ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Brief summary of the Cosmological and Teleological arguments

Updated on June 19, 2013
Source

Evidence for the existence of God

The cosmological argument was inspired by how intricate the universe is which raises the question “what was the cause?”. Thomas Aquinas developed on the original argument claiming that God must be the cause. Aquinas believed there must be a first cause, an uncaused cause, which began the chain of causes. His argument run: everything has a cause, nothing is its own cause, the chain of causes cannot be infinite, there must be a first cause, this first cause must be God. Initially there appears to be a contradiction between the premises “everything has a cause” and “there must be a first cause”. However, the first three premises present a problem so one of these must be rejected in favour of an alternative. The problem in this case is that the chain of causes cannot be infinite so rejecting the first premises in favour of the fourth allows at least one thing that is not caused. There are though problems with this argument. The first of there is the question “who created God?”. This object though misses the point of God being the first cause. The universe is contingent as it relies on something else for its existence but God is not contingent but instead God is necessary. Another objection relies on the belief that the universe requires a cause for its beginning. However, just because those parts which make up the universe require a cause for their beginning.

The teleological argument was motivated by the observation that there are many complex things which cause us to question if an intelligent designer created them. The argument from analogy is the most straightforward of the formal teleological argument which runs: the world around us and human artefacts display complexity, complexity in human artefacts comes from it having been designed by intelligent being (humans), there is no reason that what is true for humans is not true for the world around us, therefore, the complexity in the world around us comes from it having been designed by an intelligent being (God). William Paley uses this argument as a starting point and develops it. Paley begins by looking at a watch and discusses what it is that makes the watch so obviously designed. This he identifies as its fitness to purpose which he then observes as being present in natural objects. Put formally Paley’s argument is set: natural objects display design-like properties (fitness to purpose), design like properties are the result of intelligent design, therefore, natural objects are the product of design. This argument differs from the argument from analogy mostly in that no comparison is made between man made objects and natural objects so no analogy is in fact being drawn.

The most prominent objection to Paley’s argument comes from Darwin’s theory of evolution. This theory suggests that complex organisms evolved gradually over millions of years from simpler organisms through natural selection. This presents an alternative explanation as to why natural objects display the same complexity as man made objects. However, there is not necessarily a contradiction of ideas as God could have used evolution as a tool for the designs. Further objects exist for the argument from analogy. Hume states that the world is dissimilar from man made objects and argues that “the world plainly resembles more an animal or a vegetable than it does a watch”. If analogies can be drawn between natural objects and both designed and non-designed objects then the argument from analogy fails to look convincing. There is finally the problem that, if the argument is accepted, then what kind of God does it deliver? We want to conclude that the world has a designer with particular characteristics such as benevolence, omnipotence and omniscience but with the argument we are not even able to probe it was only ONE God.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • jadesmg profile imageAUTHOR

      jadesmg 

      6 years ago from United Kingdom

      thanks for the comment and I'm glad i could help. Hume was certainly a very good philosopher and had many brilliant ideas - as a fellow Scot i feel I should support him lol

    • Thomas Swan profile image

      Thomas Swan 

      6 years ago from New Zealand

      Thanks for the informative hub. I had heard these arguments before but didn't know their formal names. Hume always amazes me, he was 200 years ahead of his time. His counter argument is never something I would have thought of. The cosmological argument is nothing more than a "god of the gaps" argument. It is no more evidence for God than it is evidence for there being no "first cause". The teleological argument is well countered by natural selection, but it always amazes me how Christians think they can recognise God's work. It's like an argument from stupidity: the less you know about natural selection, the happier you are with thinking God made it all. Great hub and thanks for the Hume quote!

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)