ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Creation And Evolution, Is Man Superior

Updated on July 12, 2015

Is man Superior to animals?

Recently we had a discussion on a forum I participate in, about evolution, and one person said that no one has ever found a real fossil and added that “the Theory of Evolution is an unproven theory and it is without evidence”

To this I had to smile because they have such good examples of fossils that if you lay them side by side you can actually see evolution in action. I'm sorry but if anyone believes any less, they are still living in the dark ages. I wonder if the person realizes that all of the oil, and coal in the world is obtained from fossils?

Belief In A Creator

I believe there probably is a Creator who created the small creatures, and made them to evolve.

In Genesis the first chapter, it says,”Let the waters bring forth the moving creature that hath life”. We don’t know exactly which creature it’s speaking of, but it could have been the creature from which mankind evolved.

What is it that separates humans and animals?

We were able to determine the physical differences, the hands, upright posture, and the human brain, which seems to be the most important.

Genesis says God gave man dominion over every living creature, and if all that’s true that’s what separates us from the animals, control, dominion and, supreme earthly power (Genesis 1:26)

When God said he formed Adam from the dust of the earth, maybe it meant that when the creature crawled out of the waters onto land that the creature evolved into man

Mankind's Brain and Mind

Man is superior in his thinking, and by the fact that he is able to express whatever he wants. Animals probably have these same attributes on a smaller scale. Mankind has both the mind, and an agile body, which makes him more able, not better, or supreme. He only thinks he is

The downside is that the human mind feels shame, some kill for pleasure, and I THINK these trait are unique to Humans
Something else unique to humans is the ability to have self control, and not act on the animal instinct ID part of the personality

Humans use logic, and reasoning, they love, hate, create war, and have the ability to create peace, if they really want to.
We cook our food, and stay in touch with our family longer than any other animal. Mankind is able to express all of their feelings and thoughts.

The Differences Of Animals And Man

I think that animals too have all of these attributes, and abilities, and are able to express it to their kind. I also feel that they are able to understand most of it

But the major difference is that man can take a thought, create, and invent, and change a thought into a real, working product. Animals can't do this. Man too dominates everyone, and everything, even the ferocious beasts. Mankind exhibits dominion and control

Sooo cute baby pig. How could you not love it?!
Sooo cute baby pig. How could you not love it?!

My Conclusion

If God is real as the bible says he is, he gave mankind control, domination,
sovereignty, and supreme power over all that is on the earth. He also gave mankind higher consciousness, which can eventually lead him back to being in the image of God, just as he was created. Man can speak an idea, then bring it into existence by making it with his hands

I’ve come to the conclusion that man is supreme in a way, but he could be more so, if everything he does is with love

If you are someone who believes in God, then you know it is the main thing that is different from the animals, the animals were created by God's words, and mankind was formed by God's hands in his image

One thing I know is that baby animals are Cute

Do You Believe In Evolution?

See results

Do You Believe In Creation?

See results

Do You Believe In Both?

See results

Do You Think Man Is Special?

See results

© 2015 Mara Alexander

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Mick Beet profile image

      Mick Bert 2 years ago from Australia

      I think God is everywhere..........when we past away we see a light that like is our maker....but it's too hard for us to explain in human terms..."make sense"...lol

    • Oztinato profile image

      Oztinato 2 years ago from Australia

      Creation and evolution go hand in hand and are not mutually exclusive.

    • Jodah profile image

      John Hansen 2 years ago from Queensland Australia

      I believe in an intelligent creator and natural selection/survival of the fittest and improvement within a species to suit the environment. I don't believe in evolution per se. This was an interesting hub and good food for discussion. I think man is capable of much better than he has shown so far, and I agree that baby animals are cute. Voted up.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you Mike, I understand what you're saying, yes you are probably right

      Thank you for stopping by, and I hope you do again

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Oztinato thank you, I agree. Some people have indicated that because Genesis calls everything God created "good" that the first people had to be created to look, and behave exactly as we do.

      I think there are times we as humans focus on the wrong things which blocks our true sight

      Thank you for your input

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you Jodah

      I believe in both, and natural selection, but maybe what we are seeing in the old humans found, is something else going on.

      But they do have a strong case for evolution because of what they have found which is forms of people that seems to have developed from earlier forms

    • Jodah profile image

      John Hansen 2 years ago from Queensland Australia

      MonkeyShine, maybe the existence of the different forms of people overlapped (existed simultaneously) and interbred resulting in a new form. In Clan of the cavebear(I know it is fiction) Neanderthal and Homo Erectus (or Cro-Magnon, not sure) existed at the same time and some interbred resulting in altered features and eventually a new form.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Jodah I think that is a very strong possibility, but that too would fall under evolution..

      Look at the mixed people today, it seems they look better than either of their parents. The offspring of a mixed marriage kind of evolves both, and each generation will be further away from what their parents were, because over the years they will be more and more diluted, and years further on down the road, a new species may arise from that long ago mixture where it all started

      That's evolution

      Stop by again Jodah

    • Jodah profile image

      John Hansen 2 years ago from Queensland Australia

      Good response MonkeyShines. It's an interesting subject to dwell on.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you Jodah

    • Nell Rose profile image

      Nell Rose 2 years ago from England

      I totally believe that evolution and God go totally together too, I can never understand why people argue over, this was fascinating reading! voted up and shared! nell

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Very good hub on the subject is Man superior! generations have come and generations gone , from BCE to AC , simply proven nothing has evolved into anything , all animals still make their own kind.

      and man still make man as the bible clearly says , he returns to the dust he was created from. So true .nothing can evolve into anything not living. Man does not live long enough to evolve into anything. And man accomplishments are only done throughout his life span which is short, how long did it take for man to make a, Automobile, a toilet, a light bulb, Also we can take into thought our mental capacity is only 1% of 100 , that is like a cup at 1% filled , when the rest of the cup is not being use, if man can do wonderful inventions in a small lifetime , think just what he would be able to do at full capacity. The point is there is a higher Authority who has always demonstrate his power by his creations, the sun , the moon and stars are his faithful witnesses

      man can not touch these.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you so much Nell for voting up this hub. I really appreciate it. I've also never understood why people think that evolution contradicts Creation, because it doesn't, and it is so clear in many things. I will be reading your hubs soon. Thank you again, you're very kind

    • Larry Fields profile image

      Larry Fields 2 years ago from Northern California

      Hi, Debbie. You wrote:

      "I believe there probably is a Creator who created the small creatures, and made them to evolve."

      These days, there's too much of the either-or mentality reflected in the extreme positions taken by both sides in the evolution 'debate'. I'm glad that your nuanced hub has staked out a part of the middle ground. Voted up.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss thank you for stopping by. Are you saying that evolution doesn't exist? There is proof that it does

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you Larry, yes there's too much fighting between the creationists, and evolutionists when really they are both right. Creating man "good" doesn't mean they looked the same as we do, and just because we evolved doesn't mean God did not create us. oh well

      Thank you for dropping by Larry, and I hope you will again

    • Austinstar profile image

      Austinstar 2 years ago from Somewhere in the universe

      Your poll "Do you believe in a creator "or" evolution" should allow you to vote on one "or" the other. There does not seem to be a way to vote on "I believe in evolution, but NOT a creator".

      If I answer "yes", it records that I appear to believe in both.

      If I answer "no", it records that I appear to believe in neither.

      Which makes the answers "both" and "neither" redundant.

      Other than that, I feel like you presented a pretty good hub.

      BTW, the Pope currently supports both - that the 'creator' created everything, and used evolution as the creation tool.

      And yes, you are correct, evolution is as strong a theory as the theory of gravity is. Many people mistake the word "theory" for "opinion". Theories are proven facts stated in a logical manner. They have been tried and tested and all theories produce reliable results based on many, many observations and experiments. They can be falsified if the predicted results are not found. Your forum fried should look up the definition of the word 'theory'.

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Yes I am saying I believe in creation,

      example if a building exploded , what are the chances a life would be created in that bang.

      like any disaster life would be taken not created. Next even scientists can not agree on the subject , that is why this subject is still dicussed even now , because of no real evidence. You say it is , then I welcome any evidence you have , because the truth is more important then opinion and a belief .

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thanks Austin I fixed it

      Good for the pope, that's good to know.

      I think slightly different-

      I think he created them with speech, and allowed them to evolve, but that's just my opinion

      Thank you for responding

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      All scientist agree on Evolution Kiss, I don't know where you get that they don't. There is overwhelming evidence of evolution, in everything. It's not just a theory, it's just called that. Please supply a reference to real scientists saying they don't think evolution is a fact

      My premise is that God created us, and made us evolve, so if a building exploded, it wouldn't matter, God doesn't create people from buildings

      Thanks for stopping by and telling me how you feel about it

    • profile image

      TaraLane89 2 years ago

      So true Debbie

    • DabbleYou profile image

      DabbleYou 2 years ago

      Is man superior over all animals? Sure, I believe so. We interact in a society and take part in our community. We communicate with others in a civilized way. We have education, religion, and many other things that help us advance our knowledge. Those few things alone make us more superior than animals already.

      Very interesting topic. :)

    • Buildreps profile image

      Buildreps 2 years ago from Europe

      Great Hub about a very hot topic, Monkeyshine75. There might be a creator that underlies the creation, but there appears to be evidence that the Universe requires no creator at all - the self-propelling mathematical Universe. Not the dead Universe like Atheists think, no everything is spirited, from every stone up to every Human. Everything wants to go 'up', to the Omega point.

      Evolution is a fact, although not according to the false Darwinian theory. The bible is a false document and totally useless for any purpose.

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      No they do not all agree , you can research it , I do have a name that you can look up , there are nany more, but saying all scientist agree is like saying all people are bad , or all are, good, that is not true or realistic. People believe in many things.

      I did request evidence from your statement. I will post a Ref Microbiologist Radu Popa does not believe in creation

      Yet,in 2004 he asked:“How can nature make life if we failed with all the experimental conditions controlled?”He also stated:“The complexity of the mechanisms required for the functioning of a living cell is so large that a simultaneously emergence by chance seems impossible.”

      Can you post yours as well.

      thank you I appreciate your comments as well.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      We’ll start with Wikipedia which says

      “The vast majority of the scientific community and academia supports evolutionary theory as the only explanation that can fully account for observations in the fields of biology, paleontology, molecular biology, genetics, anthropology, and others.One 1987 estimate found that "700 scientists ... (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) ... give credence to creation-science" That was way back in the 80s but now I'm pretty sure only 1 or 2 believes in Creationism today

      Please not their references at the bottom of that page

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_...

      The University of California 2nd

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      I am happy you consider Wikipedia a resource , I have posted and written to poems there one is women heal, I can go and edit , which I have , and it posted the last edit, Wikipedia is simlar to hubpages but more, Audience when looking up a subject, the last post done on your Ref was two days ago , which tells many that there was error in this document of writing , not so credible.

      You also stated all scientist that from the start is not true. Thank you for your reply.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Wikipedia cited their references, so there was no reason for me to paste them here. They're at the bottom of the page

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_...

      In the 1980s it was 700 scientists out of a total of 480,000 , that's 35 yrs ago. but even then 700 is hardly anyone, today you won't find more than a handful if that many. To me that's everyone. Thanks for stopping by

      I believe in creationism, so why are your arguing with me about it. I know for a fact there is evolution. So there must be both

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Reference Bible

      Ge 2:7And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul.

      There is nothing here that says anything evolves , or big bang, I am convenience that a higher entity , the heavenly Father would exatly know how he made his creations. then man who only uses 1 % of his brain capacity and is capable of errors in his beliefs and theories, But the supreme being of the entire universe is perfect and does not make mistakes.

      Reference Bible

      De 32:4The Rock, perfect is his activity, For all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness, with whom there is no injustice; Righteous and upright is he.

      Mans activities are good , but not perfect.

      this is my last post to you since you take this as argument. I do not see argument ,

      I believe if you tell the world you believe in something , then you should be able to support it with good references, or good examples, I respect your stand and what you feel about the subject. Thank you for your reply.

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      There is one more scripture that is important to keep in mind , that is

      Reference Bible

      Ec 3:11 Everything he has made pretty in its time. Even time indefinite he has put in their heart, that mankind may never find out the work that the [true] God has made from the start to the finish.

      Notice the scripture says all things he has made, not evolved.

      And the seal of truth on this is

      Reference Bible

      Heb 6:18in order that, through two unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled to the refuge may have strong encouragement to lay hold on the hope set before us.

      The heavenly Father does not lie , it is impossible as written.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you DabbleYou I agree with, and appreciate your comments. Thanks for dropping by :)

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Thank you Oztinato, I agree, they do walk hand in hand

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Buildreps thank you, you are right. We don't know everything yet, and people may be taking the bible literally, when it may be symbolic. Thanks for your reply

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss the bible says

      Ecclesiastes 1:9

      The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.

      All of the skeletons they found of the past stages of men, are not new creatures, but evolved creatures

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      New World Translation

      Ec 3:11He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has even put eternity in their heart; yet mankind will never find out the work that the true God has made from start to finish.

      This is true of his words , which means he made all things , but as written we will never know all his work from start to finish,

      so to assume he evolved anything is against these words written , it clearly says we will not know. Also remember man thinks with a very small capacity of 1% , we can not be rely on that small percent to be 100% accurate , they have not even found the cure for the common cold, why would I believe they know all the wonderful things of God who is perfect and Dynamic in power. You can not compare them.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss you're saying that people use 1% of their brains. The myth is that mankind uses 10% of their brains, but it is not true. Man uses 100% of his brain, not 10%, not 1% but every bit of it. The fact man uses 100% of his brain is proven. People have been put in MRIs, and spoken too, shown pictures, touched, given short tests, read books while the MRI recorded every area of their brains as each area light up.

      Just because God made something does not mean it didn't further evolve, they have skeletons showing that people did indeed evolve.

      Just because it calls them beautiful does not mean they looked like us

      I appreciate your comments

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      I appreciate your commit as well but he said he created man in his image why would man need to evolve into something else. Apes are still in the jungle and zoos there brain has never match up to a human brain, and it is science who says that the brain capacity man uses is very small in usage.

      I will believe the word of God over any human anyday. They have people believeing things that are not true. Like they been to the moon. Really ! Guess again.

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Also I really disgree about the brain usage

      compared to the genius minds in history they can tap in more then the majority of other humans proven, it is great to have faith and believe , but there is a limit to all things .

      And man has own.

    • Oztinato profile image

      Oztinato 2 years ago from Australia

      Each person is "potentially" superior to the animals. Unfortunately we can also be far inferior by not discovering our individual soul.

      Therefore some people are way inferior to the animals while others strive for and achieve something higher.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss

      Try reading some sites you find here. They have proven we use 100% of our brain, this is objective, not subjective, so believing has nothing to do with it

      https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+of+the+br...

      Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Print Comment

      Busting a brain myth: We really do use 100 percent of our brains

      http://hub.jhu.edu/2014/07/24/busting-a-brain-myth

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss I never said we came from monkeys, just that we evolved.

      Who do you say all the skeletons belonged to?

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      how much we really use really only God knows. But I agree man has error in his records and case studies , you just proved that with the brain , scientists do not all agree on the same subjects. Because I also pulled that fact about the brain though a science record.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Well if there are some who don't believe we use 100% they must have missed all of the demonstrations and presentations, and I don't know how that would be possible

      They teach the 100% brain use in school because it was proven

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Well if you want to believe that , I am not standing in your path , but for me I must agree agree with the bible a 100% there was a time people believe the earth was flat, people did not know about DNA , and many judgment put innocent people in prison based off of their personal opinions and judgements . Man has achieved great things but he is still limited

      I have never been disappointed in the bible's answers.

      But man is a different story.

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Also your comment 13 hours ago about skeletons , things found and altered, also you must admit, man has not seen all creatures of the earth, they can find the remains of creatures never seen, does not mean the evolved . Man simulates things from computer graphics, it is still a guess and is altered. They can do the same with lost children and what they think they would look like years later, I just seen one of Micheal Jackson if he had not had face surgery interesting what man can do , but that does not mean it is a true fact just because someone presents there theories and Ideas. Through their own creative hands not Gods

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      The fossils of man that they found aren't made up. I held some when our school went to a museum.

      Now why would scientists fake evolution? It does nothing for them to lie. They haven't faked anything

      The bible does not deny or support evolution

      There is a lot God hides from man till it is time to reveal it

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      I agree that it is a lot we do not know , the bible says we will never know all his works from start to finish, I believe that , but I do not believe man has the ability to say he knows things about the heavenly Father in a personal way, if you are satisfied with your answers again I am not in your path, but as for me what ever he says from his word is good enough for me.

      the past is gone so we are to be concern for our future , that is more my concern and focus, thank you for your reply.

    • ptosis profile image

      ptosis 2 years ago from Arizona

      I thought human were mammals and therefore animals. Besides if being the smartest makes the greatest of all then that would be dolphins, mammals that went back into the water with larger brains than humans.

    • ptosis profile image

      ptosis 2 years ago from Arizona

      I thought human were mammals and therefore animals. Besides if being the smartest makes the greatest of all then that would be dolphins, mammals that went back into the water with larger brains than humans.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Well, Ptosis I was speaking of the Human animal verses all other animals we are aware of

      Thanks for stopping by and giving you opinion. You're always welcome to do so

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss you said " the bible says we will never know all his works from start to finish, I believe that , but I do not believe man has the ability to say he knows things about the heavenly Father in a personal way "

      I know we can't know everything about God himself, but God does reveal things to man, even those who don't believe in him. He works through the minds of people to fulfill his plans, even when they don't know it. They just think that the ideas came from nowhere.

      Thanks for stopping by Kiss

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      Thank Monkeyshine75 I truly believe your statement , he reveals to who he wishes ,

      when he wants ,

      New World Translation

      Isa 55:9“For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So my ways are higher than your ways And my thoughts than your thoughts

      .

      that is why we can never know his works from start to finish , because we could never in our own mind comprehend the things he has made, inckuding us. Man is still learning about DNA, and it is more clear then it was earlier in the 19th century. But all the pieces

      of the puzzle is there , people just do not know how the pieces work togetogether and in harmony .

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss thank you. Lets look at how life came about (in what order)

      If you work your way backwards through the fossil record, for about 400 million years you would be working back through ages that included organisms living on land. From about 400 million years back to 600 million years, all kinds of complex multicellular life would have been confined to the waters of the earth. From about 600 million years ago back to about two billion years, you'd be looking at simple eukaryotes, and from two billion back to at least 3-and-a-half billion years, maybe much further, there would be evidence of prokaryotes, including the stromatolites.

      The earth itself is thought to have come together as a planet a bit more than 4-and-a-half billion years ago, but would have been in the finishing-up phase for perhaps three-quarters of a billion years. So where did those first prokaryotes come from?

      All knowledge comes from God, so anything the scientists know, is what God showed them

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      One theory, panspermia or the space seed hypothesis, proposes that life can be found on meteors and other space debris. In fact, some very rigorous tests suggest that there may be bacteria in space, perhaps left from some long-destroyed planet and perhaps capable of surviving a leisurely trip across the universe. If this is the case, then no one could be sure of the conditions under which that otherworldly life would have evolved. This is a possibility, but a bit of a dead end explanations-wise.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Another theory (which is the one I believe) is the special creation theory, that supernatural force put the first prokaryotes together as part of the long building plans which would ultimately lead to us. Science tends to be resistant to supernatural explanations of things (they aren’t really testable, and their proponents don’t accept them as falsifiable), but when you’re dealing with conditions so far in the past, there is really no more or less evidence for this idea than any of the others.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss you speak of not being able to know the mind of God, but at the same time, you seem unwilling to explore the possibilities. I think we are supposed to have an open mind, and seek the truth without fear that God will allow us to get confused. We have to seek to find, and when God sees how hard we are seeking him, and his truths he'll count of worthy of giving us the answers we seek

    • Kiss andTales profile image

      Kiss andTales 2 years ago

      As an example if you owned a diary and I knew that you owned it, would it be reasonable to assume that I was in title to read it, just because I knew it exist?

      Or I am I entitled to read it because we are family?

      When you are invited to read it by the owner, then it would be welcomed , and even if you do not understand everything written in it you respect the fact that what was written was the owners personal information and logs.

      If not given permission, would we go digging for what we think is in that diary , would we assume we know and pass opinions ,would we go as far as saying they want us to read it because it exist.

      The point is there is limits to everything.

      Even Adam and Eve found this out in a tragic way. that death was a reality because they faced it, and passed the disease down to our genes as their future offspring.

      What I am saying is that we also should know our limits . As satan had Eve to think the heavenly Father was holding something back from them. He was holding eternal death from them. But they wanted to be like him the reason they stole the fruit.

      We also can repeat the same act by thinking we can be like God in knowing things that he is not ready for us to know.

      Jesus put it simple .

      John 16:12 “I have many things yet to say to YOU, but YOU are not able to bear them at present.

      Also there will be things granted to know and things not granted to certain humans

      As written Mathew 13:11. Luke 8:10 .

      We can be satisfied the bible holds enough.

    • MonkeyShine75 profile image
      Author

      Mara Alexander 2 years ago from Los Angeles, California

      Kiss that's what I am trying to say. No man knows anything except God reveals it. Everything every man knows came from God, whether they believe in God or not. That includes what scientists know

      We should never become satisfied that we know everything, and we can't assume we understand God's word, we have to continue to search.

    Click to Rate This Article