ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

1988 Olympics: Katarine Witt, Elizabeth Manley, Debi Thomas, and Midori Ito.

Updated on November 13, 2015

Katarina Witt in 1988

Katarina Witt in 1988

Can't be sure if Witt earned 8.0 in her short program.

Witt is powerful and proficient. However her details are much desired. If I give her 8.0 PCS, that may largely owe to her expressiveness.

The way Witt handles her body is embarrassingly poor for a top skater. Witt's efforts to cover up her deficiency are also pitiful. Witt loves to present a dramatic show, but that's too shallow and cheap.

On the other hand, Witt in free program shows her usual audacity and power. Of course, she again deploys dramas to save her stamina. I don't buy that. No matter how corny it seems, however, her way of salvaging works magic. Witt is definitely a smart player.

Witt's first jump combination is +2 GOE by the standards of her time.

Here Witt's PCS for free program is 8.5.

War Room
War Room

From the award-winning creators of Fireproof and Courageous comes War Room, a compelling drama with humor and heart that explores the power that prayer can have on marriages, parenting, careers, friendships, and every other area of our lives

 

Elizabeth Manley in 1988

Elizabeth Manley in 1988

In short program Manley beat Witt far and wide.

You can tell how Manley uses her body more easily and more proficiently than Witt. Manley is a skater better than Witt in bodily moves;she is more polished than Witt.

But Manley's lead may be marginal.

Manley's PCS for short program is 8.25.

In free program, Manley shows a higher degree of polishing, connectivity and general skating than Witt while Witt is better than Manley in handling jumps and putting up a show.

Another thing is that Manley's physiological disadvantage, being shorter than Witt, might have marked her down. Also Manley might have put up a show like Witt. Perhaps Manley's skating was too honest without sophistication,that might have earned her extra carrots.

Her PCS in free program is 8.5.

The Polar Express (Widescreen Edition)
The Polar Express (Widescreen Edition)

This beloved Christmas movie on DVD was directed by Robert Zemeckis and features the voice of Tom Hanks in many of the lead roles.

 

Debi Thomas in 1988

Thomas could have been the best skater of the game, but she was not in her full capacity at the time. Her two-footed, step out and hands down would mark -3 in GOE.

Here, Thomas shows that she was a skater with the greatest potential and her inability to bring forth completeness to her execution ruined her chances.

As you can see in her, she had all balanced assets other skaters such as Witt, Manley or Ito lacked of, but she was unable to harvest fruits. You may say she was unlucky, but it is fair to say that Thomas hadn't matured to that level.

In this competition her PCS for free program is 7.5 which is much lower than her default PCS 8.25.

Debi Thomas in 1988

Midori Ito in 1988

Accurately speaking, Ito's jumps are not qualified for GOE due to her bad free leg position despite the fact that Ito's jumps show good height and strength.

A wrong habit is not a matter of mistake but offence to technical integrity. It's not a matter of deduction; it shouldn't be tolerated. Even to prevent the similar abuses, the principle of quality control has to be in force.

Her PCS is 8.0.

In her free program, Ito appears more impressive than in short program. Smooth and easy. Strong and proficient. Yes, Ito was indeed a skater with the best jumping technique at the time, except her free leg position.

However, Ito also shows that she has no line aesthetics due to her physiological handicap. Her arms and legs are not as efficient for artistic expressiveness as other skaters'. Ito's skating would earn points in jumps while losing points in other elements such as spin, line and extension.

Her PCS is 8.5.

Midori Ito in 1988

I think Witt's victory in 1988 is convincing unlike her 1984 Olympics. Despite Witt was surrounded by formidable challengers such as Elizabeth Manley or Midori Ito, Witt's performance seems as strong as her competitors.

On the other hand, Manley or Ito could have won as well. Except Debi Thomas, any of the trio could have claimed the crown.

It was a great battle among three big shots.

Who do you think is the real winner of the 1988 Olympics?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)