ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Alfred Kinsey

Updated on September 10, 2017

KINSEY


The Sexual Revolution is hailed by Liberal Atheists as the greatest advance for mankind since the wheel—or at least since penicillin. Alfred Kinsey is the man to whom we owe much for these changing mores.


According to this view, Kinsey freed us from "ignorance, hypocritical condemnation of sexuality from religious intolerance, and misguided prejudice, that condemned most people to be totally ignorant about the most basic knowledge about human sexuality." Such a statement makes me wonder how the human race ever survived before Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Report.


Another Liberal Atheist claims that Kinsey "freed Americans from superstition, myths, and misinformation," because "he rightly treats sex as animal behavior above and beyond moralizing."


As with most evils, this evil began with a series of huge lies. The biggest was about Kinsey himself—that he was a conservative Republican family man. He was in fact a sadistic, masochistic, homosexual child molester who had no experience in the study of human sexuality. Kinsey was a zoologist whose only previously published work was a study of the gall wasp. He died of orchitis, caused by his years of constant, brutal, masochistic masturbation methods.


ALFRED KINSEY
ALFRED KINSEY
ONE SECTION FROM THE KINSEY REPORT
ONE SECTION FROM THE KINSEY REPORT
ALFRED KINSEY ON THE COVER OF "TIME" MAGAZINE
ALFRED KINSEY ON THE COVER OF "TIME" MAGAZINE

The Kinsey Report


Alfred Kinsey published his first book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male in 1948; followed by Sexual Behavior in the Human Female in 1953. Combined, the two became known as the Kinsey Reports. Among other affronts, the Kinsey Report claims that 95 percent of the men in the "Greatest Generation" were secretly sex offenders.


Kinsey wrote that his "studies" had revealed that 10 percent of all men were homosexuals—a false figure that is still quoted today by the homosexual movement in order to persuade society of the normalcy of homosexual behaviors. The truth is about 2 percent—a gigantic difference.


Alfred Kinsey also reported that babies only a few months old were able to enjoy sexual pleasure. How could he possibly know this? His methods were simple: He recruited pedophiles to molest hundreds of babies as part of his "research." Kinsey's own charts and graphs show that genital, anal, and oral sexual abuse experiments were conducted on children—on babies.


Kinsey claimed that he himself had witnessed 26 orgasms experienced by a four-year-old child within a period of 24 hours. He also described reactions of other children during his experiments: their screams, the way they writhed in pain, and those who went into convulsions. The notes from the Kinsey Report claim that these reactions were also orgasmic—that they came from pleasure not pain. He made this claim because the children were too young to speak for themselves, because they were too young to talk. My question would be, "Were they too young to remember?" Alfred Kinsey was a sexual psychopath.


PHOTOGRAPH FROM THE HOME PAGE OF NAMBLA
PHOTOGRAPH FROM THE HOME PAGE OF NAMBLA

Alfred Kinsey


The conclusions of Kinsey's research are fabricated. During interviews he used the well known psychological method of only rewarding and reinforcing the answers he was looking for, while disapproving of answers that did not advance his desired results. This form of mental manipulation is more powerful than most people realize.


75 percent of his research data was secretly thrown away because it did not match his desired results. Only 14 percent of the men he interviewed were sexually normal. 200 of his subjects were sexual psychopaths like him; 1,400 were pedophiles; and hundreds of others were male prostitutes or those who practice homosexual behaviors. Very few normal women would even speak with Kinsey about their sexuality—this was the early 1950s, when the vast majority of women still maintained a sense of propriety about themselves.


The North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is the world's largest organization of pedophiles. Kinsey is their hero, the man who provided the "scientific" basis for the normalcy of their beliefs.


KINSEY
KINSEY

KINSEY


Alfred Kinsey viewed human beings as nothing more than animals. If human beings have no soul, no spirit, no afterlife, no God—then whatever desires we feel as mere animals must be right and should not be suppressed no matter how deviant or perverse they may be to others. Satanists have exactly this same creed.


Kinsey was on a mission to destroy traditional morality. He sought to devalue what was most precious to human beings: love, marriage, and children. One look at the sex education programs in our public schools—and our amoral society—tells us his mission has been a sensational success.

My primary source for this article is the book The Marketing of Evil by David Kupelian.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • prairieprincess profile image

      Sharilee Swaity 

      5 years ago from Canada

      James, the man was a complete deviant, and the way he conducted his work is beyond shocking and appalling. I have heard of the Kinsey Reports but was not aware of how corrupt he really was. Thanks for shedding light on this. I remember that another psychologist also did an experiment where he left children alone, and saw the effects. The early roots of psychology are questionable in several ways. Thanks for writing another brave article. Bravo!

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      6 years ago from Chicago

      cynthtggt— You are welcome. Your comments are extraordinary and I appreciate the dialogue.

      You write, "it's men also that lay the foundation of thought that brought into fruition our great Western Civilization."

      Yes, that is definitely true.

      You wrote: "To regard life above sex is men's calling and always was."

      Yes, I agree with you. The implication is that the Christian Faith is a great and needful constraint on men's natural (or base) sexual urges, which would be to spread his seed as far and wide as possible according to Darwinists.

      Your said, "The illusion men have that women make them moral, and not God"

      This is an excellent point. It is ultimately God, to be sure. But women have always tended to make men more moral. Look at the temperance movement when women said "lips that touch alcohol will not touch mine." It worked! Half the men in the country quit drinking. Which was great! Now, can you imagine men saying to women, "Lips that touch alcohol will not touch mine?" I can't. It is well known that millions of men go to church—and millions of children—because their wives want them to. I am sure it happens the other way but I doubt it is nearly as common, that a man has to nag his wife to get up and go to church. Publicly, men have brought more women to God through evangelism no doubt but privately I'll bet far more women have brought men to the Lord than the other way round.

      Thank you very much for your thoughtful and insightful remarks.

    • cynthtggt profile image

      Cynthia Taggart 

      6 years ago from New York, NY

      Thanks for replying. But I disagree with your take that women dictate the morality. Men wear the crown, and women unconsciously seek men greater than themselves, despite what the feminists say. Men have gone the way of Stanley Kawolski, the unsympathic figure in "A Streetcar Named Desire." And it's men also that lay the foundation of thought that brought into fruition our great Western Civilization. To believe that a woman's surrender of herself to a man reduces the mind to pittance, is to reduce even God to meaninglessness. You are wrong on that front. To regard life above sex is men's calling and always was. And I did not say women were "not persons" before the 1960s, I simply believe that feminism rose in response to men's dereliction. God is intent on making our inner world as "Thy will be done as in Heaven." The illusion men have that women make them moral, and not God, is precisely why a great percent of women in some countries suffer genital mutiliation to "purify" them. A woman's crotch is not a man's salvation, only God is man's salvation. A great book called "Intimate Partners" reveals the inner fight for power that destroys marriages, for example, and you ought to read it. Like I said, when men lead, women will follow. If all men's appetites so uncontrollable, why do so many need Viagra?

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      6 years ago from Chicago

      cynthtggt— Thank you very much for taking the time to read my article. Your profile page shows many titles that I am anxious to come over and read, which I will do soon. I have made myself a note to do so. Welcome to the HubPages Community.

      I appreciate your kind compliments. Kinsey predated the Sexual Revolution. Your comments dig some deep wells that might be hard to fill in this short space. I understand that the lack of propriety among females today can be defended by "Look at men! They have always been improper!" I am not convinced of this argument. In various decades and époques of Western Civilization it seems to me that the women set the morality. I think there is something about men that is different from women but I know the feminists denied this is so. I never thought a goal to "be like men" was a worthy one for women but a degradation of their true calling in this world as the softness in it and the nurturers of it. It seems to me that most men will do whatever they can get away with sexually and always have but the women of each generation decide what that will be.

      I do not buy the idea that women were not considered to be "persons" before the 1960s. I had 12 aunts, a mother, 2 grandmas, 5 sisters, and I have 4 daughters. They have always been considered and felt considered as much "persons" as any men have. The feminist idea was "you don't need a man; marriage is slavery; children will tie you down; be independent." But it did not produce independence. Even Leftists admit it without saying it when they brag that single women vote for Democrats 2 to 1 because they "depend" on government programs to survive. So they have replaced a husband with the State. But they are still not independent.

      I love this that you wrote: "What Kinsey and the sexual revolution did was take the experience of sexuality of loving partners and turn it into a collective experience devoid of love, or love between people irrelevant"

      Brilliant analysis!!

      I appreciate your thoughtful and insightful remarks.

    • cynthtggt profile image

      Cynthia Taggart 

      6 years ago from New York, NY

      I discovered you only lately and I wish I had sooner. This is a well-written hub and I am interested in reading more of your writings. Not sure what came first, Kinsey or the sexual revolution; but there is a component to the origins of the movement not mentioned. You wrote, "when the vast majority of women still maintained a sense of propriety about themselves," as though "propriety" never had relevance for men. The disregard for women as "persons" has been, even in biblical times, one of the most degrading and exploitive postures man has held against women for eons, which Jesus spoke about and against. I just want to say that when men start to maintain a propriety about themselves, it is certain women will follow. "Sins of the fathers" came before Kinsey and the sexual movement. I don't mean to get too deep here, but I think even Warren Beatty would agree that had he not been what he was in his youth, he would not have become the father and husband he is today. What Kinsey and the sexual revolution did was take the experience of sexuality of loving partners and turn it into a collective experience devoid of love, or love between people irrelevant, but it is men who lead above women in propriety. Women follow what men do, and if a man's only propriety is held at bay by a woman's chastity, then he never loved in the first place at all, not her, not even life itself.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      fpherj48— Thank you very much for taking the time to read my work. I sincerely appreciate your affirmation and encouragement. I look forward to reading some of your Hubs, which I have made myself a note to do ASAP.

      I am with you. I also have been known to be politically incorrect.

      I think it a shame that moral relativism is taught to our public school students. I just read a book review the other day about a new work called "Lost in Transition: The Dark Side of Emerging Adulthood." The author interviewed hundreds of young adults and reports that with the lone exceptions of murder and rape, they do not consider ANYTHING to be morally wrong. It is extreme moral individualism. While at the same time they are taught collectivism on economics. Just the opposite of what made America great in the first place.

      I am grateful to receive your compliments. Welcome to HubPages!

    • fpherj48 profile image

      Paula 

      7 years ago from Beautiful Upstate New York

      James...I have read a few of your hubs and am impressed by each. I am not quick to comment before allowing myself some time to absorb & understand. I have always had the opinion that Kinsey was a freak. Your info however, reconfirms my common sense. Often I will visit the hubpage of a particular commentor, to familiarize myself with him/her (bio, their hubs, etc). It helps me to get a potential handle on their thought process. In this case, I see I have nothing to say to Lady "G," that would assist her frame of mind.

      My eyes are burning (to say nothing of my heart) after reading the entire sparring match between you and "Alex," in your Hub on Homosexuals and marriage (rights?) Were my vote to be counted, make it ONE for James. (poor baby,Alex merely wants to be loved and accepted) OK. I love you, now please go away. Thank you.

      I enjoy your writing style and skills as well as your subject matters. I will be back. Keep fighting the GOOD fight. We're all in this together.

      As for my own purpose in writing....it's selfish....for the sheer fun of it. I don't believe I could tackle a serious and/or controversial matter without getting myself kicked out of the community. I need to do some major work on my political correctness.....right after I convince myself that it's necessary. You see, James, in my world, when someone says or does something immoral, illegal. illogical, unintelligent, unnatural, unacceptable....you get my drift....we don't often respond by offering a platform for discussion, argument, debate, and/or justification. We simply........oops, you see, there I go....almost said something politically incorrect!! Bye for now!

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Beth100— You are most welcome! Peace and light to you!

      Thank you taking the time to read my article. I enjoyed reading your insightful comments. I very much appreciate your gracious compliments as well.

      You wrote: "The one thing that perturbs me more than Kinsey is the fact there are still people out there willing to stand up for him."

      That also perturbs me. I don't understand it except by knowing that most people do not know the truth about Alfred Kinsey and his "research." Especially if all they know came from that movie.

      Pedophilia is pedophilia.

    • Beth100 profile image

      Beth100 

      7 years ago from Canada

      First, James, brilliant piece!! I remember reading his reports in university and watching the movie when it was released. I never liked anything about this person (though I have a more unpleasant term for him) and his findings were apalling as it is obvious how he came to these conclusions.

      The one thing that perturbs me more than Kinsey is the fact there are still people out there willing to stand up for him. Worse, they use religion as an excuse. What gives?!?

      Pedophilia is pedophilia. It has no gender. It has no religion. It has only one want. And it is a perverted want that does not survive in any other species in nature. If it isn't found naturally in nature, it should not exist.

      Thanks for bringing forth the truth about Kinsey and his pervisions. He has done the harm but with the truth, it can be undone to a degree.

      Peace and light.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      sheila b.— Yes, "Kinsey" was also a movie—more of a propaganda piece actually. After Alfred Kinsey was revealed for who he was in the shocking book by Judith Reisman, Hollywood had to make a film that made him appear like a wonderful man. They completely whitewashed his sins. Shameful!

      Thank you ever much for your outstanding comments. I enjoyed reading your thoughts. And I surely appreciate it when you let me know you have read one of my articles and enjoyed it. :-)

    • sheila b. profile image

      sheila b. 

      7 years ago

      Kinsey is another example of how the media misinformed the public. I remember hearing and reading many reports about his books - wasn't there a movie, too? Yet, in my memory, all of the reports were positive, Kinsey was a genius and his research brilliant. Actually, James, it seems much of what I 'learned' in the 50's and onward was just plain false rather than accurate.

      I read the comments, see you wrote about the latest push to decriminalize pedophilia - might it be worthwhile to include that in the article? If not, then I hope you'll write a separate one on the subject.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      lilyfly— I appreciate the update, my friend. Thank you for sharing your letter. I am grateful for your expressions of admiration and affection.

      Well . . . I believe the Holy Spirit has the power to "cure" anyone of anything—including homosexual proclivities and urges toward pedophilia. Now this is not an easy or routine thing by any means. The subject must clearly be repentant with a contrite heart and truly want to change and beg God for forgiveness with constant prayer—and much prayer from other saints. In other words, I do not see any person as beyond redemption. But the longer a person wallows in darkness, the more habitual a person is invested in and infest by demonic sin, the harder and more impossible the task becomes. I think it becomes impossible for them to change on their own. But nothing is impossible to God, who made each of us.

      Beyond that, I agree that the law is another matter and people must be punished for what they have done according to the law. Child molestation is an awful crime.

      With love,

      James

    • lilyfly profile image

      Lillian K. Staats 

      7 years ago from Wasilla, Alaska

      I just wanted to update you on my own personal battle against child molesters. I saw a group of church members standing foursquare behind a pedophile and called them on it. I wrote a letter to the editor, and since I don't get that letter, this is not Verbatim;

      Recently I listened to a Pastor exhort us to pray for child molesters. Yesterday I saw an entire church standing foursquare behind a pedophile.

      I understand the concept of prayer and forgivness for everyone, yet this is the only group I cannot forgive or pray for. Does no one see the dichotomy? That gays are inherently damned, but Pedophiles must be forgiven?

      It is my fervent prayer that child molesters are apprehended, and put out of their misery permanently, or bricked away from the sunlight, and life, in perpetuity.

      I'm sure the Almighty loves us all, but I am not nearly so holy.

      O.K., that actually is almost verbatim.Molestation is a choice. Ahhhggg! Who is running the show now... the devil? Seems like it! Keep going Sir... we need schooling! Much admiration, and affection, lily

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Hello, hello,— Your comments are brilliant! Thank you ever much for posting them here.

      Yes, the Kinsey Reports never should have been published without checking his research for validity and to discover what a pervert and child molester he was. But the almighty dollar spoke louder than virtue. They guessed right that this subject would be a huge seller—especially a book that approved of whatever deviant practice anybody could dream up. Talk about pandering!

      Kinsey should have ended his life in prison. He could have carried on his "research" just fine behind bars, though he would have been the catcher not the pitcher in there.

      I agree about Freud too. A quack.

    • Hello, hello, profile image

      Hello, hello, 

      7 years ago from London, UK

      I think he was a mentally sick man and should been locked up and celebrated a great man. These books or reports should have never been printed. Surely, they must do more harm. Same as Freud. I think the publishers only done it because there was great money to be had. It is disgusting to what level they can stoop. Sex always sells. Yet they reject any decent writer, even without reading their MS. Oh well, that is the world all over.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Kaie Arwen— Thank you ever much for reading my twin Hubs on Kinsey and Moody. Heinous is a good word for this man. I, too, am surprised that he still has defenders.

      As Dr Samuel Johnson once said: "Such is the state of a man abandoned to the indulgence of vicious inclinations. He justifies one crime by another; invents wicked principles to support wicked practices; endeavors rather to corrupt others, than own himself corrupted, and to avoid that shame which a profession of his crimes would bring upon him, calls evil good, and good evil, puts darkness for light, and light for darkness. "

      Sorry to disgust you. I do appreciate the applause! :)

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      WillStarr— I have no doubt that the Catholic priest scandal was all about homosexual predators. How many little girls were molested by priests? Not many. Homosexual predators naturally gravitate toward occupations that will put them in proximity of their prey as an authority figure—teachers, coaches, boy scout leaders, boys and girls clubs, foster fathers, the priesthood, and now horribly: through adoption.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Lady Guinevere— Thank you for your comments. I checked out your Hub. It is certainly true that many people have contracted AIDS who have never engaged in homosexual behaviors. Of course, it began with men tearing each others anuses and the virus entered through these tears. That is why its original name was "gay cancer." If a quarantine had been effected early, millions of deaths could have been prevented. It later spread through blood transfusions, heroin addicts sharing needles, and infected men having sex with unsuspecting women—some knowingly.

    • Kaie Arwen profile image

      Kaie Arwen 

      7 years ago

      James- I first heard of Kinsey about a year ago; I was sitting on the front porch, enjoying a nice hot cup of coffee and BANG! The pleasurable afternoon ended. Alfred Kinsey was a heinous man............. evil, twisted............ sick, disgusting........... but I believe I'll stick with heinous. 0:-D

      That anyone on here can attempt to defend him astonishes me. Unfortunately, there are still people who can be fooled........... I applaud you once again for exposing the devil's work for what it is. Kaie

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      drbj— You are quite welcome, my friend. I believe the book I used for much of this material used the book you mentioned as a reference. I remember that from the endnotes. I will get a copy of the Reisman book. I saw her on television today briefly. I want to read her book on Kinsey.

      Thank you for reading my little Hub. I am grateful for the compliments. :-)

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      lilyfly— You are most welcome, Lily. It is a pleasure to have you visit again. Your comments never fail to make for excellent reading.

      You wrote: "Anything that destroys innocence in a child, is inherently evil."

      Amen to that. Just today I saw on the news that a group of psychiatrists had a big meeting on how to remove the stigma on child molesters. Many of them wanted to decriminalize and even normalize sexual relations between adults and children. After the glorification of homosexual behaviors I suppose we should have expected this to be next.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Cardisa— This man makes me angry too. Thank you for visiting my Hub. I appreciate your comments. You asked this question:

      "How would someone know that a baby enjoyed sex unless they were exposed to sex?"

      Exactly. Therein lies the rub.

      You also asked: "Didn't the authorities investigate this man? Wasn't there enough evidence in these so called report to lock him up and throw away the key?"

      No and yes. He was not investigated until long after his death. There was plenty of evidence to convict him of criminal sexual abuse of children but he got a free pass.

    • WillStarr profile image

      WillStarr 

      7 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      "Point is: Those priests who had/have AIDS could have had that before they became priests and that doesn't necessarily mean they were GAY either."

      I said that the left will go to absurd lengths to deny that the offending priests were homosexual predators who deliberately targeted vulnerable young males, so I want to thank you for going out of your way to prove my point.

      Thank you, Lady Guinevere!

    • Lady Guinevere profile image

      Debra Allen 

      7 years ago from West By God

      I don't have any beef with that book. I simply asked a question.

      With the Freud thing, I was simply telling you that Kinsey didn't originate that thought or that concept. Give credit where credit is due.

      From the article in the link it also states: "Just how widespread is homosexuality among priests and bishops? For obvious reasons, no reliable statistics are available. The percentage is vigorously disputed, of course, but one indication of the scope of the problem is that those who argue for the lowest estimate insist that the number of gays in the clergy is no higher than that of the gay population in society at large--as if this were not on its own showing evidence of a profound crisis. "

      I also wrote a hub on the subject that not everyone who has AIDS is Gay and they got a really bad rap from people who think or assume that to be Homosexual one has to have AIDS and vice versa. That hub is: http://ladyguinevere.hubpages.com/hub/Not-Everyone...

      Point is: Those priests who had/have AIDS could have had that before they became priests and that doesn't necessarily mean they were GAY either.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      WillStarr— I appreciate your candid response as a Catholic to the issue of pederasty. I think that this common knowledge to informed people such as you and me but buried by the Main Stream Media since it provides facts that disprove their agenda.

      Thank you for that link. You are a discerning individual, my friend.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Lady Guinevere— I read perhaps a dozen chapters each week from the Old Testament and I never skip over the "Song of Solomon" even if I do not quote it. What is your beef with it?

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Lady Guinevere— I agree that pedophiles can become predators of both little boys and little girls but the overwhelming evidence facing us today is that in the Catholic priest scandals almost every case is about pederasty.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Whidbeywriter— Hello! You are welcome. Thank you for taking the time to read my article. I appreciate your insightful remarks.

      I think any person allowed to be born can participate in the ongoing dialogue of the human race but it is also up to us as discerning human beings to discriminate between ideas that enhance the human race and those which seek to destroy what is good among us.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      WillStarr— Thank you for this excellent riposte. I appreciate your participation in this conversation.

      Even for an Atheist or Darwinist there is nothing "natural" about homosexual practices. These homosexual behaviors are surely against any concept of evolution. Nothing "evolves" from them.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Lady Guinevere— Thank you for providing those two links. I am personally ambivalent about the celibacy of priests.

      You wrote: "I already told you what lie you had tole--Freud was a nut and he was the one who gave the first Psychological report that babies have sexual pleasure."

      I am well aware of Freud's views on infant sexuality but this article is not about Freud. Therefore, I object to you calling me a liar because of Freud's views when what I wrote about was KINSEY'S experiments on infants and his subsequent writings about them.

      I promise to come over and read your article that you posted on my FaceBook page and tell you what I think of it.

      Whatever your opinions are, I fail to see that I have "lied" about anything in this article. If I am wrong please correct me.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      SirDent— Thank you the encouragement and the laudations, my brother. I very much appreciate the Scripture that you quoted. God Bless You!

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      charmgirl— You are most welcome. I am sorry if I offended your sensibilties but I felt this needed to be said. Thank you for visiting and commenting.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      WillStarr— Thank you for the compliments, my friend. I appreciate you reading this article and chiming in with such excellent remarks.

      You are surely correct about the Catholic priests. Nearly all of them molested boys—very few girls were involved. They were obviously homosexual predators, drawn as always to a place where they would likely come into contact with the objects of their desires as an authority figure.

      Yes, Kinsey has been thoroughly debunked by those who have been paying attention. Hence the film a few years ago that completely whitewashed who the man truly was in an attempt to reframe his legacy in the minds of the movie-going public.

    • drbj profile image

      drbj and sherry 

      7 years ago from south Florida

      Alfred Kinsey and his flawed research helped to launch the sexual revolution in the 50s. In a book published in 1990, the authors, Reisman and Eichel, literally demolished the two "Kinsey Reports." Title of the book: "Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People."

      Thanks, James, for this well-written and eminently readable expose of Kinsey, the charlatan.

    • profile image

      lilyfly 

      7 years ago

      This just sends chills up my spine. Last Sunday I went to a church, and the Pastor asked us if we should pray and forgive child molesters. Everyone said yes. I thought.... this guy has done it. I hope I'm wrong with every fiber of my being. James, I don't know about you, but it is the ONLY group I will not pray for, or forgive. Anything that destroys innocence in a child, is inherently evil.

      My parents were readers of these "new thinkers". It's not "new" thinking. It's as old as sin. Thanks, James, for saying so. lily

    • Cardisa profile image

      Carolee Samuda 

      7 years ago from Jamaica

      Did he really publish such a report and get away with it. Didn't it cause some sort of suspicion. How would someone know that a baby enjoyed sex unless they were exposed to sex?

      It's ridiculous that a report like that would be used to determine human sexuality.

      Didn't the authorities investigate this man? Wasn't there enough evidence in these so called report to lock him up and throw away the key?

      This man makes me angry, I am so glad he isn't alive today!

    • WillStarr profile image

      WillStarr 

      7 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      The Catholic priesthood has long been a haven for homosexuals, precisely because, there, they are not expected to marry. Thus, the priesthood has long been a homosexual underworld. It has been estimated (by the Church) that nearly 50% of the priests were homosexuals. Earlier in the last decade, hundreds of priests died of AIDS:

      http://www.catholicculture.org/news/features/index...

      In any case, pedophiles are attracted to prepubescent (sexually immature) children, of either sex. They have no interest in the sexually mature

      But the victims in the Catholic Church were almost all young, but sexually mature, MALES, and their molesters were indeed, homosexual priest/predators. And the claim that they had no access to females is bunk. Females have also been altar servers for some time now.

      The offending priests were indeed, homosexual predators, almost exclusively.

      And yes, I am a Catholic.

    • Lady Guinevere profile image

      Debra Allen 

      7 years ago from West By God

      How many of you have read The Song of Solomon? It's a book in the Bible that I rarely, if ever, hear anyone quoting scripture from.

    • Lady Guinevere profile image

      Debra Allen 

      7 years ago from West By God

      Willstart you quoted me by you misread me.

      "Those priest of the Catholic Church are not homosexuals. They do what they do because the NATURAL act that God put in us was stripped."

      It is NOT natural to be a pedophile but the act of sex is. Show me where they knew all those priest were homosexual before they were priests.

      Being homosexual does not always mean Pedophile and vice versa.

    • Whidbeywriter profile image

      Mary Gaines 

      7 years ago from Oak Harbor on Whidbey Island, Washington

      Hello James, as always you certainly did your research. What a horrific man who doesn't deserve to be a part of the human race in my opinion. Thank you for sharing this hub even though I agree with some of the others as it not being a pleasant thing to read, but definately good information to know. Blessings to you

    • WillStarr profile image

      WillStarr 

      7 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      "Those priest of the Catholic Church are not homosexuals. They do what they do because the NATURAL act that God put in us was stripped."

      See? Normal, heterosexual men are suddenly attracted to young men when they become celibate.

      Never mind that almost all the offending priests were known by the Church to be homosexuals when they entered the priesthood.

    • Lady Guinevere profile image

      Debra Allen 

      7 years ago from West By God

      James I already told you what lie you had tole--Freud was a nut and he was the one who gave the first Psychological report that babies have sexual pleasure. http://www.bartleby.com/278/2.html

      YES, I have an idea about how the secrets of sex can and does destroy marriages, The Life and Times of a Stepford Wife. I gave you my link on FB on your ad for this hub. Those priest of the Catholic Church are not homosexuals. They do what they do because the NATURAL act that God put in us was stripped. It was stripped back int he 1500's (?) because they could marry only they married too many and the State was afraid they wouldn't get tax money from them because of the Non-tax status the Church--or any church--has. http://www.futurechurch.org/fpm/history.htm

    • profile image

      SirDent 

      7 years ago

      This is the first I have heard of this man, though I had heard the term Kinsey reports before, I had no idea what they were.

      It seems you created another masterpiece, James. I was reminded of one scripture as I read this.

      1Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

      Keep working in the anointing God has put upon you.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Maralexa— You are quite welcome. Thank you very much for reading my Hub. I appreciate your comments as well.

      The story of Alfred Kinsey, his twisted research, and distorted findings, and then his glorification by the Liberal Press, makes me sick too.

      You asked: "Why and how did he gain such popularity? respect? Were his research methods not publically criticised at the time?"

      He was lionized by radical journalists who yearned to usher in a new age of sexual licentiousness in America in the name of hedonism. They never checked his reserach methods because he provided them with the ammunition they craved to overthrow moral conventions and customs as faulty social constructs.

      As the brilliant Dr Samuel Johnson once wrote:

      "A very little acquaintance with human nature will inform us, that there are few men who can patiently bear the imputation of being in the wrong; and that there is no action, how unreasonable or wicked soever it may be, which those, who are guilty of it, will not attempt to vindicate, though perhaps by such defence as aggravates the crime."

      James

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      Lady Guinevere— I do appreciate you for coming by to read my article and respond to it.

      I am not aware of religion harming marriages though the Kinsey-fueled sexual revolution surely has: The rate of divorce has exploded in my lifetime by 900 percent. The number of marriages per capita has dropped by 50 percent during the same time period. The number of households headed by a married couple dropped below 50 percent in 2005 for the first time in American history. This statistic stood at 80 percent when I was born.

      As far as your allegation that this Hub is full of lies, if you will specify a lie or lies I will provide my footnotes for the fact I noted to prove that what I wrote is true. If you are correct I will edit my article.

    • James A Watkins profile imageAUTHOR

      James A Watkins 

      7 years ago from Chicago

      annaw— Thank you for being my first visitor! I sincerely appreciate the kind compliments, as well as the voted up and interesting. I will come by soon to read some of your Hubs. :-)

    • profile image

      charmgirl 

      7 years ago

      Thanks for a very interesting and comprehensive expose of Kinsey and his works. I never read anything of his and I'm glad I did'nt!

    • WillStarr profile image

      WillStarr 

      7 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      Another excellent Hub, James.

      Kinsey has been thoroughly debunked and discredited through the years, but his 'findings' persist among the world's various sexual perversion promoters, such as NAMBLA.

      Almost all of the Catholic priests exclusively targeted young, but sexually mature males, because those priests were in fact homosexual predators, a know fact in the Church that the left still hotly denies, claiming that they were heterosexual pedophiles, based on Kinsey.

      The left's agenda of normalizing the perversion of homosexuality was threatened by the revelation that the offending priests were homosexuals, so they defended by asserting Kinsey.

    • Maralexa profile image

      Marilyn Alexander 

      7 years ago from Vancouver, Canada and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico

      Thanks for this obviously well-researched hub. I will have to leave this subject to you, James. I'm am sorry to say your findings make me sick. I can not understand the kind of behaviour involved with Kinsey's "research".

      Why and how did he gain such popularity? respect? Were his research methods not publically criticised at the time?

      Thank you for tackling such a huge subject. Blessings from Maralexa

    • Lady Guinevere profile image

      Debra Allen 

      7 years ago from West By God

      Full of lies again! Freud was the one who said babies can get sexual pleasure. 10 percent, hmmmm would that be the 10 percent Christians get out of the Bible too. Religion is the one who is keeping things too secretive and it is harming marriages and peoples lives.

    • annaw profile image

      annaw 

      7 years ago from North Texas

      This is a great Hub, quite interesting and informative. You have definitely peeked my interest in reading his works. Thank you James for this well written Hub. Voted up and interesting.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)