News articles have been talking about lab results regarding testing of a historical text that mentions Mary wife of Jesus. The test results indicate the text is not a modern forgery, and that the text was created in ancient times. This raises the possibility that Jesus had children, with the text as substantiating historical evidence. The implication is that his descendants might be alive today. Thoughts?
sort by best latest
these false doctrines have been around long before Brown, and surface every now and then.because there are many that are easiiy deceived that will believe and promote them . Thats why there are so many warnings in scripture
Agreed. The controversy has risen again recently because of the DaVinci code, but the question has been around for much much longer.
for those who dont understand ,the DNA of His mother only and they would not have been His descendents, just relatives.
As you said either He is who He said or Not and that is where FAITH enters the equasion of being a Christian
That is because you fail to see the matriarch part of the equation. Religion suppresses that side up until recently. Both Mother and Father DNA and Genetics are important.
. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed.
See all of Galatians 1
Cel, this is not a debate on whose scripture is right because I can give you another scripture that states what I have. I am not going there and you know that. If you want to do that then do it elsewhere.
I checked the site tsadjatko linked to, but stopped reading when I saw the claim that this question was 'born with the DaVinci code'. I first heard the topic in the 60's, and made the mistake of asking about it in a Methodist Sunday School.
Deb: Who is "your" Father? Do you even believe in Jesus? Everytime someone quotes Scripture, you get offended! Why?
Paul was the deceiver. Anything he says is against what Jesus taught. Jesus said that all his works were not in the bible. Jesus did marry and that would have no bearing to his ministry or works. He was in a human body.
wow lg you have no business wriitng on CHristian blogs as you clearly are deceived
Lady G, God wants a relationship with his creations, but not a sexual relationship.
Care to elaborate on how or why Paul was a deceiver, without just saying so? Evidence?
Boy you all are the deceived one. Who said God was having a sex relationship. God is both. Celafoe, do not tell me what I can write on. That only makes you look bad. Creegan and why would he not have that relationship. He sd he nevr leave us.
He will never leave or forsake those who love and follow Him.
"Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee." Hebrews ch13 v5.
Paul wrote that!
Amen James! I've never met anyone like this! Stating Paul was a deceiver, Jesus was a fornicator or married, and stating that His marriage would have not bearing on His ministry? This is truly an unbeliever! Popes are in human body! So??????
Per request, tsadjatko, I deleted your response.
But if you had not made the request to delete it, I would have left it there.
For direct responses, you can use visit a Hubbers profile and use "Send an email".
Lot's of things are possible but only a fool believes anything that is possible as a fact when there is no evidence.
Well said and although I agree with you wholeheartedly the scripture does not specifically say that he was not married, but it is obvious that if he was it would have had to be mentioned and it is not.
there is absolutely NO SCRIPTURAL proof to this lie. And Jesus with a twin brother, I thought I had heard all the lies but that one --WOW What garbage you are diseminating and will be held responsible for.
To firmly believe anything does not make it fact - the fact is there is absolutely no credible evidence that Jesus had a twin brother. Your ilk are sadly misguided by deceipt or else purely evil deceivers yourselves (or possibly both).