The Bible says our world is a few thousand years old. Science says 4.6 billion years old. In all these differences, how do you view science facts from the Bible? Can both of them be associated in ways?
sort by best latest
Science doesn't change. The same search for the truth with the same proven rules for centuries now. New data refines conclusions. Also many insane ideas are touted as science by people with no credentials. Be careful what you call science.
It's not even an historic text. There is very little in the Bible that can be independently confirmed, mostly only very general events. At best it is a collection of stories written to teach people life lessons.
Oops, sorry, "historical"? I meant an ancient text. It has value as a way for us to learn about ancient people, not history.
Dude, towards the end of the book of Job, God gives Job a huge science lesson. check this link out and you'll be in awe. http://evidencebible.com/witnessingtool/sciencecon...
k12wswow: Seriously? I'm a bit underwhelmed: The very first one is wrong. "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth" Is what the text of the Bible says. There's nothing about a sphere. The rest are equally as misleading.
Why is it so hard to believe that some more inteligent then we are , who uses more then we do of our thinking abilities, we only use about five % or less many at 1% .So just think if we could use 100% we would be pefect and many things would be made
Kiss andTales: We use about 10% of our brain a lot of the time, but there are many times when we use close to 90% of our brains at once, but even if we used 100% of our brains all the time, we would hardly be "perfect", just meeting our potential.