Are White People Israelites?
Disclaimer: This is not about the argument that Ashkenazi Jews are not legitimate, nor is this saying that there are no white people with Israelite ancestry. This is an argument against the claim that all whites alone are the 12 Tribes based on a few erroneous arguments. I said I would do this after exposing the Hebrew Israelites as both sides are wrong in their arguments. Also, note that there are major differences between most British Israelites and Christian Identists. The latter is the American counterpart to an already established religion.
- Verses on Skin Color
- The Color of Christ
- A Great Nation
- Herbert Armstrong
Verses on Skin Color
Laban, a rich herdsman of Mesopotamia, son of Bethuel, and grandson of Mahor, Abraham's brother (Genesis 24 28-31). In Hitchcock's Bible Names Dictionary, Laban means white, or in other translations, "to be white,". "See? His name means white, so he must be white." By that logic, anyone who is not named Laban must not be white. By that same logic, Eyphah, the name for the son of Midian and for one of Caleb's concubines, must be dark because the name means "darkness". However, that name can also mean "gloomy". What else can Laban be translated to? "shining; gentle; brittle." So their names alone do not automatically signify skin color.
Songs of Solomon 5 10
- "My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand."
Again, you need some knowledge of Hebrew to combat this archaic English. Look this up in the Strong's Concordance. We get:
- 6703. tsach. dazzling, glowing, clear.
This is just saying that the lover is beautiful. Other translations come to this conclusion too.
The Color of Christ
They use Daniel 7 9, Daniel 10 6, and Revelation 1 14-15 to say Christ, God, or both are white because it says his head and hairs are white. But it says it is white like wool. What is the color of pure wool? White. Notice how 7 9 said it was like pure wool, then Revelations says "white like wool." Pure wool is not dark. It is white. This was regarding his hair color.
This is obviously a supernatural image, not some basic description of a man. How can I prove this? Read Revelations 1 16.
- "and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength."
The word countenance means a person's face or facial expression. Where else do we see this happening? Matthew 17 1-2. says the Savior was, "transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light." So this is not even about his earthly skin color. This is about his heavenly image. It can also be taken as symbolic. Some scholars say that in ancient times, describing a body as being like brass gives the impression that this person has glory, strength, and stability.
"See? That is America and the European countries. These are the great nations he is talking about." Friends, read the whole chapter. Promises are here made to the Jews returned out of captivity, which extends to all those who, through grace, are delivered out of spiritual thralldom. They also don't take in context as to when this will happen. This is not saying that a sign of who the real 12 Tribes are that they would be a great nation in the end times. By that logic, China must be one of the 12 Tribes. Or what about Saudi Arabia? All great nations. But greatness does not mean you are one of the 12 Tribes.
"And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people: all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed"— Isaiah 61 9
Whites Spread the Gospel
White people are attributed with spreading Christianity around the world and this is one of the arguments used by British Israelists to say that they must be the chosen seed of Abraham. But if you do the research they have actually spread a lawless and immoral form of the scripture with which they debate among themselves what is true and what is not. Most of them are against any form of Protestantism and Catholicism, meaning that their logic is faulty.
Herbert W. Armstrong Arguments
I was a former fan of this man. I had downloaded several of his books on my device and I thought he was very wise and scriptural. But recently I figured out that he was a supporter of this ideology. I have found several flaws in his book "The United States and Britain in Prophecy,” some of which I have already refuted.
Prophecy of moving to England: Gen 49:22
- "Joseph is a fruitful bough by a well whose branches run over the wall" p46 "Over the wall is obvious proof that they would "run over, or past the nation's boundary - in other words, be a colonizing people!"
He takes this verse too literal. Using this logic, none of those branches could run to England. Only four verses later: "Up to the utmost bound of the everlasting hills" which taken so literally as Armstrong had in the last verse means that the land must have high mountains, which England lacks.
- "The scriptures plainly tell us that Israel was to lose its identity, its religion, its land, its name. In Deut 32:26, God wanted them through Moses: I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men." p69
He uses this to say that this is about whites losing their identity and forgetting that they were of the 12 Tribes. But this happened in Kings 17:22-24 when they settled and assimilated into Assyria. Armstrong also claims that the Throne of David was replanted in England via one of the daughters of Zedekiah (Jer 41:10; 43:6-8) To him, "a tender one" must mean female or daughter. "Certainly a tender young twig, then, represents a daughter" p88-89. This is a reference to the verse Ezekiel 17:22 according to him. But this is a reference to Isaiah 53 2, not replanting to England.
Please check out this source below for a more in-depth breakdown of these individuals. Anglo-Israelism Utterly Refuted
As I do some more research into their doctrines I will update this article. Peace and blessings, and all praises to the Most High.