Trump’s Day One: A Bold Agenda to Reclaim America
Part of Trump, the enemy of the People, Bold Agenda was to deny the American Public access to critical information.
One such item was this:
"Trump ‘retired’ a database tracking the most expensive weather disasters. Now it’s back — and finding over $100B in losses"
You have to ask yourself, why doesn't Trump want you to know the cost of his anti-climate change agenda, which is also part of his failed Bold Agenda.
Well, now the database is in private hands and reporting on the cost of Trump's anti-earth program.
What is it about Trump where so many millions are willing to let Trump hurt them? I don't get it.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/22/climate/ … trump-noaaThe United States just crossed $38,000,000,000,000 in national debt.
It was $36,000,000,000,000 on January 1st.This is such a gut punch to see our history destroyed by one vile man’s vanity and ego...
https://x.com/Ronxyz00/status/1981007438158651817Does Trump have any solutions to even remotely fix this disaster?
Job-based family coverage hits $27K annually...
‘A quiet alarm bell going off’: Job-based family coverage hits $27K annually | Healthcare Dive https://share.google/nlQmQ8k2ZrNxdoF0yThey are SO close to getting it. They are SO close to understanding they’ve been played....
Come on MAGA.. Set yourself free.
While Trump's presidential approval rating has declined since he took office in January, it still remains higher at 45.5% today than his first term average approval numbers of 42.8% and higher than former President Joe Biden's approval rating of 43.2%, according to RealClearPolling.
According to Rasmussen Reports daily polling on Oct. 22, Trump's approval is at 48% down from 50% three months ago.
This week's Economist/YouGov poll ending Oct. 20, found a 43% approval rating, up from 41% three months ago.
In the most recent MorningConsult poll ending Oct. 19. it found a 46% approval rating up from 45% three months ago
.
The recent Reuters/Ipsos poll ending 10/20, it found a 42% approval rating up from 41% three months ago.
RealClear Polling which encompasses the average of 10 different pollsters, including Emerson, Daily Mail, RMG research, CNBC, Quantus Insights and those mentioned above, shows Trump's overall favorability is currently at 45.5%, the same it was three months ago and a 52.2% disapproval rate compared to 52.6 three months ago.
WOW looking pretty good considering a government shutdown.
Sources are always nice--- https://www.app.com/story/news/2025/10/ … a-ds=sophiAmericans blame him for the shutdown and Americans blame him for an economy that is circling the drain... Americans believe he is a fascist dictator and overwhelmingly disagree with his brutalization of citizens through his gestapo forces . He polls negatively on absolutely everything... Why? Because the man is an inept liar
Really wonderful new polls! So, pleased to see more citizens recognizing what a great job Trump is doing. Yes, approval rates are going up, and this is what I expected. Gosh, with so much going on, too. Must feel pretty bad for Trump haters. Oh well.
Did you think that those poll numbers were wonderful when they were Biden's?..... And didn't you recently claim that you put no stock in polls?? the answer is yes
Why are the right wing folks hiding from acknowledging Trump seeking a Payday from taxpayers for his crimes??? You know the scenario that he has set himself up as judge jury and cashier?
Trump has pardoned Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, whose crypto exchange has been boosting the Trump family’s own crypto venture, WSJ reports.
The most corrupt president in history.Oh boy. Jack Smith asking to testify in an open hearing probably ensures the government staying shuttered permanently…here's the story from magas favorite rag...
Republicans obviously do not want Jack Smith to testify, he's too smart, articulate and has a squeaky clean past. He also did absolutely nothing wrong, let alone treason and they know it.... BRING IT.. LET THE CLOWN CAR ROLL
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jack-s … ump-probesMost states have already begun to issue notices that there will be no SNAP benefits to be uploaded in November.
The Republicans are so damn determined to hike healthcare costs that they are willing to let children miss out on their food aid.
And yet, Trump is focused on his tacky ballroom.
Bullshit Barbie: "At this moment in time, the ballroom is really the president's main priority".
https://x.com/Acyn/status/1981419031237447722I warn democrats not to fold and to hold firm not giving Republicans ANYTHING in this shutdown. Do not trust their promises to discuss the matter of the healthcare after we fold and give them what they want.
As we approach zero hour, the issues that divide will become more stark and those that have been politically indifferent will be forced to get involved as their pocketbooks are involved. The longer this runs the more people will understand what is at stake and perhaps in their distress will ask how is it that we have 40B to give Argentina? The short term cost of extension of the health care subsidy for a year is between 31-35 billion. What happened to the principle of “America first”?And that is the key - Republicans, meaning the MAGA Republicans are totally untrustworthy. If people like Liz Cheney promised to do something, the Democrats could and would have taken that to the bank. But with Trump-controlled MAGA people like Mike Johnson, he would lie through his teeth if Trump told him to.
I feel very sorry for the people Trump and the Republicans are going to hurt by not negotiating now, but the larger good of affordable health care for most Americans is at stake.
The shit just seems to be continually hitting the fan with this bunch doesn't it?
THE GRIFT NEVER RESTS
Trump’s DOD Gives Massive Contract to Company With Ties to His Son
Donald Trump Jr. joined the company as an adviser in November 2024, right around when his father was elected president....
OH BOY PLEASE TELL ME MORE ABOUT HUNTER
A Florida-based drone manufacturer linked to Don Trump Jr. just received its largest ever contract to supply parts to the Pentagon, the Financial Times reported Friday...
DOESN'T MATTER THOUGH DOES IT?
The opportunities for investigations to be opened in 2026 are just endless
https://newrepublic.com/post/202253/don … ium=socialI know we live in crazy times and there is a daily fire hose of literal crap from this administration but remember 4 months ago when tulsi said that Obama committed treason and she had the proof and was sending it to the Justice Department?
Anything come of that? Seems like a big deal.....LOLOne purpose of Trump's Bold Agenda is to starve Americans.
"Trump administration won’t use contingency fund to pay November food stamp benefits"
As our high school physics teacher once admonished us for being total jerks said "you can kiss my rosy red asshole" (he wasn't fired but we sure got the point). Anyway, that is what I think of Trump, the enemy of the People, telling USDA to let Americans starve - he is a rosy red asshole.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/24/politics … ember-snapPleased??
Wow. Thousands of furloughed federal workers lined up in Maryland today to get food. ... BRINGING BACK BREAD LINES!
https://x.com/mmpadellan/status/1982069634787393691No, just not your same old republicans--- They're off their pedestals, and standing strong against socialism. WINNING!
People losing their jobs and having to get food assistance is winning???
Yeah I guess in Trump World... The creuler the better. trumpism is a really ugly movementKeeping socialism out of our Nation is worth the inconvenience. Well worth it.
Like I said, trumpism is an ugly, vile movement.
There is help available if you choose to seek it.
Rehab Centers That Offer Treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome
For assistance in finding a treatment center that addresses Trump Derangement Syndrome and other forms of political obsession, contact RehabNet.com via our contact form or call us today.
https://rehabnet.com/treatment/trump-de … -syndrome/Is that all you have to debate Willowarbor? You have nothing concrete? No facts to challenge her claim. Just insults?
This is not an insult.
It is simply providing information to help the mental health of those who suffer with TDS.
It is an actual site that provides actual help.
Help is available for sufferers of TDS and this link provides a pathway to that help.I think the link you offered was really informative. It is only a short matter of time before TDS is listed as a mental illness. I actually put a thread together on the subject--- Cricket
So, you are contradicting Mike and saying TDS is not a mental illness right now.
No, not at all. I actually checked the link he provided about help for TDS and found it enlightening. I even created a thread on the subject, which no one has responded to—hence the crickets. Based on my research, I believe TDS is a genuine mental health issue, even though it hasn’t yet been officially recognized as such. In my view, I see it as a very serious condition and a threat to our society.
There is help available for you if you choose to seek it. This is a real link.
Rehab Centers That Offer Treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome
https://rehabnet.com/treatment/trump-de … -syndrome/There is real help available for those who seek it.
Rehab Centers That Offer Treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome
For assistance in finding a treatment center that addresses Trump Derangement Syndrome and other forms of political obsession, contact RehabNet.com via our contact form or call us today.
https://rehabnet.com/treatment/trump-de … -syndrome/It amazes me that so many people on the Right have no clue what socialism is. If they did, they wouldn't spread the Right-Wing lie that Democrats and Independents who agree with them are socialist.
As a refresher so that they can't plead ignorance anymore -
SOCIALISM: Socialism is an economic-political system and ideology that holds that the means of production (e.g., factories, utilities, major firms) should be socially owned—by the state, workers’ co-ops, or the public—so that production is run for use and broad welfare, not primarily for private profit.
That is NOT what Democrats support.
But, given the way Trump has a terrible habit of telling many businesses how to run their companies - or is having the federal gov't buy ownership stakes - one might compare him to a socialist.
But what is true is when we compare Trump to other fascist leaders, he checks virtually every box that experts have come up with that describes a fascist mindset.
These five pillars are a consensus of experts in the field as to what makes up a fascist:
Palingenetic ultranationalism (“national rebirth” after decay). — Make America Great Again (even though America was great when he took office.)
Authoritarian leader cult + disdain for liberal checks/independent courts/press. — Much of MAGA fits the definition of a Cult following
Mass politics fueled by grievance (propaganda, “us vs. them,” conspiracies, big lies). — Trump is the poster child of this pillar.
Exaltation or tolerance of political violence / militias to intimidate opponents, alongside efforts to bend the state. — Isn't Trump, without legal authority blowing boats up out of the water and trying to declare martial law?
Hyper-nationalism/xenophobia; racism framed as protecting the nation’s purity. — Trump's war against immigrants fits the bill here.
All fascist dictators check everyone of those boxes and there should be no doubt in ANYBODY'S mind that Trump does as well."SOCIALISM: Socialism is an economic-political system and ideology that holds that the means of production (e.g., factories, utilities, major firms) should be socially owned—by the state, workers’ co-ops, or the public—so that production is run for use and broad welfare, not primarily for private profit.
That is NOT what Democrats support."
Certainly doesn't seem that way with the communist Zohran Mamdani poised to be the future mayor of NYC. Many leaders of the democrat party including Jefferies, Warren, and a host of others have thrown their support behind him.
You need to take an honest look at the democrat party. Socialism IS what they and their leadership support. This situation in NYC proves it.Based on Trump's actions, Republicans are more socialist than what most Democrats have ever demonstrated being.
Absolutely...direct government intervention in the private sector is a socialist as It gets.
Mike, it’s become very clear to me that today’s Democratic Party no longer reflects its own name. They’ve drifted far from being truly democratic and have embraced outright socialism. History shows that socialism pops up every few decades, only to fade once Americans recognize it for what it is, something that doesn’t fit our nature or our founding principles. At our core, Americans believe in democracy, individual freedom, and the Constitution, and socialism strays far too far from all three.
There’s a difference this time, though. What we’re seeing now is a far more aggressive form of socialism, one that’s not just about economic control, but about reshaping culture and silencing dissent. It’s wrapped in the language of compassion, but too often it promotes division, resentment, and even violence when people dare to disagree. It encourages dependency instead of opportunity, punishes success, and undermines the very values that built this country.
The Democratic Party is dead.Shar,
You are right. The left lives in an imaginary world of their own making and geta infuriated if facts, truth, and reality don't agree with it.
The democrat party I grew up with and knew prior to bill clinton was a party you may not agree with but you knew they loved the United States as much as you.
Now, there are members of the democrat party who would gladly destroy the United States and everything it stands for. This is done by the massive illegal immigration permitted under biden, the extreme lawlessness embraced by the party, and more. It is a shame what has become of the democrat party.Mike, Absolutely, I agree with you. It’s striking how much the current Democratic Party has shifted from the values many of us remember, back when patriotism and a sense of responsibility toward the country were evident, even if we didn’t always see eye to eye politically. Today, it seems like there’s a growing willingness to prioritize ideology over the fundamental principles that keep the country strong and secure, from border control to respect for law and order.
On a related note, I received a comment yesterday here on HP, responding to my thought, "There is right and wrong," Shar
I quote from the reply I received - "No, no there actually isn't. And that's part of what makes America"
I think this comment really adds weight to my perspective. The comment, which perfectly illustrates the mindset that seems to be taking hold of some on the left, that truth and reality are subjective, and facts are very much negotiable. It’s alarming to see this approach gaining traction because it challenges the very foundation of rational discussion and accountability.Just look in the mirror so that you can see the hypocrisy you and Trumpers believe
Now, there are members of the Trump party who would gladly destroy the United States and everything it stands for. This is done by the massive illegal deportation permitted under Trump and Miller, Trump's extreme lawlessness embraced by the party, and more. It is a shame what has become of the republican party. it was the party of Lincoln. Good luck with the racism it has created.There is help available for your TDS.
This is a real link that would provide you with help.
Rehab Centers That Offer Treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome
For assistance in finding a treatment center that addresses Trump Derangement Syndrome and other forms of political obsession, contact RehabNet.com via our contact form or call us today.
https://rehabnet.com/treatment/trump-de … -syndrome/You have it all wrong. TDS stands for Trump Denial Syndrome of which all Trumpers suffer from. Sadly, there is no cure for it because they have all been brainwashed by Trump himself.
If you want help, I've provided the link, help is available for you and all who suffer from TDS.
This is a real link to provide real help.It's a real link to something that is not even recognized by any credible psychologist. Please stop wasting my time and yours. i know it must make you feel really good to claim dems suffer from TDS, but that in itself is sick Do yourself a favor and go find help from a real shrink.
"It's a real link to something that is not even recognized by any credible psychologist."
That is just not true.
You should read what at the site for the rehab.
The republican party does not reflect its own name. Republican means no monarchs.. Trump is a much of a monarch as some kings.. Republicans were the party of Lincoln. Good luck with the racism part. The republican party is the party of Trump and MAGA. Long live the King.
I’ve got to ask -- what facts are you basing that on? You said Trump’s like a monarch, but I don’t really see how that fits when he was elected by the people and operated under the same limits as every other president. If you’ve got specific examples of him acting like a king, I’d honestly like to hear them.
About the “party of Lincoln” point — I get that the Republican Party has changed over the years, but let’s be honest, so has the Democratic Party. History’s full of shifts like that. From where I sit, the GOP has actually opened up and evolved quite a bit; they’re not the same stuffy bunch they used to be for decades. In a lot of ways, I see today’s Republicans resembling the Democrats back when JFK was president, strong on country, economy, and pride in being American.Just because Trump was elected president, does not preclude him from acting as a king. I asked AI specific question to get the facts that you requested. Here are the results of my questions. I know you don't reply to AI generated replies, but could it be you are afraid to face the truth about the man that you constantly make excuses for and generalize his actions? Please indulge me, you might learn something.
What do you think 7 million people were protesting on No KIngs Day? Answer: Defending First Amendment rights (speech, press, protest), Opposing immigration crackdowns and executive overreach, Demanding accountability and checks on presidential power, Rejecting the idea of a “unitary executive” or president-as-king model.
When I watch Trump's cabinet meetings, they are more like holding court. He demands fealty from each of his members. They go around the table and tell him what a great job he is doing, just like kissing a kings ring. Here is the breakdown of each of those statements.
1. **First Amendment Violations**
Trump’s administration has repeatedly clashed with free speech, press freedom, and protest rights:
- **Weaponized litigation**: Trump filed a $15 billion defamation suit against *The New York Times*, which a federal judge dismissed as “improper and impermissible,” calling it political invective rather than a serious legal claim.
- **Retaliation against law firms**: Executive orders targeted firms like WilmerHale for representing political opponents. A federal judge struck down the orders, citing violations of the First Amendment and separation of powers.
- **University crackdowns**: Columbia University was pressured into a $200 million deal with the Trump administration after student protests. Critics say the deal compromises academic freedom and autonomy.
- **Flag burning rhetoric**: Trump claimed he “took the freedom of speech away” regarding flag burning, despite Supreme Court rulings protecting it as free expression.
---2. **Immigration Crackdowns**
Trump’s second term has seen sweeping changes to immigration policy, often bypassing Congress:
- **Suspension of asylum**: An executive order halted asylum access at the southern border, invoking the “invasion clause” of the Constitution. Courts have blocked parts of the order, citing violations of immigration law.
- **Birthright citizenship rollback**: Trump signed an order ending citizenship for children born to undocumented parents. Legal challenges argue this violates the 14th Amendment.
- **Mass deportation push**: Over 181 immigration-specific executive actions were issued in the first 100 days, including revoking Temporary Protected Status and deploying 10,000 troops to the border.
- **ICE raids and fear tactics**: Aggressive enforcement has led to job losses and economic disruption in immigrant-heavy sectors like agriculture and hospitality.
---
3. **Executive Overreach**
Trump has expanded presidential power in ways critics say resemble monarchical control:
- **Budget reallocation**: During shutdowns, Trump redirected funds without congressional approval, including military pay and law enforcement bonuses.
- **Independent agency purges**: He fired Gwynne Wilcox from the National Labor Relations Board mid-term, violating statutory protections for agency independence.
- **East Wing demolition**: Trump began tearing down part of the White House to build a ballroom, bypassing review agencies and historic preservation norms.
- **Unitary executive theory**: Trump signed orders asserting control over independent agencies like the SEC and FEC, challenging decades of legal precedent.
---4. **Resistance to Accountability**
Trump has undermined institutions meant to check executive power:
- **DOJ purges**: Prosecutors investigating January 6 and classified documents were fired or reassigned. Loyalty to Trump became a hiring criterion.
- **Inspector General firings**: Multiple watchdogs were removed, weakening oversight of federal agencies.
- **FOIA evasion**: Agencies like DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) used auto-deleting apps like Signal to avoid public records laws.
- **Pardons for allies**: Trump commuted sentences for George Santos and January 6 rioters, often citing personal loyalty rather than legal merit.
**Donald Trump has taken numerous actions without congressional approval, primarily by leveraging executive powers, emergency authorities, and constitutional interpretations. These include military strikes, tariff impositions, immigration changes, and budget reallocations.**
Here’s a breakdown of key actions Trump undertook without explicit congressional consent:
Military Actions Without Congressional Authorization
- **Strikes on Venezuela**: Trump authorized covert CIA operations and military strikes against alleged drug cartel boats off Venezuela’s coast, citing imminent threats.
- **Iran Bombings**: He ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, invoking commander-in-chief powers. Congress was notified only after the fact.
- **Expanded Caribbean Deployment**: Over 10,000 troops and naval assets were moved to the region amid rising tensions with Venezuela, without a formal declaration of war.
---Budget Maneuvers and Spending Overrides
- **Pocket Rescission**: Trump used a rarely invoked tool to claw back ~$5 billion in previously approved congressional spending.
- **Shutdown Tactics**: During government shutdowns, he froze or canceled funding for projects in blue states and threatened furlough pay delays.
- **Green Energy Defunding**: He unilaterally canceled transportation and energy projects that conflicted with his executive orders.
Tariffs and Trade Policy
- **Sweeping Tariffs**: Trump imposed tariffs on dozens of countries and goods, citing national security under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Critics argue this bypassed Congress’s taxation authority.
- **Reappropriation of Tariff Revenue**: Funds collected from these tariffs were redirected without congressional oversight.Immigration and Visa Policy
- **$100,000 H-1B Visa Fee**: Trump imposed a steep fee on employers sponsoring foreign workers, triggering a lawsuit from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for bypassing congressional and public review processes.
- **Border and Asylum Changes**: He reshaped enforcement protocols and refugee caps through executive orders, often sidestepping legislative input.
---White House Renovation Without Oversight
- **State Ballroom Construction**: Trump began demolition of the East Wing to build a privately funded 90,000-square-foot ballroom without waiting for approval from the National
Capital Planning Commission.
---Broader Context: Executive Power Expansion
- Trump’s actions reflect a broader trend of presidents stretching executive authority, especially in military and immigration domains. Congress has often acquiesced or failed to assert its constitutional role, allowing presidents to act unilaterally.I do use AI, but I’m careful and straightforward in how I ask my questions. Otherwise, it might give me a biased answer, one that simply reflects what I want to hear.
For instance, I asked this-Does President Trump resemble a King or dictator in the way he governs? Offer an answer in bullet points
Answer
onstitutional authority
President Trump governed within the U.S. system of checks and balances.
His actions and policies were subject to review by Congress and the courts.
When rulings went against his administration, he generally complied.
He did not suspend elections, dissolve Congress, or override the Constitution — actions typical of dictatorships.
Leadership and communication style
His approach is direct, assertive, and often unconventional.
He emphasizes results, efficiency, and national strength.
His rhetoric and public displays tend to focus on patriotism and “America First” priorities.
Supporters view his expectations of loyalty as commitment to his agenda and the success of his administration — not personal devotion.
His rallies and speeches frequently center on national pride, economic revival, and independence from global influence.
Criticism and differing perspectives
Critics argue that his strong, confrontational tone can resemble authoritarian leadership.
They point to his criticism of the press, political opponents, and certain government institutions as signs of overreach.
Supporters counter that this reflects resistance to political establishment norms and bureaucratic inefficiency, not authoritarian intent.
Summary
Trump’s governing style is assertive, nationalistic, and results-focused.
It operates within democratic limits but challenges traditional political norms.
Whether it resembles bold leadership or overreach depends largely on one’s interpretation and political viewpoint.
I then ran through what AI offered you, and simply asked -- "are all of these truly factual? Offers were answered in bullet points. I need facts without conjecture.
. As you will see, I got some different answers than you received. Here is what I received."
1. First Amendment Violations
Claim:
Weaponized litigation: That the Donald Trump administration filed a $15 billion defamation suit against the New York Times which was dismissed as “improper and impermissible.”
Fact check: Yes — Trump filed a $15 billion lawsuit against the New York Times.
PBS
+7
The Washington Post
+7
The Daily Beast
+7
A federal judge dismissed it (or more precisely, struck down the complaint for being “improper and impermissible”).
Reuters
+1
So this part is factual.
Retaliation against law firms: Executive orders targeted firms like WilmerHale for representing political opponents; a federal judge struck down the orders citing First Amendment and separation of powers violations.
Fact check: Yes — A judge struck down an executive order targeting WilmerHale as unconstitutional.
Democracy Docket
+3
Reuters
+3
courthousenews.com
+3
So this claim is factual in the essence of what’s described.
University crackdowns / Columbia University $200 million deal after student protests:
I found no credible source confirming this exact scenario (a $200 million deal with Columbia after student protests pressured by the administration) in my search.
So this is unverified in its current form.
Flag‐burning rhetoric: Trump claimed he “took the freedom of speech away” regarding flag burning, despite Supreme Court rulings protecting it.
I found no reliable source for that exact quote (“I took the freedom of speech away”) in connection with Trump and flag‐burning.
The Supreme Court does protect flag burning under the First Amendment (e.g., the case Texas v. Johnson). So that part is factual. But the claim about that specific rhetoric is unverified.
2. Immigration Crackdowns
Claim:
Suspension of asylum: Executive order halted asylum access at the southern border, invoking “invasion clause” of the Constitution. Courts have blocked parts of the order citing violations of immigration law.
Trump did issue policies restricting asylum and border access; courts have blocked some parts. That general statement is factual though the invocation of “invasion clause” (which clause?) needs clarity—there’s no widely accepted “invasion clause” invocation I found.
Birthright citizenship rollback: Trump signed an order ending citizenship for children born to undocumented parents; legal challenges argue violation of the 14th Amendment.
I found no credible evidence that such an executive order successfully ended birthright citizenship. It was proposed/announced but not implemented in a way that clearly meets this description. So this claim is unverified / misleading as written.
Mass deportation push: “Over 181 immigration-specific executive actions were issued in the first 100 days… revoking TPS and deploying 10,000 troops to border.”
Trump did issue many immigration related executive actions early in his term (first term) and did revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for some countries. That general point is reasonably factual though “181 actions in first 100 days” is a specific number that would need verification.
ICE raids and fear tactics: Enforcement leading to job losses and economic disruption in immigrant‐heavy sectors.
There is reporting about increased ICE enforcement under Trump and concerns about economic impact; so the gist is plausible, though the claim “job losses and economic disruption” is general and attributing full causation is more interpretive.
3. Executive Overreach
Claim:
Budget reallocation: Trump redirected funds without congressional approval during shutdowns (military pay, law enforcement bonuses).
I found no clear verified example in my search of exactly that phrasing (redirecting military pay or law enforcement bonuses in that way) although presidents do use reprogramming and the like. So this is unverified as stated.
Independent agency purges: Fired Gwynne Wilcox from the National Labor Relations Board mid‐term, violating statutory protections.
I did not find evidence of “Gwynne Wilcox” being fired from the NLRB (I found no major reference). So this appears incorrect or unverified.
East Wing demolition: Begins tearing down part of the White House to build a ballroom bypassing review agencies & historic norms.
I found no credible evidence of this major project carried out by Trump (and indicating bypass of review agencies) in my search. So this is unverified / likely false.
Unitary executive theory: Trump signed orders asserting control over independent agencies (SEC, FEC) challenging precedent.
While Trump expressed strong views about independent agencies, I found no specific widely‐documented order described exactly like this (SEC, FEC) in my search. So it’s at best partially supported, but as written it moves into interpretation / conjecture more than verifiable fact.
4. Resistance to Accountability
Claim:
DOJ purges: Prosecutors investigating Jan 6 and classified documents were fired or reassigned; loyalty to Trump became a hiring criterion.
There is reporting about firings and reassignments in the DOJ under Trump, especially U.S. Attorneys, and questions of loyalty. So some of this is factual, though “loyalty to Trump became a hiring criterion” is a more evaluative claim and harder to strictly verify.
Inspector General firings: Multiple watchdogs removed, weakening oversight of federal agencies.
It’s factual that Trump removed or dismissed some Inspectors General (IGs) under his administration. So this claim is mostly factual, though “multiple” and “weakening oversight” have interpretive aspects.
FOIA evasion: Agencies used auto‐deleting apps like Signal to avoid records laws.
I did not find verified reporting that a U.S. federal agency formally used “auto‐deleting apps like Signal” to avoid FOIA under Trump in any major, well‐documented way. This claim appears unverified / speculative.
Pardons for allies: Trump commuted sentences for George Santos and Jan 6 rioters, often citing personal loyalty rather than legal merit.
It is true Trump pardoned/commuted sentences for Jan 6 participants (e.g., some). However, George Santos is currently a congressman and has not been convicted and sentenced (as of my latest search). So “commuted sentences for George Santos” appears incorrect. The statement about “often citing personal loyalty rather than legal merit” is an interpretation. So this claim is partly false.
Broad summary sentence: “Trump has taken numerous actions without congressional approval…”
It is true that presidents often act without explicit congressional approval; Trump did make use of executive actions. This is a general fact, but the list of military strikes, tariff impositions, immigration changes, budget reallocations needs specific citations for each.
5. Examples of actions without congressional approval
Military strikes on Venezuela, Iran, Caribbean deployment without declaration of war:
I found no credible source confirming strikes on Venezuela authorized by Trump as described (cartel boats etc). Regarding Iran: Trump ordered strike killing Qasem Soleimani and other actions; those are documented (e.g., January 2020 strike) though the phrasing “ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities” is not accurate (no credible reporting found of Trump ordering direct airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities). So parts are incorrect or over‐stated.
Budget maneuvers: pocket rescission, freezing/cancelling funding, green-energy defunding:
While presidents and administrations use reprogramming, emergency powers, etc., I did not locate a widely documented case exactly like “pocket rescission ~$5 billion” under Trump with that phrasing. So unverified.
Tariffs & trade policy: Tariffs on dozens of countries citing national security, redirecting tariff revenue without oversight:
Trump did impose tariffs on many goods and countries, used Section 232 (national security) and others. So this is factual in broad terms. But “reappropriation of tariff revenue without congressional oversight” needs evidence, I did not find that in my search.
Immigration & visa policy: $100,000 H-1B visa fee bypassing congress:
I found no credible source for the “$100,000 H-1B visa fee” imposed by Trump. Visa fees are regulated, but this figure appears false or at least unconfirmed.
White House renovation: East Wing demolition to build ballroom privately, bypassing national planning commission:
I found no credible documentation of this project. So false or unverified.
Summary
Many specifics in your list are factually supported (e.g., Trump’s lawsuit against the New York Times, executive order targeting WilmerHale struck down).
However, many items are unverified, inaccurate, or mis‐characterized (e.g., birthright citizenship order, George Santos pardon, major White House demolition, $100k H-1B fee).
Some statements mix factual actions with interpretation or framing (e.g., “weakening oversight” or “loyalty became hiring criterion”)—those are more subjective.
NOTE --- it offered somewhat different results. Weeding out conjecture.
My view-- Although I find President Trump controversial and very different from any president we’ve had before, I believe he works diligently to use our court system to his advantage, but importantly, within the bounds of the law and the Constitution. He often takes legal challenges involving his administration all the way to the Supreme Court, seeking genuine guidance rather than bypassing the system.
I see him as a problem solver who’s unafraid to take paths that others have not followed, yet he remains within legal and constitutional limits. He has shown himself to be a peacemaker, with notable efforts in resolving long-standing international conflicts. His continued work to help end the war in Ukraine and bring stability to the Middle East demonstrates his focus on peace through strength and negotiation.
Domestically, he’s also taken strong action to address the border crisis and is working to remove illegal migrants who entered the country unlawfully, a step many Americans feel is necessary for national security and fairness. In addition, he’s working hard to attract more nations to invest and do business in America. He’s signed important agreements to secure access to rare minerals that will help keep our nation at the forefront of technology and innovation.
I know my views may not sit well with those who disapprove of Trump entirely, but I genuinely believe his accomplishments are numerous, even historic. No, he’s not perfect, but I’ve never been more pleased with a president who works as hard as he does to build a stronger, more prosperous America.I didn't want to burden you with all the sources, but here they are.
My first question was: What are all the things Trump has done with out getting congress' approval?
Sources:
https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/202 … 58321.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white- … rcna214379
Trump steamrolls GOP Congress during shutdown to implement agenda
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/tru … 00101.html
Newsweek
America’s Largest Lobbying Group Turns on Trump Admin Over H-1B Visas
https://www.newsweek.com/americas-large … s-10945123
WV MetroNews
If Trump is a king, Congress is the court jester
https://wvmetronews.com/2025/10/21/if-t … rt-jester/
Mediaite
Trump’s White House Demolition Is the Perfect Symbol of His Presidency
https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/trumps … residency/
MinnPost
Many presidents have acted without Congress declaring war
https://www.minnpost.com/community-voic … aring-war/
FindLaw
Can the President Attack Another Country Without Congressional Approval ...
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-l
Here is the other question I asked: Can you give factual examples of each of those core themes?
Here are the sources;
https://americanoversight.org/beyond-th … -of-power/
Fact Check: Has trump violated the first amendment
https://factually.co/fact-checks/politi … ion-7f7734
Reason.com
Federal judge lists 8 ways Trump violated the Constitution by punishing ...
https://reason.com/2025/05/28/a-federal … -law-firm/
USA TODAY
Inside the 'harsh terrain' of Columbia University's First Amendment predicament
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat … 840063007/
Congress.gov
Recent White House Actions on Immigration - Congress.gov
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11265
US News
A Roundup of Trump’s Immigration Actions in His First 100 Days
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-ne … ons-so-far
Migration Policy Institute
Article: In First 100 Days, Trump 2.0 Has Dramatic.. | migrationpolicy.org
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article … t-100-days
KXAN Austin
Report: Immigration crackdown likely slowing Texas job growth
https://www.kxan.com/news/texas-politic … ob-growth/
Yahoo
While America's pocketbook is shut down, Trump is taking over the purse strings
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/whi … 01144.html
The Conversation
3 ways Trump is acting like a king and bypassing the Constitution’s ...
https://theconversation.com/3-ways-trum … ity-249347
MSNBC
Business as usual isn’t an option, so the Trump resistance is getting creative
https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/lates … rcna239343
MSNBC
Trump opens up another front in his war on America’s system of checks ...
https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/lates … rcna193461
Human Rights Watch
President Trump’s Efforts to Defy Accountability
https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/05/07/pre … untability
American Oversight
Beyond the First 100 Days: Combating Trump Administration Secrecy and ...
https://americanoversight.org/beyond-th … -of-power/
USA TODAY
Trump commuting Santos' prison sentence is just more presidential overreach | Opinion
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/coI am not about to dispute so many articles. I looked at the first article, and it sort of made my point. Trump, if Congress voted to stop his orders to strike drug boats -- if he follows suit, he will approach the Supreme Court to overrule Congress. Which he legally can do... We are jumping the gun here; the issue is being talked about, but no vote as of yet. Do you feel Trump has defied a court order in any instance? I have only found one case that could be looked at as defiance or ignoring, where there has been a discrepancy over the plane that this man was in the air when the ruling was brought down -- Kilmar Abrego Garcia Case
In March 2025, the Trump administration mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a 2019 court order that protected him from removal due to potential gang persecution. The administration admitted the deportation was an "administrative error" but contested the legal authority to return him from sovereign El Salvador
I have looked closely, and this would be the only case where it could be said he did not follow the law of a court ruling. When he disagreed on a ruling, he followed the law, appealed, and if necessary, all the way to the Supreme Court. So one can dispute his actions, but one can't dispute that he followed the law. He will if Congress votes to stop his action on blowing up drug boats, he will have the option of taking their decision to the Supreme Court. And I would think he will take the advice of the DOJ on that matter. I have fully noted that he takes only cases he feels he can win in the high court.
All the many articles that skewer Trump for breaking our laws seem irrelevant to me. I can't find any fault in that he ignored a court in the land... Can you offer an instance where he did not follow a court ruling? I live in the reality of what he has done, not what he possibly could do... I think that kind of thinking really is not fair or beneficial to the country.
I am not up to read all of the articles --- sorry, our views are derived differently. I am, as I always do, considering deeds over media articles. I feel Trump is doing a good job and staying within our laws. To be honest, I have debates about all the articles you posted over the last months... I have even added threads on some... I think my views on the subjects have been debated, in some cases, over and over.
If you have one or two from your list, I will read them and offer my view. Perhaps a couple that you find especially concerning.Laws Trump is violating:
* Maritime drug/vessel-interdiction statutes - they allow for SEIZURE, not DESTRUCTION
* Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) & Executive Orders on assassinations and uses of force
- If U.S. military personnel carried out the destruction, they must abide by U.S. law on use of force, including rules governing “unlawful killing.” One commentary states: “As a matter of domestic law, a longstanding executive order bars assassinations, and the UCMJ bars service members from committing unlawful killings.”
globaltraderelations.com
- Also, U.S. law typically requires a statute or authorization for military operations abroad. The power of the President to initiate force has limits under U.S. domestic law.
- SO, Trump is putting our soldiers at risk for prosecution.
* Prohibition on the use of force / state sovereignty - United Nations Charter, Article 2(4) to which the United States, and therefore Trump, is a signatory.
* Customary rules on crimes at sea / piracy / unlawful acts
Not that Trump gives a damn about any law that gets in his way.Well, sorry, I served for ten years.
I know the UCMJ. The president is NOT covered by the UCMJ. He could NOT have broken laws in the UCMJ as they don't apply to the Commander in Chief.
You should know this. You should know what an Article 8 is and more.Well, sorry, I served for 21 years and was a trial counsel for 2 of those years.
But, where did I say that Trump is subject to the UCMJ??? I said he is putting our soldiers at risk of being prosecuted under it for obeying illegal orders.
You have diverted --- My comment had nothing to do with avoiding laws. It was about the fact that Trump did not ignore the rulings. Only went on to dispute many to the Supreme Court level. Whenever there was a question about whether he was breaking a law, and a case brought, he respected the court process, followed the rulings, and, when necessary, took his challenges all the way to the higher courts, including the Supreme Court.
Your concern is currently being reviewed by Congress, but it has not reached the floor for a vote. Even if Congress were to act and order that the Maritime drug/vessel-interdiction statutes, which allow for seizure, not destruction, be strictly enforced, it’s reasonable to assume the Trump administration would follow court rulings. Based on past actions, one might expect that if Trump loses, the administration would bring the matter before the Supreme Court to argue for a ruling that supports their position. He had a very good understanding at the Supreme Court level. In the U.S. system, a Congressional decision or law can be challenged in the courts, and ultimately, the Supreme Court can weigh in.
As of October 28, 2025, there have been no U.S. federal court cases directly challenging the legality of President Trump's recent military strikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels in international waters. These operations, part of a broader counter-narcotics campaign, have raised significant legal and diplomatic concerns, but they have not resulted in formal legal proceedings within the United States.My choice of a word to describe what Trump is doing isn't "avoid", it is "breaking" which is more accurate.
What you focused on was "Do you feel Trump has defied a court order in any instance?" It is that which is a deflection. What has court orders have to do with anything when Trump is already breaking laws?
You might ask, if he is doing that, why isn't DOIJ not going after him? Could it be that Trump has told Bondi not to prosecute him/Sorry, but it was you who deflected when you first jumped into the conversation. That’s clear if you read my full exchange with PP. When Trump is confronted in court, he follows rulings to the letter. The only exception was the case of Romulo Avelica-Gonzalez, a rare instance where a migrant was deported at the same time a court ruling was issued, and the plane was already in the air. My context is clear--- the subject was clear, you diverted. Not interested in the direction you have taken the conversation, it is based on conjecture.
Magas.... Take all of your "Hunter" rhetoric and logic and apply it to this..
The Pentagon somehow determined that the best supplier available for drone parts just happened to be the one that had one of President's sons on its board....
What kind of mental gymnastics need to take place to make this right?Anyone who ever has complained about Hunter Biden and is silent now, can not be taken seriously.
Two big data points in the headlines this week: 1) The average cost of a family health insurance plan will be $27,000 for coverage next year and 2) The federal debt grew faster than any time other than the pandemic and surpassed $38 trillion Wednesday....
Trump says he’s increasing tariffs on imports of Canadian goods by 10% because Ontario’s commercial that accurately used Ronald Reagan’s words about tariffs made him sad...
UNBELIEVABLEI don’t get how anyone can support the president having power over tariffs after watching this exchange. He is unilaterally raising taxes on Americans..not because of a negotiating tactic or to create jobs, but because…Canada hurt his feelings. Congress needs to do its job.
He is acting like an offended monarch already, this palace he is building takes away from the idea that the President is a citizen and not divine birth and privilege. It all sends the wrong message, how long will people continue to hide their heads in the sand? He has got to GO! The midterms next year are crucial to dislodge this man from everything that matters.
Remember, they are part of a cult whose brains have been changed from his use of Big Lies, Metaphors like "poisoning the blood ...", and Right-wing mythologies like "Democrats are socialists". Science has proven this mechanism to rewire their brains.
This bunch just never stops...
Pam Bondi‘s inexperience/incompetence is on full display as she screws up yet again.
It is against the law for the Attorneys General to even discuss whether or not there is a grand jury currently open regarding a specific cord general investigation.
It’s also against the law for them to prosecute people because the president is a butt hurt manbaby throwing a temper tantrum about being caught breaking the law.
Guess what!
Thanks to Pam Bondi, we know that there is currently a grand jury open for just that reason....The anonymous donor who gave $130 million to fund U.S. troops during the federal shutdown is reportedly Timothy Mellon... the same billionaire who gave $53 million to build Texas’s private border wall.
He’s funded border enforcement, Trump’s Super PACs, and now, allegedly, the military itself.
Private wealth replacing Congress isn’t generosity.
It’s a warning....QUINNPIAIC POLL - Trump approval on the economy
TODAY: -19 (38-57%)
FEB '25: -4 (44-48%)
JAN '20: +19 (57-38%)
FEB '17: +6 (47-41%)
The consequences of Trump's agenda are now REAL...life is harder and more expensive.Have you seen how he has tanked big time with Hispanic voters? They bought his con on lowering prices and all they have seen are them growing faster and faster. They are leaving him in droves.
Anyone else pissed off that Canada created a political ad that horribly twisted Ronald Reagan’s words and took them completely out of context? Misquoting a president who shaped our nation’s policies is not just misleading, it’s a slap in the face to every American who respects the office and our history. Using his words as a political weapon cheapens the presidency, insults our nation, and poisons public discourse. At the same time, Trump has been very fair in the long and complex tariff negotiations with Canada, approaching them strategically to protect American workers and industries. Thank God Trump would never stand for such a disgrace.
He was not misquoted. That was actual footage of him speaking...
What makes you think any words were twisted at all? Hell, they weren't even taken out of contest. That was what Reagan believed about tariffs and he spent 5 minutes expounding on how bad Trump-type tariffs are.
Why is speaking the TRUTH a slap in the face?
Here is how Reagan really felt about Tariffs:
* 1986 radio address (Reagan Library):
“Protectionism becomes destructionism; it costs jobs.”
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/ … hatgpt.com
* 1985 radio address explaining why he refused to impose shoe tariffs (American Presidency Project):
“So-called protectionism is almost always self-destructive, doing more harm than good even to those it’s supposed to be helping.”
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documen … hatgpt.com
*1987 radio address (Reagan Library):
“The way to prosperity… is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition.”
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/ … hatgpt.com
This last one shows how to use tailored tariffs to achieve a specific objective. Reagan was smart enough to understand this, Trump is not.
I can hear the Cognitive Dissonance ringing loud and clear.
One of several speeches that Reagan talked about his disdain for tariffs...
https://x.com/annwmac/status/1981817056720039992
Trump is full of it as usual.... Americans aren't that stupid .When I heard about this. I watched the ad. Then I went and listened to the whole Radio Address from Reagan from April 25, 1987. What I heard on the Ad was an edited down Rated G version probably due to time constraints. The radio version Reagan uses harsher language against the use of Tariffs. Views spoken that came into conflict with Trumps. Reagan also talked about The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 and the generations that remembered the negative impact it had on the nation. Though it was edited down, the spirit of what was said remained. What we have is a President Trump lashing out because he felt threatened by Reagan's Words. Something is deeply wrong with a person who feels they are threatened by long dead Presidents.
Reagan’s trade policy was guided by the idea that free trade must also be fair trade — that America shouldn’t allow “one-way free trade,” where U.S. markets were open but others were closed. He described this balance best in a 1988 statement:
“We want free trade because it expands freedom. But we insist on fair trade, because it’s only fair that others play by the same rules.”
Lots.s can be learned regarding Reagan's trade policies with a little research.But "one-way trade" is a myth created by Trump - it didn't exist.
Here is some help in understanding that Trump is lying to you.
* We sell a lot abroad—exports rise alongside imports. In 2024, U.S. exports of goods & services rose $120B (to ~$3.2T) while imports rose $253B; both flows are large and moving. That’s literally two-way trade.
https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/us-intern … nnual-2024
* Big U.S. services surplus. In 2024, the U.S. exported $1.153T in services and imported $841B—a $300B+ surplus in services like finance, tech, IP, travel, and business services. This blows a big hole in the Right-wing "one-way trade" myth.
https://www.bea.gov/data/intl-trade-inv … s-expanded
* CRS: the trade balance reflects capital flows & the dollar, [b]not “others selling and we don’t.” The Congressional Research Service explains the U.S. has run overall deficits since 1976 largely because capital inflows/strong dollar lift imports; that doesn’t mean exports aren’t robust or that trade is “one-way.”
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF … hatgpt.com
* Monthly data show continuous two-way movement. Census/BEA’s monthly tables chart hundreds of billions in exports and imports each month (e.g., July 2025: $280.5B exports vs $358.8B imports). Whatever the balance, both sides are big.
https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/us-intern … -july-2025
Those who think trade was by-and-large a "one-way street" simply don't understand how trade works and instead rely on Trump's Bid Lies.
the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984 (signed by Ronald Reagan on October 30, 1984) was one of the most significant trade laws of his presidency.
It wasn’t a single blanket tariff increase — instead, it gave Reagan new powers and adjusted tariffs and trade rules for certain products and situations. Its goal was to make U.S. trade policy more flexible and responsive to unfair foreign practices, while also paving the way for future free trade agreements (like the one later signed with Canada).
Here’s what the Act did in plain terms:
⚖️ 1. Changed Tariff Treatment for Specific Goods
The law modified tariff schedules for several categories of imported goods — meaning it raised or lowered duties depending on what the U.S. needed at the time.
It reclassified certain items (like chemicals, electronics, and textiles) to ensure U.S. industries weren’t unfairly undercut by cheap imports.
It removed some products from duty-free lists under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) when those products came from countries that were no longer considered “developing.”
It adjusted tariffs on imports such as sugar, footwear, and lumber — industries that had been heavily affected by foreign dumping.
These tariff changes were selective — not sweeping across all imports — and were meant to protect vulnerable U.S. sectors while encouraging fairer trade competition.
2. Expanded Presidential Authority on Trade
Reagan gained broader powers under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 — the key legal tool for retaliating against unfair trade practices.
This meant the president could:
Impose tariffs or quotas on countries that restricted U.S. exports.
Negotiate trade agreements more easily without waiting for new congressional approval each time.
Suspend or modify tariffs when necessary to support U.S. interests.
Essentially, Congress gave Reagan a stronger hand to deal with Japan and the European Economic Community when they blocked U.S. exports or subsidized their own industries.
3. Set the Stage for Future Free Trade Deals
The Act also authorized the president to begin negotiating bilateral trade agreements with other countries — this was the legal foundation for what became the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement (1988) and later NAFTA.
So while Reagan used tariffs strategically, this same law helped him push forward his broader vision of global free and fair trade.
Reagan’s Message When Signing It
When Reagan signed the bill, he said it would help the U.S. “promote open markets abroad while ensuring that trade is fair for American workers and industries.”
He emphasized that while America favored free trade, it could not allow others to “cheat” or “rig the game” through protectionism or subsidies.Why doesn't Trump believe this and is doing the opposite - "When Reagan signed the bill, he said it would help the U.S. “promote open markets abroad while ensuring that trade is fair for American workers and industries.”"?
Republicans under Reagan believed in Free Trade. Republicans under Trump believe "free trade" is a four letter word. In fact, Their on-the-ground actions tell everybody that Trump Republicans no longer believe in:
* States Rights
* Free Trade
* Small Gov't
* Individual Liberty and Freedom
* Fiscal Responsibility
* Social Conservatism
* Legal Immigration
* Rule of Law
* US leadership through alliances
* Pro-legal immigration
* Civic character & prudence:
* Predictable, pro-business regulation
* Lower taxes
* Broad roll-back of regulations.
The Bolden ones are principles for which Trump as demonstrated he no longer believed in while Reagan believed in them all.
Trump Kicks Off Asia Tour with Dance Moves, Diplomacy, and a Big Peace Deal
President Donald Trump started his Asia trip with some unexpected rhythm, joining Malaysian dancers in a lively welcome ceremony at Kuala Lumpur International Airport. The White House even had fun with it online, jokingly calling his moves the “Trump Dance: Malaysia Edition.”
The colorful greeting was hosted by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, marking the start of Trump’s five-day tour across Asia. From Malaysia, he’s set to meet Japan’s new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, in Tokyo and then head to South Korea for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
But it wasn’t all song and dance. Trump played a key role in brokering a major peace breakthrough between Cambodia and Thailand, two countries that have been at odds for years. During the annual ASEAN summit, the Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul officially signed an expanded ceasefire agreement, with Trump looking on.
The deal requires Thailand to release 18 captured Cambodian soldiers and for both sides to pull back heavy weapons from the border region. “We did something that a lot of people said couldn’t be done,” Trump said proudly after the signing.
Cambodia’s leader called it a “historic day,” while Thailand’s prime minister said the agreement lays “the building blocks for a lasting peace.” Anwar Ibrahim praised the two nations’ courage, saying it proves that “reconciliation is not concession, but an act of courage.”
To top it off, Trump followed the peace signing with new economic agreements involving both Cambodia and Thailand, and later inked trade and critical minerals deals with Malaysia. The U.S. is continuing efforts to strengthen supply chains and reduce dependence on China, especially as Beijing tightens exports on vital tech materials.
All in all, Trump’s Asia tour is turning out to be a mix of diplomacy, business, and a little dance floor flair — pure Trump energy. Nothing slows him down; no matter what gets tossed in his path, he steps right over it without ever picking up the mess on his shoes.
Shouldn't he be here negotiating and end to the government shutdown?
"The President will be blamed... it will be a tremendously negative mark on the President. He's the one that has to get people together."
The dummy was right, for a change.
HE SHOULD TAKE HIS OWN ADVICE
https://x.com/factpostnews/status/19706111766030830432013--- You only have to look back to 2013 to see how Trump adjusted with the times; he recognized where the country was heading and shifted with it. That’s what strong leaders do: they move with the moment without losing their core. Times change, situations evolve, and the wise adapt instead of standing still.
I have no doubt he’s involved — he’s the kind of guy who can walk, dance, and chew gum without missing a beat. Still, getting the budget passed isn’t his job; that’s Congress’s responsibility. I’m glad to see Republicans holding firm for a budget that won’t weigh the country down with another bloated social program. I’d much rather see America stay true to its democratic roots than slide toward becoming another struggling socialist imitation. In my view, socialism doesn’t create success; it moves in after success has faded. Winners stand firm on their convictions; losers just stand around wringing their hands or holding them out.Lol always an excuse... The man changes his mind like people change underwear.... And his followers adjust accordingly. That's not ideology, that's a cult.
Calling it a “cult” because Trump changes his mind is lazy thinking, not real analysis. Leaders who adjust positions are doing what politics demands, adapting to new facts, testing ideas, and responding to what’s best for the country. That isn’t cult behavior; it’s pragmatism.
Trump has been consistent where it counts: economic nationalism, border security, deregulation, and a stronger judiciary. Those are long-term principles, not passing whims. And dismissing millions of Americans as blind followers ignores reality; people support him because they feel his policies improve their lives, not because they worship him.
If critics want to make a serious case, they should name a specific reversal and explain how it harmed the country. One doesn’t do that with photos, 10-second videos, and one-liners. That’s noise, not evidence. Adjusting strategy isn’t weakness — it’s leadership.I have been diligent on this forum pointing out every reversal... And how trumpists change their views accordingly... Any video is in its entirety.... Are you suggesting people keep rolling after the event has ended LOL.... The logic, as usual, makes no sense sorry
The Epstein files WILL be eventually released. How long can they keep the government shut down in order to hide them?
IT WILL BE INCREDIBLY ENTERTAINING TO WATCH TRUMPISTS TRY AND DEFEND PEDOPHILIA...
I mean really, why do you think Maxwell was sent to camp cupcake? LolLOL, nice diversion, you're very predictable!
Honestly, what will be truly entertaining is watching those who’ve relied on this conspiracy quietly sink into the woodwork, just like they do every time one of their many Trump conspiracies fails… I get the sense your diversion came from a bit of frustration or anger or both.
I agree Trump adjusts with time, with the audience, with what he feels like when he wakes up in the morning.
The man has no core principles to live by other than to tax the American people through tariffs. The latter is the ONLY belief Trump has held onto over time.
It is a sign of low character and weakness when a leader changes his beliefs at the drop-of-a-hat.
It is a sign of great strength when only fact-based evidence is persuasive enough to warrant a change.
Trump has PROVEN himself to be very weak like most bullies really are.
Trump is more socialist that most Democrats.Which do you disagree with? That Trump is 99% transactional or that he is weak like a bully is weak or that he is a bully?
This is a small sample of important issues Trump has flipped-flopped on that ChatGPT could find:
{b]Abortion[/b] – 1999: described himself as “very pro-choice”; later ran and governed as anti-abortion, then in 2023–25 alternated on national bans and specific state laws.
TIME
+1
Assault-weapons ban / gun control – Backed an assault-weapons ban and longer waits in his 2000 book; opposed those positions while running in 2015–16.
PolitiFact
+1
Iraq War – 2002 audio shows initial support (“Yeah, I guess so”), later claimed he always opposed it.
TIME
NATO – Called NATO “obsolete,” then said it was “very important,” later again threatened non-defense of allies who don’t “pay.”
Politico
+3
Reuters
+3
CBS News
+3
Minimum wage – Said the federal minimum shouldn’t rise; then said it should (or that states should raise it). PolitiFact rated a “Full Flop.”
PolitiFact
Mail-in / early voting – 2020–21: attacked mail voting as fraudulent; 2024: encouraged GOP voters to use it; 2025: again vowed to end mail-in voting.
The Washington Post
+3
FactCheck.org
+3
CBS News
+3
DACA / “Dreamers” – Said he’d protect Dreamers “with heart,” then moved to end DACA in 2017 while also floating deal talk.
TIME
+1
Social Security & Medicare – Repeatedly said “don’t cut a penny,” but also talked about “a lot you can do in terms of cutting,” then staff walked it back.
Reuters
+1
Climate change / Paris Agreement – Called climate change a “hoax,” then said it’s “not a hoax” but downplayed it; withdrew from Paris (twice, in effect—2017 and announced again 2025).
Reuters
+3
PolitiFact
+3
PBS
+3
Tariffs (2025) – Unveiled sweeping country-by-country tariffs, denied any pause…then paused most of them within days.
PolitiFact
Cryptocurrency – 2021: called Bitcoin a “scam”; by 2024–25 rebranded as pro-crypto, courting the industry and proposing national crypto initiatives.
PBS
+2
Reuters
+2
Trump will change his mind to take a position he thinks will help him most. Normally, it is getting votes, but in Crypto, it is getting more money for himself."Flip-flops"? All politicians do it. If they don’t adapt to the times, they become stagnant and ineffective in their roles. I wouldn’t want a total knee replacement done using 1980s methods, nor would I want a repairman to fix my washer using outdated technology from before apps —they’d be using tools and techniques that were superseded for good reason. Adaptation matters.
Yes they do, but only occasionally and generally with good reason, like new facts.
.
As you can easily see, Trump as taken flip-flopping to an art form and you have to admit, he does it only for himself.One of the positives of Trump’s “flip-flopping” is that it shows adaptability, he’s willing to adjust his position when circumstances, information, or realities change. He’s also naturally inquisitive and open to learning, which is obvious by the company he keeps and the experts he surrounds himself with. Unlike “hide-in-the-corner Joe,” Trump stays engaged and actively seeks out new perspectives. This openness helps him appeal to a broader group by showing he’s not locked into one rigid stance, allowing him to draw in moderates or unexpected allies, such as many in the tech industry. For example, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently praised Trump’s policymaking in his speech, closing with, “Thank you all for your service and making America great again.”
Yup. He's a hypocrite, just as his MAGAs cheerleaders.
Remember last year?
Trump Wanted Shutdown to Happen on Biden’s Watch, Not His
The president-elect was eager to evade responsibility for the consequences of a potential shutdown even as he blew up a bipartisan deal that would have kept the government open.
“Remember, the pressure is on whoever is President.”
"THIS CHAOS WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING IF WE HAD A REAL PRESIDENT. WE WILL IN 32 DAYS!"
Trump administration posts notice that no federal food aid will go out Nov. 1
For the record, there's enough money for a massive multi-billion-dollar bailout for trumps buddy in Argentina;
ICE's unconscionable war on humanity;
ice Barbies luxury private jets;
a cool billion for renovations for Trump's Qatari plane;
Mango Mussolini's every-goddamn-weekend golf outings;
and countless other expenditures that benefit the billionaire class, but nothing left in the well for tens of millions of food-insecure Americans.
The cruelty IS the point for this fascist regime...Your context seems to suggest that you consider all your issues with Trump to be factual. However, the way you’ve presented them lacks supporting evidence. Do you have any proof to back up your claims? You’ve made some serious accusations, and without context or verification, they’re hard to take at face value. You rarely back up what you seem to be stating as facts.
Your comments seem to be rarely anything other than AI generated
Very rarely do I use AI. I mainly turn to it for quick statistics or to verify a source for something I’ve written. I take pride in crafting my own words and writing personal, original comments. AI is helpful for pulling up facts fast, which saves me time when sourcing my personal work, but writing has always been a creative process for me. Many of us here on HP come from a time when writing meant real research and originality, and I still take pride in being a bit of a wordsmith. I would guess some here could attest to how I communicated before AI was born. You diverted from the subject of my comment. Keep your snarky remarks to yourself-
That is pretty funny coming from a bot! All of the other leftists on here like Eso, Creedence, and people have made comments about their personal life and have indicated that they are people. That one has never missed a day on this site, and never made any comment that was not something that Chat GPT would say.
Here is what Trump thinks about American national security - not much.
"How the shutdown threatens to halt Trump’s aggressive nuclear security goals"
He has set producing of nuclear weapons back years!!!
And don't go blaming it on the Democrats. In all previous shutdowns, which were caused by Republicans btw, the Democrats made sure the National Nuclear Security Administration was funded.
But not Trump and the Republicans - they put our national security at risk - AGAIN!!! (Remember Trump stealing all those classified documents?)
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/27/politics … trump-nnsaIsn't it true when someone attempt to say Democrats are socialist, they are only displaying their own ignorance?
SOCIALISM - For the umpteenth time (I have hopes this will get past the myth barrier that prevents cult members from thinking rationally):
A socialist is someone who supports socialism—an economic and political system in which the means of production (factories, resources, major industries) are owned or controlled collectively, typically by the state or the workers themselves.The goal is to reduce or eliminate private ownership of key industries and distribute wealth more equally across society.
In a pure socialist system:
* The government or community owns and manages industries such as healthcare, energy, and transportation.(Isn't it Trump who is having the federal gov't buy up parts of major companies? By definition that is socialist)
* Profit is not the main driver; instead, production aims to meet everyone’s needs.
* Taxes are typically high to fund extensive public services.
* Private enterprise is often limited or tightly regulated.
Examples of countries that have implemented socialist systems (to varying degrees) include the former Soviet Union, Cuba, and Venezuela—though most modern nations (like those in Scandinavia) blend capitalism with social welfare, not true socialism.
_______________________________________________________________________
Why Calling Democrats “Socialists” Is Wrong
Labeling Democrats as “socialists” is politically misleading because the Democratic Party supports regulated capitalism, not government ownership of the economy. Here’s why that distinction matters:
1. Democrats Support Market Economies (Trump Republicans have ditched the free-market economy in favor of tariffs)
The U.S. Democratic Party believes in a capitalist framework—private businesses, competition, and profit still drive the economy. Policies like higher minimum wages, corporate regulation, and progressive taxation tweak capitalism, not replace it.
2. Democratic Policies Are Social-Democratic, Not Socialist (People with sharp minds understand the difference.)
Many Democratic priorities—like universal healthcare options, student debt relief, or climate action—reflect social democracy, not socialism.
Social democracy accepts capitalism but seeks to make it fairer through social programs (e.g., Medicare, Social Security).
Socialism, in contrast, would replace private ownership entirely.
For example:
Medicare for All is publicly funded healthcare, but hospitals and doctors remain private—not socialism.
Student debt forgiveness doesn’t involve seizing private banks or schools—not socialism.
3. Scandinavian Countries Are Often Misused as Examples
People often call countries like Sweden or Denmark “socialist,” but their leaders reject that term. They are capitalist economies with robust welfare states—proof that capitalism and social welfare can coexist. Democrats tend to admire that balance, not socialism itself.
4. “Socialist” Is Often Used as a Political Attack - as is being done here!
In modern U.S. politics, “socialist” has become a rhetorical weapon used by opponents —especially conservatives—to suggest extremism or government overreach. However, by international standards, mainstream Democrats are centrist or center-left, not socialist.Bill Gates declares Donald "the enemy of the People" Trump to be more of an immediate danger to the health of the world than Climate Change.
He writes that because Trump is causing more people to suffer worldwide, resources need to be moved from fighting climate change to the more immediate problem of saving the lives of those Trump is trying to kill.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/28/business … ate-changeI keep seeing this fixation on the imaginary disease called TDS which is as fake as BDS and on socialism.
Clearly, the people who espouse these myths have no clue what they are talking about. It is clear they are making things up to be argumentative. I really wish they were able back up their wild assertions with facts and not mythological rhetoric.Thank you for the extensive documentation. But you know as well as I that there are those who will never see what they are trying diligently to avoid.
What Trump accomplished today while in Japan ---- Winning!
President Trump’s visit to Japan today was a major success, strengthening the U.S.-Japan alliance in multiple ways. He and Japan’s new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, pledged to usher in a “new golden age” for bilateral relations, signing agreements to enhance defense cooperation and secure critical minerals, reducing dependence on China. Japan also announced it will increase its defense spending to 2% of GDP ahead of schedule, demonstrating a strong commitment to regional security. On the economic front, discussions highlighted $550 billion in Japanese investment in the U.S., including new auto plants and plans for Toyota to expand operations, while Japan will purchase Ford F-150 trucks, boosting American manufacturing. Additionally, Trump and Takaichi signed a landmark deal to strengthen supply chains for rare earths and critical minerals, further reinforcing economic and national security. The visit also celebrated cultural diplomacy, with Japan gifting 250 cherry trees and fireworks to Washington, D.C., to commemorate America’s 250th anniversary. This visit showcased Trump’s leadership in both global diplomacy and domestic economic growth, delivering concrete results for America’s security, prosperity, and international relationship
Success? Yes. Major? Not yet at least. First, there is no signed deal, only promises.
Japan has no rare earths to sell to the US. So what we have is two dependent nations helping each other, maybe."Success? Yes. Major? Not yet at least. First, there is no signed deal, only promises." ECO
Japan has no rare earths to sell to the US. So what we have is two dependent nations helping each other, maybe.
I do not post misinformation purposely; as a rule, I offer my sources. To insinuate that is unfair. If my comment doesn't have a source, one can ask, and I will provide one.
Reuters, The Guardian, and several Japanese outlets (like NHK and The Japan Times) confirm that the two leaders signed a deal focused on strengthening supply chains for rare earths and other critical minerals, specifically aimed at reducing reliance on China and bolstering both nations’ economic and national security." https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-paci … hatgpt.com
"The leaders then signed an agreement to support the supply of critical minerals and rare earths, as the countries seek to wean reliance off China’s chokehold on the materials, which are crucial for a wide range of products, from smartphones to fighter jets.
The White House, in a statement, said the objective of the deal was “to assist both countries in achieving resilience and security of critical minerals and rare earths supply chains”.
It added that the US and Japan “jointly identify projects of interest to address gaps in supply chains for critical minerals and rare earths, including derivative products such as permanent magnets, batteries, catalysts, and optical materials”.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/ … hatgpt.com
AI
Yes — Japan does have rare earth minerals, though not in large, easily mined quantities on land like China or the U.S. What makes Japan significant in this area is its massive undersea reserves and its technological capability to process and recycle rare earths. Here’s a breakdown:
Undersea deposits:
In 2018, Japanese researchers discovered one of the world’s largest rare earth deposits near Minamitori Island (also called Minami-Torishima) — an isolated island about 1,100 miles southeast of Tokyo.
Estimates suggest this deposit could supply rare earth elements like yttrium, europium, terbium, and dysprosium for centuries.
The challenge is that these minerals are deep under the ocean floor (about 6,000 meters down), making extraction expensive and technically complex.
Domestic recycling and processing:
Japan leads the world in rare earth recycling — extracting valuable elements from used electronics, magnets, and batteries.
Companies like Hitachi and Toyota have developed technologies to recover rare earths from old motors and hybrid vehicle components.
So while Japan isn’t a top producer yet, it’s becoming a key strategic player in the global rare earth supply chain, especially with its deep-sea potential and advanced recycling systems.
Trump isn’t just talking about competition with China - he’s actively working to secure rare minerals from around the world, building partnerships and deals that strengthen U.S. supply chains. He’s a man who does the work, not just give speeches, and this approach shows he’s focused on protecting America’s economic and national security in a very tangible way.You might read what I wrote before jumping to conclusions.
"First, there is no signed deal, only promises." - THAT IS TRUE.
AI generated with sources:
The October 28, 2025 agreement between the Japan and the United States on rare earths and critical minerals is a signed framework, not a fully‑detailed enforceable treaty.
What the document is
It is formally titled the “Japan–US Framework for Securing Supply of Critical Minerals and Rare Earths through Mining and Processing” and was signed at the Tokyo summit of Donald Trump and Sanae Takaichi.
sfa-oxford.com
+3
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
+3
MINING.COM
+3
The framework sets out commitments to cooperate on mining, processing, investment, stockpiling, and diversification of supply chains for critical minerals and rare earths.
MINING.COM
+2
sfa-oxford.com
+2
According to commentary it is non‑binding in many respects (“policy framework rather than a treaty”), with key details and follow‑through yet to be specified.
sfa-oxford.com
+1
What it is not (yet)
It does not appear to include a full set of legally binding market‑access commitments (e.g., tariff cuts, enforcement mechanisms) equivalent to a free‑trade agreement.
The framework leaves many implementation details (which projects, timelines, financing, regulatory changes) pending.
Because it is framed as a cooperation/strategic partnership, rather than a full treaty, it likely does not require full legislative ratification in the same way as a formal treaty or FTA—but aspects may still require domestic legislation or regulatory change.
"Japan has no rare earths to sell to the US." - THAT IS ALSO TRUE
Again, AI generated with sources.
What Japan has
Japan has discovered large deposits of rare‐earth‑rich seabed “mud” off Minamitori Island in its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Surveys suggest about 16 million tons of rare earth elements + yttrium in those mud deposits.
Metal News
+2
rawmaterials.net
+2
Japan plans to begin test mining in 2026 for sediment at depths of 5,000‑6,000 m.
Reuters
+2
investingLive
+2
Japan has also publicly signalled its interest in cooperating with the U.S. on critical minerals: “Japan proposes rare earth cooperation with US in trade talks.”
MINING.COM
+1
What to keep in mind (why “selling to US” is not yet a guarantee)
The deposits are in deep‑sea mud at great depth (5,000‑6,000 m). Extraction is technically challenging and might take several years to become commercially viable.
Oceanographic
+1
Although the resource is identified, commercial production hasn’t started; thus Japan cannot yet reliably supply large volumes for export.
Even once production begins, processing, refining, logistics and export channels still need to be built. Having the mineral does not instantly mean “ready to ship” at scale.
Japan’s primary motivation (based on published statements) is securing its own supply to reduce dependence on China, not necessarily becoming a major exporter immediately. For example: “Rather than to enable private companies to profit from selling rare earths … the goal is to secure a domestic supply to enhance national security.”
Discovery Alert
+1
So, rather than insult me by implying I don't do research (which I have seen you accuse others of as well) you might look behind the headlines like i and Willowargor and PeoplePower and Credance do.I did not insult you--- here is my comment, I make no mention of you at all. I will report you if you continue to make accusations regarding me personally. I suggest you not reply to my posts, it seems you only get yourself in trouble.
Here is my comment
Sharlee01 wrote:
"Success? Yes. Major? Not yet at least. First, there is no signed deal, only promises." ECO
"Japan has no rare earths to sell to the US. So what we have is two dependent nations helping each other, maybe." ECO
I do not post misinformation; kindly do some research and look for sources before insinuating or requesting that I offer my resources.
Reuters, The Guardian, and several Japanese outlets (like NHK and The Japan Times) confirm that the two leaders signed a deal focused on strengthening supply chains for rare earths and other critical minerals, specifically aimed at reducing reliance on China and bolstering both nations’ economic and national security." https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-paci … hatgpt.com
"The leaders then signed an agreement to support the supply of critical minerals and rare earths, as the countries seek to wean reliance off China’s chokehold on the materials, which are crucial for a wide range of products, from smartphones to fighter jets.
The White House, in a statement, said the objective of the deal was “to assist both countries in achieving resilience and security of critical minerals and rare earths supply chains”.
It added that the US and Japan “jointly identify projects of interest to address gaps in supply chains for critical minerals and rare earths, including derivative products such as permanent magnets, batteries, catalysts, and optical materials”.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/ … hatgpt.com
AI
Yes — Japan does have rare earth minerals, though not in large, easily mined quantities on land like China or the U.S. What makes Japan significant in this area is its massive undersea reserves and its technological capability to process and recycle rare earths. Here’s a breakdown:
Undersea deposits:
In 2018, Japanese researchers discovered one of the world’s largest rare earth deposits near Minamitori Island (also called Minami-Torishima) — an isolated island about 1,100 miles southeast of Tokyo.
Estimates suggest this deposit could supply rare earth elements like yttrium, europium, terbium, and dysprosium for centuries.
The challenge is that these minerals are deep under the ocean floor (about 6,000 meters down), making extraction expensive and technically complex.
Domestic recycling and processing:
Japan leads the world in rare earth recycling — extracting valuable elements from used electronics, magnets, and batteries.
Companies like Hitachi and Toyota have developed technologies to recover rare earths from old motors and hybrid vehicle components.
So while Japan isn’t a top producer yet, it’s becoming a key strategic player in the global rare earth supply chain, especially with its deep-sea potential and advanced recycling systems.
Trump isn’t just talking about competition with China - he’s actively working to secure rare minerals from around the world, building partnerships and deals that strengthen U.S. supply chains. He’s a man who does the work, not just give speeches, and this approach shows he’s focused on protecting America’s economic and national security in a very tangible way.
Going to leave on a good note for the nite:
Democrat popularity is at a TWO DECADE LOW going into the midterms, and NOWHERE NEAR where it was during Trump's first term
https://x.com/FLVoiceNews/status/1983329937391050771Ken,
Since the democrats aren't changing their tactics or their ways of doing things is it safe to say they are in denial or lack understanding?Ken,
To confirm your story.
CNN delivers brutal reality check to its Lefty audience
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYZhT0aUn9wKen, this is music to my ears. If they keep pressing forward against the liberal off-value ideologues, they’ll drive another nail home. I’m staying confident in the common sense of the majority of Americans.
In one of these forums, Ken declared that America the safest, or one of the safest nations in the world - we aren't. I listed a several nations, some large, that are safer.
You can look these up, but in terms of homicides, the US sits at 5.67 homicides per 100K (very few committed by immigrants), the UK is ~1 per 100k, and France and Germany sit at ~0.4 homicides per 100k. Clearly, the chance of getting killed in America is horrendous, and given the god-awful number of guns on the street, we can understand why.
There is a Global Peace Index (GPI) that measures 23 different indicators.to measure "safety". In 2024, the US ranked a dismal 132nd out of 163 nations measured. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
He also said something like Americans don't appreciate how well off they are compared to the rest of the world. That might be true if you are one of those billionaires that just got another huge tax break that makes things even worse than they are now. But as of 2023, out of 171 nations, America is the 38th WORST in terms of income distribution (it is worse if you measure wealth). That puts America solidly in with third-world nations and behind EVERY "western" nation and all developed nations with the exception of Mexico, Brazil, and Turkey (I will accept those have modern economies).
Now, I don't put any of these numbers on Trump, although he helped for sure. But it took 24 years of Republican administrations and 20 years of Democratic administrations (1980 - 2024) to achieve such a piss-poor record.
What I will pin on Trump is that he is making it even worse. His Big Ugly Bill, for example WILL make our income distribution even worse than it is in 2023. When you add in all the violence created by his deportation program, we WILL have become a much more dangerous country to live in for citizens, legal residents, and immigrants alike.BEFORE you go whooping it up about the "deal" signed with South Korea yesterday (or maybe this morning), KNOW that it is not yet legally enforceable. - it is still a framework which makes the optics look good but does nothing on the ground. Because it includes possible changes in tariffs, Congress will most likely have to create implementing law before it is actually final.
"BEFORE you go whooping it up about the "deal" signed with South Korea yesterday (or maybe this morning), KNOW that it is not yet legally enforceable. - it is still a framework which makes the optics look good but does nothing on the ground. Because it includes possible changes in tariffs, Congress will most likely have to create implementing law before it is actually final." ECO, I mean your last sentence is an "If Come'...
Why would I post an “IF COME”? That’s not my style. In fact, I’ve long rejected that kind of mindset—it goes against my outlook. I notice many on the left operate on “if comes” thinking, which I find illogical, and most of the scenarios they speculate about never actually materialize.
Here is why Democrats are fighting so hard to stop Republicans from stripping affordable healthcare from millions of Americans.
"Obamacare enrollees get first look at 2026 prices as premiums soar"
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/28/politics … 6-coverageThis social program is costly, and you only need to do a tiny bit of research to see just how many enrolled once the Biden subsidies were put in place, which made it far more expensive before those subsidies were initiated.
“This social program is costly, and you only need to do a tiny bit of research to see just how many enrolled once the Biden subsidies were put in place — which made it far more expensive before those subsidies were initiated.”
Plan Year Marketplace Enrollment*
2017 ~10.3 million
2018 ~11.8 million
2019 ~11.4 million
2020 ~11.4 million
2021 ~12.0 million
2022 ~14.5 million
2023 ~16.4 million
2024 ~21.3 million
2025 ~24.2 million
Key cost and subsidy‑data
Annual spending on ACA premium tax credit subsidies reportedly rose from about $68 billion in 2021 to around $125 billion projected for 2024.
https://budget.house.gov/press-release/ … hatgpt.com
It would be common sense to assume this program would grow exponentially due to offering subsidies. This program would become as large or larger than SS... Which is about to run out. We can't afford such a social program. Math is a science, and it should speak very loudly here.
Can someone tell me why, when Republicans shut down the gov't that the Democrats made sure these programs continued to be funded? Are the Republicans that incompetent or uncaring (or both) that they could not do the same? Very Odd.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/29/politics … t-shutdown“I was part of the internal Trump administration team trying to convince the president to end the shutdown in 2018 – 2019 — for 35 days — before people went hungry, workers lost pay, and government services collapsed.
Here’s what I learned: he doesn’t give a s—.”
- Miles Taylor, deputy chief of staff for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) during the first Trump administration
I saw that President Trump is in South Korea today on the last stop of his Asia tour. He met with President Lee Jae-Myung to discuss trade and investment, and reports say South Korea agreed to about $350 billion in U.S. investments in exchange for lower tariffs on Korean goods. He’s also expected to meet with China’s Xi Jinping in Busan later this week, which could be a key moment for trade relations. North Korea reportedly tested missiles while Trump was in the country, adding a security element to the trip.
Today, Donald Trump visited South Korea, where several announcements were made regarding economic and strategic agreements. Reports indicate that South Korea will commit roughly $350 billion in investments into the U.S. economy, and U.S. tariffs on South Korean automobile exports and parts are to be reduced from higher levels down to 15 %. The agreement also reportedly includes a large aircraft purchase by Korean Air and strategic approval for South Korea to develop a nuclear-powered submarine.
Trump described the developments in his own words, noting that these actions “bring home more billion-dollar deals” during the visit. Media reports emphasize that while the announcements are significant, some aspects of the deal still require formal approval and detailed implementation. Analysts point out that the “$350 billion” figure likely includes both immediate investments and multi-year commitments, so the timeline and impact will unfold over time.
Overall, the visit combined economic, trade, and strategic elements, with large-scale investment pledges and tariff adjustments alongside security cooperation measures.Donald "the enemy of the People" Trump once again proves how weak he is as he CAVES to China. Not only is he gleefully pushing former American allies into the Russian-China sphere of influence he is giving concession after concession to China itself.
In his latest give-away Trump shows he has been bested by Xi in the trade war at every turn:
* Met China's demands to meet face-to-face
* In this so-called "landmark" deal, Trump will shave 10% off of the tariffs he imposed on them in part to force them to crack down on fentanyl. In Return, China "PROMISES" to do that. Wonderful negotiating don't you think - a concrete 10% cut for a "promise" (which they never keep). It seems very clear that both Putin and Xi are playing Trump like the fool that he is.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/30/business … yl-tariffsYesterday, former President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping reached a new trade framework during the APEC Summit in Busan, South Korea. The 2025 arrangement aims to ease tariff pressure between the U.S. and China, expand Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural goods, and stabilize global supply chains after several years of heightened trade tension.
Note -- As of now, the 2025 U.S.–China trade agreement has not been formally signed. Both sides describe it as a tentative one-year truce, with trade officials still finalizing technical details before formal ratification.
Under the reported terms:
The United States will lower its overall tariff rate on Chinese imports from roughly 57% to 47%, partially reversing tariffs imposed during the 2018–2020 trade war.
One of the most discussed elements of the agreement involves a tariff reduction on certain Chinese chemical and pharmaceutical goods—from 20% to 10%. Some outlets have labeled this as a “fentanyl-linked tariff cut,” but that is misleading. The products affected are lawful industrial and medical compounds, not the precursor chemicals used to make illicit fentanyl. The tariff adjustment was made to reduce costs on legitimate trade in medicines and industrial inputs that had been unintentionally caught up in broader tariff categories.
U.S. officials clarified that the move does not loosen enforcement on fentanyl or its precursors. In fact, China reaffirmed its commitment to maintain strict export controls and classification of all fentanyl precursors as controlled substances, and both countries pledged to continue cooperation between law enforcement agencies on drug trafficking. The tariff change therefore targets legitimate commerce, not materials tied to the illegal drug trade.
Tariffs on automotive parts and electronics will drop from 35% to 25%, and duties on consumer goods such as clothing, footwear, and furniture will fall from 25% to 15%.
In exchange, China will suspend new export restrictions on rare earth minerals and metals, critical to U.S. manufacturing, and will resume large-scale purchases of U.S. agricultural goods, including up to 25 million metric tons of soybeans annually.
Both nations also agreed to pause planned port fees and shipbuilding tariffs, lowering costs for cargo and shipping industries.
The framework will last one year, allowing both sides to review and renew terms as needed.
When Trump entered his second term, average tariffs on Chinese goods were near their trade-war peak—around 57%, up from about 3–5% before 2018. This new deal represents a partial rollback that keeps most of the leverage in place while reducing pressure on U.S. consumers and exporters.
(Sources: Reuters, Associated Press, MarketWatch, Al Jazeera, The Guardian — October 29–30, 2025)
Street view --
The reporting so far frames the deal as a short-term tactical easing, not a long-term structural resolution. Factually, it:
Lowers average U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from ~57% to ~47%.
Reduces duties on a broad category of legal chemical and pharmaceutical goods from 20% to 10%, without affecting enforcement on fentanyl precursors.
Secures a one-year suspension of some Chinese export controls and large-scale U.S. agricultural purchases.
Keeps high-level diplomatic and trade channels open.
Has not been formally signed, leaving uncertainty on final implementation.
The media largely agrees on these facts, but they differ on interpreting whether it’s a “good” or “strong” deal. Most outlets call it a tactical truce, with some gains for the U.S., but also with limitations that leave structural trade and leverage issues unresolved.First, before declaring it anything, the framework must be signed, but even then, it won't be a formal trade agreement - that requires Congressional approval.
IF, and based on history, that is a big IF, it is put in force the significant parts are
1) a "promise" to start repurchasing some agriculture products that Trump forced them to STOP buying in his first term tariff war with China. Our farmers will NEVER recover from that debacle.
2) the relief from some 2025 export controls could be real but remember how they got there in the first place - in retaliation to Trump's tariff war.
So, I guess whether these are "good" or "strong" or something else entirely depends on the frame you are looking at - pre-Trump or post-Trump.
From my point of view, all Trump did is "possibly" repair damage he already caused to happen.
Imagine having control of the entire government and then having to gerrymander 5 states to keep control because you're policies are that horrible.
Not hard to imagine at all, that is how Authoritarians stay in power.
The Trump administration, where "Christians" kick and starve the poor while beating immigrants and bombing boatloads of people and where lying to protect their pedophile or pedophile adjacent President is a sacred duty.
Reposting something Joel posted elsewhere.
"After running on no new wars, and claiming to be a "Peace President," Trump is now starting wars in both Nigeria and Venezuela and doing nuclear testing for the first time since 1992."
Then there is the extralegal murder of people in boats. It doesn't make any difference if they are drug smugglers or not, much to his and MAGA's surprise, he is not allowed to be judge, jury, and executioner**
** That is until the Supreme Court made it legal in America for any president. Fortunately, other nations can prosecute Trump under international law.
Related Discussions
- 30
Why Drill, Baby, Drill Isn't Working
by kerryg 4 months ago
Contrary to what has been suggested in several posts here over the last few weeks, Obama's supposed imposition of "regulation after regulation, roadblock after roadblock" is not what's holding up domestic oil drilling, it's the oil companies themselves holding out for higher profits.This...
- 32
Oil spill result of corporate negligence and a lack of over sight.
by Stump Parrish 14 years ago
How do we make sure this doesn't happen again you ask? Deregulate further and open more of the gulf to drilling. That could only makes sense to those in the oil companies back pockets.
- 214
Obama's attacks on BP not going down well in the UK
by CMHypno 15 years ago
Obama's attacks on BP are increasingly being viewed in the UK as signs of his anti-British stance. Or is he just trying to pull attention away from his own administration's failures?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … itain.html
- 59
What's the libertarian take on the BP oil spill?
by Don W 15 years ago
Would a free market have prevented this from happening?I'm guessing the libertarian argument would be that the failings of state regulation was a contributing factor. Those failings stemming from the fact that the regulators were in bed (figuratively and literally) with those regulated. Whereas...
- 16
Rising Gas Prices High Inflation And Our Pending Elections
by Sharlee 3 years ago
With inflation rising and gas prices surging, Biden faces hard political realities ahead of the November midterm elections. Part of the problem could be if he pushed too quickly to initiate his plan for clean energy. He came into office and used his pen to truly piss off "big...
- 103
Rogue Judges Contained
by Readmikenow 4 months ago
Thanks to the SCOTUS there will NO LONGER be any nationwide injunctions from rogue federal district court judges. I agree with the Supreme Court, these judges far exceeded their authority. There were also important rulings for parents and more.Nationwide injunctionsIn the most...