organizations to address global health challenges and contain disease threats at their source. They work with many international organizations such as the World Health Organization ..."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centers_f … Prevention
"According to the CDC, the program in China specifically charged with spotting new infectious diseases went from having four American staff in 2017 to none by 2019.
It’s impossible to say with 100% certainty that if those Americans had been there, they would have been able to alert Washington earlier to an emerging threat."
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 … na-fell-0/It was all that was needed to your question.
She just doesn't like your answer because it implicates her idol in the origins of the pandemic.
DJT would be a good choice for the country based on his success in office.
You blame him for Wuhan but, he is not the one who had us involved in the research there. Someone else did. He was trying to get us away from China and away from the tyrannic China-connected WHO and stop the billion $$$ leak into that country.
https://www.cdc.gov/budget/documents/fy … cation.pdfSuccess?
- Hundreds of thousands of dead Americans, approx. 200k more than our peer nations thanks to his anti-health messaging.
- A record $7.9 trillion in debt over just four years.
- Violated the basic human rights of kids.
- Crime went through the roof by the end of his term.
- Unable to prevent mass riots in 2020 with his tone-deaf response.
- Decimated the markets for our farmers with his disastrous tariffs.
The only success he had was to give himself a tax cut that we all knew would not pay for itself.To be fair, he did have some real successes.
1. Pushing for Operation Warp Speed being his best even though his MAGA cult largely rejected getting vaccinated (which cost many of them their lives).
2. Having his step-son broker the Abraham Accords between Israel and the UAE and Bahrain was another major positive achievement.
3. Although it pissed a lot of military off, his Space Force idea was probably a good one and on at least second blush I support it.
4. Many see him signing the bipartisan First Step Act as being a positive development.
But, unfortunately, these few good things do not match up to his overwhelming failures.
1. The biggest failure of course, one that TRUMPS them all, is the one you mentioned, hundred of thousand of needless Covid deaths that resulted from both his policies and his lack of policies.
2. Signing over Afghanistan to the Taliban thereby leaving Biden few options on how to meet the timeline Trump had set (which I agree that Biden screwed up)..
3. You also mentioned his stripping children out of the arms of their mothers in order to slow down immigrants coming to America (worse, it didn't work)/
4. Oh, how could I forget - causing an insurrection against the government of the United States of America.
And the other ones you mentioned.
Wasn't that a really dumb thing for him to do? Remove our ability to keep track of what is going on in China? Sounds like you might approve of taking all our spies out of China as well so that we would be totally blind.
Just trying to save money. Same as Obama:
"On April 21, 2005, then–CDC Director Julie Gerberding formally announced the reorganization of CDC to "confront the challenges of 21st-century health threats". She established four Coordinating Centers.
In 2009 the Obama administration re-evaluated this change and ordered them cut as an unnecessary management layer.Always some omission from the right. Although congrats on doing your own research and finding the CDC wiki page:
Thomas Frieden, the new director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has decided to dismantle a key component of former CDC Director Julie Gerberding’s controversial reorganization of the Atlanta-based agency. In a memo sent to CDC staffers on Friday, Frieden said he will “remove … from the CDC’s structure” the four Coordinating Centers—for infectious disease, health information, health promotion, and environmental health—that had been established as part of Gerberding’s restructuring, started in 2005.
While the centers' functions will be preserved, Frieden told staffers that “the current organizational structure is not best suited to meet the agency’s mission.” He based his decision on the recommendations of an internal panel which said that CDC can operate more efficiently with fewer layers of management. The Coordinating Center structure had been unpopular with many at CDC because it diminished the influence of national centers under its umbrella.
Yeah, so it wasn't so much Obama that ordered it, but the CDC asked for less after doing some internal research.And the KEY phrase is "While the centers' functions will be preserved,"
When Trump kicked CDC out of China, he Preserved nothing, just blinded America.
To save money at the cost of American lives? Smart.
I have to ask you, what was your purpose for leaving off the last sentence in the Politifact quote? It REALLY was this:
"It’s impossible to say with 100% certainty that if those Americans had been there, they would have been able to alert Washington earlier to an emerging threat. But not having them there eliminated that possibility."
The last sentence changes the meaning entirely. Was that your intent?"It’s impossible to say with 100% certainty that if those Americans had been there, they would have been able to alert Washington earlier to an emerging threat."
I used the first part because that is the truth of the matter. Period.So are you saying "But not having them there eliminated that possibility."
" is a lie? That they didn't mean to include that to contradict their first statement?
It is that last sentence which is the Real Truth. Trump ELIMINATED our capability of detecting Covid in China. What an idiot.
At the onset of the Joseph Biden administration, China release some eaglets to invade America occupy air space. Critically, am I correct? The only criticize I made against the biden government is why their don't sent a bigger eagle to clear the eaglets off. That's a sign of protecting a country.
The RANTS of a VERY DANGEROUS MAN!!
"Trump warned he will jail election officials he considers cheats; is complaining Pennsylvania’s voting is a fraud; vowed to pardon January 6 rioters; railed against women who accused him of sexual misconduct; and spent hours in recent days on sometimes incoherent rants that raised questions about his state of mind."
All one has to remember is, according to his own DOJ and Intel officials, the 2020 election was the fairest ever. Given that is a fact, then one can only conclude that is the ravings of a delusional lunatic.
Wouldn't you agree?His idea was to save money. How did he know they would be incapable without US.
Who is "they" and what would they be "incapable" of without US?
Trump is going nuts at the debate. The man is UNHINGED!!!!!
Glad you agree. I think he has broken his personal best at lying.
Yup, she did well, and she came across in a manner that will garner her any of the undecided women's votes that are out there.
This is definitely what I expected it to be, more than any other issue that is being spoken of, a large percentage of women will vote for her because she is a woman and because of Abortion now being a top issue.
Over 70% of Americans believe some form of abortion should be legal and only 10% believe there should be no abortion at all.
Harris is not Hillary... Hillary was condescending, insulting, arrogant, and wanted the war that Biden has brought against Russia. Many women didn't like her for a variety of reasons and Abortion was not really an issue, the country felt like the matter was resolved.
Kicking it back to the States was not the same as making it illegal, but it has been interpreted in that way by many. It lends credibility to the other threats Democrats say Trump poses.
We are in the middle of multiple wars and transforming America into more of a Big Brother state beholden to the International corporate elite. They are not going to let Trump and the discontented rabble supporting him do any more harm to their efforts than occurred due to his first (and only) term.
The only bump in the road now to a Harris victory is a Trump assassination, that would catapult Vance into the Presidency I believe, the backlash to Trump being assassinated combined with the massive distrust many Americans feel for their government in general these days would motivate many who dislike Trump, but don't really believe in Harris, vote for Vance who is a real true-blue American success story and who can articulate a solid message extremely well.
All the Trump supporters would vote for him, and all the people with misgivings about what is going on in America today would get behind him.The reason Roe was passed was exactly because the religious right in many states took the option away from their people. The Court Rightly decided that ALL women in America should be treated equally and not be subject to religious persecution.
Unless you consider someone being shot at an assassination attempt, e.g. someone who doesn't care about you personally sends a bullet at you that nicks your ear is an assassination attempt on your life, the Trump shooting was not an assassination attempt.
They have found that the shooter did not shoot a Trump because he didn't like the guy (they probably still don't know whether he did or didn't), he shot at him because he was a popular figure that was holding a large gathering close to where the shooter lived. Remember, he researched Biden's schedule as well. It just happened that Trump was closer.Could you provide a link to anything that supports the last two paragraphs?
That is one disadvantage of not listening to real news as opposed to podcasts or YouTube.
"But the emerging profile of Crooks nearly a week after the shooting has left authorities puzzled about a motive for his assault and has had investigators speculating that his intentions may have been less politically motivated and more about attacking the highest-profile target near him."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/19/politics … index.htmlThat was a very good report on the actions that he took that were recorded prior to the shooting, a variety of angles, a good timeline.
But nothing at all... no evidence that he targeted other politicians or had plans on attempting to kill anyone else. They mentioned it last second of that report, with no evidence to back it up.
I do appreciate the clarification they gave about his explosives, perhaps he had plans for if he escaped, who know?"In addition to the former president, Crooks had searched online about President Joe Biden and had photos on his phone of other prominent figures from both parties. "
The point is, Trump wasn't the target, it seems, it was some figure where he could make a splash by killing them. It could have been Biden, it could have been Harris, it could have been Taylor Swift; it doesn't seem he cared so long as they were popular and close by.They SAID that.
Hearsay... without substance.Only because you WANT to believe otherwise. It seems you can't conceive that somebody just wants to make a name for themselves by killing someone, anyone.
I will wait for you to find conclusive proof that Crooks, the Republican, shot Trump because he hated him or his ideas.
Personally, I go for the simplest answer - Crooks didn't care who was standing on that stage, just so that killing them would make a splash.
And once again, always looking ahead, I see. ;-)
I think that Trump needs the 'undecided' Independents and Moderates to win and he lost them with this performance.
Speaking of the women's vote, my wife's first comment was that he had colored his hair. So I had to look, and she was right.
GASpeaking of the women's vote, my wife's first comment was that he had colored his hair. So I had to look, and she was right.
Not my first comment, but I said the same to my husband. He toned down the orange makeup and got rid of the chick hair color.
Maybe it was the studio lights? A Makeover to woo the ladies? Ha.My wife said he did it to look younger — to fight the 'age' issue.
GAHe may have tried to look younger, but he still sounded like an old man who is losing his grip on reality.
Best quote I heard on the debate after the moderators ask a question to Harris about immigration and she mentions crowd sizes in her response. Donald Trump spends most of the time in his response ignoring the immigration question to talk about his crowd sizes:
'She was like Bugs Bunny draws a tunnel on a side of a brick wall, and she moves the road over, and he's like "I gotta follow the road." '
He was so easily manipulated and that really showed to the American people last night.
I don't think people tuned in to judge Trump... they tuned in to judge Harris.
She did fine on her own, Sharlee noted something that others may catch on to as well... ABC effectively did more to hurt a strong Harris performance than help.
That aside, if they keep her away from interviews that turn into disasters and they keep Trump alive, this is a done deal.
Hide her away for the next 40 days as much as possible that is the best way to handle things from here on out... if they want the win.What was it that ABC did to hurt Harris? I thought they did a very credible performance, given they had to deal with Trump's bullying and not following the simple rules. Maybe the rules were too complex for his old mind to comprehend.
I know I responded to this already... but yes.
Trump lost the election with that debate, not as obviously as Biden lost with his, but the damage was almost the equivalent.
Really all Harris has to do now is not give it back to him.
In my totally unbiased opinion, Harris beat the pants off of Trump!
Seriously, I think she will be declared the winner of this debate. I might be off by one or two, but I don't recall Trump offering a single plan to help middle class people; Harris offered five or six specific plans.
Harris "probably" lied a couple of times, Trump lied about 95% of the time. And his lies got more fantastical the madder he got. She had a lot of substance while he had virtually none.
It was embarrassing watching him. The only good thing I can say about him is he kept his energy up for the whole 90 minutes.That would be funny if I didn't believe that you believed it to be true.
I was trying to be ironic, but the core is still true - Harris Clobbered Trump and led him around by the nose like any foreign dictator will again.
And 63% or 67% (I can't remember which) of Americans thought so as well in a snap poll of Debate Watchers whose stratification leaned somewhat to the right by about 4 points. That means even some MAGA supporters thought Trump lost.
Even the stock market says Trump lost. His stock fell 10% in pre-market trading to make the $4 billion Wipeout of Truth Social even worse.
Woo hoo, game over, Taylor Swift just endorsed Kamala Harris, she is a shoe in now, lol.
Many idiots watch the debate. And they reasoning is as idotic as well. Curiously, both Trump, and Kamala, are still on the presidential race. Who wins the November election? Who wins the electoral vote? Then its all over. Good luck to Trump. Good to Kamala. And God save America!
Actually, I think many people tuned in to see how an old Trump would fare against someone tougher than Biden. And he got baited and led exactly where she wanted him to be. He was easily manipulated by her. It validated much of what his former cabinet and generals had been saying - that he is more of a threat because of his vulnerabilities. Because, according to Trump, she is very weak. Well, if someone he perceives to be that weak can make him look that bad, then what will someone more savvy be able to do to him, and by extension, the country.
Scott Jennings is a CNN political analyst and Trump apologizer. He almost always toes the party line, including all the lies. You could easily see he was disgusted with Trump's performance only saying in his defense, "He looked strong in the first 30 minutes of a 105 minute "debate". That is like saying Biden looked strong in the last 30 minutes of his debate.
I think a better word than "strong" would be coherent. Trump was less and less coherent as time went on and he got madder and madder.
WOW! Yet another Trump business venture FLOPS!!
"Donald Trump’s social media stock closes at a record low after his rocky debate performance"Shutting the gov't down for a month when he was failing as a president wasn't enough for him. Now he is telling the House Republicans to Shut It Down Again!!! (Right before the election, nobody ever said he was smart.)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/tr … &ei=13From fake bone spurs to ditching debates, Trump is running scared.
Further, he becomes more delusional by the second. First, he maintains we won a lost election in 2020 and now he says he "decisively" won a debate where he performed terribly (according to many Republicans) and Harris was masterful in leading him around to where ever she wanted to go.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/13/politics … h-analysisSome people just don't get the phenomenon that is DJT.
Some do.No, we all get DJT, how could Americans not.
But those who will either vote FOR Harris or those will vote AGAINST (like those millions of Republicans) Trump are through a clear-eyed perspective. The rest have swallowed his special brand of Kool-Aid.
Tell me again why you are going to vote for a sexual predator and who will vote to keep a woman's right to chose limited to six weeks in Florida?... because DJT is for a percolating economy, closed border, energy independence, and understands how to be a leader for We The People.
He will do what it takes for all Americans to thrive and survive. He is not racist. He is not a white supremacist. He is not a sexual predator and he is not out for himself.
He will be a strong Commander in Chief who will end the tyrannic dreams of the world's bossy dictators. He will wake them up to a warless world by using his superior negotiating skills and restoring a strong military. He will listen to the right military leaders, not the wrong ones. And he knows who is who.
He exercised his skills in dealing with Putin and Un when he was President. The proof can be seen in the pudding.
He intuitionally understands common sense values for people and in politics. He will implement policies that will benefit us. He will not fall to the puppeteers as, Biden, Harris and Walz have.
Most importantly, he will close the borders and try with all his might to deport the felons who have crossed illegally. Harris/Walz will not close the borders. They will drain Medicaid and Medicare in twelve years by funding illegal immigrants.
Also, prisoners will be held according to their crimes and not be let out on "no bail" with hopes of some sort of reforming, as Harris/Walz believe.
They ignore the fact that violent criminals only repeat their crimes when given the chance.
You like Poverty?
Migrant Crimes?
Cartel wars on our soil?
Lawlessness?
Homelessness?
Rampant Drug Addiction/Deaths?
Endless Foreign Wars?
Stagnant Economy?
Handcuffed Citizens?
I don't.
Pure and Simple.
We must end the Nightmare that Biden/Harris has brought forth with their brainless policies and negligence.... because President Biden and Vice President Harris HAS provided a percolating economy, and HAS closed border better than Trump had, and ACHIEVED energy independence, and HAS PROVEN to be a leader for We The People - the People want him to continue leading and for Harris to follow and improve upon his GREAT success.
BTW, if you claim Biden caused Inflation, then I will claim, with the same validity, that Trump caused the pandemic.What? Man, you must be living in Ozland. Because of Biden & Harris, there is a massive influx of immigrants which causing crime waves. There are articles indicating that people have been assaulted or worse because of the migrant population. Migrants are terrorizing neighborhoods which causes people to be fearful. There are those who DON'T want migrants in their neighborhoods. Biden & Harris have opened the borders, reversing what Trump has done regarding the borders. There were no problems with borders when Trump was president.
When Trump was president, there was no inflation. Now, that Biddy & Happiness Galore came into office, inflation is beyond astronomical. Prices on food & other essential has skyrocketed. It is nice living in Fantasyland but reality is far different than Fantasyland where most people live. Biddy & Happiness could care less about the plight of American people. They aren't for the middle class at all. They are for the wealthy. They care more for migrants than they do for Americans.
Trump cared about core issues while Biddy & Happiness Galore cared about inane social issues. BTW, Trump didn't cause the pandemic but Biddy caused inflation. You have to face reality & not avoid the truth.Crime has gone down so there goes your argument there.
You must be thinking of the crime wave that happened under Trump in 2019 and 2020. Since then it has declined significantly. Here are my statistics. Where are yours?
Violent Crime in 2020 - 1,313,105; in 2021 - 1,284,885; in 2022 - 1,268,880. That is a 3.3% REDUCTION in violent crime under Biden's first two years.
https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/ … rime/query
Violent Crime fell another 6% in 2023 according to the FBI.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/fbi … ed-in-2023
So, where are your statistics to prove what you say is true??
Tell me now who is living in Ozland. My guess is it is you.When Trump was president, inflation was 30% HIGHER than under Obama. (I previously provided that data and sources). So, what about that?
Also, are you trying to infer that the inflation in 2021 - 2022 was Biden's fault? Well, I am here to tell you it was no more Biden's fault than the Pandemic was Trump's.
BTW - Can you tell me what 1) the average inflation rate is for the last 50 years is and 2) what the inflation rate is today. I know you can but I bet you won't.
If Trump, cause cause the pandemic as claimed, where does the coronavirus pandemic 2019 originated? America or China?
Well, according to Trump's and the Right-Wing's logic, from America.
But the REAL TRUTH is that Biden DID NOT cause inflation and Trump DID NOT cause the Pandemic (but he did make it worse in America).The pandemic originated from Wuhan, China. Trump didn't cause the epidemic at all.
And Biden didn't cause inflation either. If you believe one, you have to believe the other even though both are not true.
Wow...
You can certainly be proud of the effort you put forth on behalf of the Party.
Kudos to you... say something often enough and someone will believe it, for sure.Isn't that the premise Trump's Lies and conspiracy theories are using? Thanks for pointing that out.
Thank you Ken. Biden has put the wool over many eyes. There are those who refuse to see the truth although it is blatant & glaring. Remember what Goebbels stated -tell a lie long enough & people will believe it to be the truth although it isn't.
How will a Trump who cozies up to about every right-wing dictator alive saying they are GREAT and BRILLIANT going to "end the tyrannic dreams of the world's bossy dictators. " He EMBOLDED them in his first term. The likes of Un and Xi and Putin got worse because of his weak leadership.
We must PREVENT the NIGHTMARE that Trump is and will bring with him.
Anyone willing to bet a few legal Haitians won't be murdered by Trump supporters in Springfield, Ohio because of Trump and Vance's evil rhetoric?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/12/politics … index.htmlSeems to me the Secret Service should be investigating Musk for this inflammatory and very dangerous tweet.
"“And no one is even trying to assassinate Biden/KamalaTrump is now forcing colleges to close with his violent rhetoric that his supporters seem to love.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/16/us/sprin … index.htmlYou must face FACTS.
Obama's, Trump's, and Biden's economies were very similar if you remove the Bush recession and the Pandemic. That is just reality whether you like it or not.
Another REALITY is this: Trump LIED to you in 2017 that "They (Obama) put American energy under lock and key.”
The TRUTH: To the contrary, Obama UNLEASHED oil and gas production (not to mention making huge increases in renewable energy) such that we "almost" attained energy independence by the end of his term.
Further, they predicted at the end of Obama's term that America will be a NET EXPORTER by 2019.
https://apnews.com/article/588d1d2ed421 … fa2b7d573e
And that came to pass, briefly. It ended in 2020 due to the Pandemic.
In spite of what your side said about Biden putting the lid on energy production the FACT remains that we became energy independent AGAIN under Biden in 2022.
Bottom line, TRUMP was no energy mastermind, he just benefitted from what Obama started. and Biden INCREASED energy production and DID NOT decrease it.
Some want to rant on and on. They have no hope for the future.
No wonder.It is interesting that your side considers the TRUTH a "rant". That tells us a lot. And attacking the TRUTHTELLER is a well known and studied tactic of those who have run out of cogent ideas.
What it means is a preference by your side to deny the TRUTH and live in Trump's fantasy world of make-believe.
A world where it is OK for the Vance to effectively call on somebody to assassinate VP Harris - “The big difference between conservatives and liberals is that … no one has tried to kill Kamala Harris in the last couple of months," That is mafia boss-type code for somebody to go do it. He should be arrested.
And isn't it rich that now Trump is whining that because Biden and Harris TRUTHFULLY say he is a threat to our democracy and somehow that encouraged a Republican who wanted to kill somebody, anybody, and another guy who voted for Trump in 2016 (and then, like many others, regretted his choice) who is apparently pissed that Trump wants to hand Ukraine over to Putin to make the political choice to shoot Trump.
Ironically, Pathological lying, Sexual Predator, serial Felon Trump is FALSELY claiming the same thing about Biden and Harris. Using HIS OWN LOGIC, that means he is calling on somebody to go after them. What is good for the Goose is good for the Gander.
Did you ever answer my question about why you want to vote for a sexual predator? I don't think so.
Here is what REAL Republicans think of Trump
"That’s coming from a self-described Reagan Republican who hopes to one day soon vote GOP for president again. But not with Donald Trump atop the ticket.
“I’ve never liked anything about him,” Sanchez said of the former president. “Nothing. The way he speaks. What he represents. … You know, that we immigrants are the worst. That we are coming from mental institutions and jails and everything else. Which is not true.”
She is voting for Harris. You should to.Springfield, Ohio, schools open Tuesday with increased security amid threats linked to false claims about Haitian immigrants
THAT is Trump's fault with all his hate-filled, violent, racist rhetoric. There is a high probability that he and Vance is going to get someone killed.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/17/us/sprin … index.htmlMyEso should know or knows better. Two lies (negative minus negative) is not positive, or make the truth. Critically, instead of sifting out truth here, why magically conjured inflation with the pandemic? There's no president under whose government inflation has not occured. Q.E.F.
What do you think the question is here? Has inflation ever occurred or did a particular president CAUSE the inflation that occurred during their term? Which scenario is your post addressing?
It is also true that a negative TIMES a negative is a Positive and a negative divided by a negative is also a positive. So what point are you trying to make?Critically again, a negative multiply by a negative, let's say minus 2 times minus 2, gives minus 4, which is still negative or below zero, or the freezing point. A division by the same -2 by -2 is -1, not plus 1. What maths are you working or scarfolding to blindfold me? What brandy are you drinking to drive me nuts? MyEso, you took too much on yourself! Seriously, tell me where I bad mouth a government cause inflation. What I said was that they's no government under whose administration inflation has not occured. QEF
You need to check your math books -2 x -2 = +4 And -1 divided by -1 is +1. (BTW, one of my degrees is in math.)
My Esoteric, that is interesting. How many degrees do you have? You stated that you have an economics degree, correct? Do you have postgraduate degrees also? I am curious-my previous job was that of an investigator for human rights. I have degrees in Sociology & History. I know that you are a very astute person.
Maths is one of my favourite subject. That minus 2 times minus 2, plus 4, d' you agree that the answer plus 4 is negative? Like as I said before, I graduate BA History. And I attempt a post graduate MSe in Internet System. So I know my Maths or Arith.
It is absolutely amazing how far the MAGA-Republican Party and Trump have fallen.
Now we have a Trump-endorsed (he called Robinson the “Martin Luther King on steroids” black candidate for governor in North Carolina once calling for the return of slavery and wanting a couple himself. He also, sort of unsurprisingly, called himself a Black Nazi on a pornographic website. (There is much more disgusting stuff in the attached article.)
This quote nicely sums it all up:
"it would be an ironic historical coda if Trump becomes collateral damage to a Republican who would have been anathema to the old GOP but who thrived in the smash mouth political era the ex-president nurtured."
With any luck whatsoever that revelation will push North Carolina in the win column for Democrats because enough Trump voters who want his policies but hate the man will be so disgusted that they won't vote or will vote for the sane party - the Democratic Party.
The rest will either agree with Robinson or stick their collective heads further in the sand and continue to vote Republican.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/20/politics … index.htmlFor those of you who falsely claim no guns were brought to Trump's insurrection, this should put that debunked claim to rest.
"Outside the US Capitol, he wore a red coat and held a gun. It was January 6, 2021, and the gunman stood on a scaffold above the west plaza as a flag-waving mob pressed against a police line. He raised the .38 revolver toward the gray-white sky and pulled the trigger. Once, twice. The gunshots made a dull cracking sound in the winter afternoon. Below him, a few rioters seemed to cheer faintly in response. The man yelled something to the crowd, waving the gun in his left hand. Then he put it away, climbed down the scaffold, and disappeared."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/20/us/john- … index.htmlWell, it seems like we have two mafia boss's from New York, Trump, a Republican, and Eric Adams, a Democrat (as if you didn't need more proof THIS DOJ is even-handed even though the last one wasn't).
The Feds are going to indict Adams tomorrow, I guess. On the same day the Special Prosecutor is going to lay out, in gory detail, the case he has against Trump's insurrection.
A lot of people seem to be going down with Adams, but I don't think it is as many as from Trump's circle that got crossways with the law.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/25/us/new-y … index.htmlThe filing has been made public about the evidence Smith wants to use to prosecute Trump. There are 77 co-conspirators that were mentioned in the brief.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bombshell-sp … 59558.html
Glen Kirshner and Brian Tyler Cohen break down some of the key evidence here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_g54MAAksMTina Peters gets nine years for tampering with voting machines in Colorado to try and help Trump in 2020.
https://news.yahoo.com/news/tina-peters … 48316.html
MAGA then does what MAGA does - makes domestic terror threats:
https://apnews.com/article/tina-peters- … a258238765
This is who you are now MAGA. You're part of a group that makes domestic terror threats against others when you don't get your way. It's why people like Cred and I can't wait for the demise of this political movement.Huh! So there was "fraud" committed in that election!
Wonder why Democrats deny any such thing as they claim there is no reason to check?Where in my post did it say anything about fraud? Please stop inventing things.
Reading is fundamental.
Former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters was sentenced Thursday to nine years in prison for her role in a 2021 security breach in the elections office she was supposed to oversee.
Peters is a prominent far-right conspiracy theorist who was accused of breaching Mesa County’s elections systems during a 2021 security update in an attempt to prove debunked claims of election fraud.
For allowing a man to misuse a security card to access to the Mesa County election system and for being deceptive about that person’s identity, on Aug. 12, a Mesa County jury found her guilty of three felony counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one felony count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one misdemeanor count of official misconduct, one misdemeanor count of violation of duty in elections, and one misdemeanor count of failure to comply with the secretary of state. She was acquitted on two felony counts of criminal impersonation and one count of identity theft.
Mesa County Commissioner Cody Davis, a Republican, spoke next, telling the court that Peters’ actions cost Mesa County $1.4 million. After the investigation was launched Peters continued to receive her salary while she traveled the country, Davis said. She also cost the county by creating distrust in the electoral system — causing the county to conduct a time-consuming and costly hand count of ballots in 2022, which found no material difference between the machine and hand counts, Davis said.
Fortunately, Colorado, the state where I grew up and spent most of my time, is "true blue". It has a highly educated sophisticated populace, distinguishing itself from other states in the region. This woman and her antics are not going anywhere and I hope that they throw the book at her.
We need more aggresive prosecutions of those guilty of such crimes in other states, it is not happening fast enough for me.
Related Discussions
- 43
Is THIS One of the Examples of Trump Obstruction of Justice"?
by Scott Belford 2 years ago
There can be know doubt that the Trump Jr. meeting with various Russians connected with Putin was collusion. It is not important that the those on the Russian side ended up only talking about influencing Donald Trump to end a set of 2012 sanctions against Russia. What is important is that...
- 339
15 People!! close to Trump in contact with Russians. No Conspiracy???
by Scott Belford 5 years ago
Over 15, close or very close associates of Donald Trump or his campaign have had contacts with Russia and Russian spies. How can this not be a conspiracy that Trump didn't know about??- Flynn - National Security Advisor (pleaded guilty)- Sessions - Former Attorney General (fired by Trump for...
- 16
The Trump Dossier revisited.
by Randy Godwin 6 years ago
Today Sen. Diane Feinstein released the transcripts of the Richard Steele interview against the wishes of Republican committee members. Steel was worried about Trump being possibly blackmailed if he became POTUS and contacted the FBI as he should have. This was before the election and before the...
- 19
Has Trump already lost the election in 2020?
by Stevennix2001 4 years ago
One of my favorite youtubers, Amazing Lucas, did a podcast covering how he feels the coronavirus could actually hurt Donald's election run; regardless of how you want to spin it. Even if Trump is miraculously able to overcome the virus, the problem is both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris can...
- 89
Paul Manafort Indictment Not For Collusion
by ga anderson 6 years ago
This should be a hot one. The much anticipated Special Counsel's first indictments have been unsealed - and they aren't about Pres. Trump and Russian election collusion, (yet???)But like a lyric from a song; 'whoo eee, whoo eee babyyy...' It sure paints an ugly picture. And one that seems to be a...
- 24
Bombshell Durham Report. Hillary paid to spy on Trump Campaign
by Readmikenow 15 months ago
Some journalists, Republican lawmakers, and other notable public figures responded to an explosive report from over the weekend involving Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe by saying that the Trump White House was spied on.Durham said in the court filing...