ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

My Last Hub Article

Updated on January 29, 2020
david tee profile image

Dr. David Thiessen is an educator, writer, pastor, and speaker. He has authored several books on a variety of topics including Archaeology

At least for now

This is my 200th article to be published at this website but it is time to make a change for now. I am working on 2 books hoping to get them published soon. To keep up on any news just go to theologyarchaeology to get the latest information.

As I was looking for a topic to write about, I went to a local Christian bookstore. There I picked up the book Confronting Old Testament Controversies by Tremper Longman III.

As the person I am, I wanted to see what controversies the author was talking about and what he had to say. Since this was an evangelical bookstore I was hoping to get some true Christian insight to the topics he was discussing.

Sadly, that was not to be. The book is written by a person who looks for ways to create openings in the biblical content to insert his person theological views. This article will only address the few I have come across in the first 25 pages.

Even in that small amount of reading there are too many to address here

Analyzing the words of the author

#1. Recent surveys show that an alarming number of young people are abandoning the faith because they feel that they must make a decision between what they learn in science class and what they hear in church (pg. 3)

The author approaches this issue in the wrong manner and provides no solutions for those students. He also ignores the Bible verses telling God’s people to not walk in the counsel of the ungodly.

Most science classes are not taught by Christian scientists thus they will not be teaching the truth especially about our origins. They will be teaching what they know filtered through deceived minds that are led astray by evil.

That fact should make the choice these students have to make easier, after all God has said we have to make a choice. We either believe and go with him or we reject God and go with evil and unbelievers.

Science does not hold the truth especially when it comes to our origins. Only God is right and Christians must side with God. What also is troublesome about that author comes a line or two later where he says we can learn from science but remain true to God and his word.

Then he states his question- does the Bible actually teach that God created two humans from a non organic past?

In other words, that author’s idea of fidelity to God is done through the author’s preferences and point of view and not God’s. To remain faithful to God and his word, one must accept what God wrote as he wrote it.

#2. The term inerrancy, however, has been much abused in recent years both by people who want to make it claim more than it does and by those who believe it claims too much and does so crudely. (pg. 7)

In other words, the author is framing this point in the context of that is your interpretation of God’s word not mine argument. When he does this, he opens himself up, and leads others to, letting evil turn their minds and hearts away from the truth.

Since Jesus did not instruct us to use interpretation, then that means there is a truth that we can know and that all the other arguments are not correct. Those people,like that author, are rejecting the truth because they have let unbelieving scientists and others, convince them that God cannot be right and that a field of research excluding the creator of all things is correct.

Attacking inerrancy is the only way that author’s, et al, arguments can get any notice or foothold in the church. On page 10 he makes the statement that our origins is an argument that is not essential to our salvation.

But that is a point in direct contrast to what Jesus said, when he said if you do not believe Moses, how will you believe me? Having the correct view of our origins is essential to our salvation.

#3. Interpretation seeks to discover the message of the biblical text that we are reading. (Pg. 11)

That may be the justification used by the people who think like that author but it is not what Jesus said. Jesus told us to follow the Spirit of Truth to the truth and that the secular world cannot have the Spirit of Truth.

What those words tell us is that all those unbelieving scientists, including those who claim to be Christian, are not teaching the truth about our origins. Only God is through the Bible.

This interpretation purpose and the use of interpretation is only a means to avoid learning the truth and humbling oneself so that they follow God and not their own ways.

The long drawn out argument in the book under study here continues to find ways to ignore what God has written and dismiss it once it disagrees with secular science or the author’s personal views.

#4. is absolutely imperative that we remember that the biblical books were written to a specific ancient audience and not to those of us who are reading them in the twenty-first century. (pg.16)

Under that logic, then, John 3:16 is not written to us and is only for the ancient audience of Jesus’ day. He cannot make an exception for the New Testament because his term ‘the biblical books’ include all the books of both Testaments.

With those words, the author has erased hope for everyone born after the 1st century AD and removed any divine instruction God has given to us. He also leaves us with no replacement scriptures to guide us today.

In his thinking, everyone can do what is right in their own eyes, an attitude God punished the people of Israel for doing. He is also unaware that the situations in the ancient church have not changed to this day making the biblical books written to us and words we must accept and follow.

That thinking also allows that author to incorporate those secular non-scientific views that try to govern life today, for example marriage and divorce, abuse, sin, and more. Sin i snot sin anymore under that author’s point of view.

#5. To read the biblical books correctly, we must first of all read them as if we were living at the time of the original audience. Otherwise, we run the risk of imposing our meaning on the text. (pg. 18)

Again that is erroneous thinking on the part of that author. God does not change and the modern world is part of the original audience. We the Spirit of Truth guiding us, we do not run the risk of imposing our own meanings on the biblical texts.

We also, do not import unbelieving secular thinking into God’s word. That is a sin as God has warned us twice about adding or taking away anything to and from his words. We do not add words God did not say or actions he did not do into the Bible.

Nor do we remove those words or actions that he did say and do.

#6. Since God is the ultimate author of both Scripture and nature, both are true. (pg. 22)

This is only possible if the people looking at nature have the correct content for the book of nature. The supposed book of nature describes the glory of God, his creativity, his innovative nature and his foresight.

It does not tell us how God created. The book of nature is made up by those people who refuse to obey God and stop following unbelieving science and scientific thinking. It is also used by those people who refuse to use faith and believe God.

The author’s next comment on the same page says that ‘scripture doe snot trump nature.’ That is a very heretical thing to say because both God and Jesus did not teach us to use nature to figure out our origins’

Plus, neither God nor Jesus told us to use science to answer our questions about our origins. They pointed to scriptures to answer those questions and scriptures does a very good job in answering them.

His admonition on the next page tells believers to stop rejecting sinful scientific theories etc., when they contradict traditional interpretations of Scriptures. What he is doing is telling people to stop believing God and believe those people who are blinded by sin and deceived by evil.

That is not what a Christian does. A believer does not lead people away from God or his truth. It is a dangerous activity to get involved in.

#7. The Bible teaches us that God created everything but is not interested in telling us how he created the cosmos and humanity. (pg. 24)

Again, this is erroneous thinking as the Bible is very clear in HOW God created. The first chapter of the Bible makes it very clear that God used his power and spoke everything into existence.

What is also very troubling is that later in the paragraph that author states that science shows us that the Bible is wrong and does not claim we all descended from Adam and Eve.

How does science know better than God when science is blind to the past, not working with the Spirit of Truth and rejects Jesus as its savior? They do not serve someone who is greater than God rather science serves someone who hates God and wants to hurt him through destroying is people through various methods including using that author.

Some final words

Be careful out there. In this world there are many wolves in sheep’s clothing who, maybe unwittingly, seek to ruin the lives of those who believe God over science and unbelievers.

They frame their arguments very carefully to make it sound like they love God and his word even though they are twisting it to send you a false message. They may call themselves dedicated Christians but if they were, they would not lead people away from God and his word.

That author’s final words in the section I have read go like this: ‘if we interpret the Bible correctly, it will never conflict with science if science is correctly interpreting nature.’

Those words are so wrong. What he should have said was, ‘If we follow the Spirit of Truth to the Truth, we will see that science is in error and contradicts God and His Word.’ Science cannot be followed or believed over God’s word for only God’s word has the truth.

© 2020 David Thiessen


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • david tee profile imageAUTHOR

      David Thiessen 

      15 months ago from Philippines

      Thank you. Go to to get any updates please

    • profile image


      15 months ago

      Thanks for the articles you've printed David. Hope all goes well with the books you're working on.

    • david tee profile imageAUTHOR

      David Thiessen 

      15 months ago from Philippines

      Yes it is. I finished reading the whole section on evolution and creation by that author an basically he says God lied, God couldn't communicate, God couldn't create and a lot more.

      he also said that unbelieving secular scientists know more than God does. It was a disappointing chapter and I have 3 more to go. How he is teaching I do not know, He is heretical, blasphemous and sinful throughout that one chapter.

      I am sure the other 3 will be just as bad

    • tsadjatko profile image

      The Logician 

      15 months ago from now on

      Amazing how subtle deception can be isn’t it? I will miss your Biblical approach to life and your analytical mindset David.

      Wait, what am I saying? You have plenty of articles I haven’t read! I’ll keep reading them, am sure that will be time well spent. Thanks for this one and I am sure your books will be successful. May God bless them and you.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)