sort by best latest
If a zygote is not a human being what is it?
A parasite that will eventually metamorphose into a human being if left alone.
A parasite? A parasite?! You see the life of human beings in utero as tapeworms?!?! What an utterly loathsome and cold-blooded way for you to view humanity. But thank you for demonstrating how Atheism mangles the moral compass of its adherents ...
Dictionary.com defines parasite as: "an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment." Other than the species thing, it's an accurate description. Not an insult.
Except that a baby is not an invading organism; there's no immunological response by the mother's body. To the contrary, it actively nurtures and provides for him/her. So, yes, referring to an in-utero human being as a parasite is inhuman!!
There is actually an immunological response. It takes special signaling proteins to turn off the tissue's attempts to reject the baby. And it often doesn't work, which can result in miscarriages and early labor. It's well documented.
Those cases are the exception, not the norm. In healthy pregnancies the mother's decidua is a perfect safe haven for her child. This is clearly not a parasite-host dynamic. That you insist on referring to it as so is absolutely despicable!!
I didn't refer to it as such, I just said the description of the word was accurate. That doesn't mean I think babies are bad or that life doesn't have value. You went negative when you generalized atheists as immoral, which is "absolutely despicable"
Aren't all Atheists pro-abortion?
I'll answer your question with another: Aren't all Christians pro-life?
Hint: The answer is "no." And don't even try invoking the No True Scotsman fallacy, because, well, it's a fallacy.
No, all atheists aren't pro-abortion. If anything, not believing in an afterlife, makes this life that much more rare and precious.