ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Are UFOs/Aliens A Cover For A Secret Space Program?

Updated on March 17, 2015
Dr Steven Greer
Dr Steven Greer | Source

UFOs As A Cover?

The Project Starlight Initiative (PSC)

Anyone familiar with the name Dr Steven Greer will be familiar with the Disclosure project.

The Disclosure project is an organization started by Steven Greer, consisting of compelling testimony from high-level government and military witnesses, which seeks to bring about the safe disclosure of UFOs, advanced extraterrestrial intelligence and zero-point technology, whilst simultaneously opposing the weaponization of space.

What many people familiar with Greer might not know, is that prior to the Disclosure project, Greer had already attempted to push for UFO disclosure back in the 1990s. As part of an initiative called the Project Starlight Coalition (PSC), Greer arranged meetings with military consultants in order to initiate a safe disclosure of what he claimed was an extraterrestrial presence.

As part of the Project Starlight Coalition, CIA Director James Woolsey and Senior Clinton administration officials were initially briefed on the topic with recommendations of ending the secrecy and eventually briefings were arranged for White House officials, members of US Congress and Senior military figures in 1997.

As part of the initiative, NASA officials had come forward to testify to finding 'man-made' structures on the moon, in addition to a moon-base where it appeared that some kind of mining operation may be taking place. It was claimed that NASA regularly airbrush such anomalies out of their images before releasing them to the public.

When asked why the discovery was shrouded in secrecy, the NASA officials claimed that they didn't know how the public would react and that there were also other reasons beyond NASA.

Public Domain
Public Domain | Source

Project Horizon: Moon Base

Perhaps rather coincidentally, perhaps not, official government documents were declassified and released by the National Security Archives in July 2014, which show how the US military were planning to have a functional military base, with twelve soldiers, on the moon by 1966 which was estimated to cost as much as $6 billion.

On 8th June 1959, ten years before man had even stepped on the moon, a report entitled Project Horizon, A U.S. Army Study For The Establishment of a Lunar Military Outpost, was produced for the U.S. Department of the Army. The report had been prepared by a group at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA).

According to the proposals for Project Horizon:

"The lunar outpost is required to develop and protect potential United States interests on the moon; to develop techniques in moon-based surveillance of the Earth and space, in communications relay, and in operations on the surface of the moon; to serve as a base for exploration of the moon, for further exploration into space and for military operations on the moon if required; and to support scientific investigations on the moon."

According to Wikipedia, Project Horizon never passed the feasibility stage "in an official capacity" - but what about in an unofficial capacity? The fact is, that NASA claim to have found a base on the moon. The question is, whose base is it and how did they manage to put it there so discreetly?


During the early 1950s, in the years following the infamous alleged UFO crash in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947, the field of electrogravitics started taking the US by storm. Plenty of research was being carried out into electrogravitic technology and the subject was garnering major mainstream media attention. Research into electrogravitics had, however, started as early as the late 1920s and carried on throughout the 1930s.

Then, according to Dr Steven Greer, in 1954 the field of electrogravitics suddenly went black (i.e. covert) and no more was said about it publicly. For this reason, the field of electrogravitics has become popular with UFO enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists who believe that the truth about breakthrough research into the subject has been covered up since 1954.

It has been suggested that the work of inventors such as Thomas Townsend Brown, who began experiments into what he believed to be antigravity in 1921, have been intentionally suppressed. Of course, there is a lot of controversy surrounding the Biefeld-Brown effect. However, rather questionably, the field of electrogravitics does seem to be gaining more traction once again in recent times thanks to scientists such as Thomas F. Valone, who has recently written about electrogravitic and zero-point technology.

Could it be a possibility that there really was breakthrough research into electrogravitics in the 1950s and that the military decided to keep it secret?

And could it be possible that they used this electrogravitic technology to quietly set up base on the moon as part of a secret space program?

After all, sending man to the moon in a rocket in 1969 would be the perfect public relations program to divert attention away from the secret space program and the moon base...

... and we all know about the conspiracy theories about the moon landing. Was it faked? And if it was real, what exactly was it that Neil Armstrong claimed to have witnessed during those two minutes of silence?

Hacking The Pentagon

Gary McKinnon is a UK citizen who used the hacker name, Solo, in what is now known as the biggest military hack of all time, to spend thirteen months hacking into NASA, US Army, US Air Force and Department of Defence computers and was arrested by the UK's National Hi-Tech Crime Unit in 2002.

It was claimed that Gary had caused as much as $70,000 damage to critical system files - Gary, who suffers with Aspergers Syndrome, denied the allegation but admitted to the hacking claiming that he was merely looking for evidence of zero-point (infinite) energy technology, after seeing Dr Steven Greer's Disclosure project testimony.

Gary spent over ten years fighting a legal battle against the US, who wanted to extradite him whereby he would have had to face up to sixty years in a federal US prison. After much campaigning on the grounds of high risk of suicide, Gary became well known within the UFO community and gained a lot of support, including the support of David Gilmour from Pink Floyd and Chrissy Hynde from The Pretenders.

Gary also managed to attain the support of the UK government and home secretary, Theresa May, announced that he would be staying in the UK to face charges.

Gary eventually walked away from court a free man.

During this legal battle, Gary took part in a video interview with Project Camelot, in which he revealed details of what he found during his cyber-expedition; an image of some kind of gigantic spacecraft, with geodesic domes above, below and on the sides, suspended above the Northern hemisphere, which he claims doesn't look Earthly, a list of non-terrestrial (off-world) officers as part of some kind of secret space program and evidence of fleet-to-fleet transfers taking place in space.

Could it be that the secret space program Gary found evidence of is directly related to the alleged secret base on the moon and that antigravity technology has secretly been used to do so? And if so, what are the implications?

It seems that the US government were extremely concerned about what Gary might know.

The Search For Antigravity

Whilst research into electrogravitic antigravity technology may date back to the 1920s, official research into antigravity dates back to the late 1940s and plenty of official research was carried out on throughout the 1950s. Although, in 1921, Thomas Townsend Brown claimed that the research he was working on showed antigravity properties, following experiments and research were carried out by others with no successful results.

Experiments for the US Air Force which appeared to disprove Townsend Brown's antigravity research were not carried out until 1990, then again in 2003 for NASA. However, during the 1990s, not long after Area 51 whistleblower Bob Lazar had come forward to speak about Element 115 (Ununpemtium) claiming it had antigravity properties and was used in the propulsion of UFOs, research into antigravity technology started to gain traction once again.

In 1992, whilst experimenting with superconductors, Eugene Podkletnov claimed to have discovered that a fast rotating superconductor reduces gravitational effects. Once again, further experiments were carried out supposedly with no successful results. Between 1991 to 1993, Ning Li and Douglas Torr claimed to have successfully produced gravitomagnetic and gravitoelectric fields using a time dependent magnetic field. Although they appeared in Popular Mechanics magazine in 1999, no further evidence was offered.

Despite the fact that no further evidence was offered, Douglas Torr was also involved in the development of a 'gravity generator' at the University of South Carolina.

A leaked document originating from the Office of Technology Transfer at the University of South Carolina, which was allegedly confirmed by Charles Platt, a news reporter for Wired, in 1998, the device was capable of creating a 'force beam' in any direction and there were plans to patent the design. After this, no more was said about it publicly.

Another whistleblower who had spoken out about antigravity technology and UFOs in recent times is former Senior Research Engineer for Lockheed Martin, Boyd Bushman. In video interviews, Bushman had demonstrated Lenz Law and had hinted that there may be more to the Hutchison effect than meets the eye. Of course, many people did not believe him.

Bushman also spoke about dark matter and the 'neutrino universe' and claimed that the (Bob) Lazar tapes were real. Experiments carried out by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Joint Institute for National Research in Russia in 2004 had confirmed the existence of Lazar's Element 115, whereas researchers at GSI from Lund University in Sweden went on to confirm an island of stability in 2013.

Despite the claims that we still haven't mastered antigravity just yet, UFO sightings are becoming increasingly more abundant and significant, with many of them being captured on video, being corroborated by multiple reliable eyewitnesses and sometimes also being tracked on radar; UFOs which appear to display antigravity properties.

Could it be that antigravity was actually cracked a long time ago and was then used to secretly set up a base on the moon as part of a secret space program, whilst presenting disinformation to the public in the form of the Apollo landings?

And if so, is it possible that all these people coming forward now to speak about antigravity technology are doing so as part of an ongoing disinformation campaign?

Could it also be possible that they are also using allegations of UFOs and aliens as a cover for the secret space program and the moon base?

To quote former CIA Director, William Casey, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

© 2015 Marc Hubs


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • marscloseupdotcom profile image


      4 years ago

      I really like your writing style Sparkster! I have interests along the same lines. I guess I am really into mars anomalies and how amazed I am the fact that nasa has uploaded all kinds of goodies :) and doesn't say a damn thing about it verbally. It just blows my mind. It really is like an easter egg hunt when you were a kid kind of thing. So yes, what speaks to me about a space program is what you are saying. I enjoy Steven Greer's presentations and his passion and am glad you wrote about him. Also Gary Mckinon, and amazing guy to say the least !

      I like your passion about the secret space program. I have a real passion for Gary Wilcox's testimony which happened in 1964 starting at 10:00 am on a new york farm. I think there is a true opening for the public to understand that there is a civilization underground on mars by hearing his testimony and his stellar character and then adding things such as your statement about the hole in mars that seems to look down into an opening.

      And also your astute fact of saying that John Lear was verified. To me, that is a great staple-clue for a current mars civilization. By that I mean it really adds up. So I think all this equates to a secret space program indeed.

      In 1964 I think a martian visit happened with Gary Wilcox first, his testimony is on youtube but also I did a video of this precious interview. I installed some of the anomalies I found on mars through a few selected mascam photos etc. and put in his interview which was recorded when a news man recorded his testimony. I think it is so sad his name is almost faded with time. What a terrible thing to happen!

      But to make the intrigue grow even further I think it was true what was said about how these beings told Gary that they were doing a tour of the western hemisphere! Because after about 1 and 1/2 hours of communicating with Gary I think they moved on over to New Mexico and that is when Lonnie Zamora spotted what I think was the same oval craft and probably the same two beings that spoke to Gary Wilcox. There mode of dress and size seems so similar as well in both Gary and Lonnie's testimonies. And of course the same day "April 24th, 1964".

      But also in the year 1964 (when mars was closest to earth) I think Donald Shrum saw them as well but this time a mothership came down! Also their mode of dress is similar to Gary's and what Lonnie saw, their size, same year (1964). The best interview I ever heard I think is George Knapp's interviewing the authors of "Aliens In The Forest" about the Donald Shrum incident!

      This is a staple to one of my menu's on my "" site under "martians". Along with Ernest Norman's testimony and his book "The Truth About Mars". I've had a little debate with Richard Hoagland about Ernest Norman because he thinks Percival Lowell was ripped off by Ernest Norman but in all of Precival's books about mars you can't find the word "underground" civilization anywhere. For some strange reason Richard doesn't seem to want to talk about current going ons on mars such as why all the green anomalies and the list goes on. But he is one great mars enthusiast there is not denying that! Maybe the father of the anomalies movement on mars.

      So again, yes there has to be a secret space program but I think it could have been brought in the for-front when that 1964 martian visit to earth went from New York to New Mexico Socorro desert (Lonnie Zamora) to Holloman Air Force Base) in which a leak occurred when Richard Doty a military officer hinted to Linda Moulton Howe that Lonnie Zamora's testimony could be tied in to the Holloman visit by extra-terrestials which I truly think were martians. There is other hints as well.

      So I agree Sparkster, that a space program exists and it involves what I think are exchanges of scientists with our plasma scientists as indicated by maybe the ultimate whistleblower Bob Dean in some of his terrific youtube videos. Though he doesn't talk per-say about martians being the scientists he has great theories as to there being a civilization under mars.

      The mere fact of all the anomalies on mars nasa is revealing and not talking about, you really have to wonder, nasa MUST of got the ok from the martians to be there. I think that "ok" happened in the 1964 western hemisphere visit by the martians that eventually led to Holloman AFB and the launching of Mariner 4 to mars, then the photos occurred. The rest is history! Just a theory though and I can't seem to shake it:)

      I'll even go further to state that the martians could of been invited to see that launching of Mariner 4. Only the hairdresser knows for sure :)

    • somethgblue profile image


      4 years ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      The UFO issue as we know is a catch-22, when real ones are seen by the public, The Powers That Be claim it is our own secret aircraft. When our own secret aircraft are seen they claim it was a UFO.

      TPTB have hyped the UFO story from the get go to control the spin and keep the public guessing. Now with advanced holographic technology, the public will never grasp what is real or not.

      We both know that zero point anti-gravity propulsion systems have been around since the 30s, heck the Nazis had their own working versions and we own all their technology.

      Folks that still think rockets are used are just plain naïve.

    • sparkster profile imageAUTHOR

      Marc Hubs 

      4 years ago from United Kingdom

      Thanks for the comments.


      That's fascinating. I myself have seen many strange things I have never found explanations for.


      Thanks for the link. I haven't been able to get the video to play for some reason. I've read about electric, hydrogen and water powered cars that have been suppressed. On the positive side, a salt-water powered car has been approved for use in Europe recently.

    • somethgblue profile image


      4 years ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      Sparkster, here is a link to a video, go to the 31 minute mark as it pertains to this hub. They have been using anti-gravity since 1945, electric cars were possible for the last 80 years but the Oil Industry has censored this information.

    • MizBejabbers profile image

      Doris James MizBejabbers 

      4 years ago from Beautiful South

      Interesting questions. I certainly believe secret government operations could be hiding behind UFOs. Of course very few people know the real truth. My husband was at NASA for several months as a spook for you-know-who, and even he doesn't know. Here's something I don't understand. I can't remember the year, but sometime between 1997 and 1999, we saw a round bright light in the sky that orbited in the same spot for over a year. We got out our strongest telescope and viewed it. It was a large round silver sphere with a dark stripe around the hemisphere. There were smaller lights (crafts, maybe) flying in and out of it. I tried to tell this to my friends, but they either didn't see the bright light, didn't care about the bright light, or didn't believe me.

      One person suggested that it was the space station (that eventually fell) but it couldn't have had a fleet of crafts fly inside it. I will say that after the station fell from orbit, the sphere disappeared. My husband said that it may have been using the station as a shield, but with his knowledge of the space program, he said it would have been impossible for it to have been part of it. Do you have any knowledge of what I'm talking about? We can't be the only humans to observe this for over a year.

    • somethgblue profile image


      4 years ago from Shelbyville, Tennessee

      These experiments on zero point energy (anti-gravity) that apparently are unsuccessful are also known publicly, much as the Apollo Space program was. In other words the public experiments are a failure and yet the ones conducted by T. Thompson Brown, Tesla and others seemed to be successful but are only revealed to the public decades afterwards.

      Don't you find it odd that so much of this 'science' isn't taught in schools or history but once whistle blowers and researchers discover it then they claim it wasn't successful.

      We all got suckered and we are only now discovering how deep the rabbit hole goes . . . great article Sparkster!


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)