searchinsany profile image 82

If John wrote after AD 90, why did he not mention the destruction of the temple in AD 70?


If John wrote after AD 90 as many Bible commentators claim, why did he never mention the fulfilment of Jesus’ prophecy about the destruction of the temple, Jerusalem, and the dispersion of the Jews in AD 70?

 
This question is closed to new answers.

sort by best latest

searchinsany profile image82

Alexander Gibb (searchinsany) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
  • lone77star profile image

    Rod Martin Jr (lone77star) 3 years ago

    Nowhere on your page did you mention Moses parting the sea. Why? Could it be because it was not relevant? There were millions of things John of Patmos did not mention in Revelation. That lack does nothing to date his writings.

Bishop J L Hayes profile image80

Jerry Lynn Hayes Sr (Bishop J L Hayes) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

3 years ago
  • searchinsany profile image

    Alexander Gibb (searchinsany) 3 years ago

    Lone77star

    I didn’t mention The Book of Revelation in my question. My point is that all John’s writings are after AD 90 according to most commentators. If so why did he not mention the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in AD 70.