savvydating profile image 81

Is morality undervalued? Are ethics replacing morality?


Though similar, there are distinctions between morality and ethics. Which school of thought do you live by? Are you moral or ethical?

 

sort by best latest

tamarawilhite profile image89

Tamara Wilhite (tamarawilhite) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Ericdierker profile image

    Eric Dierker (Ericdierker) 16 months ago

    But morality can do the same thing. Universally accepted that in war we kill each other. "They" can justify killing you based on morals.


  • See all 4 comments
ValKaras profile image86

Vladimir Karas (ValKaras) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    Val,.the golden rule is "of doing" rather than "not doing." Personally, when I choose morality, fear of punishment does not enter my head. Morality is "higher" and not subject to fear at all. Humans have the capacity to choose above the animalistic.


  • See all 3 comments
Jodah profile image85

John Hansen (Jodah) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    There is a fine line, Jodah. It is said that morals define personal character, and is unchanging, while ethics depend upon what a group or society chooses, so it is "other-dependent." You always keep the conversation at a higher level. Thank you.

Ericdierker profile image79

Eric Dierker (Ericdierker) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    Then do you not agree that a person strictly following ethical principles may not have any morals at all, since ethics are dependent on the definitions of others?


  • See all 2 comments
Besarien profile image85

Besarien says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    Thank you, Bersarian. My understanding is that morality pertains to one's character, and as such, is consistent. I do agree that many who believe they are moral are actually quite immoral.


  • See all 2 comments
Bella Sames profile image79

Annabella (Bella Sames) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    Plants and meat aside, if one is indoctrinated by a jihadist doctrine, then one has accepted a cultural norm, within a distinct set, that is harmful. However, morality transcends cultural norms. In ethics, there is a gray area that is not absolute.

profile image0

Peter Hillson says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    A very thoughtful answer. Thank you. I agree with your final (last) statement.

junkseller profile image87

junkseller says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • Ericdierker profile image

    Eric Dierker (Ericdierker) 16 months ago

    Well said. I really want someone to set forth a plan or concept as to which is morality and which is ethics. It is so blurry it is not even a line.


  • See all 2 comments
jonnycomelately profile image85

Alan (jonnycomelately) says

You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.

16 months ago
 |  Comment
  • savvydating profile image

    savvydating 16 months ago

    Not sure where you're going with the urination analogy. I will say that we need not re-define our current definitions of morality and ethics. It appears that some are confused about what the actual definitions are.


  • See all 3 comments