ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Genesis Gap.

Updated on July 9, 2020

The Genesis Gap is an interesting study and I hope the following will make some sense of it. There are arguments for and against and I tend to think the argument for it is more believable but it hasn’t any bearing on our salvation per se. That’s a different matter. If asked about this topic, most Christians have no idea about it at all, despite what has been written on theistic evolution simply because it isn’t taught in churches these days. Yet it was written about by a Scottish theologian, Thomas Chalmers in the 19th century. Even though this man is credited with first bringing it to light, many other theologians before him also preached it. And this was well before Charles Darwin proclaimed his theory of evolution. Many Christians today agree that human existence on the Earth is only 6000 years old with the 1000 year millennium to come to complete the 7000 year / 7 day creationist view. Adam to Abraham – 2000 years, Abraham to Jesus – 2000 years, Jesus to now – 2000 years, the millennium yet to come. The age of the human race is indeed only 6000 years old but this has nothing to do with the age of the earth. Some believe there was nothing before that. (YEC’s) But if carbon dating is to be believed, isn’t that asking a question?

This is the first ‘mystery’ in the Bible – let’s look at these first two verses in Genesis. 1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. This sentence can either be considered as a statement or a summary but it doesn’t say when or how He did it, we simply know that He did it from nothing and it was perfect.

2. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. These two verses contain the story of the original creation while the verses after record the story of God’s full re-creation of the earth over 6 literal days in complete detail. And the original creation certainly was beautiful. But verse 2 is suggesting the earth was a desolate place and in darkness at that time. God made light, verse 3 on the first day but the sun wasn’t made until day 4. Between verses 1 and 2 Satan rebelled, he wanted power and was cast out, along with fallen angels. He had to be removed from heaven before Adam was created to cause him to sin as God would never cause Adam to sin. Angels are spirits to serve God but humans, made in God’s likeness, were His children and Satan felt secondary because he craved a physical body like Adam. Satan still accesses heaven, where he condemns us until the time soon to come when there is war in heaven and he is cast out forever.

God told Adam and Noah: Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. Replenish is another word for re-populate and meaning the same thing – if God didn’t mean that He would have said to multiply and fill the earth, as if He was saying it for the first time. Both Adam and Noah were told to re-populate the earth after a major destructive event, namely a catastrophic flood on two occasions. Peter, an apostle of Jesus and led by the Holy Spirit says in his epistles, 2 Peter 3: 5 - 7, For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgement and perdition of ungodly men.

The Bible only refers to two total and catastrophic floods; the first one is in Genesis 1: 2 above and the second is the flood in Noah’s day, Genesis 7, which was about 1100 years later and nowhere near the scale of the one before Adam. My understanding of what Peter said – the words heaven and world are to mean the universe as a whole. (In the same context.) Earth only refers to the planet earth so by his words heavens were of old’ and the highlighted text is in reference to the scale of the flood of ‘the world that then was’ and represents the universe. Noah’s flood was only confined to earth and had no effect on the sun, moon and the stars or the upper heavens, which were all there as in the time God restored it before He created Adam. What Peter said is NOT a reference to Noah’s flood because it didn’t cause the same desolation, so logic demands it must be a cross-reference to Genesis 1: 2 as there is no other Biblical alternative and cannot be ignored. So if Peter’s reference to Genesis 1: 2 is as it is meant, then the Holy Spirit is calling your attention to something very significant that millions of Christians/creationists are blindly overlooking. Specifically that of a glorious ancient world that God created in the distant past and had long since been utterly destroyed; plunged into darkness and overflowed by a great raging flood on a universal scale at some time between Genesis 1: 1 & 2. If you’re wondering what God did with all that water, Genesis 1: 6 & 7 has the answer.

In this original earth God gave Satan stewardship over it, along with angels, (referred to as ‘sons of God’) but that wasn’t enough for Satan, he wanted to be above God and so he rebelled, which is why God destroyed the original earth and is a reasonable explanation for the Genesis Gap. (Satan being a spirit whom God created isn’t yet destroyed.)

In 2002 a startling discovery was made in Western Australia that is causing scientists to rethink their theories. A tiny Zircon crystal was found in ancient rock formations and is Uranium-Lead dated to be about 4.5 billion years old. Chemical analysis of this crystal shows that it was formed in liquid water and if that is so then it gives credence to the Genesis gap. If this is to be believed, then all scientific geological evidence must also enter the debate. Proof is found in the fossil remains of all prehistoric things living in that time including the bones of Neanderthal man-like creatures. (Hominids.) In this ancient earth that had living things in it, there must have been a sun to support life but the first flood was of such a scale to cause a ‘galactic cosmic mess’ across the universe that it ‘blacked out’ the sun and caused an ice age, which destroyed all prehistoric life between 10,000 and 13,000 years ago. (There is no mention of an ice age in the Bible, but geological evidence does support it.) This extinction occurred suddenly and on a vast scale all over the earth with many different species of animal remains all mingled together that have been found not only in one place but over half of the earth’s land mass. In one case a whale was found entombed with elephants. In the mix of these bones and fossils, some lived in the warm temperate zones yet they were found in the frozen wastes of the Polar Regions. This evidence is largely ignored today because it doesn’t fit the prevailing scientific ideas, and the ‘Young Earth Creationists’ have seized upon it as evidence of Noah’s flood but the types of animals on the earth at the time of this first flood – dinosaurs, mammoths etc. were not here in Noah’s flood. After the first flood and before the reconstruction, God cut a clear line from the original earth between plants, animals and hominids and created everything new again, including Adam, the first man. The first 5 days shows how quickly God worked on re-creation. God re-created the plants and animals early on the sixth day, just before He created Adam on the same day and is proof of why we didn’t evolve from apes or hominids. God brought all the animals to Adam and he named them but a ‘helper’ could not be found for him, so God made Eve from a rib from Adam late on the 6th day also. On the 7th day He rested from all His work and saw that it was good.

Satan assumed that by luring Adam and Eve into sin he would destroy God’s plan to eventually replace him. But the fall of man merely opened the way for salvation through the saving work of Jesus on the cross. In this original earth Satan was the first to sin long before mankind was on the earth and death was passed down through him. Death is evident from fossils/bones from all living things; they either died, or fought and died, so death was here well before Adam. And unlike Adam, who was created in God’s likeness, hominids weren’t, they were just a higher form of all the animals in that time and like apes only communicated with noises. All creatures have a limited power to think and solve problems but it is not to the same degree as we who were made ‘in God’s likeness.’ Science has shown there is no direct link in the DNA of prehistoric man of the original earth and present day man. Adam was a completely new creation on a re-constructed earth. (DNA can show what area of the earth you originated from but that’s it.) Some plants and probably some animals were brought across to the restored earth, because they could co-exist with Adam and Noah but dinosaurs couldn’t, which is why there were no dinosaurs, they all ceased in that first flood, and they were never on the Ark that Noah built. Uranium-Lead dating, if it is to be believed as evidence, proves it. The newly re-constructed earth that Adam walked on was absolutely pristine on the surface. But under Adam’s feet and hidden in the rocks are the buried fossils/remains, which we have now discovered and is God’s record of the truth of the existence of a previously created original earth.

If all the above is true and I think it is, it could be a help to those struggling with choosing in a belief of God and the Bible or evolution.

There is more at


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Jack Jenn profile imageAUTHOR

      Jack Jenn 

      11 months ago from Nelson Bay NSW Australia.

      Hi Lou,

      Thank you for reading the article and I can understand how you may be unsure of the truth in it - it's not the easiest theory to believe simply because no-one was there but one does have to ask certain questions knowing the age of the earth is much older than 6000 years. And I must admit I too, was sceptical of the theory at first.

      You mention being new to Hubpages - you will find that most who post here do so for the edification of others but there are a few who just want to push their own agenda and you've already discovered one of them who has a lot of strange ideas and as mentioned, I'll be interested to see how he answers your good question.

      I liked the way you presented your article and I'm going to read some more of your articles. And again Lou, good to make your acquaintance.


    • Lou Tenant profile image

      Lou Tenant 

      11 months ago from Somewhere in America

      Hi Jack. I came from your comment on my article. I’ve researched Gap Theory before and it is certainly is very interesting.

      I’m not sure if I believe that theory but I agree that the earth is not 6000 years old (I’ve run into quite a few young-earthers). I think too many times people try to extrapolate scientific facts from the Bible, which is not meant to be a science book.

      But anyways, nice article! You present a very interesting analysis.

    • Jack Jenn profile imageAUTHOR

      Jack Jenn 

      13 months ago from Nelson Bay NSW Australia.

      Hi Rodel,

      Believe whatever you like - and I hold no atheist views.

      On reading your comment I think you could have added more 'between the lines' so that I could have made a better response.

      All you have done is make statements, which would lead others, as well as me, to scratch their heads and wonder.


    • profile image

      Rodel Padrique 

      13 months ago

      Gap Theory is another example of compromise theology to appease liberal theologians. Gen. 1:1 defines the creation of time and space, indicating earth as the center of creation of material universe.

      An old earth theory is in conflict with many facts of pure science (i.e., purely based on scientific observations and not theoretical assumptions).

      Carbon dating is method of measurement based on certain assumptions.

      The Book of Genesis clearly tells us one thing: a young earth.

      Our compromise to the atheist scientists has undermined the Word of God.

      We say it is not relevant to our faith, but it is the foundation of our faith.

    • Jack Jenn profile imageAUTHOR

      Jack Jenn 

      2 years ago from Nelson Bay NSW Australia.

      Hi Bill,

      Thank you for reading this hub and your comment - very much appreciated. Firstly, I want to say I agree with you about taking God's words as literal, I don't want to be guilty of adding or taking away anything - I'm only saying that I believe what I've said about the gap theory.

      How the English language can be confused if enough information isn't supplied in a response so that the recipient fully understands the meaning conveyed. In my response to your hub it seems I have misread what you were saying - I thought you were defending the theory, which is why I also thought TSAD was criticizing your views - perhaps I am now confused!!

      If you ever get an opportunity with a little time on your hands, I would appreciate your opinion on the only other hub I've posted in these pages, which is my END OF DAYS - just how close is it, have you any idea? I should pre-warn you, it is well over an hour to read and fully digest and I would value your comment on it.

      Best regards,


    • lifegate profile image

      William Kovacic 

      2 years ago from Pleasant Gap, PA

      Hi, Jack. One problem I have with the gap theory is that in the direct opposite of Paul's statement in Romans 5:14. Death reigned from Adam. Death is the result of sin (Romans 6:23). According to the gap theory, the world was in sin long before so God had to recreate it.

      There are many things that I disagree with, and I believe with good reason, but I'm not going to debate them here. As you said, it doesn't affect our salvation at all, and I appreciate your sincerity.

    • Jack Jenn profile imageAUTHOR

      Jack Jenn 

      2 years ago from Nelson Bay NSW Australia.

      Firstly, because of your last response, allow me to apologise for my first response to your comment in which it appeared to be negative and without a full explanation of what you really meant - I would have thought you could have been a little more thorough in saying what you didn't understand.

      You did the same thing in my other article END OF DAYS, which left me confused - you didn't give any valid reasons for your negative comment there either. I would only suggest if you make a comment positively or negatively, please, explain it clearly. In regard to that article, I have made considerable changes and additions to it but I doubt those changes would have included a suitable response to you because you didn't explain yourself properly.

      As I mentioned, on comments you have made on other articles, you do a similar thing , which isn't edifying or helping the author with your views. Being negative is ok, as long as you do it in a nice way.

      In response to the points you make in your last comment to me as I perceive them - as they can be taken 2 ways:

      1. I agree - If we are living for God, He will always give an opportunity to turn back when we fall, that is mercy.

      2. No argument from me on that score.

      3. By definition: Psychological Projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

      4. No argument with that one either, although some find it hard.

      5. If we profess to be Christians we should always try to avoid condemnation within ourselves of others but we will get it from unbelievers in not many days hence.

      Again my apologies if I have judged you wrongly.


    • Jay C OBrien profile image

      Jay C OBrien 

      2 years ago from Houston, TX USA

      What does that mean?

      I believe God will act as a mirror and we will see ourselves more objectively.

      I believe God is Good and always Good.

      I believe people Project themselves onto others.

      Forgive to be forgiven.

      Avoid Condemnation.

      This is my understanding.

    • Jack Jenn profile imageAUTHOR

      Jack Jenn 

      2 years ago from Nelson Bay NSW Australia.

      From what I've read of your own articles and particularly how you comment on articles from others, you don't seem to understand anything.


    • Jay C OBrien profile image

      Jay C OBrien 

      2 years ago from Houston, TX USA

      From article:

      If all the above is true and I think it is, it could be a help to those struggling with choosing in a belief of God and the Bible or evolution.

      Please summarize theory and proof for I do not understand.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)