Define a woman who sleeps with a lot men. Now define a man who does the same? What are some words and adjectives used to describe such a woman? What are some words and adjectives used to describe such a man? What do you think of these labels? What about your personal experiences?
Not too bright, considering the spread of STD's, with or without protection.
Not too bright, considering the spread of STD's, with or without protection.
I think both are reasonable. My experience bears both out; those that are consumed by sex are either not too bright or have a mental problem of some kind. I did see a film about a woman (British, I think) that required sex from strangers several times a week. Her problem was eventually traced to a chemical brain imbalance and cured - she even kept her husband through it all.
that is an interesting perspective .... its seems stds are everywhere and no is safe
"Define a woman who sleeps with a lot men."
" Now define a man who does the same?"
" What are some words and adjectives used to describe such a woman?"
Skanky ho. Whoring around. Desperate.
What are some words and adjectives used to describe such a man?"
Playboy. Ladies' man.
"What do you think of these labels? What about your personal experiences?"
They are obviously unfair but there's more to the equation than just looking down on promiscuous females and putting promiscuous males on a pedestal.
Both are sexual creatures but both experience very different responses from open sexuality.
Wilderness is right - the risk of STDs should put an end to casual sex, but because the sex drive is so strong - hormone-pumped people will probably continue to behave irresponsibly.
Sexual acceptance and equality for females is a double-edged sword. Do you remember those slut-walks of a few years ago? Young women claiming they had the "right" to dress trashy and parade themselves half-clothed?
While their hearts were in the right place, they were playing right into the hands of every straight man alive. After a century of feminists burned bras and demanded that they not be objectified by their bodies, the slut-walkers did just the opposite. They became the public persona of the stripper every man wants to watch but is afraid to go to the club and do so.
Females have a tougher road when it comes to sexuality. Not fair - but there it is.
Very good points and responses ... do you agree/support with these labels and definitions of promiscuous men and women? why or why not?
Don't know about "fair" - women have advantages in the area, too.
"Give me what I want or I'll shut you off". Just let a man try that and see how far it goes. Sex can be and very often is a weapon to women.
Sex is also very definitely a hook, or bait. Consider the normal dress of the sexes; women consistently approach dressing very sexually, men do not. Women, for example, expose a great deal more skin, including right to the current social limit - that would be quite abnormal for a male.
So even the normal day-to-day dress code is a little along the lines of the slut-walk (never heard of it). Personally, I see it as built-in evolutionary wise as the strong sex drive of men.
Define a woman who sleeps around - "A slut is a woman who behaves like a man." I heard a female comedian say that once. :-)
Generally speaking most men and women frown upon women who sleep around. Conservative women hate it because they feel like the "loose women" are a threat to their relationships by "tempting" their men. They blame these women for changing traditional courtship values.
When a man sleeps around with beautiful women he is thought to have some kind of "magic spell" that "seduces" them. Getting a "hot looking" woman is seen as a (challenge). Other men want to know his "secret".
On the other hand if a woman sleeps around no one considers that to be a challenge after all most men are ready to have sex! She is expected to have a much (easier) time to get men.
It's like comparing a guy who goes out (prospecting) to sell products on commission facing rejection over and over again; versus a woman who works the order desk where people are (contacting her) to get the product!
Naturally the person who has the most "challenging job" and is successful will be admired more than the person who simply answers the phone and takes orders.
With the advent of the sexual revolution, the birth control pill, better career opportunities and higher pay some women want to be seen as equal to men in all areas of life including sexually.
Men generally only care about (men) respecting them. If the men admire them women follow their lead. Men for the most part do not knock each other for their sexual behavior. They also don't care what women think!
Seriously I don't believe (women) admire men who sleep around with a lot of women. They call them "dogs", "liars", "cheaters", "a-holes", and "no good". There are also have always been some women who see these guys a "challenge". They won't to be "the one" to get him to finally commit. This is especially true if the man is good looking, successful, and respected by other men.
One can only imagine what it would be like if women didn't care what men think! Suppose women also did not put other women down or call them names for doing exactly what many women do?
You would have a situation where both genders are supported by their own. Neither women or men would be attacked or put down by (both) genders.
The reason why this will never happen is because women are very "competitive" with one another. They not only put each other down for their sexual behavior but they will knock each other for their weight, the clothes they wear, hairstyles.. If two women wear similar outfits People Magazine will pose the question: "Who wore it best?" The whole stroll down "The Red Carpet" for awards show is for women to critique other women's gowns/dresses. Whenever a magazine shows a female celebrity without make up or with cellulite it makes a lot of women feel better about themselves! Men don't get caught up with "competing" with one another's clothes and appearance. Women could stop the double standard if they stopped putting each other down and didn't a damn about what men think.
For the most part I agreed up until the last paragraph. The minute a man sees another man outclassing him in any way, he is quick to call him a ____. Men are ultra competitive and what do they compete for more than women? Whether movies, books or real life, I have seen men belittle other men the first chance they get, if they think the other man is making him look less-than in any way.
I meant to say there have always been women who see men who have lots of women as being a "challenge". They want to be "the one" who finally gets him to commit.
Women could stop the double standard if they stopped putting each other down and didn't (give) a damn about what men think. This is not likely to happen.
Women respect other women who are able to get men to marry them. The perception is men don't want to get married or commit. This is their "challenge". Not many men are going to reject sex with attractive woman. That's "easy".
Therefore both genders are respecting what they consider to be the "challenge" among their sex. A man who seduces beautiful women is respected because he is seen as overcoming a (challenge). A woman who has a man considered to be a "catch" that pleads for her hand to marry him is admired by other women because it's viewed a challenge.
It's the perception of overcoming a (challenge) that garners respect from one's own gender.
I think some women are highly respected when they turn down "the challenge" (securing a loving, good looking, successful, husband) and choose some other satisfying path entirely. It's like women everywhere look at this phenomenon, hit their own heads v-8 style and collectively say, "That was an option?"
Yep, I saw that just today. Every woman stopped and simultaneously slapped themselves in the head. It was quite a phenomenon!
It's interesting that we assume a woman like that is really just wounded and a man like that is just going with his natural instincts.
I think something is broken inside each of them. I think the man is likely less aware of his emotional needs and might not realize that it is that need he is actually trying to fill.
Would that imply that a woman is aware her actions are resulting from emotional failures, but is not strong or smart enough to override her emotions with reason?
It doesn't sound too complimentary to either sex, which is probably fair enough given their actions.
No, it's not complimentary... like any weakness or shortcoming, it is chalked up under the negatives column. Smart enough? That would depend on the person. Strong enough? Well if he/she realizes they are compensating, consciously trading sex for love, then I would say... they weren't strong enough. Like any addiction, one simply has to say no, but for what ever reason, the individuals say yes.
And, just maybe, those individuals do not follow the same moral code most of us do and find nothing intrinsically wrong with sex. Given that they accept the physical risks, that the value received is more than the probable price to be paid, it becomes quite reasonable to have a hundred partners. Presumably Soloman slept with lots of different women...
Can't say I would agree, but can understand such thinking.
When it comes to sex, moral codes seem to fly out the window faster than the speed of light. There have been many a good man and woman, who in a moment, found resisting certain opportunities nearly impossible. What are we talking about again? lol
All too true, unfortunately. Because I want, I can have and hang the morals for the moment.
by S Lynn Mitchell 7 years ago
Do you think promiscuity and low self-esteem go hand in hand?I have seen many woman randomly give their most precious possession (their bodies) to anyone that would take it. I'm not one to police ANYONE'S sex life, but I can't understand why a woman would risk pregnancy, communicable diseases, and...
by Tigercub684 5 years ago
Can a gay man be attracted to a specific girl, but not women in general, and still be gay, not bi?As a writer, i'm wondering if it's possible for a gay or straight character to be attracted to a person of the gender that opposes their typical sexuality? Like, a gay person to be in love with a...
by deecoleworld 9 years ago
Double standards or something else?: Define a woman who sleeps with a lot men? Now define a man?Why is it, that when a women sleeps around she is considered a hoe/slut/whore but when a man does the same he is considered a pimp/player/ "the man"? I have heard many sides of this...
by peter565 7 years ago
Why is there a double standard between men and women that have lot of sex?When a men have sex with a lot of women people call him a champ, but when women have sex with a lot of men, people call her a slut (mostly by other women, men usually don't care). Why do you think that is the case?
by Ronnie wrenchBiscuit 6 years ago
Many women find me sexually attractive and exciting. I have no explanation for this as I consider myself just an ordinary guy. But I am a master of the art of seduction and satisfaction. I understand what women want, and so I am ready to answer your questions , and provide valuable insight that...
by Tessa Schlesinger 3 years ago
Like many other women, I can add my name to the 'me too' movement. I faced sexual harassment for a good 40 years.Harvey Weinstein is far from being the only jerk that thinks his fame and fortune is reason enough to rape and harass women sexually.QUOTE: “We believe the evidence will show that the...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|