BBB – You Guessed It! Big Beautiful Ballroom

1. 85

   Sharlee01posted 9 days ago

   
   
   The "Big Beautiful Ballroom" being constructed at the White House is being funded entirely through private donations, with no public taxpayer money involved. President Donald Trump announced that the project would be financed by contributions from various corporations and individuals, as well as from his own personal funds.
   
   Major Corporate Donors
   
   A diverse group of companies has pledged significant amounts to the project. Notable contributors include:
   
   Amazon
   
   Apple
   
   Google
   
   Meta Platforms
   
   Microsoft
   
   Lockheed Martin
   
   Booz Allen Hamilton
   
   Palantir Technologies
   
   NextEra Energy
   
   Caterpillar Inc.
   
   Comcast Corporation
   
   HP Inc.
   
   Micron Technology
   
   Reynolds American
   
   T-Mobile
   
   Ripple Labs
   
   Coinbase
   
   Hard Rock International
   
   Altria Group
   
   These companies have pledged varying amounts, with some contributing over $10 million each. For instance, Lockheed Martin has donated more than $10 million, and Alphabet (Google's parent company) has contributed $22 million as part of a legal settlement with Trump over his suspension from YouTube.
   Business Insider
   
   
   Individual Donors
   
   In addition to corporate contributions, several individuals have also pledged significant donations:
   
   Stephen A. Schwarzman (CEO of Blackstone Group)
   
   Kelly Loeffler and Jeff Sprecher
   
   Charles and Marissa Cascarilla
   
   Edward and Shari Glazer
   
   Harold Hamm
   
   Benjamin Leon Jr.
   
   The Lutnick Family
   
   The Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation
   
   Paolo Tiramani (CEO of a construction company)
   
   Konstantin Sokolov
   
   Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss
   
   These individuals have pledged amounts ranging from several million dollars to tens of millions. For example, Paolo Tiramani donated $10 million in stock to the Trust for the National Mall, the nonprofit managing the donations.
   ABC News
   
   Fund Management and Recognition
   
   Donations are being managed by the Trust for the National Mall, a nonprofit organization that supports the National Park Service and is dedicated to the restoration of the National Mall and the White House.
   
   The total cost of the ballroom project is estimated to be around $300 million, with construction already underway. The project aims to create a 90,000-square-foot event space capable of seating up to 999 guests.

   replyreport
   1. 79

      wildernessposted 9 days agoin reply to this

      It occurs to me that a project that size will likely not be completed during Trump's tenure there.  What kind of man does this without being able to see/enjoy it?

      replyreport
      1. 60

         Willowarborposted 9 days agoin reply to this

         A man who doesn't think he's leaving office...

         replyreport
         1. 79

            wildernessposted 8 days agoin reply to this

            LOL  And let the fantasy continue!  Fairy tales are SO much fun, right?

            replyreport
            1. 60

               Willowarborposted 8 days agoin reply to this

               Oh like he didn't try before LOL???

               replyreport
               1. 79

                  wildernessposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                  I had not heard of a constitutional convention to remove the President and install a King.  When did that attempt happen?

                  replyreport
               2. 68

                  IslandBitesposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                  Remember when he told the world step by step what was about to happen?
                  
                  Well, people should listen this time.
                  
                  
                  Bannon Claims ‘There Is a Plan’ for Trump to Run for a Third Term
                  
                  In an interview with The Economist, Mr. Bannon vaguely asserted that there was “a plan” to circumvent the 22nd Amendment, which states that “no person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice,” regardless of whether the terms are consecutive. He also suggested that he was part of a team developing that plan.
                  
                  “Trump is going to be president in ’28, and people ought to just get accommodated with that,” he said.
                  
                  “At the appropriate time, we’ll lay out what the plan is,” said Mr. Bannon, without elaborating. “But there is a plan.” He added that Mr. Trump was an “instrument of divine will,” echoing, as Mr. Trump himself has, the language of the divine right of kings.
                  
                  Mr. Bannon’s statement comes after months of Mr. Trump publicly toying with the idea of running for a third term. Even as the president insists he is serious, some Republican leaders have dismissed the idea as a joke, noting that the Constitution does not permit it. White House aides have mocked reporters for taking the president at his word.

                  replyreport
                  1. 81

                     Readmikenowposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                     I don't know why this is ever even a story.
                     
                     There is NO way President Donald Trump can run for a third term.  It is not legally possible.  Trust me, MAGA would not support it.  We're looking forward to J.D. Vance's first term in office as president in 2028.
                     
                     President Donald Trump doesn't even want to run for a third term.  These stories pop up every now and then to troll the media.
                     
                     Trump says he won't seek a third term
                     
                     US President Donald Trump has denied that he is considering a third presidential term, a move which experts agree is banned under the US Constitution.
                     
                     "I'll be an eight-year president, I'll be a two-term president. I always thought that was very important," Trump told NBC's Meet the Press with Kristen Welker in an interview that aired on Sunday.
                     
                     Trump, 78, has previously said that he was "not joking" about wanting to serve a third, or even fourth, term as US president.
                     
                     He later said his statements were meant to troll the "fake news media".
                     
                     https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9l3399wvno

                     replyreport
                     1. 60

                        Willowarborposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                        Well hopefully we don't see the horrible violence toward police officers in the capitol again...

                        replyreport
                     2. 60

                        Willowarborposted 7 days agoin reply to this

                        Are magas going to riot again?

                        replyreport
                  2. 72

                     Ken Burgessposted 7 days agoin reply to this

                     You/they read what he said wrong... you think the plan is that he is going to run again.
                     
                     He won't need to run again if we are knee deep in WWIII... he will just suspend elections until the war is over.
                     
                     This is the apt moment for an "I told you so"... the Biden Administration got that ball rolling... Trump will remain in power until it is finished.

                     replyreport
                     1. 68

                        IslandBitesposted 7 days agoin reply to this

                        You/they read what he said wrong... you think the plan is that he is going to run again.
                        
                        I never said what I think "the plan is".

                        replyreport
            2. 85

               Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

               I mean, the crazy gets crazier every day.  It is sort of funny to watch, though.

               replyreport
               1. 72

                  Ken Burgessposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                  Torching Teslas? Climate-loving liberals driven crazy by Trump harm their cause. | Opinion
                  
                  https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ … 330639007/

                  replyreport
                  1. 85

                     Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

                     Thanks for sharing...
                     
                     Ken,  I completely agree,  vandalizing Teslas, dealerships, or charging stations is absolutely unacceptable. Attacking a company or its employees simply because you disagree with the politics of its CEO isn’t protest; it’s outright destruction and intimidation. It’s alarming to see people setting cars on fire, throwing Molotov cocktails, or shooting at dealerships over disagreements with Trump or Musk. This isn’t just a harmless display of frustration; it’s criminal behavior that puts lives and property at risk.
                     
                     What’s especially disturbing is that for some on the left, it seems to have become acceptable to condone “any means” to suit a narrative, including destruction of property, violence, and breaking our laws. To me, that’s an unhinged mindset: when political disagreement spirals into celebrating lawlessness, everyone loses. If you disagree with a person or a policy, use your voice, organize, vote, boycott, or support alternatives; don’t resort to arson, vandalism, or threats.
                     
                     Those who cross the line and break the law need to be dealt with according to our laws. Crime is crime regardless of the cause. I stand with peaceful, constructive action and with enforcing the rule of law,  not with Molotovs, broken windows, or intimidation.

                     replyreport
                     1. 81

                        Readmikenowposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                        Shar,
                        
                        I like Jesse Waters segment about BDS  "Ballroom Derangement Syndrome."
                        
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTd8I4APHZM

                        replyreport
                     2. 60

                        Willowarborposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                        I don't think anyone gives a shit about Elon anymore... He's irrelevant.  Kens piece is  from March lol...

                        replyreport
                        1. 85

                           Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

                           "I don't think anyone gives a shit about Elon anymore... He's irrelevant.  Kens pieces from March lol..."  willow
                           
                           
                           I am sure Elon is so sad you feel that way...  LOL
                           
                           Not sure why you felt the need to jump into this conversation. All you added was an insult toward what Ken shared — and he wasn’t even addressing you. I have a great rapport with Ken, and we often exchange thoughtful and interesting posts. I genuinely appreciate what he shares; his posts always give people something meaningful to think about.

                           replyreport
                           1. 60

                              Willowarborposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                              Is it insulting when the right winger shares that something the left posts is out of date?

                              replyreport
                              1. 85

                                 Sharlee01posted 7 days agoin reply to this

                                 In my view, it was meant as a dig... But hey, we all have our own way of communicating here on HP.
                                 
                                 Sharlee01 wrote:
                                 "I don't think anyone gives a shit about Elon anymore... He's irrelevant.  Kens pieces from March lol..."  Willow
                                 
                                 I am sure Elon is so sad you feel that way...  LOL
                                 
                                 Not sure why you felt the need to jump into this conversation. All you added was an insult toward what Ken shared — and he wasn’t even addressing you. I have a great rapport with Ken, and we often exchange thoughtful and interesting posts. I genuinely appreciate what he shares; his posts always give people something meaningful to think about.

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 60

                                    Willowarborposted 7 days agoin reply to this

                                    Not sure how a "dig". Is determined from words on a screen LOL....

                                    replyreport
                                    1. 85

                                       Sharlee01posted 7 days agoin reply to this

                                       "I don't think anyone gives a shit about Elon anymore... He's irrelevant.  Kens pieces from March lol..."  Willow
                                       
                                       Actually, my main concern was why you jumped into the conversation without adding anything relevant to add; you just made a snarky remark. As I mentioned, Ken and I have a good rapport and often discuss various issues. He was sharing an update on something we’ve both been following for some time.
                                       
                                       I have openly shared with you that I have no interest in conversing with you; not sure why you bother with adding comments to my posts.

                                       report
                     3. 72

                        Ken Burgessposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                        I agree, it was just one example of many of how unhinged and dangerous to the safety of Americans the Leftists have become.
                        
                        The FBI, DOJ and others being focused on these extreme Leftist groups as the primary threat to American's safety and wellbeing is what is needed.
                        
                        Going after Antifa and those funding those efforts is far too long in coming.
                        
                        These people want violence, want the destruction of America, its institutions... Capitalism... the Republic... they will not be happy until everything is torn down just as the Communist movement destroyed any and all opposition in China, millions died...
                        
                        That threat has been thriving in America for far too long... the enemy within... it needs to be rooted out, treated like a cancer, before it consumes and destroys the country entirely.

                        replyreport
      2. 85

         Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

         Dan, in my view,  I think that’s exactly what makes Trump different from most politicians, he takes on big projects knowing they might outlast him, because he’s thinking about legacy and impact, not just instant credit. He’s always been a builder, and builders think long-term. Whether it’s a ballroom, a border wall, or the economy, he likes to start things that will stand as a symbol of what he stood for: strength, beauty, and vision. That’s the kind of man who builds something knowing others will enjoy it after he’s gone.
         
         I have a feeling it will be done at a good speed.

         replyreport
         1. 79

            wildernessposted 8 days agoin reply to this

            I think you're right, although I also think a goodly portion of it is the personal legacy he will leave behind.

            replyreport
            1. 85

               Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

               I can agree with thar. But can't say I blame him, I mean, what president does not want to leave a monument? Most leave libraries, but Trump, well, he has attached himself to the White House... I must smile

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  Willowarborposted 8 days agoin reply to this

                  He's a liar, a pathological liar

                  replyreport
   2. 81

      Readmikenowposted 8 days agoin reply to this

      Shar,
      
      Many people don't know that an official state ball was held outside during the obama administration because there was no white house ballroom.  Looking at pictures of it was pretty sad.  This is going to be an impressive ballroom showing the best of America.
      
      It's a great idea.

      replyreport
      1. 85

         Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

         Mike,  I think it’s a wonderful addition to the White House — something that’s long overdue. I really appreciate that President Trump made sure it was paid for through donations rather than taxpayer money. That says a lot about his respect for the American people and his commitment to doing things the right way. I give him so much credit for having the vision and determination to create something truly beautiful that will represent the best of America for generations to come. 
         
         He’s definitely going to be remembered for leaving a true legacy — I mean, he actually added a wing to the White House! I absolutely love this.

         replyreport
2. 68

   IslandBitesposted 8 days ago

   Images of a destroyed East Wing,  sparked an outcry online and a quick defense from the White House.
   
   Part of the criticism erupting this week is because Trump previously said construction of the ballroom wouldn’t affect the existing White House.
   
   “It won’t interfere with the current building,” he said in July. “It’ll be near it but not touching it — and pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of.”
   
   The National Trust for Historic Preservation added to criticism of the administration in a letter to the National Park Service and other organizations Tuesday, warning that the current design of the ballroom threatens to “overwhelm” the White House and requesting a freeze on further construction until a commission that oversees the iconic urban landscape of the nation’s capitol is consulted.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

   replyreport
   1. 79

      wildernessposted 8 days agoin reply to this

      OMY!  Yet another lawsuit trying to stop Trump!  Will it never end?

      replyreport
      1. 85

         Sharlee01posted 8 days agoin reply to this

         I did some research on the project this morning hope you will take a look at the facts on just what is being done. I mean, the pictures tell the entire story.

         replyreport
3. 79

   wildernessposted 8 days ago

   Copied from a facebook post:
   
   Hillary Clinton is furious about Trump’s White House ballroom construction: “It’s not his house. It’s your house. And he’s destroying it.”
   Fact Check: Hillary is 100% wrong!
   The truth is that the White House has been rebuilt, reimagined, and expanded more times than Hillary has been cheated on.
   The idea that any construction equals “destruction” ignores more than two centuries of American history.
   The White House has never been frozen in time.
   It’s been a living, breathing symbol of the presidency…rebuilt from ashes, modernized through wars, and upgraded to meet the moment.
   When British troops burned the building to the ground in 1814, it wasn’t preservation committees or political pundits that saved it.
   It was American determination.
   James Hoban rebuilt it from the rubble by 1817.
   That was the first full reconstruction of the People’s House—long before air conditioning, Wi-Fi, or Secret Service checkpoints existed.
   If rebuilding from literal ashes wasn’t “destroying it,” then a new ballroom certainly isn’t either.
   By the early 1900s, the place had turned into a Victorian museum of clutter.
   It took Theodore Roosevelt to rip down partitions, rip out garish décor, and expand the building for the modern presidency.
   He even added the West Wing, the same space every president since has used to run the country.
   At the time, critics said Roosevelt was “defacing” history.
   A century later, it’s the most recognizable part of the complex.
   Then came Harry Truman, who discovered that the floors were sagging and the walls were separating from the frame.
   Engineers warned that the entire mansion was in danger of collapse.
   Truman didn’t whine about preservation purity… he gutted the entire interior, leaving only the stone shell standing, and rebuilt it with steel beams and reinforced concrete.
   When the first family moved back in 1952, the “new” White House had an entirely different skeleton.
   If Hillary thinks Trump adding a ballroom is destruction, what word would she use for Truman literally rebuilding the whole thing from scratch?
   Later presidents kept adapting it.
   Calvin Coolidge added a third floor.
   Franklin Roosevelt expanded the East Wing.
   Nixon put in a bowling alley.
   Carter installed solar panels.
   Reagan revamped communications rooms. (And ripped out Carter’s solar panels!)
   Barack Obama added a basketball court.
   The Clintons themselves oversaw interior redesigns, new wiring, and furniture restorations.
   No one called it “destroying” the White House then.
   And let’s not forget—when the Clintons left the White House, they were caught up in controversy for taking furniture, china, and gifts that didn’t belong to them.
   Government auditors had to step in to recover property that was part of the White House collection.
   So before Hillary scolds anyone about what belongs to “the people,” she might want to remember that her own exit raised questions about knowing the difference between public property and personal souvenirs.
   And lets not even get into the graphic details of what Hillary’s husband Bill did in the Oval Office.
   Meanwhile, President Trump’s renovation isn’t costing taxpayers a dime.
   It’s being privately funded, with full transparency about design and cost.
   No public money, no hidden invoices, no bills handed to the American people.
   That alone separates it from nearly every major renovation in modern history.
   So let’s be honest.
   Every generation of presidents has changed the White House to fit the times.
   Some changes were born of necessity, others of taste, and some for history’s sake.
   What matters is that the building endures, representing the nation’s strength, not any one family’s ownership.
   The White House belongs to the American people, but it is also the president’s residence.
   That has always been the balance.
   It’s “our house,” yes, but the caretaker inside has always had the right—and the duty—to maintain and modernize it.
   Hillary’s outrage ignores that history.
   She was happy enough to redecorate and refurnish when she lived there, but now she calls renovation “destruction.”
   The same walls she once walked through were rebuilt by men who understood that preservation doesn’t mean paralysis.
   If anything, the real disrespect would be letting the place rot in the name of politics.
   The White House has survived fire, war, decay, and bad wallpaper.
   It will “survive” this, too.
   A ballroom won’t destroy it.
   It will, as it always has, evolve with America… standing taller than the critics who think shouting “it’s not his house” can erase two hundred years of renovation, resilience, and renewal.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Willowarborposted 8 days agoin reply to this

      Sorry, he tore down history... And as usual lied about it because he is a pathological liar.... All to replace it with a gaudy tacky Russian style edifice...

      replyreport
4. 85

   Sharlee01posted 8 days ago

   A lot of the media is making it sound like the new ballroom project is destroying a historic part of the White House — but that’s simply not true. The area being modified is the East Wing, which isn’t part of the original White House that dates back to John Adams in 1800. The East Wing was actually built in 1942 during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency, mainly to cover an underground air-raid shelter from World War II. Later, it became office space for the First Lady and her staff and an entrance for guests and tours — a functional addition, not a historic one.
   
   The main historic structure — the Executive Residence — along with the President’s private apartment upstairs and the East Colonnade (the long walkway connecting the two buildings) will remain completely untouched. You can visibly see that the work is limited to the newer wing, well away from the true historic core.
   
   What President Trump is doing is adding a beautiful new ballroom to a modern addition that’s already been renovated many times before. This is actually the first major architectural expansion of the White House complex in over 80 years, and it’s being funded entirely through private donations, not taxpayer money.
   
   I think that’s something to admire, not criticize. It’s a forward-looking project that adds beauty and purpose to the White House while fully respecting its historic legacy.
   
   I think the photos offer the facts on what will be altered, better than any news media could. Facts matter, and photos are worth a thousand words.
   
   White House Pre 1942 addition
   
   
   After completion of 1942 addition
   
   
   The East wing addition was removed, with its East Colonnade, a covered walkway that led to the White House. Nothing beyond that structure has been altered.   What is considered the Historic White House will remain.
   
   
   Aerial photo of the demolition of the East wing and walkway. 
   

   replyreport
5. 60

   Willowarborposted 7 days ago

   Breadlines and ballrooms...
   
   It's very French revolution to build a tacky gold ballroom while people can't afford groceries, rent, heat and healthcare... Tells you a whole lot about his morality doesn't it when he won't tap emergency funds to pay food aid...
   
   

   replyreport
6. 85

   Sharlee01posted 6 days ago

   Glad he is on their side--- lol What a tool, and they wonder why Trump uses the word lunatics.
   
   Swalwell demands 2028 Dem candidates vow to destroy Trump's White House ballroom project.  California Democrat wants future presidential nominees to destroy $250M addition on day one.  Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., said the next Democratic presidential nominee must vow to demolish President Donald Trump's White House ballroom, proposing the pledge as a litmus test for the party’s 2028 contenders.
   
   "Don’t even think of seeking the Democratic nomination for president unless you pledge to take a wrecking ball to the Trump Ballroom on DAY ONE," Swalwell wrote on X on Saturday.
   
   I mean, this form of hate is a true symptom of  TDS.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      Ken Burgessposted 6 days agoin reply to this

      With 'Americans' like that, who needs foreign enemies... we have plenty homegrown terrorists and traitors masquerading as politicians and professors within.

      replyreport
      1. 85

         Sharlee01posted 6 days agoin reply to this

         Ken, it feels like everything is upside down—what’s good is treated as bad, what’s bad is praised, and there seems to be no sense of right or wrong anymore. This story really highlighted, to me, how misguided some actions can be. I mean, what sense does it make to destroy a $300 million structure just to satisfy what can only be described as “blood lust”?

         replyreport
7. 60

   Willowarborposted 6 days ago

   THANK GOD WE'RE GETTING A BALLROOM THOUGH..
   
   "Cincinnati Public Schools is opening a "Safe Sleep Lot" at Taft Elementary School to provide a secure place for homeless families to sleep in their cars, addressing the issue of students arriving at school without sleep due to homelessness. The lot will be a temporary measure, offering overnight security, bathrooms, and resources like food and hygiene products while families await permanent shelter placement. This initiative is the first of its kind for a school district in the nation "
   
   WELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE FOLKS..."A BALLROOM FOR ME AND BREAD LINES FOR THEE"

   replyreport
8. 85

   Sharlee01posted 6 days ago

   What did Joe do to help these folks?  It seems to have increased during his term. Did he Cincinnati has experienced a notable increase in homelessness in recent years, though it may not rank among the highest in the nation.
   
   Recent Trends in Cincinnati Homelessness
   
   Increase in Unsheltered Individuals: In 2023, the number of people sleeping outside in the Cincinnati area rose by nearly half compared to 2022, from 752 to 1,100 individuals
   Cincinnati.com
   .
   Student Homelessness: Over 300 Cincinnati Public Schools students were reported to be without a stable place to sleep at night, often residing in their parents' cars
   https://www.fox19.com
   .
   Statewide Context: In Ohio, the homeless population increased by 3% in 2023. Among Ohio's maaddress this problem?
   
   Yes, homelessness in the United States has increased over the past five years, with a significant rise observed in 2024.

   replyreport
9. 85

   Sharlee01posted 5 days ago

   I would think the Ballroom will be ready to celebrate the birthday of our nation - July 4, 1776
   
   

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Willowarborposted 5 days agoin reply to this

      Gross... While this disgusting bunch refuses to use emergency funds to continue snap.... While Americans are drowning in his shitty economy... Can't afford their homes, groceries...heat. 
      
      F trump.  VIVA LA REVOLUCION

      replyreport
      1. 72

         Ken Burgessposted 5 days agoin reply to this

         Ahhh yes.  Democrats force the Government to close.
         
         Blame Trump for it.
         
         All so you can stir the call to revolution.
         
         The hypocrisy:
         https://x.com/SpeakerJohnson/status/1982844850895745524

         replyreport
   2. 60

      Willowarborposted 5 days agoin reply to this

      A sickening display of ostentatious wealth when Cincinnati just opened a parking lot that families of the school district can use to sleep in their cars...
      
      OH YEAH... A FREAKING GOLDEN AGE

      replyreport
      1. 68

         IslandBitesposted 5 days agoin reply to this

         They are disgusting. Disgusting hypocrites.
         
         SMH

         replyreport
   3. 60

      Willowarborposted 5 days agoin reply to this

      Do trumpets realize how absolutely tone deaf this is...

      replyreport
      1. 85

         Sharlee01posted 5 days agoin reply to this

         Do you realize this ballroom was completely funded through donations? For years, we didn’t have a proper space to entertain at the White House. I’m not being tone-deaf, just genuinely thankful that we now have a ballroom thanks to these contributions. Interestingly, none of the concerns you raise here daily were ever mentioned while Biden was president—you simply didn’t express any at all. 
         
         I honestly don’t see your point at all. I assume it might be irritating that this wonderful gift was given during Trump’s tenure. But don’t worry, apparently, some nut-job Democrat already wants to tear it down in 2028. Not sure why anyone would want to destroy a gift, or say something so ridiculous, or even think the Dems have a shot at the White House in 2028—classic TDS. In my view, the Democrats are done; the party has failed.
         
         Source for " nut-job Democrat already wants to tear it down in 2028"
         https://www.foxnews.com/media/lara-trum … hatgpt.com

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Willowarborposted 5 days agoin reply to this

            Donations? LOL I'd call it influence peddling... Excuse me for not giving a shit about a gaudy ostentatious ballroom when most Americans are flailing out here unable to afford to live

            replyreport
            1. 85

               Sharlee01posted 5 days agoin reply to this

               "Donations? LOL I'd call it influence peddling... Excuse me for not giving a shit about a gaudy ostentatious ballroom when most Americans are flailing out here unable to afford to live" willow
               
               Were you as concerned under Biden when we had 9% inflation? During Biden’s first three years in office—2021, 2022, and 2023—Americans faced extreme inflation. The annual inflation rates were roughly 4.7% in 2021, 8.0% in 2022, and 4.1% in 2023. In contrast, when Trump took office, inflation was about 2.9%, and he was able to keep it close to that level even while managing trade issues. So it’s fair to say he was actively working on controlling inflation, and I have faith he can get the economy back on track.

               replyreport
            2. 81

               Readmikenowposted 5 days agoin reply to this

               I believe it is safe to say you are not an investor.
               
               This is a great investment.  Depending on how the deal is structured.  It is the same with any building project.  There are investors.
               
               How do you think all the capital is raised to build all the huge buildings in a city?  Do you know cities issue bonds to pay for projects?  People aren't buying influence when they buy a government bond, they're not buying influence when they invest in a building project.
               
               This is how things get build all around the world. 
               
               The world of finance is complicated.

               replyreport
               1. 85

                  Sharlee01posted 5 days agoin reply to this

                  Great point...

                  replyreport
            3. 81

               Readmikenowposted 5 days agoin reply to this

               Then you should be glad the ballroom being built at the White House is not using taxpayer money to build it.  Private donations.

               replyreport
               1. 85

                  Sharlee01posted 5 days agoin reply to this

                  Good point. I actually posted the list of investors — most of them are pretty generous when it comes to donating to charities. It’s not like they’re picking a ballroom over helping people in need.

                  replyreport
10. 60

    Willowarborposted 5 days ago

    WELCOME TO THE BALLROOM
    
    https://x.com/AmoneyResists/status/1953513771281891493

    replyreport