ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Which Translation?

Updated on February 23, 2015

My wife was talking to a friend not long ago who said she wouldn't read the Bible because there were too many translations. My wife replied that that shouldn't stop her as most of the translations say the same thing. And for the most part that is a good principle to follow. If you want to read the Bible just about any translation is a help.

The reason for most translations is to make the Bible easily understood. The translations vary mostly by target audience which has caused the translators to adjust the vocabulary to meet that of the target audience. Reading levels of the various translations vary from Elementary level to Senior High level. So if you aren't a member of a church or study group you only need to decide which reading level is best for you.

Whatever version you choose to read none of the difference between translations or versions will make a difference unless you do read the Bible, so go ahead, choose a translation and read it.

Most Popular Versions based on a review of Amazon.com

1. Holman Christian Standard Bible

2. King James Version

3. American Standard Bible

4. English Standard Version

5. New American Standard Bible

6. New International Version

7. The Message

8. New Living Translation

9. Douay Rheims Version

10. Ignatius Revised Standard Version

The Holman Christian Standard Bible is a new translation from the original texts published in 2004. It is intended to be optimized between word for word and thought for thought translation. It has a reading level suitable for early teens and seems to be a good translation.

The King James Version - KJV - is probably the best known of the translations. It was intended for the Church of England of King James I of England in 1611. It is the version most often quoted in literature and popular media. It was revised in 1769 without a new name being given to that revision, and that revision is the most readily available of the two. While this is the version that I use many people complain of its archaic language.

The American Standard Version was a response to the English Revised Version. American scholars realized that American English differed significantly from the English of England so they wanted a version of the Bible that reflected those difference and would make it easier for American readers to use. Published in 1901 I would think that many people today would still have issues with the language.

The English Standard Version is a word for word translation using modern English. Published in 2001 it has a reading level suitable for early teens.

The New American Standard Bible, originally published in 1971 with further revisions in 1995, was intended as an update for the American Standard Bible. It is a word for word translation with a reading level suitable for older teens.

The New International Version was intended to balance word for word and though for thought translation with a simple English vocabulary. Published in 1978 it has a reading level suitable for early teens. This is the version my wife uses in her Women of Faith Bible.

The Message is the Bible done in a novel format. It is a paraphrase rather than a translation. My wife was very impressed by it while I being a conservative have some issues with it. Nevertheless it is an easier read than some version and conveys basic truths. Published in 2002 it has a reading level suitable for early teens.

The New Living Translation was published in 1996 and revised in 2004. It has a reading level suitable for early teens. Our pastor recommends this as an alternate translation useful for devotions.

I'm not acquainted with the final two versions so I'll leave them alone. I did however find two versions on Amazon.ca (amazon.co.uk also has a slightly different order) which rated higher on the list.

The New King James Version - NKJV - was introduced in 1982. It updated the language of the KJV thereby reducing the reading level. It is considered to a Junior High English level. This is the version our church uses.

The New International Readers Version introduced in 1996 has simplest reading level of any of the versions, it is suitable for eight year olds.

Now that you've had a chance to learn a little about a few of the translations out there you'll perhaps be more comfortable knowing that many scholars are working hard to ensure that there is a translation or version that will be suitable for you to read. You can find these versions on-line, as e books, or comfortable paper editions. So go ahead, choose one, and enjoy reading a book God intends to bless you by.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • msorensson profile image

      msorensson 

      6 years ago

      I have several versions. However, my favorite remains the KJV, precisely because of the language. Mine is now 27 years old but I took good care of it so it is still in good condition.

    • barrydan profile imageAUTHOR

      barrydan 

      7 years ago from Calgary, Alberta, Canada

      Dear Saved by Grace,

      The laborer is worthy of his reward. I don't believe that the publishers of any version are trying to restrict the word of God, they're just trying to recoup their costs. I don't have a problem with the copyright as the translators and publishers have a right to earn a living.

      Having used a variety of translations over the years I believe that most of the common modern translations (NKJV, NIV, NASB, etc.) are all faithful as to intent. The KJV of 1611 is perhaps more literal than most (definitely not all) and there are differences in the Greek Text used, but those are more of concern for serious Bible students.

      The most appropriate Bible is the one people read, and if updating the language gets more people reading the Bible I will simply praise the Lord.

    • profile image

      Saved by Grace 

      7 years ago

      Dear Brother

      Just for further consideration. All Bible (translations) are Copyrighted, with exception to the King James 1611 which are under a Crown Copywright.

      Please read the following link.

      http://www.jesusfolk.com/Bible/Verses/copyright.ht...

      Does it not make scense that the word of God cannot be restricted by any man. i.e. that of trying to claim a copyright to it.

      Personally I consider the King James 1611 the most approprate as it does not water down the intent.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)