Joseph O Polanco profile image 39

As an Atheist, would you say you accept all evidence or just scientific evidence?


 

sort by best latest

profile image0

Best Answer Stargrrl says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Joseph O Polanco profile image

    Joseph O Polanco 2 years ago

    But they'll swallow the Theory of Evolution and other such bunk hook, line and sinker :)


  • See all 20 comments
M. T. Dremer profile image95

M. T. Dremer says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Kylyssa profile image

    Kylyssa Shay (Kylyssa) 2 years ago

    Very eloquent. Evidence that isn't scientific isn't really evidence, it's beliefs, conjectures, and opinions which only serve as evidence for the existence of beliefs, conjectures, and opinions and not their subject matter.


  • See all 9 comments
Kylyssa profile image97

Kylyssa Shay (Kylyssa) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Joseph O Polanco profile image

    Joseph O Polanco 2 years ago

    So your answer to my question would beeee? :)


  • See all 20 comments
SarahFriedman profile image76

Sarah (SarahFriedman) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
ChristinS profile image97

Christin Sander (ChristinS) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Joseph O Polanco profile image

    Joseph O Polanco 2 years ago

    Thanks for sharing Christin! Does this mean you only accept scientific evidence or do you readily accept all types of evidence? :)


  • See all 29 comments
Link10103 profile image76

Link10103 says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
cebutouristspot profile image76

cebutouristspot says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Robert the Bruce profile image

    Robert the Bruce 2 years ago

    Simply stated, ceb. It's sad that more people do not (or will not?) understand what EVIDENCE is. Evidence must be compiled and analyzed in order to come to a conclusion. But most people operate on what they "feel" is true.


  • See all 5 comments
Bigtelv37 profile image66

Tevin Marshall (Bigtelv37) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Robert the Bruce profile image

    Robert the Bruce 2 years ago

    Christian scientists are good at falsifying info. You have to ignore mountains of evidence in order to say that evolution is baloney. There's a good reason more than 99% of scientists accept evolution. Also, evolution can be compatible with a god.


  • See all 19 comments
tsadjatko profile image80

TSAD (tsadjatko) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Lowdown0 profile image

    Robbie Newport (Lowdown0) 2 years ago

    This is a very good comment and makes sense, unlike the atheist who don't. Atheism is a religion, which denies there is an absolute. They go against all evidence to have their wild faith in Macro Evolution, blinded to reality that contradicts them.


  • See all 6 comments
Besarien profile image85

Besarien says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • tsadjatko profile image

    TSAD (tsadjatko) 2 years ago

    Besarian there are good answers to every question you pose. I suggest you get a little less focused on yourself & a little more on the facts.Hear of the great commission? Science indicates evolution doesn't happen.Presenting truth isn't intoleran


  • See all 3 comments
Addison Molrower profile image59

Addison Molrower says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
Jbedwell profile image61

James Bedwell (Jbedwell) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

12 months ago
 |  Comment
Robert the Bruce profile image59

Robert the Bruce says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Joseph O Polanco profile image

    Joseph O Polanco 2 years ago

    Does this mean you don't consider historical, legal, experiential or Bayesian or rational evidence to actually be evidence?


  • See all 3 comments
AndrewHil93 profile image44

Andrew Hill (AndrewHil93) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Joseph O Polanco profile image

    Joseph O Polanco 2 years ago

    Does this mean you reject historical, legal, experiential, Bayesian and/or rational evidence?


  • See all 7 comments
profile image0

jfischerstone says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

2 years ago
 |  Comment
  • Kylyssa profile image

    Kylyssa Shay (Kylyssa) 2 years ago

    You seem to have missed the bit about atheists not thinking God is real. You know your belief is based on what you think is real. How is taking the blame and responsibility for everything you do getting off the hook?


  • See all 18 comments