After college, I spent a year and a half in law school. I learned that there is the truth and the interpretation of the truth. Just as there is no right or wrong answer in the practice of law, it is all up to interpretation and how you relate your interpretation to others.
Of course we have the statutory rules that can be broken (i.e malum prohibitum), which makes breakiing these rules wrong, but the offenses that are wrong within itself, like rape and murder (malum in se) are constantly challenged and beaten daily (O.J Simpson) on interpretations of the truth (evidenciary material).
Some things are true within themselves, but challenging the truth has it's merits.