ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The UFO That Landed NASA in Court

Updated on March 21, 2019
Jana Louise Smit profile image

Jana is an amateur everything when it comes to space, nature and science. She loves exploring mysteries, both classic and new.

A local model of the UFO.
A local model of the UFO. | Source

Town In The Middle

Kecksburg wasn't where the story started, nor where it ended. This small town in Pennsylvania was where something crashed in the woods after it traveled quite some distance. Afterwards, the case involved missing files, a forgetful NASA and eventually, the story landed up in court. Let's start at the beginning.

The Eyewitnesses

The first people to see the Kecksburg UFO weren't in Pennsylvania. During 1965, on December 9, thousands watched an object streak through the night sky. It was unanimously described as a big and brilliantly fireball. Sightings were reported in Canada (including several pilots), and six states in the United States.

The newspapers treated it as a meteor. This assumption came after the authorities dismissed the possibilities that it could have been satellite debris, a missile or an aircraft in distress. Must've been a funny meteor. It allegedly rained metal pieces over Ohio and Michigan, some of which were so hot they started field fires. The UFO was also linked to sonic booms that occurred in Western Pennsylvania.

An Acorn Arrives

Duly, the UFO crashed in Kecksburg. A young boy claimed to have witnessed the incident and his mother, who saw blue smoke rising from the trees, placed a phone call to the authorities. It was a call that would later bring the military and people who, according to residents, behaved in a sinister manner towards them.

Before the uniforms arrived, locals went to investigate. Among them were volunteers from the local fire department, perhaps under the impression that a light aircraft had fallen. The thing they encountered, however, had no wings. The object was about the size of a Volkswagen bus and according to the time's media reports measured 12 to 15 feet high, with a diameter of 8 to 12 feet. It was also completely metal, with no bolts, rivets or panels. The shape resembled an acorn.

The witnesses found a curious detail when they examined the base. It was encircled by a band inscribed with writing. The closest thing people could match the scribbles with were Egyptian Hieroglyphics.

The Military

An established fact is that the United States Army arrived. Things get murky and sinister after that. Locals at the scene claimed the area was taken over by a strong military presence, already somewhat strange for a “meteor.” Civilians were booted from the site, before the artifact was loaded onto a truck and taken away. Afterwards, the military issued a statement about the remarkable emptiness of the forest. Their exact words? The search discovered “absolutely nothing.”

There was also a reporter present. Base in Greensburg, the Tribune-Review ran the story the next morning and it was supportive of those who believed something fell in Kecksburg. It detailed how the area was immediately cordoned off, by State Police to await the U.S. Army. The story claimed that the military brought their own engineers and civilian scientists. When the newspaper ran a follow-up later, the story said that the authorities found nothing.

Some locals had reason to believe that this “nothing” was actually something very important. Several complained about visits from officials who threatened them. They were specifically told not to talk about what they saw. If true, the visits and threats were a lot of effort for a whole lot of nothing that happened in Kecksburg that night.

The Truck

Witnesses described how the object was loaded onto a flatbed truck (example above), covered with tarp and quickly driven away.
Witnesses described how the object was loaded onto a flatbed truck (example above), covered with tarp and quickly driven away. | Source

Sci Fi Channel Takes on NASA

In 2003, the Sci Fi Channel wanted the truth about the incident. Their scientific team arrived in Kecksburg and found damaged tree tops leading straight to the crash site. When analyzed, tree core samples showed that the damage happened in 1965. This contradicted the claims that nothing came down.

The Channel approached Leslie Kean, an investigative journalist and asked her to work with the Coalition for Freedom of Information. What started as another investigative job, turned into years of legal battle and a successful lawsuit against NASA (that night, some officials apparently identified themselves as working for the agency).

The Court Case (2003 to 2005)

  • 2003 — The Sci Fi Channel and Kean file for NASA to release documents on the Kecksburg incident
  • 2003 — In November, NASA releases around 40 uninformative pages
  • 2005 — NASA admits that something fell and was found, but claims it was a Russian satellite

The Russian Satellite

The satellite in question was real. Around the time of the Kecksburg crash, the Soviet probe Kosmos 96 was falling back to Earth. Here's why it couldn't have been the acorn in the woods.

1. According to Stan Gordon, a local UFO reporter, witnesses and the initial media reports claimed the thing slowed down as if being controlled. Controlled landings weren't a defining attribute of satellites in the 1960s

2. After launching, Kosmos 96 malfunctioned. Some suggested the object was part of the satellite's debris, but witnesses never mentioned any charring, torn pieces or damage

3. Kosmos 96 never left the atmosphere. The Kecksburg UFO entered the atmosphere and caused shock waves that were recorded on a seismograph near Detroit

4. The Russian probe was bell-shaped. The description of “acorn” was also suitable, but the soviet piece's measurements were much smaller than those given for the UFO

5. In 1991, a US Space Command report stated that Kosmos 96 did crash on December 9, 1965 — but in Canada and 13 hours before the UFO's re-entry at 4:45pm

6. Nicholas Johnson, the Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris (stationed at NASA's Johnson Space Center) made no bones about it. In 2003, he insisted that the Russian probe was nowhere near Pennsylvania on the evening in question

The Court Case (2005 – 2007)

  • 2005 — After NASA's surprise statement about the metal fragment, Kean requests their sources for this claim, since their spokesman said the records were misplaced in the 1990s. Kean never receives an answer
  • 2005 — In December, Kean files another lawsuit to force NASA to search for the documents
  • 2007 — In March, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan denies NASA's request to have the case thrown out. Instead, he calls NASA's attempts to explain or find the documents a “ball of yarn,” and gives them until the end of the year to find the missing records
  • 2007 — Kean receives the documents from NASA

The Fireball Press Releases

NASA issued widespread statements to the media about other fireballs. None was released after the Kecksburg sighting.
NASA issued widespread statements to the media about other fireballs. None was released after the Kecksburg sighting. | Source

The NASA Files

When Kean received the files, several documents were missing or destroyed. Some had nothing to do with the case. Despite this, her analysis found that the object wasn't from any known country. She couldn't rule out an old theory — that the Kecksburg UFO was a secret U.S. project. If this was the case, the stonewalling that endured for over 40 years was unusual.

Another interesting finding was that the records showed NASA did investigate things that fell from the sky, something that had been denied earlier in the case. This was supported by the discovery that a box — full of files about recovered fragments — was missing. She also found that NASA released abundant press releases out about other fireballs, but was oddly silent about the one in Kecksburg.

Kean, who was not personally allowed to search NASA's archives, suspected that some of the paperwork linked to Kecksburg had not been released. However, she and her team decided to cease their case against NASA, having exhausted all their legal avenues.

© 2019 Jana Louise Smit


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Tim Truzy info4u profile image

      Tim Truzy 

      6 months ago from U.S.A.

      It's interesting how files disappear from NASA, like they could not locate the files that described how to put together spacecraft to go back to the moon under President Bush or Clinton. Something landed and they don't want us to know no more than they tell us. Great job. Loved it.



    • Jana Louise Smit profile imageAUTHOR

      Jana Louise Smit 

      6 months ago from South Africa

      Thank you, Paul. And Michael, yes, I will definitely do more hubs like this one. :)

    • profile image

      Paul Howe 

      6 months ago

      Very intriguing. One day the truth will be known.

    • profile image

      Mike Parkes 

      6 months ago

      Good for you to be doing this kind of research! I think it is a fascinating area, abduction experiences also, it is all one big mixed bag of weirdness. But weirdness that people are actually living through. And there are witnesses and questions are raised, and then suddenly the big group "doesn't know", "lost those files,", "it was parts of a Russian satellite." Yeh sure... sure it was. It is so pathetic that no one in NASA will every honestly admit to anything besides the standard party line, "it was nothing, you are mistaken, we have no records of that (any more!)" ha ha... you keep going! We are all losing but it is a good fight, expose the truth! Good for you, more!!!

    • Jana Louise Smit profile imageAUTHOR

      Jana Louise Smit 

      6 months ago from South Africa

      Hi Michael. I agree that this is a very intriguing case. I like the fact that there were so many witnesses and scientists involved. The more eye reports and physical evidence, the better!

    • profile image

      Mike Parkes 

      6 months ago

      What an interesting story! Roswell all over again.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)